Glinner posting a trans man’s post-op bottom half without permission just proves that “Gender Critical’s” don’t see trans people being worthy of decency or respect. Ridiculing trans people for having procedures that has nothing to do with GC’s is unnecessarily cruel.image
The same people who want you to support “gender affirming care” are panicked and horrified you might find out what that actually entails. This is why they use these childish words. They don’t want you to know they cut off a slab of a woman’s thigh and sew it elsewhere.
8 comments
“The same people who want you to support “gender affirming care””
“are panicked and horrified you might find out what that actually entails.”
Grow the fuck up, bubbles.
Most people find surgery and/or the healing aftermath (usually both) to be gross. *Any* kind of surgery. I’ve seen people attempt to show pictures of surgery (usually cosmetic) to dissuade others from doing the same, as if the mere revulsion was reason enough not to do it. It’s kind of like how some militant vegans try to gross out omnivores to get them to convert, it very rarely works.
I suspect that there’s more to it than that, though. Perhaps showing the immediate aftermath of a first stage vaginoplasty to evoke “Look, you/they will be stuck with ugly freak genitals forever!” (I’m not going to check if that’s the case this time, out of respect for privacy) it hasn’t healed yet, and vaginoplasty is usually done in two stages, so it’s not finished yet. Regardless of the specifics, this kind of thing is fundamentally dishonest.
[Edit: On a re-read, it appears that this is a trans man getting a phalloplasty. Apologies, they usually go after trans women, so I assumed. General point still stands, though.]
<@KeithInc. > #166402
But smoking is wrong! Abortion is something to support, but do you think smoking is good?
@Roxas #166492
My condolences but smoking, as direly unhealthy is still a choice some people get to make. Obviously you can and should ban smoking in public places but inside their property, people should get to smoke(and do any drugs they wish to), as they want.
Why are you advocating for forcefully taking such basic freedoms to make unhealthy choices for yourself away? Do you want to do same with junk foods?
“Smoke weed not nicotine”
Some smoke both and yeah, you have no moral right to force “protect” people against their will in cases like this. Being a functional adult in the Western society means you have to live with people excercising their freedoms in ways you may throughoutly disapprove of. You shouldn’t even dare to think about banning these freedoms to “protect” others, you may think yourself a saviour but you’re only pushing nanny-glowed fascism there, my folks.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
