“Uh, none of the evidence of eviloution is undisputed, it is ALL disputed,”
Not really. You aren’t pointing out actual flaws in the science, or the methodology of an experiment, or anything. You’re disputing the conclusion. “If that were true, then the Bible would be WRONG!” is the gist and the essence of your ‘dispute.’ JUst an argument from conclusions.
“and highly disputed BTW, as it is all based upon flawed and imaginative assumptions,preconceived assumptions again btw.”
No. About 95% of all scientists accept evolutionary theory because it is science. SAYING the assumptions are wrong does nothing to disprove or dispute anything.
“And there is no way to KNOW the sea floors are any younger than any place else on the earth.”
See, that’s a bullshit objection. Science can explain how they came to the conclusion, and what observations led to it, and you just raise the threshold for KNOWING the TROOF!
You don’t examine the process by which they came to the conclusion.
"nswer me this where did the sea floors come from if they are younger- did they just poof appear or what; your thinking is almost comical when thought out.”
Exactly. You read the highlights and chapter titles without understanding the study and reject the conclusion out of hand. THat’s not disputing the science.
“All the matter is same age ALL of it, none of it could be any older or younger unless it was CREATED later (lol).”
Yes, yes, the sediment on the sea floor is likely as old as the universe, but it hasn’t BEEN ‘sediment on the sea floor’ for as long as the continent it eroded off of has been a continent.
“Yes the materials have been sifted sorted BY the global flood of Noah’s day; we see the flood strata everywhere on earth.”
SO, one great big flood managed to deposit lighter materials beneath heavier deposits?
And flood waters churning all the strata sorted dinosaurs into specific strata to appear to follow a timeline? I’d love to see the experiment that sorted dinosaur footprints in the mud to the same strata the dinosaurs ended up in.
"And the water receded back in to the earth and the Mtns rose up after the flood as Bible tells us and we see the overt/obvious evidence of their too in the inverted broken strata layers so we KNOW they rose up and water runs down hill, it always has btw, except in Grand Canyon where it had to flow up hill for millions years to form the canyon but that is the only exception (lol).”
Pick a lane. Provide your evidence OR mock the theory that you don’t even understand. You suck at both, but stick to one or the other.
