www.quora.com

Jen Wenny #psycho #pedo #transphobia #homophobia quora.com

(A psycho woman named Jen Wenny on Quora answering questions. Possibly a troll?)

Question: Is my 7 year old sister a pervert? She always watches me in the shower. I tell her to stop and leave my room but she never listens, what should I do:

Answer: Don’t! Invite her into the shower and have fun!

Question: I’m male, and me and my brother used to suck each other off when we were 13 and 14, is this normal?

Answer: Not with the same gender! But with boy and girl siblings, sure!

Question: How do I come up with a plot that isn’t cringe?

Answer: you don’t, and I don’t care about your pronouns; OK MAN?

Robert Cornell #fundie quora.com

Those are NOT ridiculous. Both acts are dangerous and sinful deeds which should not go unpunished. Marijuana causes hallucinations and feelings of paranoia, which can lead to violence. It also may cause somebody to hallucinate a pagan “God” and turn Muslim or atheist. Prostitution, aside from being atheistic, sinful, and often homosexual, promotes the spread of diseases, many of which are incurable and untreatable. People definitely SHOULD be jailed for their crimes against God.

Trevor Guthrie #psycho quora.com

(A meme in reference to Kyle Rittenhouse.)
It’s funny how a person can fire a gun into a crowd of liberals and instantly hit a:
Pedophile, woman beater, or a career criminal.
It’s almost as if their entire political party consists of rapists and subhumans.

Robert Cornell #fundie quora.com

A true President Trump supporter, like me, would SUPPORT the protestors at the Capitol today. If you condemn them, you are a progressive socialist Never-Trumper MASQUERADING as a Conservative. I put people like you in the same category as AOC. I think you are secretly an atheist, too.

Robert Cornell #fundie quora.com

As a resident of NorCal, I’ve seen how California has changed from liberal, to leftist, to radical-left. It pains me to see how my state has fallen for the propaganda of far left dems. I am devoting my time to debunking the 18 fundamental lies of leftism.

Biden won fairly
Russia interfered with the 2016 election
President Trump is racist
Justice Kavanaugh is guilty of sexual assault
Kamala is black
Abortion is not murder
Taxing the rich will grow the economy
Affirmative action works
Christianity is false
Legalizing drugs lowers drug abuse
There is no leftist indoctrination in public schools/universities
Humans are changing the climate
Gun control works
Mass immigration grows the economy
Obama was born in America
Michelle is a woman
Earth is a billion years old
We came from monkeys
Every one of these points is false. I am challenging every leftist in the world to prove ONE of these points to me. If anybody can do that, I will denounce my religion and become a Never-Trumper. However, I don’t think you can prove any of these. I don’t think ANYBODY can prove these, because they are LIES.

Robert Cornell #conspiracy quora.com

There are a lot of similarities between Biden and FDR. Of course, there’s the political similarity. Both of them are progressive socialist. They both want to raise taxes and take the guns. FDR tried to pack the courts, and Biden has openly talked about court packing. It’s not hard to see why Biden would compare himself to FDR.

However, I have another answer. Now, this is a radical idea. I mean, this MAYBE has a 1% chance of actually being true. But I think I’m onto something, so PLEASE, consider it critically.

Biden is very old. He obviously has symptoms of dementia, including his extreme difficulty with speech. He often forgets obvious things, thinking he’s running for Senate instead of president. He also thought he was running against Reagan. Are those characteristics of a 77-year-old? Maybe, but Biden’s dementia is SEVERE. No, those are the characteristics of somebody MUCH older. 138 years old, to be exact. Somebody who was alive early enough to start a world war- and successfully shift the blame to Hitler.

In case it’s not obvious what I’m saying, I’ll spell it out for you. BIDEN IS FDR! Well, I’m not sure. Even I have to admit that this is pretty unlikely. But still, these are UNCANNY similarities. There’s even a physical resemblance. All FDR needs is a nose job and slightly different hair, and I can totally see him as Biden!

If we could prove that Biden is in fact FDR, then he would be ineligible to be president. Don’t get me wrong, there was fraud! But if there wasn’t, “Biden” STILL couldn’t be president because it would be his FIFTH TERM! The 22cd amendment says that “Biden” CANNOT be president. That means automatic victory for Trump.

I know that this PROBABLY isn’t true. But in the 1% chance that it is- I DON’T WANT TO LIVE UNDER THE FDR REGIME 2.0!

Dianne Paulsen #fundie quora.com

Soon, God the Father will Demonstrate HOW He can imprison 7.9 Disobedient, SELF-Leading God-created Souls, in hell for Eternity.

You just wait.

or you could . . .

RUN to GOD, and beg God the Father to teach ‘you’ to live His Unselfish Ways, so that ‘you’ will become selfless, like Jesus, our Example, so ‘you’ are working WITH GOD, instead of with satan, AGAINST GOD.

TIP: ‘Good Intentions’ lead to hell.

Hero Vercingetrix #sexist #ableist quora.com

(answering a question if autistic men can be attractive to women)

Well, think about it this way:

Women are generally attracted to men who display leadership qualities. Take into consideration that in most of human history women would favor men who held power, station, and authority. The attractive man would be the man that all others would look up to, and respect.

Given women's propensity to follow, lack of moral compass, lack of self-direction, and tendency to submit herself to power, the moderately autistic guy would not be mentally fit to stand amongst his peers as a leader, much less as an equal. When life becomes more about survival, and bringing home the bacon, people would very likely not have any patience for his weird quirks and tendencies. His inability to read the room, and recognize danger, would likely result in him being killed. His deficiencies would most likely preyed upon by male competitors. A woman in this sort of world would be seeking a mate who could provide security, wealth, and the power and ability to make provision for her welfare.


Eid Badr #fundie #dunning-kruger #pratt quora.com

Question: Can mutations create new traits?

Eid Badr: The problem with your question is the definition of trait.

If you consider the ability to digest something that your stomach never digested before a new trait then yes mutations create new traits.

If you are asking about something like an animal that does not hair at all and does not produce hair at all to go through mutations and then produce hair then no, this is not possible.

Or for example if you are asking abotu something like an animal that does not have wings at all to go through mutations and then graudually have wings then not this is not possible and mutations cannot do that.

On Quora questions like this ask about brand new generally beneficial traits. Traits that are not only beneficial under certain conditions. For example E.Coli is able to activate a silent Citrate digestion gene using mutations but only if it is put in a citrate medium. And this is only beneficial when E.coli is put in a citrate medium, if this medium has no citrate then this mutation is not beneficial. So it is not generally beneficial for E.Coli to activate the Citrate digestion gene.

Another example would be becoming lactose tolerant or lactose intolerant. Either would be beneficial only under certain conditions, and that depends on your diet.

Mutations are not random.

Mutations cannot create brand new generally beneficial traits.

Mutations help species adapt to their diet and their environments and conditions.

Mutations cannot get a species or an individual out of its genome type to which it belong.

Mutations cannot transform a genome type to another genome type.

Humans had only human ancestors.

Moneys had only monkey ancestors.

E.Coli is still E.coli

Lizards are still lizards.

Finches are still finches.

Evolution is a myth.

Robert Cornell #fundie #homophobia #conspiracy quora.com

The worst part? In order to be PC, the dems actually SUPPORT child marriages because, according to their delusional logic, it would be “Islamophobic” to speak out against it. On the other hand, they just legalized homo marriage 6 years ago, so paedo marriage would be the logical next step on the liberal agenda. Biden will surely pardon Weinstein!

Oleg Volkov #pedo quora.com

Yes, in most civilized places in the world, cartoon pictures of little girls, no matter how pornographic, are legal. It’s also legal to be a pedophile. Only child sexual abuse is illegal.

Sure, pedophobes do their damnest to outlaw that, but most countries are unwilling to implement the concept of thoughtcrime.

Of course, I can provide no guarantees that police and courts in your place would actually follow the law. They are quite likely to be infiltrated by pedophobes and hurt you just for thinking about children or breathing the same air as children. Human rights aren’t worth much in the modern world.


There is nothing “normal” about pedophobes. They are people who let their feral instincts override their humanity and turn into violent monsters the moment children are mentioned.


Yeah, that’s exactly the way pedophobes think. Not a bit of tolerance, respect for human rights and ability to differentiate fantasy from reality.

Linds Anthony #fundie quora.com

Ah, you’re comparing God with a human. You’re saying “well, I forgive people if they commit a crime! I don’t wreak revenge on them! That’s because I’m good and God’s bad.”

But you’re a human. You’re flawed yourself, so you may cut your kids a lot of slack. (“I know I told him not to do that…but hey, I was worse when I was his age!”) Or you’re aware your rules may not be fair (“I said I’d ground her if she was out after 10…but maybe I was being a bit too strict…maybe I’ll let her off…or check what other parents are doing…”)

Whereas God isnt flawed. He doesnt have to doubt His judgements (and He spells everything out VERY clearly upfront. Eve knew PRECISELY what would happen if she ate the fruit.) So people going against Him shows theyre pitting themselves against God. And while God showed huge mercy in the OT (have you READ the story of the Israelites in wilderness, endlessly disobeying, squabbling, making idols…) He wasnt going to be mocked. Because God isnt like your soppy old Dad (where kids smirk “oh, he SAYS all this stuff but I can wind him round my little finger!”) but is the Almighty. And would we WANT a soppy old God who said one thing but…it never happened? You wouldnt know where you were. There wouldnt BE any Law (“I know it SAYS not to steal but God’ll shrug and look the other way if I smile at Him”)

God is there to be treated with reverence and love. We HAVE to follow His word. It’s not a matter for debate. You deciding that “I don’t approve of God so I’m ignoring His EVERY WORD” isnt like deciding youre not voting for a politician or shopping in a certain business. God wil prevail. Makes more sense to work with Him than try to fight, when it’s all set in stone…

Victor Ahaiwe #conspiracy quora.com

Question: How long were the British in Palestine?

Answer: British presence in Palestine resulted to the present day havoc in Middle East crisis. They purposefully invaded Palestine to corrupt Christianity to justify their reasons for rewriting the Bible “ The King James Version “.

They are still occupying Palestine but indirectly as they use the people that they choose to be identified as being Jewish in the fake name “Israelites “.

who are Israelites? The continent Africa and the people Africans fits every description. You can fool some of the people some of the time but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time. British lies using Christianity is over its maintenance is becoming too expensive and dangerous to the world.

lies and luxury are expensive to maintain but truth and simplicity are self maintained. It’s becoming too expensive to continuously occupy Palestine lately as killings surges both side and continuously over 75 years.

The people occupying Palestine use bombs and technology to protect themselves but the so called Africans are asked to call on the God of Isreal for protection.

Who gave us that name “ Africa”. Our original name is Israelites, we are 10 of the 12 tribes. Why did Europeans lied that we were lost .

Ronald Small #fundie #crackpot #pratt quora.com

Question: When I was a child, I was taught that dinosaurs were reptiles, but now it seems that they are treated like ancestors of birds. Does this mean that dinosaurs were in between the evolution of reptiles and birds?

Ronald Small: There is no such thing as evolution. That is why no one can show me an example of evolution. NOT ONE. Evolution requires new, novel genetic information to form out of thin air. Show me a single case of it. It doesn’t exist. Dinosaurs did not evolve into birds. For goodness sake, REPENT YOU HEATHEN! Buy a Bible!

Brian Pope #fundie quora.com

You clearly idiot storyteller about dumb weakest thanos compared to ALMIGHTY GOD! LOOK AT TIMOTHY 6:16 THANOS BACK REFORMED CUZ GOD DID IT FOR THANOS BY AUTOMATIC AS HARD AS GOD GO! GOD IS BEFORE ALL THINGS INTO EXISTENCE. BEFORE ATOMS WAS STILL LIVING GOD! YOU BE HUMBLE BEFORE GOD. GOD WILL COME AFTER THANOS (THAN NOS) HMM NOS TO GOD'S DARKNESS IS INFINITY POWER THAN HIS IDIOT INFINITE GAUNTLET IS POSSESSION CAME FROM GOD. ALL GODS ARE NOTHING COMPARED TO GOD. GOD IS CREATOR. THANOS IS CREATED BEGIN AND CANNOT EVER REPLACE TO THE CREATOR WHO CREATED HIM! YOU HUMBLE BEFORE GOD. NOTHING IS INFINITY POWER THAN ALL CREATURES, CREATED BEGIN. DEVIL CAN END THANOS. DEVIL IS PURE OPPOSITE OF LIVED. GOD IS LIVED. DEVIL CAN END THANOS BUT GOD NEVER DIE CUZ GOD IS BEFORE ALL ATOMS WAS CREATED! GOD REALIZED THAT HE IS ALIVE CUZ ATOMS FINALLY INTO EXISTENCE. END OF STORY. GOD WILL COME AFTER IDIOT FOOLISH COMICS BOOKS FROM THE WORLD. MEN IS GRAVE IMAGINATION AND UNDERESTIMATED GOD. HOW'S CUTE? GOD'S ONE COMMAND THANOS WILL BE LOST HIS WHOLE POWER AND DISAPPEARED!

Terigi Ciccone #conspiracy #dunning-kruger quora.com

Question: What’s a dead giveaway that someone doesn’t know anything about climatology?

Terigi Ciccone: Two signs; first they ask questions that assume that global warming is real and humans can do something about it. The second signal is they accuse people who don’t buy the story of being climate change deniers.

Buck Master, former Business & Estate Management at Pro Se Litigation #fundie quora.com

(In answer to: “What if Superman met Jesus Christ?”)

Jesus is real and conquered death, unlike those that would like to believe in concocted characters from Krypton who could not even overcome Kryptonite. I am sad for those who believe in fairy tales and superheroes who have no basis in historical fact because you will be judged by the king of kings, who is not amused.

Stephen Thomas Blume #fundie #pratt quora.com

Question: Did Australopithecus Africanus have a face like a bonobo?

Answer: A. africanus is nothing but an old ape skull. It’s no different than any ape skull, but it’s made into a hominid by modelers that give it human characteristics.

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-3bf0fb8e89c9c7d89bc8f06017120b25

A. africanus and bonobos both have (1) laid back foreheads like any ape, (2) large brow ridges like any ape (3) small craniums like any ape (4) 45 degree protruding jaws like any ape. They both have “U” shaped dental arches, again like any ape. Humans have “V” shaped dental arches. They are both apes. Modelers and artists from the Smithsonian and Nat Geo and the like “evolve” old ape skulls into “hominids”. A. africanus is just an old ape skull.

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f2b9abd225842d383e3548960d022eb5

Here is the model made by the Smithsonian. Notice that model forehead is much more vertical and human-like than the skull, the cranium is much larger on the model, the model’s brow ridges are much smaller. The model is given human hair, human skin, human eyes with 50% sclera showing, human-like expression. A. africanus is nothing but an old ape skull, but the folks at the Smithsonian want you to think you are looking at your ancestor.

So, to answer your question, yes, A. africanus has a face like an ape since it is nothing but an ape.

Dom Clark #racist #wingnut quora.com

Isn't Jewism the ultimate and purest fascism?

Quite the opposite. Fascism is fundamentally good while Jewry is fundamentally evil. Jewry directly opposes almost all of the foundational ideas fascism is built on. The essence of Jewry is domination through parasitism motivated by pure greed. Fascism is built on the ideas of hard work, self-reliance, charity, humility, submission to legitimate authority, and service motivated by selflessness.

Theo Tsourdalakis #fundie #pratt quora.com

Question: Why did humans evolve with a protruding nose?

Answer: The answer is simple.
They did NOT EVOLVE with a protruding nose because evolution (macro) is nothing but a popular MTYH. It is Santa Claus or the tooth fairy.
It has zero credible scientific evidence supporting it.

Your question falsely infers that evolution (macro) is true and real - it is neither.
Macro evolution is a popular myth, a fairy tale, devoid of credible scientific evidence. Recent discoveries in genetics shows that it is NOT possible.
(See book Signature in the Cell by Stephen Meyer.)

The evolution battle is often MISrepresented as science against religion – this is baloney!
The real battle is between good science and Darwinism.
When Darwinian/Macro evolution is scrutinised using the scientific method, it crumbles.
The scientific method demands: observation, measurement, repeatability. Darwinian/Macro evolution has none of these, all it has is circumstantial evidence which is open to interpretation. Ask yourself: What evidence is there that our great …. Great grandfather was a bacterium?

Dr John Sanford (Geneticist and inventor of the Gene Gun) said :
“The bottom line
is that the primary axiom [of Darwinian/Macro evolution]
is categorically false,
you can't create information with misspellings,
not even if you use natural selection.”
There is significant dissent from Darwinism. For proof of the dissent to go http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/ and download the list of brave scientists who are willing to publicly declare their dissent from Darwinian/Macro evolution. Micro Evolution is observable science, Darwinian/Macro evolution is a fairy-tale supported only by propaganda.

Thomas Munos #fundie quora.com

“How do creationists explain why whales still have leftovers of their hind limbs? It serves no function.”

Creationists believe we are seeing evidence of ID in the left over hind limbs of whales, which shows robust design. Rather than evolution, we see many designs packaged into the genome to enable different designs to manifest as the environmental conditions changed. These changes aren’t mutations and natural selection, for this is way too inefficient, but it is programmed to switch based on environmental factors.

According to Creationists, the oceans were very shallow before the flood so the hind legs served a purpose of helping whales become dislodged should they find themselves in very shallow waters. Also, some scientists say it helped with mating so that too may be an additional function that it performed.

God in designing life, has intelligently designed life with a multitude of designs in the genome which can be switched on or off by environmental factors. After the flood, the need for the hind legs became unnecessary because of the deep oceans so the hind legs shrunk away allowing the flow of resources to flow to other critical organs. Rather than evidence for evolution, this is evidence of ID. A prediction of ID is that over time we will see that mutations are not the cause of this change but biological triggers are switched on or off by environmental factors enabling different designs to manifest themselves for different environments. Just like some creatures loose their sight when they start living in dark caves, so the whale lost it’s hind legs when they were no longer needed. Again, this is evidence for design and not evolution.

Daniel Quatro #fundie #homophobia quora.com

Question: Do you believe that animals could be gay?

Daniel Quatro: Sure, why not?

People like to point out how homosexuality occurs in nature, so therefore, it's natural for people to be homosexual as well.

But there are things that occur in nature that we shouldn't emulate as humans. For example, some animals eat their young.[1]

Does anyone justify infanticide or cannibalism using that logic?

Now, I've probably offended some of you with that statement, so let me clarify. I'm not comparing homosexuality with infanticide or cannibalism or saying they are even remotely the same thing.

I'm merely pointing out that trying to justify a behavior, because it occurs in nature, can get you into trouble.

Nature is a wonderful thing, but it can also be pretty messed up. Humans are the same way. We have tendencies, desires, and feelings that aren't always good.

Just because it feels or seems "natural" doesn't mean it's right.

Edward Smith #fundie #pratt quora.com

Question: How can abiogenesis to explain the origins of life?

Edward Smith:

It can’t. It is proven to be impossible for inert chemicals in the ground to form anything by themselves, save a few crystals. Scientists have long known it to be a non-starter, even evolutionary scientists recognise this and outline the problems in their books and articles.

The issue is not with the science, it is with evolutionists who refuse to accept the scientific evidence and insist it happened anyway, purely because life exists. More reasonable people, including many other evolutionary scientists, accept the need for creation, but then say evolution took over. Conveniently side-stepping the obvious.

Gerald McDonald #fundie quora.com

What is the evolutionary benefit of coughing?

Imagine you are the first ever life form. Some how you grow to have lungs and when you eat something it goes down into those lungs. (don’t forget evolution is supposedly guiding your formation, so it doesn’t realize you need a stomach or an esophagus for food to travel to the stomach), but it gets the lungs right, but the food goes down the wrong way, and the gods of chance an luck have not had the time nor knowledge to have developed a cough reflex to push the wrong stuff back out of the lungs. So you did, because you were haphazardly formed by the gods chance and luck of the evolutionists.

Evolution did nothing to help any organisms. They were designed and created by God.

Simon Elliot #dunning-kruger #conspiracy #racist quora.com

Absolutely not because if that were the case then Islam would be reduced to 0.1% in China, it would have banned Uighurs from rights, put a symbol on Uighurs and Muslim restaurants would be closed.
Those you see in prison or who have been detained are guilty of supporting Islamic extremism or separatism, the Chinese government does not react without reason.
For those who say "Uyghurs terrorists are a myth" then it is blind or ignorant on these matters who would do better to shut up if he does not want to make a bad figure.

See this links:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_conflict
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_China
https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/792959.shtml

Lincoln Maene , I spent 5 years as an edgy internet atheist #fundie quora.com

Modern Atheists are almost exclusively Christians in denial. Very few have achieved any sort of intellectual rejection of Christianity in its core values (ala Nietzsche). And because they have wholeheartedly swallowed the ethical presuppositions of Christianity, they get really mad when the moral picture of God—in the old testament for instance—or the state of the world around them conflicts with the atheists’ Lord and savior: Jesus Christ. Take your average Atheist, for example, waxing pathetic about how the ever present pointless suffering and evil in the world shows that there is no God.
[snip]
And that’s why the atheists get so mad: because they love Jesus Christ with all their hearts, their one and only true Lord, whose absence has destroyed all true meaning and longstanding joy from the atheist’s life.
[posts a stained glass image of Jesus]

Rene Donaldson #fundie quora.com

In Dragon Ball Z- Dragon Ball Super the primary antagonist is Frieza. He’s the only reoccurring primary antagonist in the canon. He’s a symbolic amalgamation of dragon celestial and dragon demon races. He represents the real life rulership of the celestial dragon race over monkey demons. Dragon Ball Z’s story of Frieza’s empire ruling over aliens is just symbolic for the dragon celestials ruling over all races and species of demons. The saiyans were just one of many races under Frieza’s empire - in real life monkey demons are just one of many demon species who are under the authority of Dragon celestials.

The saiyan race is a warrior race trained to kill and destroy taking orders from a race of dragons who have an empire in space. This is based off the reality of celestial dragons princes who give orders to demons to continue their domination over mankind existing on earth in the 3rd dimension.

Our fascination with Dragon Ball is literally based on the will of the spirits of the monkey demons whom the fictional saiyan race is a cartoonish exaggeration. So the real life version of Frieza and saiyans are literally on the same side. There’s no fighting between monkey and dragon; there’s no super saiyan; no god forms; no ui; no blowing up planets or being galaxy - multi universal in power tier; theres no shaking the universe through fighting. All of that is fantasy to keep you entertained on monkey demons and their celestial dragon masters who dominate them.

Gerald McDonald #fundie #dunning-kruger quora.com

What do you think of the recent find that the Neanderthals moved further South and were technologically more advanced than previously believed?

It serves to proves what Creationists have said all along. The Neanderthal were humans. Not humans that became humans from some animal. And this also lends credence that there are no such thing as evolved into humans. Humans are and always have been human.

Glenn Ricardson #fundie quora.com

(In response to: Do Christians ever fear that they will end up in Hell for all eternity?)
Yes, let's look at this in a simple way, we have very intelligent people in this world ,( Doctors, Engineers,, Technicians,, Mathematicians,, Chemists,,physicist,,Biologist,,Dentists,,etc. etc. BUT there is Not one man on Earth Today that Has the Brains or can even BEGIN to COMPREHEND How POWERFUL THE LORD IS we cannot even in our WILDEST Imagination ( drugs,, Alcohol, Acid Mushrooms, Lsd, Pcp, weed, Cocaine, Angel dust ,etc. None of those Heights, (good trips or bad trips ) we still don't have the Ability to Understand HOW MUCH GOD LOVES US,,so HE stept Down to Our Level ,and Became Flesh and Blood to Teach us How to Live with Love for Each other, if you cannot love your Enemies and Forgive them unconditionally then you Also don't LOVE The LORD can you imagine forgiving someone Unconditionally ?? JESUS SAID BE HOLY. JESUS NEVER SAID BE A CHRISTIAN,,, ,,,CHRISTIAN IS THE NAME OF A PERSON IN THE BIBLE,,,SO RELIGION OR RELIGIONS ARE THE WORKS OF the devil and could lead you straight to Hell

William Tong #crackpot #psycho quora.com

( Part 3 [Final] )

There are widely varying opinions on what to do about the problem of Sasquatch. There is the Kill ’EM ALL AND LET GOD SORT ’EM OUT crowd. I'm one of these. Then there is the “we're going out in to the woods naked and banging drums to chant our Bigfoot prayer of protection and wave beads and crystals around til they show up and dance with us. Then we'll all get high and communicate telepathically and sing Kum Ba Yah My Lord” crowd. These are the ones who grossly (and fatally) underestimate just how dangerous these creatures are. Unless everyone never wants to camp, hunt, fish, or so anything at all in the woods again, these creatures must be terminated. Keep in mind that compared to them just how feeble we really are. Even the fastest, fittest, and strongest of us is pathetically easy to kill by a Squatch. We're slow. We're loud. Compared to Bigfoot’s mastery of the woods and the art of evasion and concealment, were stupid and easily frightened.

One last thing. What IF Uncle Sam decided to inform us plebes that “hey guess what y'all ain't crazy after all heh heh. Yep. They're real. Chew on that why dontcha?” Next thing you know the Sierra Club and PETA and a gazillion funky tree huggers are screaming to make all Sasquatch lands protected. Well, they're everywhere so guess what Joe Logger? You just lost your job. Sorry Sammy Salmon Fisherdude. The Squatch need that food. Go work at Burger King. No more camping Mr. Civilian. We can't guarantee your safety in the woods so sorry. Hey Carl Cattleman we're just as bummed as you that a Squatch clan ate 43 of your cows. But they're Federally protected now you so you can't do anything. It's their land now. Move if you don't like it.

Think about it.

Gerald McDonald #fundie #pratt quora.com

(Part 2)

In the past, no one from the past is around to testify that evolution had actually occurred, so the claims about the past are not admissible as evidence, no matter how much the evolutionists cry, “but the similarities, the similarities”, because we see life forms born all day long, with similarities, but they are being born from other kinds of life forms. We’ve seen this pattern occurring for thousands of years. And whether they like it or not, what is observed holds more weight than anything they imagine had occurred.

And one great evidence that shoots holes in the speculation of evolution is the fact that if evolution had been going on for billions and billions of years, why is it not observed today. I mean, we are talking about bacteria replicating something other than more bacteria, or else how did they supposedly get to the place of being called humans.

And to tell the truth, even if evolution moves to slowly to occur, we are talking about what has supposedly occurred in the past. And millions of years has already occurred. So why isn’t the “bewitching” hour for many of the different kinds of life forms occurring all around us?

What has been said is that the different kinds of life forms all came from different kinds of life forms. Bacteria to frogs, or mosquitoes, or bananas, or apples. Maybe not quite in that succession, but if bacteria had evolved from something, shouldn’t we after all of these supposed millions of years that have already passed, be seeing bacteria replicating something more than other bacteria?

So, the question is guys, why are we expected to fall head over heels in accepting what is not even observed occurring.

Gerald McDonald #fundie #pratt quora.com

(Since I can’t post all of the question here, I will split it up into multiple parts.)

What scientific evidence would prove that humans continue to evolve even today?

The same that is required to prove evolution in the past or that it will occur in the future.

The same that is required to prove gravity occurred in the past or is occurring today. The same thing that the wind caused the sand dunes in the desert. Or that earthquakes caused the formations of the mountain peaks.

Observable occurrences.

The evolutionists wish for everyone to accept their word that evolution had occurred and that it is presently occurring.

To make this wish easier to accept, they make the claim, (unsubstantiated one again), that the reason why evolution is not observed, personally by all, is because evolution supposedly occurs too slowly to observe occurring.

But isn’t it funny, that many of the public, don’t realize that if evolution is supposedly toooooo slow for “anyone” to see it happen, that the “anyone” should also include the evolutionists themselves. The very ones who are saying that evolution can not be observed, are the ones that are saying evolution is occurring, but you “just can’t see it occurring”? Man talk about gullibility. Maybe the public are just too busy, trying to survive to realize the nonsensical twisted rationale the evolutionists have fallen into and are trying to push us down into.

If it is not being observed, how have they confirmed that it has or is occurring?

Peace John #fundie quora.com

What is the strongest proof that God does exist?

The strongest proof that God does exist, I mean the true God who dwells in heaven and owns the earth is that no matter how knowledgeable we think we are, we still ‘die' at the end and no one can stop that, for the fact that we can stop death is a big proof that God does exist.

Edward Smith #fundie #dunning-kruger quora.com

(sigh… another creationist answer to my question.)

What would dolphins look like if they went back to land again? Would they become bipedal and have hands with opposable thumbs, or would they have hooves like their ancestors?

Dolphins were never land animals in the first place. Your question betrays a total lack of knowledge of biology, the fossil record and even the definition of evolution.

The idea of such as you believe is pure fantasy and only true in the wild imaginations of evolutionists.

Dean Cooper #fundie quora.com

Man could not have authored the Bible. We know that the Bible is authored by God because it foretells the future with 100% accuracy every time. No other book in the world has 100% fulfilled prophecy. This shows that it comes from the mind of God. Man would not write a book about how his God whom he loves and worships gets crucified. Man would teach that we get to God by our good works. The Bible is accurate from Science, Archaeology, Prophecy, Unity and Morality.

Dean Cooper #fundie quora.com

For me, ONE of the main reasons i believe in God is the sheer impossibility of the alternative.

We are living on a 6,371 km diameter rock, hurtling through space at a speed of 66,000 mph, a million miles away from a 27 million degrees Fahrenheit inferno and no-one in charge.

The Bible is not a book but a collection of 66 books, written over a span of 1600 years across 3 continents, by over 40 writers inspired by God in 3 languages yet it has ONE primary theme ( The Glory of God and salvation of mankind ) and zero errors or contradictions. It is scientifically, prophetically, archaeologically, historically and linguistically accurate.

Ignore the word "trinity". its not important.

William Patton #racist #wingnut quora.com

Why are some people so against Liberals?
The progressive liberal belief in absolute equality is daily affronted by the reality of intractable racial differences. It has been over 150 years since the demise of slavery and 60 years since the demise of segregation. Neither abolition or integration has brought about the liberal utopia.

How do liberals explain this chasm between reality and their ideals and expectations? They do what all liberals do. They explain it through a combination of hysteria, denial and conspiracy theories. Even if there are no actual racists oppressing black people, they are being oppressed by the mysterious forces of “systemic racism” and “institutional racism.” White people benefit from the invisible knapsack of “white privilege.” As the evil oppressors of blacks, the only way to bring about true equality and to establish a just society is to treat white people differently than black people. White people have to be punished for their unwitting sins and the sins of their ancestors. This is “social justice” or “racial justice.”

In such a way, the twisted logic of progressive liberalism leads back to racial hierarchy, inequality and the ‘racism’ they claim to hate. Oddly enough, it leads to both intolerance and bigotry, and the loss of liberty and equality.

From a non-liberal perspective, it is utterly alien:

[photos of African-American women protesting, a mural of George Floyd as an angel]