This is another thing I just knew would happen if there was ever a Charlie Kirk statue created! I knew the leftists would make markings on it like this. I know leftists pretty well! Especially the marking on his neck, in the area he was struck. But hey! I still love the statue. I think it looks great! I always said if I ever see the statue of George Floyd, I'm gonna smear my dogs' shit all over it! At least it'd be the same color he was. And it's fitting too. George Floyd was nothing but a nasty, shitty thug. I won't say he deserved to die, but what good did he bring to this world? None. At least Charlie Kirk stood up for a right we all have, the right of free speech.
12 comments
I can't believe you people put up a statute of him. That's hilarious. It's like a giant "kick me" sign stuck to the back of your country's shirt (yes this is a dated reference, but I'm old).
Also, I feel it must be noted that Chuck was sitting down at the time of his timely demise.
Or, ya know, you lot are pissed that society don’t revere Charlie Kirk like you lot have been trying to do for the last year but instead ensured people make fun of him and turn him into a bloody meme, which is only compounded by the bizarre behavior of his widow in the weeks since his assassination.
First primo: Your “free speech” is not a right, it is a very irresponsible priveledge your government offers you, much like the free possesion of firearms. Second primo: Go get fucked or I would do it happily for ya, force you into a septic tank by a gun point. At least you’ll be the same colour as your arguments.
So you hem and haw over the desecration of a Charlie Kirk statue, but would do the same to a statue of George Floyd? Pretty hypocritical of you. At least Floyd wasn’t a right-wing demagogue but a victim of police brutality.
@Skide #265502
I mean, so does the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I’m not sure why you immigrated to such a libertine country instead of a country with the right idea on “freeze peach”, like Singapore or China.
@MixMasterMikaeus #265512
I cannot speak for @Skide myself, but I for one do draw the line between free speech and hate speech. Too many Americans think they are the same thing and treat them as such; horribly abusing the “right of free speech” to genuinely harm their fellow human beings. But plenty of other western countries (UK, Germany, France, Belgium, etc.) do legally draw the line at using said right of free speech to spread hatred, bigotry, slander, and libel. And the latter is the version of free speech that I strongly support.
Some may call that censorship, but IMO it’s in the same way that being required to wear seat belts when driving is “infriging upon ones rights”. Most people are just too dumb to be allowed to make their own decisions on a lot of stuff.
@MixMasterMikaeus #265512
For one, great argument, any of the places you can conjure do not allow you to immigrate without some proof of their ancestry to just live there outside of work visas. For another I happen to be trans and wanted to live in a place that does respect me at least somewhat. Third freedom of expression is different from free speech and very much include the concept of hate speech, recently the thing was even more codified in law over here. Finally trust me, if I could move to Sweden or Norway or Denmark, I would but this is the road that opened for me and so I took it. I get to be critical about this particular part of north american society if I want to, right to public hate speech and sicking people on other people and calling it freedom is a bad joke not worth protecting. You may as well argue with me that every cretin with a mental patient record and genocidal tendencies should have some sacred right to bear arms.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.