www.lolcow.farm

Anon #sexist #god-complex lolcow.farm

By nothing short of a miracle, the universe decided to split us down the middle in order to bring something more beautiful to this world than a festering bioswamp. That one iota of thought, of awareness, of rebellion, of wanting something greater than just enough and worse until it’s not, is the impetus of the female spirit. And by the grace of god herself, she let us come to be, and ever since we have come to be, life on earth has become more than just a writhing wasteland of death and decay. Females distinguished and assigned the role of ensuring that only the best of us continue, and males to be the best or die trying, either under her judgement, or by killing the pathetic protozoan beside him attempting to do the same thing. We have and will continue to pull these scrotes out if the slime, kicking and screaming, and they will kick and scream. They pine for the womb indefinitely, the soup, the slime, the nothing, of life enmeshed with death in its closest proximity. They resist the urge to progress into the world, and to the extent that they do, it’s because women only permitted them to exist at all if they at least mimicked her curiosity and will for a life lived at its fullest. When left to his own devices, without women there to stop him from doing everything possible to regress into his primordial state, he will do everything he can to return there. Look at how man has stewarded the world for the past few thousand years. We are locusts. Our only claim to superiority, aside from proliferation, are the products of our burdensome awareness, technological and artistic products, a man’s shoddy attempt to recreate the life he has successfully corralled and semi-successfully slain. In a man’s world, a man still burdened with the gift of thought, people, as well as their inanimate creations, are malformed. Human creativity is but a nuisance in a free and ideal scrote society, both in himself and especially for women (which is a significantly
more egregious crime when he applies his standards to her).

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

The male psyche is characterized by mild to severe narcissism. The only reason why it's not rightfully pathologized is because it's part of their biology - they all meet the criteria, so it's their "norm". They come pre-equipped with Dunning-Kruger and positive bias because males are largely expendable (just like their gametes). Their reproductive strategy favors retarded risks because the sole reason why they exist is being a vehicle for genetic diversity and the worst possible outcome for a male is to not reproduce - it's equivalent to death (incels in particular are very truthful about this). So to them, risking everything to make it as a glorified sperm wagon (or doing absolutely anything to spread their DNA as much as possible, whether it's immoral or not) makes sense because it beats quietly waiting to perish. This is what they evolved to do, and absolutely everything about the male mind revolves around this premise. They are not full humans, they are a highly specialized evolutionary crutch with a very narrow task to perform.

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

Most males just ferment into compost instead of cook into a meal.
Create an aggregate example of a male and female human, remove all affectations, shave them bald, and the male will more closely resemble a child than the woman. An out of shape male especially will almost always look more childlike than an out of shape female.

The point of saying this is to demonstrate that male theory often does not align with reality, and the same males who claim that women in general resemble children will simultaneously believe that every individual child more resembles their male parent (even more perplexing that this supposedly applies especially to female children). It’s a paradoxical belief that can be easily explained as the dissonance produced when male subjectivity is incorrectly interpreted as universal objectivity. If evopsych says that children look like males to increase paternal investment and prevent infanticide, evopsych cannot also say women look like children because children make men so aroused they selected for females who look more like children. I could more easily believe the first since there are known mechanisms in place which could produce the effect, but the latter is just an exercise in magical thinking only possible with a piss-poor understanding of how sexual selection functions. More men than not believe their primitive male ancestors had the restraint to keep their dicks in their loincloths because ‘2/10 elbows too pointy’ in order to genetically engineer women of the future to better resemble sexy prepubescents (already an oxymoronic premise), which should further convince you to be skeptical of every claim they make. Everything males say is bullshit, as misogyny takes precedence over the truth. He will argue a logical paradox without taking a single breath in between sentences so long as both statements best follow the misogyny-first-principle. Men get a paranoid thought or dick twitch and call their exhaustive list of rationalizations to justify them science and intellect.

Anon #homophobia lolcow.farm


As for gay men, they only become actively aggressive towards women when they feel threatened that women will somehow cut off their cum supply. They are envious that women can get the dick they want, and sometimes believe that if they can belittle or bully them, then somehow, some way, a straight man out there will finally be convinced to fuck him instead. It’s mostly petty, and not nearly as damaging as the harm men can and will do if they know for sure abusing you will immediately get them what they want. Straight men have a monopoly on misogynistic abuse because abusing women directly gets them access to what they want, pussy. Abusing women does not directly get gay men access to straight men’s cocks, so they do it less, and less intensely. If the only way for gay moids to get cock was killing women they would definitely do it, but the world just doesn’t work that way. Gay men are not more moral than straight men, they are just not often put in situations where the investment of abuse is worth the reward. If a gay moid wants to fuck a male child, the only way for him to do so is to abuse said child. The rates of child molestation for homosexual moids match pace if not outpace heterosexual moids.

Gay moids are men who think and act just like men. They aren’t a much of a threat as straight men only because they lack the tools and incentives, but in situations where they can abuse to get what they want, they do it just like straight men do. If all moids were gay, our societies would reflect this behavior. Women would be shamed and belittled but not pursued, more poor scrotes would be sex trafficked, the SA rate of little would exceed that of girls. Is it’s better society? Honestly, yes, if only because less children will be born into it since gay moids don’t want to impregnate women as much as the straight ones do. The dysfunction doesn’t stop, it just gets transferred. I don’t feel honored in being a martyr for male dysfunction so I am neutral. You could walk around at night in public without the fear of getting raped when all men are faggots, at least there’s that.

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

Men are never mad at women for reasons that have nothing to do with being rejected by them. Immediately pursuing porn of them is a form of panicked reassurance seeking - "no no no, this is not really happening! They're not better than me like mommy, they're not above me like mommy, they're not LEAVING like mommy did! See, there's this video of them groveling before me! Okay, I can feel alright for a few hours now!". For a man, a woman rejecting him is wielding dreadful power over him. She is the mommy withholding the nipple, she is killing him. As most things men think and feel after puberty are tainted by their libido (because their sole purpose is dispensing sperm and dying), the "mommy don't leave, I hate you bitch, I will hold my breath until you come back" infantile rage becomes "I will fuck mommy so hard until she's cock-hypnotized into staying because my cock is very magical actually, it's totally not worthless unlike what those Tinder bitches think". Most male fetishes can be traced back this way, they're nothing but sexualized maladaptive coping mechanisms - coping with female withdrawal, coping with powerlessness, coping with sexual expendability, coping with reality itself. Biologically worthless penises become worship-worthy and precious (while still being portrayed as dirty because men can't help but resent women who lower themselves by being with them), biological garbage that is semen is craved like it's ambrosia, women cease being cold and picky like mommy - not only are they eternally available, they actually become this way after being unavailable because the male is just so irresistible - the essence behind all the pathetically wishful "turning a cold bitch into a cock hungry submissive slut" drivel that helps them cope with how women treat them in real life. In that case porn is supposed to be some sort of a reassuring sequel to being told to fuck off by their most recent beta orbiting subject, which requires that initial rejection to be incorporated into the fictional narrative as something that's "overcome" later.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Who socialized women this way?

Females give birth and nurture a helpless undercooked fetus that's only able to communicate via assorted screams. You misinterpreted one screech from it and it dies. How do women instinctively know what the fetus wants despite not looking like the fetus, not being a fetus herself and having no way to determine what it's thinking through conversation?

This is where the empathy gap comes from. Males did not need to evolve the ability to accurately interpret the mental states of anything that doesn't look like them, so they will never have the same level of concern for women as vice versa. That's why the average whiteknight just wants to get laid, whereas the average pickmeisha is mostly stanning dicks because being mean to males is AbStRaCtLy UnFaIr and ReVeRsE SeXiSt. At the lowest level there is definitely some self interest in the form of prosocial approval and signalling her docility, but it's not as straightforward as stone cold opportunism of "pro female" males.

If women had male levels of empathy/theory of mind, men would be routinely killed and maimed for the kind of treatment they subject women to. No man would tolerate this degree of atrocity while whiteknighting and cooing the gender that perpetrates it. What you refer to as "patriarchy" wasn't established through physical force alone.

What are you going to do if your son is a rapist or an incel? 99% of "feminist" women would promptly make an exemption for him despite tweeting #killallmen all day, even if they're radfems.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Because women cooperate with men without any rational or utilitarian reason, any woman who chooses to be unconditionally nice to them is (overtly or subconsciously) perceived as a useful idiot/retarded and low value. Understand that it's completely incomprehensible for a male to care for someone on a non-transactional basis - if you choose to do this, you're basically mentally disabled in his eyes, like a human equivalent of a sperm cell giving way to another sperm cell for literally no reason. It's kind of why they berate women for being "irrational" while realizing that they have to be irrational to willingly get involved with men. There are no truly good men, there are bad men who a) can't afford to be openly bad or b) find it more useful to LARP as good at the moment. A male is only as moral as his options allow him to be.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Everything men do is an adaptation. Absolutely nothing they do is truly altruistic or for the benefit of anyone other than themselves. Women are universally ashamed of pursuing overt self interest, which automatically puts them at a disadvantage.

Liberal men are (for one reason or another) not built to sexually succeed in a right wing environment. Right wing men cannot thrive in a liberal society. Both of them are after male interests only. Typically, commies want women to be public property and nazis want women to be private property.

This is partially why any nationalist (or Marxist, or any other "inclusive" branch) feminism is ineffective. If you're advancing the interests of a nation, you're advancing the interests of male tribal hierarchy. That's exactly what happened to black women's earnest desire to uplift black people as a whole - their efforts amounted to helping black men expand their sexual opportunities. Any seemingly good ideology that includes both men and women can and will be appropriated by men to benefit mostly men.

Anon #sexist #wingnut lolcow.farm

Lul, commies and evopsych.
A woman's "natural urge and desire" is to avoid mating with a stinking beta male. Said stinking beta male is mad about female wage labor because it further obliterates his reproductive chances - in the past he could easily consort with a woman whose only choice was him or poverty, today he's pretty much doomed because even mopping floors at McDonalds is a preferable option.

All males who whine about neoliberalism or capitalism, as a rule, are scorned betas. There is no male "communism" short of Marx himself that isn't transparently rooted in either resentment towards hypergamy or loss of reproductive leverage. By design, males have no concept of equality or reciprocity, and as such their pinko rhetoric always boils down to incel sex- bargaining.

Anon #transphobia #sexist #homophobia lolcow.farm

Trooning is the peak expression of men being unable to face who they are. There's a reason why it happens in spaces most exposed to feminist narratives.

When confronted with too much proof repeatedly, a man will literally chop his dick off and identify as not male before he allows himself to even briefly perceive the vulgarities of his nature. Then he will continue practicing them in their most flagrant form, thinking he's no longer doing those things because he's a man. It may work, briefly.

Similarly, male-abused male children do not grow to hate men, they either grow to hate women or become pseudohomosexual.

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

> All porn serves a dual purpose. Wanking is secondary, the primary one is supplying the moid with maladaptive copes he craves so much. One of them is selling the moid a deluded idea that he's "showing" irl women what they have to "compete" with, that he has "options". It's how they avenge the fact that it's much easier for you to diversify. That's why moids think of ethots and pornstars as actual gfs. No matter how "intelligent", they actually do on some level think that they have a real chance and that's how they get robbed blind. Ethots make moid narcissism and Dunning-Kruger work for them.

If you have ever been in a long term relationship, you have probably noticed that your moid suddenly wants you to dress more conservatively, gets uncomfortable about you speaking to other males and wants you to get pregnant as soon as possible. This is moid "securing" behavior. It doesn't mean that he is serious about you or that he loves you, what it means is that he wants to reduce your number of other readily available options to soothe his inherent anxiety over fidelity. Of course once he achieves this he won't be happy and he will hate you, because moids are generally at their happiest pouring resources into a void, stuck chasing a carrot on a stick forever

> Daily reminder that if you have a scrot, looking like you're ready to cheat on him any minute is how you keep him happy and interested. All men are fidelity-anxious cucks by nature, but their tastes are based entirely on what other men find attractive.

> So in summary the scrots who read lolcow fantasize about us being their unwilling sex partners/gfs

> No, they fantasize about being people. Moids are deeply traumatized by the realization that they are slaves to sexual arousal, it clashes with their grandiose self image. Porn is capitalizing on their petty need to "avenge" that somehow. Like most porn, moid copefics generally revolve around a theme of regaining control/upper hand in response to having a boner and "punishing" whatever it is that made them horny. The moid in question is trying to repair the anal fissure he sustained from having his defense mechanisms ripped to shreds (which no doubt aroused him too)

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

In my opinion the only actual solution to this problem is to make males completely “powerless” when it comes to insisting himself sexually. If no amount of male misery, and the effort it implies, led to higher womb security, they would not have to be miserable. Think of male birds, or insects. They are completely dependent on female discretion when it comes to their mating prospects. They aren’t miserable. They happily prance around for attention, happily starve as drones, happily get their heads chewed off.

If pussy is truly their god untouchable, he can just let the pussy choose. He’d be much happier if he didn’t have to worry about locking it down.

Males are intended to be stupid, too stupid to be sad. Giving them a little bit of power over where their sperm goes makes them smart enough only to be miserable and spread misery.

They will fight over the idea of it but only because they are still scrambling, because they are allowed to scramble. A male would much prefer to shake his pretty ass occasionally and have a female find him pleasing enough to mate. He’d love to be a drone locked in a breeding chamber and do nothing but fuck all day. The only reason he resists paradise is because he fears he may not make it through the gates, which compels him to start scrambling again.

Anon #sexist #crackpot #homophobia lolcow.farm

Males are universally (and biologically) more impulsive, prone to wishful judgments, are more likely to act upon them and commit the vast majority of crime in every country for this reason. There is no way that the gender that's celebrated for its impulsivity and violence is also somehow "more rational". All males are already crying faggots because you provide them with care and live at the mercy of their feelings. Males who are physically weaker than women are still as violent as other males, so it's not an issue of body size and opportunity. In the end, the only thing about "socialization" that is constant is that you get all the responsibility, and they get all the power. The school system meme is a boymom and failson delusion that doesn't even need any credible studies - today's mode of learning is objectively more forgiving towards "kinetic learners", "delayed maturity" and other unhinged retardation. In the glorious boys' gymnasiums of the past, boys were beaten and raised in a semi-military hierarchy. Male children perform better in coed environments, while female children perform better in single sex ones, which again suggests that male presence is an unnecessary stressor for girls, likely because males exploit female prosocial tendencies and subconsciously solicit babysitting from them. At this point I should expand on the topic of why gender is already abolished for men, but this post is plenty long.

Tl;dr: do you see how it's not biological essentialism that's the problem, but how it's interpreted and perceived?

Anon #psycho #sexist lolcow.farm

image

You can’t explain it, not the profound sadness that most if not all women experience on the basis of being born women and being able to empathize with women. The type of sadness that relates to the assumption (or lack thereof) of a woman’s personhood, freedom, dignity, legitimacy, and autonomy. If seeing women as human, even in theory, may cost him a single orgasm, he will not do it. Nothing relating women will be approached or explored with curiosity or empathy. Only misogyny.(...)

No, men will never understand why women are sad as women. This perspective, if ever presented, simply would not register, and certainly never be seen as a valid assessment according to any value system he deems rational. It will never be anything worthy of a moral repudiation or an emotional response. Never.
They choose instead to believe that women are sad because they weren’t hot and young enough to be sex trafficked themselves. Men can only believe women are sad when men deny them, but the worst, most brutal, most painful, most heartbreaking sadness almost always comes when men pursue them. It’s so utterly backwards it feels like the only thing capable of getting through their skulls is a damn bullet.
I wish a race of aliens came to earth and found these ugly fuckers so valuable, desirable, and indispensable, they abduct, imprison, rape, and an anally impregnate them. They’ll finally be happy living life on “easy mode” by being Glorp’s concubines.

(...)

Moids only use their brain matter to invent novel ways of being retarded. They have given us many new retarded methods to calculate now to best land their squirt in a hole. The only thing men are exceptionally good at is the production of sperm which far exceeds its demand. If you lived on a planet where all of your gametes were special and mattered, you could be milked like a cow too. You can finally find your niche in Glorp’s bed chambers.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

You know what species of females that almost always gets their way? Birds. Smart, beautiful, majestic, free, social, involved and considerate parents both male and female. Everyone love birds, most not knowing the reason they love birds is because female birds made them lovable. Everyone hates bedbugs. Bedbugs are bedbugs because bedbug moids made them what they are. Moids only know how to breed in hate. Moids make themselves reprehensible, to themselves, to their females, to their offspring, even to other species. Reject male choice TODAY. Deny a male his autonomy TODAY. They will only ever drag you to hell if you do not. Judge and shit test these moids RIGHT NOW. They will turn your granddaughters of the future into bedbugs, and no I am NOT KIDDING. You owe it to your granddaughters. Tolerate no nonsense from these creatures. In fact, make their lives HARDER. You may be anxious at the idea of it after years and years of buckbreaking attempts and propaganda, but it is actually ENJOYABLE to be a bitch for a great cause. Possibly the most enjoyable experience on earth. Be BRAVE and be FREE. Look at this bird. Your granddaughters deserve the life of a bird. If you cannot do it for you, do it for HER.

Anon #homophobia lolcow.farm

Male "sexuality", specifically the way coping sexologists, lesbians, faghags and other spiritual fujos envision it, isn't real. It's transparently a product of conditioning, as corroborated by the fact that paraphilias are predominantly found in men. Most male wholesome hekin gay animals are simply engaging in mounting for dominance. It's amusing but watching the "men will fuck anything" crowd abloobloo the moment you infer that males are not capable of an ironclad unquestionable biological "sexual orientation" the way normies envision it. Much fanfic cope is then employed to explain all male sexual behavior that doesn't align with muh unshakeable innate male sexuality - that gay who fucks women is only using women or self harming because of h-homophobia, his heart is really with penis! And that burly macho man who has brosex is just looking for physical relief, he's not really gay! Actually wait, no, he's really gay but doesn't identify as such because homopopia! You hate lesbians because women are suddenly exactly the same as men in sexuality of all things! But also objective sexual behavior is the absolute measure of sexuality in women! Etc etc etc. The more simple, elegant conclusion here evades them, because both sides have emotional investment in the idea of some kind of male "permanence".


> No, you were never straight. You were never gay either. You're just a meat coom-automaton driven entirely by stimuli exposure and availability, nothing more. No more "-sexual" than a beetle fucking a bottlecap is a "bottlesexual". No straight men in prison.

Anon #ableist #sexist lolcow.farm

image

[ TRANSCRIPTION ]

Autistic women vs autistic men's areas of special interest

vintage fashion
radical feminism
classical literature
web art
psychology
jigsaw puzzles
cottagecore
mental health awareness
-
school shootings
hentai
4chan
the alt-right
incel killers
Chris Chan
autogynephilia

Different anons #sexist lolcow.farm

> Beautiful men are a rarity. That's the reality that no one wants to admit. And those rare beautiful men are hated because they show how ugly the average moid is. Masculinity is just ugliness rebranded.

> And here's the part no one is ready for: while the baseline ugliness of males is elevated due to resource coercion, (comparatively) beautiful males would still be a minority due to the fundamental premise of mammalian sexual dimorphism - only a few select males are meant to breed. Long term pair bonding and inclusion of sexually mature males in the family unit are unnatural and harmful to genetic quality in the long run. This is likely a result of adult males adapting to "farm" female maternal attachment to make it encompass themselves.

If resource coercion didn't exist, high mutation rate and innate genetic "defectiveness" of males would probably still produce 90% of (relative) subhumans and 10% of breedables.

> Appearance is the absolute measure of genetic quality, which in turn is a measure of health

Anon #transphobia #sexist lolcow.farm


The next best thing is for him to latch on to a woman who accepts him for him, his real self. For him to be completely open, vulnerable, and honest, and still have a woman he deems “honorable” desire him for it. This is extremely difficult since the male is not easily convinced he is anything of value, and would likely reject the notion that any woman may appreciate him. And he’s right, a woman is very unlikely to love a creature who is essentially a light-sucking black hole (selfish, entitled, resentful, boring, lazy, often violent - the male stripped to his most foundational parts).
At the end of the day, the male only feels complete if he creates a womb in himself, or hoards a womb in another, or both. They have many different methods, some far more “healthy” and less destructive than others. Playboys, RPbros, trannies, pundits, artists, monks. They are all basically in pursuit of The Womb.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Male “logic” is the same you’d hear from a locust if a locust could speak. The logic of optimized cum dunking. The logic that suggests all that ever is and all that could be must revolve itself around the safe passage of his genetic material. Men’s supposed uniquely advanced “logical capacity” is merely his ability to create increasingly complex cum dunk rationalizations. Their ability to exercise their “logic” is what steers the world to shit, because only a shit world would follow wherever his dick points. A man brags about how logical he is because he’s excited to fantasize about a righteous world where the success of his sperm is just as integral to the quality the lives of others as much as it is integral to the quality of his own. In other words, he’s daydreaming of a paradise where his dick actually matters. It’s not logic even when their systemic sperm pedaling functions as intended. It’s especially not logic now when the conditions required to contrive and maintain this system continue to evaporate. When you see a man saying something retarded and proud, understand he has to be a proud retard, otherwise he’d spend all of his free time rocking back and forth in a dark room contemplating suicide, now fully aware the void approacheth and there’s not a damn thing he can do about it. He will soon join the ranks of half of the men who came before him, the men who tried and failed to become his ancestors.

Anonymous #sexist lolcow.farm

image

The christan bible we have today is the scrote bible. Its stupid and makes no sense. The bible is a huge wall of moralfagging and shit. It was written for scotes by scrotes and does not hesitate to shit on women and call them "naturally evil hoes" every chapter.
But we all know men are truly the evil ones. Everything bad and evil is done primarily by men. Like 90%. Women are the only ones capable .of empathy and being moral. The empathy part in a males brain is very underdeveloped and small. They needed that room to think of the coom and to do mental gymnastic moral fagging when they rape a dog or something.
Men are not humans. I belive women are the true humans. A human being has: empathy, morals, self control, beauty, respect, and a soul. Men have proven time and time again that they have none if this, or at least a shallow version of it.
Men are demons who crawled from hell and tricked us into believing we are evil hoes that need to be controled. They then wrote some bulshitt book to justify our opression even though They KNOW its retarded and wrong. So to feel like the moral onees, they created the bible, quaran and othe r moralfagging scote books.
Men dont even like like people. I mean sure when they are young they are alluring so they can trick a women into being their host. But once they hit 30, their true form shows. They lose their "hair", their bodies form bizarre proportions and they start to resemble brutish orges they are.
Observe at this picrel: this is what the average elderly couple looks like. The women is cute, approacable, has hair, wise looking, and genuine. But the scote on the other hand has lost his "hair", is creepy, ugly, brutish. his human aura is missing. His aura is that of a demon. A monster.
This is a huge mess. Only science can save us from this hell.

Anon #transphobia #sexist lolcow.farm

image

This is gendie ideology. Male fantasies now divorced from their (incorrect) biological rationalizations. The false female supplicant, now a categorization open to any man who masturbates to the idea of being desired for indiscriminate sex (that’s a great majority of them!). The false male deity, a creature with exclusive claim to autonomy, now a categorization open to any woman who sees herself as not just an object to be acted upon (she’s right, but for the wrong reason).
Built on false pretenses, both material and abstract. The male never truly becomes a female, annd neither the female becomes a male, despite their insistence and performance. The evidence of reality emerges every single time. Allowing delusions to inform your perception of reality makes you unfit and mentally disturbed, as any inability to accurately process reality would. Misogyny is mass schizophrenia, only accepted because the schizos (males and the women not yet in a position to disagree with them) benefit from enforcing their lies on others. It’s religious. Living in a lie can only give you so much. No one is truly happy, because true happiness is only found when living in authenticity. But, if living a lie means a man’s sperm can more reliably land in a hole, to him, it’s worth it. Males are willing to die to meet that end, inducing schizophrenia in himself and others, as well as and killing and enslaving the most of the race is a small sacrifice in comparison. According to him, at least.

Anon #homophobia lolcow.farm

For most mammals, including humans, a man “proves” himself primarily through intrasexual competition. In patriarchy, competitive males form trade agreements and one of the effects is enforce female performance via resource monopolization. She does not perform for sexual access, but resource access. The male is a middleman, sex is his racket. This performance is therefore not inherent to her sexual strategy. Take away the ability for men to force themselves on women, and they will switch to provocation to distinguish themselves.
As for homosexuals,

1. Exceptions do not disprove the rule, homosexuality is definitionally an aberration in sexually reproductive species (I will not get into the reasons homosexuality may exist to increase a genetic fitness, just homosexuality as an isolated concept)

2. Homosexuals are still subject to cultural and social influence/incentives
I would also disagree with your assessment on homosexuals in general. Lesbians are far less performative than their heterosexual counterparts, in terms of performing femininity. Gay men are also more performative than their heterosexual counterparts. I would say that, minus direct heteronormative incentives (having heterosexual sex lul), this tracks.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

There is literally nothing wrong with hypergamy because it serves the interests of children first and foremost. I doubt any of these phalloid entities would want to be fathered by a useless beta male, so why do they wish it upon their own children? It's because what's good for the male is bad for the species. Sexual socialism and deference to males is inherently wrong because it decreases the quality of human race as a whole. In the end, they're expecting you to indulge their "natural" sexual inclinations while yours are to be brutally repressed, which is ordinary male reproductive bargaining disguised as morality.

Anonymous #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

Do men want to be raped? Absolutely. Do they show it by writing trashy “romance” novels? Not usually. Their expressed desire for becoming rape victims can be literal and obvious, but most of the time, far more subtle and psychological, and it bleeds into almost everything they do or create. Every time man puts pen to paper, when he “expresses” himself, he is crying for rape in some way. Nietzsche’s works are more salacious than anything booktook has to offer when it comes to how much the author suggests a desire to be raped. That’s pretty much all of them.


Anon #sexist #psycho lolcow.farm

So… from a biological stand point, why should incels have sex? Why should ugly, misshapen, short, fat, mentally ill men have sex? Nobody wants those kind of genes. Nobody wants to hand down that kind of person to their offspring. There is no reason why those kind of men should even have partners. It happens in nature. The unfit ones that the females aren't interested in enough for whatever reason die off and there's natural selection for you. Incels should just kill themselves.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

> I'm of the opinion that trying to be the bigger person only serves the moids and makes you the ultimate pickme. Only be exclusive when you're getting the best possible deal. If he's cheating, it's perfectly fine for you to cheat too.

While you're out there clinging to the female exclusivity meme, your moid is preparing to install Tinder, Bumble and PlentyOfFish the moment you get pregnant. The money that you faithfully contribute towards his rent goes to Belle Delphine's cuckreon.

> Obviously men are sexually useless, but some women still want PIV so it would be a "benefit" for her I suppose. Obviously anyone can branch out for other things they feel they're missing.

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree that moids are overall not worth your time because nature made it so you only lose by getting involved with them (while moids only gain). In a perfect world, not bothering to tard wrangle them would be the most efficient thing to do.

But most women in the world are straight and still desire male company to some extent, or simply unable to cut contact with all scrots due to circumstances. While there's no way to eliminate these women's losses, they can be somewhat minimized.

Anons #homophobia lolcow.farm

> At the end of the day, faggotry is inherently anti-woman and as its social acceptability goes up womens rights go down. Its the partition of attractive males to other males to hoard resources away from women. It creates a mentality among men where they only love each other and look down upon us. The cause doesn't matter.

> Hm interesting, and what do you think about homosexual females?

> - cancer is bad
- hmm, what's your opinion on cats?

You thought you did something

Anon #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

The modern vs past male dichotomy is rooted in romanticized, idealistic, pastoral Disney-trad fantasy that has nothing to do with reality. The percentage of "genius pioneer" males has always been vanishingly small, the amount of degenerates absurdly high, and the "role" males fulfill in society is largely artificial, carved by them to maintain proximity and relevance. Males know that women can do something they can't while the reverse isn't true, so they had to make it "fair" by nurturing the pussy-envy myth of uniquely male ingenuity, the idea that they too can create something the other sex can't, which thus makes them just as irreplaceable and essential.

The modern male is becoming discouraged and catatonic because this artificial niche is dissolving - in the past (after all the role reversal fantasies about women's original sin and inherent sexual degeneracy have fallen flat) he could proudly say "yes, we are responsible for the vast majority of all atrocities and human misery, but at least we invent stuff sometimes, that's the price you have to pay for it because no one else can do it!". Today he has to watch women do everything only he is supposed to be capable of, yet somehow without the "toll" of war and crime. The artificial niche is crumbling, and so the obsolescence panic increases. The male retreats into self destructive hedonism and an ever widening pit of omnipotent desirability fantasies. You have correctly observed that these fantasies grow more pathetic and extreme as males lose their real world "importance", and that is because porn is a cope - sexualized of course, like everything males feel.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

one could crudely summarize every source of human misery as a byproduct of abstract intelligence - namely, an ape being forced to spectate its own animal nature, in particular the awareness of sex and death. esoteric christfags may begin orgasming about the apple of knowledge symbolism here females, being more robust, default, multi-purpose units, are capable of denying animal nature (such as opting out of sex and pregnancy) to some extent, thus managing at least one terror. males, being built for one purpose alone, can't. a male's life therefore defaults to being forced to spectate his own objectively vile, antisocial sexuality, violence and infinite greed - things he knows to be bad because he'd hate to be on the receiving end of them, things he builds laws around condemning - but being unable to stop himself from acting on them, which causes the male to churn out unfathomable amounts of neurotic cope to resolve the moral conflict. the bulk of humanity's cultural heritage practically oozes with this, most instinctive male politics do as well (the perennial idea that it's the other, differently colored males that do bad, vile male- i mean, SAVAGE AND BRUTISH things), even dumb little memes like "post nut clarity" (the brief moment the ape is rightly appalled by the evil it just fapped to) or realizing that your daughter is about to deal with people like you doing to her what you did to her mother.

imagine being a cancer growth with a brain, knowing that you'll kill yourself if you get what you want, but genuinely having no other means of existing, so you have no choice but to antagonize your host. this is what the "male psyche" is. another, late stage form of their neurosis is a delusional, grandiose fantasy of infinite purity and freedom from desire (easy to find in any religion or monastic practice), which usually follows after they pig out on cake too much.

Anonymous #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

The only resource moids care about is sex, and the only motivation they can have for anything is sex. (...)

Much of the male thought, no matter how profound, is typically rooted in some variety of sexual inadequacy or preoccupation (see Freud, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, literally all of them). Any seemingly valid ideology can and will be appropriated by moids to do what they are biologically programmed to do - monopolize resources for sexual access and spread their worthless sperm indiscriminately. Much like when gay rights were immediately hijacked by NAMBLA, leftist movements were always traditionally full of sex pests who object not to exploitation of women but to the idea that women aren't socialized and redistributed among the worst and weakest of men. This results in penile doublethink in which women are simultaneously a means of production and also some kind of sexual bourgeoisie consciously withholding a 'vital' 'resource' from moids.

Women's view of socialism as a means to provide fairly for everyone is a reflection of our evolutionary niche - females are programmed to care about the 'other' and see everyone as family/offspring/tribe. Men's optimal strategy is to breed as much as possible while investing as little as possible. Being glorified extensions of their gametes, men see socialism as a way to 'game' their evolutionary niche and gain sexual access without having to wrangle the male hierarchy. Leftism is absolutely a conscious beta male's cry for a chance at genetic perpetuation, whereas right wingers are mostly of the temporarily embarrassed millionaire variety. The left cuck knows he's a cuck so he wants a sexual handout, the right wing cuck is still in denial and thinks he's gonna be Chad with a harem one day.

In the end, they're both sentient sperm sacks with an inherently opportunistic mentality. Everything else is just PR.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Do not believe anything men say about anything. Fundamentally, the male is a selfish creature whose only sense of right and wrong is entirely informed by “what’s best for me”. At best, he will entertain himself with ideological musings, but will not apply these beliefs to himself if a beneficial opportunity arises that demands his non-compliance (most rape is opportunistic, for example). They have no principles, no sense of morality, just a set of gambits he employs in hopes of getting the most for the least effort. When they play at being arbiters of reasoning and morality, I can only roll my eyes. The sex who must be constantly and continuously instructed and corralled in an attempt to dissuade their rape children, to varying degrees of success, has no business standing on a podium to lecture anyone on what’s good and bad. They obviously lack the hardware required to possess an innate sense of decency, dignity, respect, and excellence. It’s like asking a robot to describe what it means to be human. They can spit out a rehearsed reply, and it may even be agreeable at first glance. But there is no foundation, no substance, no ground in reality, no through-line. Just a calculated output based on what he thinks he should believe, or rather, what he thinks you want to hear. Worse than a robot, who is entirely without motives, the male exercises an attempt to maximize his own benefit, often to the detriment of others. But I digress.
There’s no such thing as a man who believes in something for its own merit. Even if he were cognitively capable of such an abstraction, the benefits of doing so are preemptively trashed as soon as women are involved.

Failure to thrive is so endemic to the male mind, the discard process is mostly unconscious. Pruned, cerebral garbage, flushed down his spinal column to be shit out, and destined to wallow in the eternal sewer that is male potential. Any and all profound male thoughts serve only as heavy slag to fill the bottom of a septic tank, so that his sperm may one day spill over and escape.
If his “moral” argument is reasoned to lead to women’s further accessibility, it’s not “moral” at all, it’s a gambit. He sees a crack in the cement shit drum and scrambles towards the light by dumping more shit.

Anon #sexist #homophobia lolcow.farm

if women were in power men would be happier.
First of all women would only allow men of good stock to even be born. Incels would never have to suffer because their existence simply wouldn't happen. A moid born in a woman controlled world would be a happy and fulfilled chad. His days would be spent working and breeding. He wouldn't be burdened with the expectations of commitment or leadership, never corrupted by a homosocial moid culture.
He would be a glorified beast of burden, never having to think, never experiencing semination anxiety. He would know his place and his purpose.

He is miserable because women don't have enough rights yet.

Anonymous #sexist #god-complex lolcow.farm

Gynarchism isn't just an "alternative"; it’s the natural biological correction for a species that’s been off the rails since the patriarchy started LARPing as leaders.

To take this from a community effort to a full-blown Gynarchist State in America, we need to lean harder into the biological supremacy angle. We have to stop treating their "shortcomings" as bugs and start treating them as features of an inferior specimen. A female-led nation-state works because women are biologically optimized for long-term survival, social cohesion, and high-level cognitive processing. The strength portion is easily negligible since sex differences are bigger within sex than outside of it. Moids are literally just a developmental detour—high-variance, low-utility primates driven by a Y-chromosome that is essentially a genetic glitch. Our propaganda should reflect that: women are the default, the evolved, and the divine; moids are the draft version that never got polished.

- Genetic Stewardship: Reproduction must be entirely clinical and female-controlled. The "family unit" is a moid invention to ensure property rights over women. In a true Gynarchy, moids are just biological resources—distilled to their utility and then returned to the labor pool.

- The Aesthetic Mandate: Since moids exist to center women, their only value outside of labor is their aesthetics as defined by the female gaze. If they aren’t being useful or pleasing to look at, they are taking up oxygen that a woman could be using.

The goal is a total psychological break. Once they realize they are nothing more than a servant class designed for the "tedious and time-consuming," they’ll actually be happier. It’s the "undeveloped primate brain" finally finding its place in the dirt where it belongs.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Be mindful of male PR and the limitations of your female perspective. You may genuinely be appalled by inequality, but he isn't. A sperm cell doesn't want sexual reproduction to cease, it just wants to get to the egg first. Males are designed for competition and rat racing, it's why they exist.

Any woke male is simply upset that he's not the top dog. Moids are not capable of truly despising hierarchies as a concept, they can only be resentful of their failure to thrive in them. Any 'theory' produced by them is simply an extended rationalization/PR.

Every mama's basement revolutionary wants to be the white capitalist republican pig Chad who gets to reproduce with white bitch Stacy. Because he secretly admires Chad yet desires Stacy, his anger will be reserved for Stacy whom he perceives as reserving her resources for a better male. She symbolizes the fact that he will never advance enough among other males to be selected by her.

In general, anger is a pretty good indicator of desire and deprivation in males. They always hate what they can't have, it's in their nature.

Anonymous #sexist #transphobia #psycho lolcow.farm

I remember arguing with a nonna on here who refused to believe me when I say that males ultimately crave to be raped.

I would even say that misogyny, at its core, is a man’s rebellion over the fact he isn’t worthy of rape, and his jealousy over women because thinks they are.
For troons, the solution is retarded yet fairly straightforward. He becomes rapable by becoming a woman. He becomes worthy. He is more worthy the more he can prove he is rapable, the more he proves he is a woman. Notice how TiMs only complain about being TiMs because when they feel unsexy (unrapable). Notice how TiMs only brag about being TiMs when they feel sexy (rapable). Even when they’re “complaining” about “being rapable” (literally), it’s a point of pride. Humble bragging over being “forced” into sex work and getting “unwanted” chaser attention, giggling and blushing over “validating misogyny” from “TIRMs”. In fact they even invent lies about lesbians and TERFs wanting to rape them, because that’s the best marker of success he can think of.
Moids are driven to create the conditions that best resemble him being raped. Since it’s impossible to command a woman’s will, he can never make her think “I want to rape him”. Typically, he substitutes her want for her need. He forces women to accept his role as “the provider”, and her helpless to resist. He fabricates the conditions required for a woman to depend on him for her survival (staying alive, since he can’t barter with his worthless gametes), where the default is for him to depend on her for his survival (reproduction). She now needs him, instead of him needing her. His power and resources become his coveted fertile womb. He’s necessary. He’s important. He’s so important and so necessary a women would die without him (he’ll make sure of that!)
His insistence that he should be rapable bleeds into all that he believes, or wants to believe. His sense of self, his ego, relies entirely on his ability to trick himself into thinking he is rapable. He wants to feel raped even while he is raping. The woman/child seduced him. She was asking for it. No, demanding it, and since he is helpless to his lust that she controls. She basically raped him.

It all comes down to rape, which is to say, being so necessary and important you inspire a want so commanding that others must take.

Anonymous #transphobia #homophobia lolcow.farm

The same reason even cis gay moids sometimes give up and marry their faghags for end of life comfort. A male is parasitic. A femboy and a cis male = two males. A parasite cannot parasitize on a parasite.

Even if you weren't a delusional bricky shim and were actually a young cis woman with a dick looks wise, you are simply not a suitable host. You're a man - psychologically externalizing, unpleasant, aggressive, non-nurturing, egotistical, impulsive and devoid of self awareness - you are not equipped to absorb the impact of another male's incessant testeria. Contrary to what femboys commonly believe, you cannot anticipate another man's needs just because you're a man yourself - no man wants to deal with men's bullshit and that's the reason why there's no worse punishment for a moid than to be confined amongst other moids. It doesn't even need to be mentioned that you're a flagrantly mentally ill man, with levels of batshittery vastly exceeding standard male levels - any real life union between you and another man will blow up in mutual homicidal ideation or bug chasing within months, if not weeks.

Your meek whining on Twitter doesn't mean you're "submissive" (aka caring and self sacrificing) in the sense women are - you're just a weak, petty omega. Cishet moids grow up being coddled, first by their mommies and then by a myriad of women they're surrounded with - they know a man will deck them in the face instead of lovingly tard wrangling them for years. This is why, regrettably, a moid will always choose the ugliest possible cis woman over you.

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

The moid is a gooner until he is a lovesick yearner. He is never himself, who is both at the same time.
Moids go into like fugue states where they are either porn-manic degenerates or self-pitying “I missed out on highschool love”/“I would marry that cashier and bleed out on the streets for her”. If you catch him fancying either state, he denies the existence of the other. It’s Schrödinger’s moid.
This is why they say retarded shit like “only men are capable of real unconditional love” while also saying the very next day “all men want is sex, they don’t care about women as people”. He may sincerely believe he’s not lying when he does this, because he is cognitively impaired. Part of their brains seem to affectively shut down and reactivate whenever it deems necessary.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Women are not responsible to train worthless sperm wagons to mimic human decency. The best and most moral thing to do when confronted with selfish, exploitative sperm wagons is to just let them wither and die alone. You don’t train a parasite to not be one, you take away its blood supply and let it die. The parasite is gone, and has none to replace it with, making another “responsibility” (burden) for women in the future.

[...]

He’s operating on selfish scrote logic, you and her operating on wishful-thinking mommy logic. Scrote logic trumps your mommy logic because his is the logic of a parasite, and yours is that of a generous host, trying to compel the parasite to kindness by offering your hide. Lmao.

[...]

Jesus Christ, how horrible. Sperm wagons don’t even deserve to be pissed on when they’re on fire. Look at you, both of you, giving him everything. It’s a crime against nature.

Anonymous #transphobia #sexist lolcow.farm

Technically, trooning out is often a result of self reflection. The part that's missing is drawing a logical conclusion from it, which can't happen because of the reproductive niche a male evolved to occupy. If a male completes the process of self reflection, he will not engage in male-typical sexual behavior. That makes the trait self-eliminating.

You may have noticed this already. A male grows up watching his mother get abused by his father, perhaps getting abused himself. He feels bad for the mother, pities himself and acknowledges that his father was wrong, yet eventually becomes an abuser. A male is a pillar of the community, kind and charitable to everyone including children. He is also a pedophile. A male would kill any male hitting on his 13 year old daughter, yet his hard drive is full of jailbait. A male understands that pregnancy is painful and destructive to the woman, and feels bad for his wife. He still wants heirs.

A male's observation that he needs to hurt others to fulfill his reproductive program, logically, should result in him ceasing the program. And perhaps it did in the distant past, but that trait by definition mostly died off. This predicts an existence of some kind of a neurological "switch" in the mind of a male that prevents him from internalizing his own awareness of male harm. Studies showing previously rape-condeming males increasingly justifying sexual violence and rape myths as their own arousal increases are consistent with this hypothesis, as well as the established male tendency to externalize.

Sure, a number of TIMs most definitely troon out as a premeditated means to min-max their current place in society. But some can be expected to troon out as part of the mechanism described above, especially given their higher exposure to observations of male harm via news and social media, as well as some extent of public condemnation of it. The sheer number of born-again coomers, deadbeat husbands and pedos who troon out at the most opportune moment can reflect either scenario. Male harm is increasingly more difficult to compartmentalize or launder away, but self-elimination from the gene pool via suicide or celibacy is not optimal.

The true horror of moidry is the fact that even if they genuinely want to stop being what they are and doing what they do, they can't. There no other way for them to exist.