All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
Say you see a car in a parking lot, it is 95 degrees outside, the car is not running and there is a child or an animal inside of it. If you broke into the car to save the life of the animal or child, are you violating the owner's right to his property? Thoughts?
Children are one thing. I'd say it's fine to break into a car to aid one. The parents are acting criminally, your response to their negligence would be justified.
Animals have no rights and are only property. You may not break into someone's property to help them.
Other humans share the bulk of my genes, so there is an evolutionary advantage in not harming others. Survival of our genes is all that matters, everything we do or feel is in service to that prime directive. I'm not concerned with arguments of "sentience," one has rights simply by virtue of being human. Perhaps if some non-human was as advanced as humans we would be forced out of necessity to recognize legal rights, but I cannot recognize the ethical rights of non-humans.
What about those humans who possess inferior or defective genes
They have as much of a responsibility to ensure the survival of their genes. Not sure what you're asking.
What advantage is there in not harming a infertile cripple over not harming a dog? If a person is not intelligent enough to understand the concept of property then surely by your definition an act of aggression against them would not be morally wrong.
If the person is a threat, or acts criminally, then their life's value does diminish. If they are extremely mentally disabled, then they're basically the property of their family.
I don't see what impotency has to do with anything. We are a social species, and as such depend on others aid. Harming innocents hurts social cohesion and others would target us as a threat to overall safety.
so if you saw someone torturing a dog you wouldn't try to stop them?
Probably not. I would certainly speak up, but likely not use force. Of course it's also possible my emotions may outweigh my rational thought and I would use force, but I hope I wouldn't.
If you reach the age of 20 and you still have yet to see a naked female, you are doomed
Family nudity, strip clubs, porn, movies and such don't count. Nudity before adolescence/puberty also doesn't count as you the time thought girls were gross because they had cooties. I'm talking a woman who isn't your moher either being voluntarily nude around you or not minding you seeing her nude.
My three lifelong fantasies
1. Having mental powers to kill everyone around me
2. Having a female twin who finds out about my existence and comes to find me, killing everyone around me in the process (EDIT: yes obviously we also have sex)
3. Just killing everyone around me using any tools available
I have similar views to many of these guys - alt right, anti-feminist.
Maybe I can help to describe how some of these men feel (but I don't think it applies to all of them, some of them don't deserve to be on the list).
If you really think that your own race of women have been corrupted, it is natural to look elsewhere. Traditional morality held that a woman should be chaste before marriage, that the marriage vows were sacred, and divorce was either illegal or scandalous. And also, women would stick to more feminine/maternal activities.
I do deeply resent the fact that these things have changed. If you are a white man looking for a wife in the modern environment, you encounter women who care more about their careers than getting married, who might not have a strong desire for kids (they've been told it's not important), who might have had a lot of sexual partners, and who have a divorce court system in their favor. I don't know for sure if this is true or not, but let's assume it's also true that obesity, drug use, alcohol abuse, and tattoos/piercings are more common now than they were for most previous generations.
So if you're in this environment and you don't like it, you might feel that it is too hard to find someone you're happy with. It is tempting to say "screw this" and go somewhere the odds are in your favor.
It's sort of like the conservative white guy is a foreigner in his own country now. The culture he's swimming in just doesn't feel right. Maybe it's like being a freshwater fish thrown into the ocean.
But as I wrote on a post here the other day, I do now think that it is a mistake to date outside your race as an escape from what you see as the current defects with your own culture. And it's particularly unfortunate if you find someone who will marry you not for you as an individual but because she values your race.
Ultra-conservative white men who are tempted to go Asian should remember:
"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one that is most adaptable to change."
[OP from "What do you like most about helicopter rides?"]
I think, as the leftist falls into the sea below, they have time to reflect upon their life decisions before their life achieves finality. I want them to know their beliefs and hatred has no place in healthy, civilized society, right before they hit pavement.
It's the psychological part that I like.
I'm tired of seeing feminist cunts and bluepill fags tell us it's our personality.
If that was the case, then why do the assholes over at /r/theredpill get laid so frequently?
Either it's our persssssonalityyyyyyy or everyone who posts at /r/theredpill is a liar.
Pick one normiescum. Just fucking pick one and stay consistent.
No, this isn't a "the lefties are the REAL racist", but its an interesting thing I noticed among them.
Many leftists, especially those who hate the Alt Right, even the fools lurking this sub trying to downvote everything here, all of them believe that whites are inherently superior. All of them. None of them really believe that whites were EVER equal to other races. Many of them recognize the same racial truths that our ancestors noticed time and time again, but the left has such a pathological mindset that they repress the truth and express a hatred towards that truth. I always wondered how leftists grew to hate white people so much, that their hatred is strong enough to influence even their own perceptions on their policies. It can't just be anti-white propaganda can it? After all, the same leftists can argue that individualism, capitalism, and free speech is evil when they view such concepts under a white male, but then these same leftists will preach that collectivism and identity politics is evil when the Alt-Right whites starting adopting these concepts. Many weak people tend to become far leftists, they seem to have adopted this mentality and show a hatred towards success and the strong, so their hatred of white people may in fact, just be another branch of this general pattern of thinking. Formed by their resentment, insecurity and acknowledgment of whites being superior.
The left inherent belief in white superiority may also be another driving force in why the left deliberately attacks white interest groups far more then black or Latinos or Asians interest groups, despite the fact that many of them exists and some actually exert influence on our politics. It's because they don't take them seriously. Just like me, they probably don't take black nationalist very seriously because they'll never really be able to accomplish their goals, but white nationalism scares them because deep down, they believe that white nationalist can succeed and that the white-ethno state will objectively end up being a good place.
Of course, the left embrace of white supremacy is different from the Alt Right. The left just unquestionable accepts the concept because of their feelings. The Alt Right hardly embraces any real form of "white supremacy", they simply want a white ethno-state. The acknowledgement of "white supremacy" is simply the acknowledgement of objective facts, that whites have played a major role in technological advancements and in building advanced societies. However, the things that whites surpass at are considered "superior", so that's why the left can unironically see white supremacy in anything.
The fact that the left believes in white supremacy is why its so hard to have serious discussion about race with them. They emotionally are unable to. I noticed, people have tried to be rational with these same leftists, pointing out their racial double standards and that they are acting no different from the "racists" they hate, and it simply slips from their back. But the moment you talk about racial differences in IQ, oh now it begins to affect them. Why? Because you are unintentionally confirming their repressed worldview and they are experiencing cognitive dissonance.
5 Stages of Inceldom
1 Denial
"I'm not incel! I'm just not great with ladies. Few more weeks at the gym and another self help book and I'll be drowning in poon!"
2 Anger
"These whores need to pay for rejecting me. Chad shouldn't get every woman damn it."
3 Bargaining
"Cmon girls, what if I pay for your dinners and movies, then will you look at me at least?"
4 Depression
Where most of the people in this sub seem to be, contemplating suicide, laying down and rotting, etc
5 Acceptance
The ultimate form of an incel. The final destination. This is when you get Wizard Powers. This is the only way we can end our misery outside of suicide and getting a woman.
The Alt-Right is pro-White male-Asian female thing is just a meme. Some White nationalists race mix because White women have been corrupted by Liberalism. Most of them don't. And it's White Liberals who are really promoting race-mixing far more than any other group.
I don't think Whites should have equal political rights in Asian countries, especially not if they don't assimilate and respect Asian values. And I hold minorities in Western countries to the same standard.
Progress is a unique feature of Western civilization. With the exception of the introduction of technology, the entirety of the third-world has made no progress and continues in the natural state of man--constant, low-lying ethnic/tribal warfare.
Furthermore, who says we're against technical change? Whenever a leftist brings up "progress" it is almost inevitably in the social sphere, which yes, we do oppose. Currently speaking you have to be detached from reality not to notice that the threats to technical and scientific advancement are from the left who engages in suppressing work that doesn't fit a political narrative and who also peddle postmodernism which kills objective research.
No, diversity sets off warning bells and as I've said in a previous post, raises transaction costs and harms moral and social norms. The moral emotion of purity most likely developed to prevent such a thing from happening--you cannot diversify the heartland of a nation without repercussion.
To flip this, I find it funny that you people never assume that racism reciprocates. Native Americans were brutal to the settlers and currently blacks disproportionately commit crimes on whites, including rape which to my knowledge is not rooted in economic issues.
"The old system often benefits you conservatives, explaining why most of you are white. The old system benefits you mainly in wealth and society. Discrimination still exists because we have not foregone this system that doesn't work in today's society anymore."
Ding ding ding We aren't cucks who are going to go quietly into the night. We want the institutions that we helped build and were built for us to continue to benefit US. The bourgeois sold out the American white middle class and we won't forget it.
"Discrimination still exists because we have not foregone this system that doesn't work in today's society anymore."
Discrimination exists because multi-ethnic democracy and a multicultural society are alien and should be done away with. I'm not discriminatory toward Mongolians because they're on the other side of the Earth.
Why is an ethnic separation so apocalyptic to you? Or are you really using sheep's clothing to dress up the right for the global downtrodden to use our country as a battered women's shelter?
Not all of us view this as an "all or nothing" situation. First off, I think that countries as large and with as many different types of people as the USA don't really work as a cohesive unit to begin with. People feel disconnected from the country as a whole. I'm also against imperialism so I don't see land expansion/conquering as vital to a nation's interest.
Therefore the answer in my mind is to break the nation apart into sections that make sense. There could be sections for the different major racial groups in the country (white, black, mestizo/amerindian), sections for political ideology (socialist, libertarian) and sections for religious affiliation (protestant and catholic).
I would be content with whites having a race based state encompassing at least one region - preferrably either the Pacific Northwest, Great Lakes states, or New England. Anything larger than that would be great, but anything less than that would be unacceptable.
The exchange of goods and ideas can continue without the exchange of people. No reason for us to not be on good terms with our neighbors of varying races/beliefs/faiths so long as our borders are clearly defined and respected.
Nobody would really be kicked out of the country, but rather just maybe have to move a few states over in order to live with other people like themselves.
Classic violent liberals. Why can't you be civil? Use your mouth words, retard.
Edit: Everybody say it with me now.... PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
I'd also like to add: We all know that Republicans are not the ones killing cops, rioting in the streets, terrorizing conventions, protesting every event the opposition holds... I mean laugh all you want at what I said but you cannot deny that Democrats have proven they are the party that uses violence to try to silence the opposition. Correct The Record shills, COME N GET IT.
[OP of "Hitler and the "Big Lie""]
I'm so sick of people accusing Hitler and Goebbels of saying that they brainwashed the masses by repeatedly telling massive lies. What Hitler actually said is that Jews do this. And Goebbels was accusing the English of doing the same thing. So, if anything, Hitler was proven right since Jews constantly misquote Hitler...
Incel ranking system
Official Incel ranking system organized from least normie to most normie
-Note: Females cannot be incel, they can be Volcel though.
-TKHHHV: Talkless Kissless Hugless HandHoldless Virgin. This incel has never even talked to a female, nonetheless done anything else with one. This was the least normie type I could find.
-KHHHV: Kissless Hugless HandHoldless Virgin. This incel has talked to females before but, has not kissed, hugged, held hands with, or has had sex with a female.
-KHHV: Kissless HandHoldless Virgin. This incel has talked to females before, and had hugged at least one before but, has not kissed, held hands with, or had sex with a female.
-KHV: Kissless Hugless Virgin. This incel has talked and held hands with a female before but, has not kissed, hugged, or had sex with one.
-KV: Kissless Virgin. This incel has talked, held hands, and hugged a female before but, has not kissed or had sex with one.
-Virgin. This incel has done everything with a female but has not had sex with one.
-Volcel. This isn't an incel, but a voluntary celibate. This person chooses not to have sex when they have opportunities to.
-Prostitute Virgin. This incel has only had sex with a prostitute before and has not had sex with a regular female.
-Normie. Has done everything with a female including has had sex with them. Seen as scum to us incels because sometimes they try and take their anger out on us, unsuccessfully.
-Chad. Fucks multiple women each second, has pumped and dumped every female you've ever known. The epitome of masculinity, everyone should strive to be a Chad but, only the top 20% make it.
If I forgot any ranks, let me know and I'll add it to the list.
Our own government is using our tax money to advocate for the genocide of it's own people. Obviously the Liberals and the redditors here will ask, "But whats wrong with white people going extinct, white is only a skin color?" The problem here is that Africans, Arabs, the Chinese etc. do not share our history and as such they have no incentive to protect, preserve, and teach the history of European 'Western Civilization', as we see here.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe when Canada has a population of 100,000,000 and the largest religion in this country is Islam, and the most popular language in Canada is Cantonese we will look back at the people that created this country as us rather than them, but that is a huge risk to take. We've already seen this happen. For example, we have already seen the push for curriculum that reflect the diversity of schools, which means no more white male authors in 2100 for example. Canadian History Class will begin with the advent of multiculturalism in Canada, with other units on 'The Migrant Crisis' and 'Western Imperialism'. The Seven Years war in Canada? No longer relevant in the slightest.
What about the cultural products of Western Civilization? Is the Miserere going to be sung by Muslims? Can anyone find any recordings of the Lux æterna done by an Islamic choir? What about the Pietà; will African immigrants to Canada in 2040 consider it their cultural legacy? These are real worries that are not rooted in 'supremacy'. We have already seen what has happened to the uniquely British elements of our culture in Canada, can someone assure me that our culture as a whole is safe?
First let's define what exactly is meant by multiculturalism, because it seems we're not even arguing over the same thing. If you read through my past replies to you carefully, you should notice that I typically prefaced "multiculturalism" with qualifiers like "societal-scaled" or "large-scaled", which only really exist in the most metropolitan cities in the Western world: NYC, LA, Toronto, London, Paris, etc. That is the type of multiculturalism, which is actually what most people interpret the term to mean nowadays, that I am against and attacking. You on the other hand seemed to be implying, intentionally or not, that I was against any form of human movement. That's a complete strawman, and I've made it quite clear explicitly that small-scaled "multiculturalism" is to be encouraged, except that form of interactions between different groups of people is not what's associated with the modern concept of "multiculturalism". In other words, you once again resorted to semantic arguments, just like when you tried to make it sound like I was against technological and economic progress when I first criticized social progressivism.
And I wholly reject your completely unsubstantiated conjecture that multiculturalism is necessary for technological and economic progress. Seriously, how the hell do you even come up with this kind of drivel? Once again, the exchange of ideas between different groups of people is important, but there's absolutely no need for large numbers of different groups to inhabit and encroaching on each other's living spaces in order to achieve that. Exchange of valuable ideas and information are usually done between the intellectual classes of the various groups of people anyway, and they're the ones that disproportionately drive the civilizational progress. There's absolutely no reason to import the average Joes from groups XYZ into one's home nation.
For reaons still unbeknownest to me, my original comment regarding social progressives in the other thread triggered you.
Asian people and Asian nations should of course cut out the hate and cooperate more, especially when it comes to goals that are clearly mutually beneficial, such as economic development and overthrowing the vestiges of western imperialism from their collective cultures. If massive multiculturalism and ethnic diversity MUST be forced upon all nations of Asia, would I personally rather the source of said diversity come from other Asian nations over non-Asian nations? Absolutely, without a shred of doubt! But because there are still some non-trivial cultural gaps, not to mention some bad history between various nations, I'm under no illusion that massive immigration and ethnic diversity even within Asian nations themselves will be the next greatest thing since sliced bread. Just as I wouldn't want millions of Koreans flooding into China, I would never wish for millions of Chinese flooding into Korea. And of course the same applies to all nations in Asia. Small scaled immigration to and from are and should of course be encouraged (especially if the outcomes are mutually beneficial for all parties involved), as that allows for successful assimilation into the host nation much more feasible and thus likely.
But okay, I'm still not quite sure if that addressed the source of your contention. Since even now, I still don't know exactly what it was that you were disagreeing with. Why did you maintain the pretense that I was attacking the need for technological and economical progress even after I explicitly made it clear that it was only social progressivism, specifically societal-level ethnic diversity via mass immigration, that I was against? That was quite intellectually dishonest IMO. And instead of engaging me in debate and clarifying your position, your responses degenerated into baseless ad hominems and low-effort comebacks like "Stop trying to act like an intellectual. Nationalists cannot be." FYI, if having a non-binary view of the world, which cannot yet be said of you with remarks like the one above, is enough to make you think I was attempting to be an "intellectual", then that says more about your naivety than whatever it was you were trying to accuse me of.
Now judging by your various responses in the last thread and your original post here, your main complaint seems to be that some of us espouse views that are more commonly associated with the alt-right. Okay sure, that's definitely something we can discuss. The precise political affiliation of our sub has been a frequent topic of debate since its inception over a year ago. But relatively recently, it is my understanding that we've finally come to a consensus on the matter: we don't unconditionally support any western political ideologies, rather we support whatever policy that is good for us, Asians. As such, said policies could potentially come from the left, who call out overt racial discrimination/violence against Asians; the right, who are more in favor of abandoning the current affirmative action system that's artificially capping the enrollment of Asian American students into top universities; BLM, who brings the issue that is white supremacy to the forefront of western societies, and makes sure even the most insular whitey knows of their discontent for such a system; and even gasp the alt-right, who are IMO (and many others it would seem) correct in their assessment that ethnic homogeneity for a nation is a source of strength, because this has been repeatedly demonstrated empirically time and time again throughout history up to the present day. To me, this is quite obvious from a mathematical POV as well: if you consider any given society as a dynamic physical system (which it is), the more ethnically homogeneous or equivalently the less diverse it is, then the less degrees of freedom there are in the system, therefore a lower probability for errors, which in the real world simply means less differences for its citizens to fight over.
As long as you refrain from low-effort accusatory innuendos and baseless ad hominems, then I'm all for open dialogue.
"As for why people disapprove of women dating outside their race - it is typically either a sense of ownership (in the case of racial puritans, who think they need to preserve their racial "purity") or people who perceive particular interracial relationships as unhealthy."
These are merely rationalizations each group uses to justify their opposition. Though the alt-right crowd is more honest in the sense that their espoused justification more closely aligns with the true driving motivation behind their disapproval for race mixing by white females. And IMO, this motivation is the underlying universal cause for all such thinking, regardless of racial or ethnic background.
It simply comes down to evolution and group competition, with every group competing against all others for their own group's interests. Of course sexual interests are arguably one of the most important, if not the only interest that counts (from a biological POV that is). Every human alive today is predominantly descended from ancestors who had high in-group loyalty and xenophobia. The human groups that did not possess such behaviors, were assimilated into groups that were at best, and completely genocided at worst. And from an evolutionary POV, males fucking out-group females usually means a successful conquest or subjugation (which could even be economic in nature, not necessarily militaristic) of said out-group; that then necessarily implies females breeding with out-group males en mass means your people have become conquered and/or subjugated. It shouldn't be difficult to see, which one of these outcomes is the more desirable option for one's group/tribe/clan.
[OP of "Happy Valentine's Day!"]
[Commenting under "Did you know that the U.S. government burned millions of books linked to National Socialism?"]
There they have the list of the (((German-speaking authors))) whose books were burned by the Germans. It was all writings of kikery and communist destroyers.
(((Walter Benjamin))) Socialist
(((Ernst Bloch))) Marxist theorist
Otto Dix Painter of Degeneracy
(((Alfred Döblin))) Novelist, Essayist
(((Albert Einstein))) Scientist and More Einstein published more than 300 scientific papers along with over 150 non-scientific works. Einstein's political view was in favor of socialism and critical of capitalism, which he detailed in his essays such as "Why Socialism?"
Friedrich Engels Atheist and Marxist Theory Founder
(((Lion Feuchtwanger))) Degenerate Novelist and Playwright
Marieluise Fleißer Degenerate Author and Playwright
(((Leonhard Frank))) Degenerate Writer
(((Sigmund Freud))) Pervert Masquerading as a Counselor
Alright, I've had enough. I hate hearing Kikepedia referring to these Jewish scumbags as Germans.
The list continues with more Jews, queers, and other degenerates. The National Socialists were great and noble people for burning this destructive garbage.
The Alt Right is not National Socialism or Fascism. If it was it would just be called National Socialism or Fascism.
You could absolutely be alt-right and favour a fairly limited government free society.
I believe for example that more freedom could quite possibly achieve our goals, if Civil Rights type legislation that coerces white people to associate with non-whites was repealed I think we'd start to see a natural movement back to white ethnic enclaves for example
Just a few small things, like allowing people to make racially based restrictive covenants on properties again, would probably make a huge difference.
Unfortunately the Nazi larping stuff is quite prominent so the tone of debate you'll get when advocating a more libertarian approach will often be quite dismissive.
[Commenting under "‘I’m not a monster’ Le Pen says we must save shipwrecked migrants but then send them home"]
Send a submarine and blow up one ship, that's all it takes and they'll stop coming. We shouldn't rescue them, look at what's happening in Tunisian and Libya, boats go 15 meters out then capsize. Then "Italian" boats ""save"" them and bring them to rape and kill the native Europeans
Submitter's Note: Truly abominable poetry ahead. NSFB. Read at own risk. Keep Brainbleach ready.
Oh chad are you playing games? Ecks dee you are so good!
You fix her computer Chad fucks her pooper
You treat her with class Chad is barring her ass
You bare your soul She is rimming chads asshole
You spent all night fixing her computer Chad spent 8 minutes bruising her crefix
You regale her with lit Chad's hammering her clit
You buy her a meal Chad cops him a good feel
You give up your seat She's sucking chad's meat
On Micheal Flynn resigning due to his conflicts of interest with Russia.
Thats a win for fake news. Shame really. All we can hope is for no dominos.
Women groom beta providers as children
I remember growing up in school, adults would always tell me to stop worrying about being friendless and girlfriendless. Even in HS I was told to focus on my studies so I could make a ton of money and get a woman in my 30s.
They were literally telling me to become a beta provider as young as middle school.
WELL FUCK YOU WOMEN, FUCK YOU. I'M GOING TO KEEP MY MONEY AND SPEND IT ON ANYTHING BUT YOU.
[OP of "Option 3 please"]
Transcription:
digraph path_to_anarcho_capitalism {
start_here -> liberal_democracy;
start_here -> seasteading;
start_here -> leftist_dictatorship;
liberal_democracy -> ancap [label="Gain power by winning a free election"];
seasteading -> ancap [label="Sweet, you’re already there"];
leftist_dictatorship -> military_dictatorship [label="Oh shit, coup d’etat"];
military_dictatorship -> liberal_democracy [label="Reinstate democracy, but not before physically removing a lot of communists."];
military_dictatorship -> ancap [label="X number of communists pushed out of helicopters equals percentage of government shrinking into non-existence"];
}"White men with Asian women crying about white genocide yet they are by their own definition, committing it en masse. If the white race disappears it will be hugely in part by these "white nationalists"."
Think, as a man it is possible to impose sexual intercourse on a female. Not in the context of rape, but women cannot force sexual intercourse on man, for he would just go limp.
As a man, there is less attachment he feels to his children than a woman would. Women spend 9 months creating a strong emotional attachment to their baby in the womb, and experience the near-death pains of childbirth. Men do not. Thus men can simply walk away from the relationship and go impregnate someone else if want to act like irresponsible boys. In terms of white genocide, it is white females who they are protecting.
So White-male means White men putting a dent in the Asian population, as it disrupts what would have otherwise been an AMAF relationship creating Asian children. White people are the actual minority in this world, as only 1/9 of the population is white. They can never hope to amass a population as Asian people, the most populous group have. "One less Asian in the world," is what these white nationalists think. Even better, they think, is having these Eurasian children spout alt-right beliefs as it makes them feel safe knowing their children are deaf, dumb, and blind.
As Whire males often vacation in the Philippines or Thailand and impregnate vulnerable local women, what they do is create economic and emotional stress on a group with few resources to begin with. For example, abortion is illegal in the Philippines due to a strong Catholic tradition so these single mothers must birth and raise their children and this forces them to forego the opportunity cost of raising themselves out of permanent poverty. This keeps the Asian community down.
White male-Asian female is not creating white genocide, it is preventing it.
"No, it isn't. What separates us from animals is culture. That's it. Without culture, we're just animals. So might as well just go extinct just like hundreds of animal species go extinct every year. Why bother?"
Exactly wrong. It is by expanding the gene pool and cross-breeding more varieties that prevents us from going extinct. For example, the Asians can benefit from the White's tolerance to lactose, while the Whites can benefit from the physical fitness of Blacks, and the Blacks can benefit from the femininity of Asians for their women. Once you blend all of these qualities together for a few generations, you end up with super masculine intelligent men, and super feminine graceful tempered women.
Have you ever directly benefited from a woman's action?
After that Varg quote I've been thinking, are women completely useless outside of sex? Women are essentially useless and devoid of any substance or value.
They can't even enjoy doing something that isn't moving them higher in the social ladder. Every action they make is to improve their social standing.
Supposedly women exist that are capable of thought but I have yet to meet one.
Do women understand that no one likes their personality and that attention and compliments they get about anything is just because of their cunts?
Of course they do. On some level they know they are vapid, they just get to suppress it and rationalize they aren't. As long as men keep on validating them the illusion persists.
That's why they are so upset about men seeing them as objects. I mean, it wouldn't even occur to any man to think his whole humanity is in question because some girl wants his dick, to think like that you need to be seriously doubting it yourself.
Women live on whiteknighs and beta orbiters, Chads reap the rewards. Cause they can excuse being used for their cunt in their fwb relationship as long as so many guys just love her sense of humor and intelligence.
Lol, no one does. You all know it. If you were male no one would give you time of day. You'd never have anything relevant to say. You'd never make anyone laugh. No one would ever call you interesting or stand talking to you for more than few seconds. You'd have no friends. Your posts would get no likes. Other men would hate you, including all your beta orbiters who are really just friends and only caring and loving because of what a great person you are - no, they'd kick you out of the group for being annoying. No one would ever ask you questions or find your anecdotes fascinating. No one would find your quirks cute.
If all of you turned into men you'd be a group below incels cause you wouldn't even be able to stand each other. Even your adoring dad would see you as a disappointment. Suddenly those suicidal tendencies would have much higher success rate. And still no one would give a shit.
Friendzone: Guy v girl edition
Guy:
Told that women desire sweet, caring, loving romantic guys and that friendships build and develop solid relationships. He follows this and get friendzoned repeatedly while the women go for chad and players who just use them as cum deposits. When he points the hypocrisy out, he's scapegoated as "a manipulative asshole who was "pretending" to be nice just to fuck her; typically by frustrated women who failed to snag Chad in a ltr. He goes home to LDAR.
Girl:
After friendzoning the guy that actually cares about her and in an attempt to snag Chad in an ltr. She'll agree to be his fuck buddy, hoping her sex is great enough to get him to commit. In the beginning she'll pretend to be happy to be his booty call but soon she'll start hinting and demanding they do stuff outside the bedroom. When Chad reminds her what they are, she runs off to cry to her friends and whiteknights that he was "using" her for sex. They all call him a jerk and an asshole and that she's special and he never deserved her. Chad doesn't care that much because he quickly adds a new girl to his harem.
Conclusion: No matter the situation, men will always be blamed when things don't work. The difference is being physically attractive and popular will always get you women no matter what.
What's the point in getting your own place when you're incel?
So I'm pretty stoked about this job offer I just got. It's in my field, which I enjoy, and pays very well for someone my age, and even for someone 10 years older. When I start working I'll easily have enough to move out.
I don't see much point though. My parents are completely open to me living with them, and getting my own place would be nice but would cost so much money. Around where I live a nice 1BR is commonly 1500-2000 a month, which I can afford but would feel stupid wasting all of that on rent. It would not help build my net worth at all, it would just enrich my landlord.
The only reason I see to getting my own place is if I was having regular sex with women, because living with my parents would make it awkward and unpleasant. But because women don't find me attractive, this probably won't happen. If I move out, all I will have is an empty apartment to come home to. My parents can be a bit annoying sometimes, but definitely not to the point where I would pay thousands a month to avoid them.
So it seems like the cost/benefit of moving out just doesn't work out in my favor if I'm incel.
What are your thoughts?
"Men just want me for sex"
Most girls have nothing else to offer but their vagina. They expect the guy to do all the work in the relationship - ask her out, pay for the date, think of funny and witty things to say, compliment her, do favors for her, have a car and job while it's acceptable for her to be NEET, etc - while she just has to exist.
She deluded herself into thinking the guy is with her for her amazing, totally non cookie cutter personality. In truth if a guy wanted a good personality he'd just chill with another dude. The only reason why guys put up with all the shit involving dating is the prospect of having sex with a female.
Any guy who pretends otherwise is being dishonest.
How is the concept of a "nice guy" insulting to the female?
I'm certainly not one, I'd personally rather die than validate a cunt.
But we are talking about someone doing you favors (+) because they want to have sex with you (+).
Can't get much better than that. I get that the female might not what to actually have sex in return but it what sick twisted universe is this insulting? Fucking retards.
Personality is eternal proof that you were once ugly
Women want a guy who is not only good looking, but has been good looking his entire life. If you were an ugly teenager, but a good looking adult, women won't want to mate with you because even if you are good looking now, women don't want their offspring to be ugly during their teenage years.
When a woman meets a good looking man, how does she make sure he was not ugly during his teenage years? Then answer is social skills. If the man has poor social skills, that means he was too ugly during his teenage years to have any friends to socialize with.
[Commenting under "Congratulations /r/Physical_Removal on 1000 Helicopter Pilots!"]
We must secure the existence of our helicopters and a future for physical removal
(I think I said it right, correct me if wrong)
On the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling unanimously to keep the travel ban suspended.
When Trump ultimately wins the case he will have the political capital to impeach all these judges.
45D intergalactic shoots and ladders
All marriages should be arranged
Sluts are too stupid to choose a partner for themselves.
An underrated cause of inceldom is having a unique face
Studies have shown that people tend to be attracted to people who look similar to them. If you have a unique face and aren't male model tier in looks, almost no woman will find you attractive. I notice that a lot of incels are very distinct looking as in there aren't many people that look like them. Try observing couples on the street and you'll notice a good portion of them look like they could be related.
"These deluded cunts live the most privileged, pampered lives of any group in human history and they go through it thinking they're oppressed."
No the fuck they dont, they understand they are in awesome pioneering unchartered territory in terms of how good they have it, they view the feminists before them like jesus on the cross who died for them the only difference being they get to experience heaven right now. The oppression thing is just a big act to keep things the way they are. They aint that dumb. The enjoy talking oppression because they see it as a fun mental game to put over men and a sure fire way to uphold the current bullshit.
Women think they can be excused for acting like spineless peasants just because theyre female and therefor 'inferior' , but only when it suits them. Best to just put them on dog leads. They will exploit and abuse every opportunity they can because after all theyre not really capable of being honorable of dignified. The arab world understands this. Theyre just slimy slug, ferret, toad fucks in dresses with big mouths and lots of makeup.
[From "I am James Allsup: conservative writer, YouTuber, and Students for Trump veteran who was assaulted outside Deploraball; AMA!"]
From MightBeANovelty:
Based on your experience, what is your opinion on the Physical Removal of Leftists from a society? Can a society remain peaceful with leftists and communists?
Reponse from jallsAMA:
I really Hoppe that happens, so to speak.
Reponse from TheGreatRoh:
Holy shit! Another Hoppean! Meme Magic is real.
Reponse from jallsAMA:
Praise kek and fire up the helicopters.
N.B.: jallsAMA is James Allsup
I found the guy that my crush was cucking me for
After doing tons of detective work, using clues from things my crush (the obese girl with hairy arms) said, I finally found the guy she is going out with. It was hard to find the guy because my crush's friend's list is private. But I'm 100% I found the guy now, because my crush is on his friends list, he has the same unusual first name, and all the details about him match up with what my crush said about him.
The guy was some fat Mexican guy that looks and dresses like a drug dealer. He has a shitty pube beard, and his dress style reeks of 2005 white trash (Vans shoes, Volcom hoodie, Zumiez cap). His job is he is glass blower for making bongs. His FB page is full of 420 memes.
I was really shocked because she seemed like such a good girl. She comes from a well-educated family. Her dad is an engineer, her uncle is a medical doctor, and her sisters all go to prestigious universities. I myself am an engineer with a masters degree and an exciting and highly paid job at a prestigious laboratory. I am also physically fit and musically talented.
It's really eye opening to me that she cucked me for this piece of trash. Looks like I am significantly uglier than I thought.
Chads aren't Chads anymore
Women have a serious "grass is greener" syndrome. I think with each generation they try to push the envelope more and more, like a junkie taking stronger and stronger doses to get his fix. Chads are on the decline. Any woman can have a Chad at any time, so that has become too comfortable and boring for them. I think soon women will want average or ugly guys because that would be pushing the envelope for them. I could even see at some point them not even being attracted to humans anymore and will only have sex with animals, insects and plants. Hell, maybe someday they'll only have sex with hand sanitizer.
Thinking of starting a gaming youtube channel where I torture, stalk and kill women in video games
Would have some commentary, probably no facecam though. Seems like a niche that could be pretty successful.
A look inside stacie's life
Stacy wakes up and she checks normiegram, normiebook and her dating sites. She got 400 likes on her photo on Instagram, Chad commented "thick" the beta orbiter commented "Gorgeous" and her friend Katie pm'd her asking if she hooked up with Chad. She replies "yes he was so good" Stacy and Katie blew 2 chads together the night before, they are good friends. She checks her dating site and sees 2 guys who she fucked in her inbox, she rolls her eyes and blocks them. They were attractive, but they were bad in bed. She has 70 new messages and only 3 of them are chads. One says "dtf" the other says "you trying to hangout?" And the last one says "want to grab something to eat" Stacy thinks to herself hmm.. maybe I can fuck all of them today. She puts on some dry shampoo, makeup and she is ready to meet Chad #1 now. She goes over to his house, Chad says she looks nothing like her picture but that's ok. Stacy laughs hehe you're so funny, Chad makes some bullshit small talk and she just laughs and eye fucks him. Chad fucks her in the kitchen and she is off to meet Chad #2. When Chad 2 opens the door she says "omg your so tall hehe" Chad says she is just short and he greets her. After drinking some of chads cheap ass champagne, they get 2 minutes into Netflix and chill and she is trying to suck his dick. While she sucks his dick the door opens, Chad?!?! It's not what it looks like! Says Chad. Stacy runs out of the apartment, the adrenaline feels good. The next day chads girlfriend forgave him because Chad said he will make it up to her; Chad said he will try out bsdm with her. Stacy is off to meet Chad #3. Chad 3 takes her to red lobster, Chad sees her looking at the most expensive meal on the menu and he is thinking "this slut better not fucking order that" he then suggests something cheaper and he says it's phenomenal. She smiles and says okay. Chad is feeling a little spontaneous today, so they go fuck In an empty parking lot. Stacy goes home and writes on Twitter "it was such a long day" and "I'm lonely anyone want to cuddle?" Her ex comes over and they fight and then they fuck. After that they cuddle, watch some normie tv shows and smoke some bowls.
I hate every woman
These deluded cunts live the most privileged, pampered lives of any group in human history and they go through it thinking they're oppressed. An average woman will look at an average or below average man and think "he's so male privileged, I wish I could have the kind of status and respect men get just for being men, life is so easy for them" and at the same time "omg did he just hit on me? does he think he's actually on my level? id never date that ugly dork, why can't men like that just know their place?". They use double think constantly to believe they're more oppressed than us but also still so above far above us in status that we should never expect them to be interested in us. To any woman who reads this, I hate you and your dirty, used up cunt.