Specific Claims of the New Chronology:
- Historians and translators often “assign” different dates and locations to different accounts of the same historical events, creating multiple “phantom copies” of these events. These “phantom copies” are often misdated by centuries or even millennia and end up incorporated into the conventional chronology.
- Archaeological dating, dendrochronological dating, paleographical dating, numismatic dating, carbon dating, and other methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts known today are erroneous, non-exact, or dependent on traditional chronology.
- No single document in existence can be reliably dated earlier than the 11th century. Most “ancient” artifacts may find other than the consensual explanation.
- Histories of Ancient Rome, Greece, and Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy – mostly on the basis of documents of their own making.
<...>
- There was no such thing as the Tartar and Mongol invasion followed by over two centuries of yoke and slavery, because the Mongols so-called “Tartars and Mongols” were the actual ancestors of the modern Russians, living in a bilingual state with Turkic spoken as freely as Russian. So, Russia and Turkey once formed parts of the same Empire.
- This “Evil” Empire was governed by a double structure of civil and military authorities and the hordes were actually professional armies with a tradition of lifelong conscription (the recruitment being the so-called “blood tax”). The Mongol Horde “invasions” were punitive operations against the regions of the empire that attempted tax evasion. Tamerlane was a compilation by German historians of Russian and Turkish warlords.