Conrad #wingnut #psycho

Conrad #wingnut #psycho datasecretslox.com

Yes, I'm making an argument that we should make the penalty for drug dealing death. If they're people in the US, arrest them, try them, execute them. If they're foreigners on the high seas, shoot them with a hellfire missile, like we're doing now.

14 comments

Yeah this would backfire. B8g time. DARE would work better but didn't work at all. Yet is better than OPs idea

Several countries have tried that over the years. It doesn’t work, in the end it leads to more general corruption and violence as drug dealers are willing to do anything to avoid arrest. Absolute bans of anything that widely wanted don’t work and have a bunch of negative side effects.

Do you remember what Former President Duterte did? He did what you said, and it resulted in the death of innocent people and even people who got falsely alleged of dealing drugs.
So your idol is Duterte…YIKES!

Cool. Would this extend to the pushers like the owners of the company making the opioid at the root of the crisis in the US? Or will it only be applied to poor and/or brown people as usual?

@ShatteredGlassSkywarp #238824

They think narcoterrorism is bad now? Wait until those “narcoterrorists” are getting shot at just for existing within 500 miles of any drug, and they’ll see just how bad it gets.

Yeah that's really going to help. 🤯 We all have heard stories about people being executed in Asian countries for trafficking, usually the Mr Littles, and it doesn't seem to deter anyone else.

The only way I can imagine to short-circuit drug dealing is to legalize drugs. That would reduce the profit motive that drives the drug trafficking industry.

Not a great answer, because it would leave us with a huge number of addicts, but a great answer simply doesn't exist.

If they're people in the US, arrest them, try them, execute them.

I notice he didn’t say “if they’re guilty, execute them.” Seems like maybe an important part you shouldn’t leave out, I dunno. Also, what’s the exact definition of “drug dealing” he’s saying should earn people the death penalty? Are we talking about a “drug kingpin” like Pablo Escobar was, or even let’s say, the guy who sold crack to a few of the people I used to hang out with back in the day? Hell, technically, my best friend from high school was a drug dealer, since I once bought a joint from him for like 5 bucks, lol

@ShatteredGlassSkywarp #238824

Haven’t commented in years over but honestly can’t stand the straightedge voices all over without a counterweight:

1.Sobriety cult: Fuck that, you have your own poisons which you like? Go ahead, now if you overdo too much, you should have some gov agency to turn to for help. None of the cold turkey of Jeebus shite, though. There are people on this earth, who cannot do their day without some heavy drugs and trust me, you are no judges on their needs.

2. Not all drugs are equal and we don’t get enough of those comments. Pot is pretty much harmless, so are shrooms for most, booze, coccaina and tobacco are up to you and your own personality and should be legal, much like booze. Opiates, crack, meth, flakka, bathsalts and such and other highly enhanced shit that comes from them needs control.

3. To counter the idea, legalize, make help aviable, when needed and promote responsible use. Yes, it is possible even with so called “heavy” narcotics unless we are talking opiates or some other seriously fucked up comboes.

4. No prosecution against the users, you want to help them, then help instead: Ask the important questions, Are you sheltered? Do you have support? How the hell can we help you? Making complete abstinence any given condition for these programs is just wrong, medicine agrees. I’ve lived with some serious addicts, you cannot just make decisions above their heads. I am a loud and proud and unashamed addict myself(Stop using the word narcotics like an 80s ctp. Planet, Bacon can be a quite a deadly and addictive narcotic, courtesy of the whole south of the US of Fash these days).

5. Abstinence and sobriety should not be your societal goal. Conciousnes carries different challenges for each and every one of us, if you are happy to live it without drugs, I’m happy for you but let the hell off people who need a serious high to confront theirs.

PS. DARE did shit, the only thing it did was piss teens off with the hypocrisy, you were never allowed to fuck that lion with a middle finger and grab a doobie legally anyway, so it was just adding an insult to an already gaping wound.

Two words: Rodrigo Duterte.

Conrad: “Yes, I'm making an argument that we should vote for the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party! Because the leopards aren’t gonna eat MY face! Right?”

Yeah, where I come from Rodrigo Duterte tried that. Guess what? He’s been hauled off to the ICC.

Almost as if killing people for a mental condition doesn’t solve shit! Wow! What a revelation!

@Skide #238845

My point was that OPs idea is worse than DARE was. And really their method woukd cause more international problems while not solving the ones they complained about. I used to get stoned in 90s and do nit judge those that do so even if I choose not to anymore.

It sounds like the Nazis who executed their sick. Like others said, no mention of a trial, suggesting extrajudicial murder and false excuses to oppress people; Duerte is a rightful target of the ICC for these crimes. Because of the current US abuses in Venezuela, the international coalition part of Operation Carribe is compromised, Canada is reevaluating what to do to avoid being involved in those crimes against international law. Some Canadian technology is involved but activities under Operation Carribe may also unwittingly provide intelligence helping the US regime's crimes. This also means that this is among the events eroding US relationships with allies, among other Trump actions.

Conrad #wingnut #psycho datasecretslox.com

14 comments

Confused?