In a post-Christian society, the revolution’s message is pleasure without limits, but unlimited debauchery has led to diminishing returns, a reminder that the hungry man appreciates food more than the glutton. <...>However, according to sexual revolutionaries, the fall of man began with Christianity, consequently humanity must return to a more civilised paganism; but although pre-Christian societies were highly sophisticated, so were their methods of torture and killing; their attitude to weakness was to trample on it.

The worship of sex is what Chesterton called a heresy — just one aspect of the truth, exaggerated to cover and control everything else — since although it is true that sex is natural and good, because created by God, when treated as the whole truth, it becomes a dangerous mania. Having children, the natural end of sex, can offer the unlimited joy of participating in God’s creation; but the only limit allowed by the revolution is family limitation.
<...>
Media reports about sex crime co-exist with pornographic imagery, although the two are seldom linked; however, the logical outcome of the Darwinian emphasis on Man as “just another animal”, coupled with “the right to sex”, is rape. The revolution implies that since sex is perfectly natural, there should be no barriers to it — except the barrier to that outcome which in the animal kingdom is the whole point of sex: procreation.
<...>
This Revolution has been portrayed as social evolution, but the revolutionaries may be going too far, too fast, exposing their masterplan as a “top-down” revolution aimed at controlling the population — literally, population control. Paradoxically, the endless quest for love is destroying the one who would offer unconditional love, if only allowed to live — the unborn child. But as the number of victims grows, and post-abortive women — and men — are “silent no more”, instead of “free love” we may hear calls for the need to free love, held hostage by false freedom.