A DRAGONFLY DISPROVES EVOLUTION!😱🤯
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8o1zxWNE0SQ
10 comments
Well, thankfully the video was short.
That said, it is (apparently) some sort of engineer stating that because humans can't, at this moment, make a good flying machine that mimics dragonfly flight, it obviously is a super complex designed creation.
Because that is always a great argument.
…and while reading Leviticus, count how many legs said dragonfly has, OP. Here’s a beetle, but it’s essentially the same just as a reminder:
image
Both disprove something: and it’s not Evolution, Eric.
…or is that redacted from your BuyBull as it disproves your own ’God’s Omniscience ?!
Being only able to count up to four. No wonder the Atheist Prof. Stephen Hawking was buried & memorialised in Westminster Abbey - along with Charles Darwin - by the Church of England, it shows one thing:
image
image
Doing so for he who showed he could do infinitely more than just count to Four but prove the existence of at least Eleven dimensions, said C-of-E values education .
No wonder they’re one of the biggest landowners in Britain - next to the Ministry of Defence - when they count schools in their property portfolio. That dragonfly, and it’s number of legs. Count ’em: if you have the education to do so.
Because your so-called ‘God’ can’t .
When even he can prove less than jack shit, ergo…!
@Chloe Dragonfly shaped? Doubtlessly. But based on other sort of biological based mechanical sort of things (from actual powered flight devices to even prosthetics) I will grant the idea that designing something meant to mimic the flight motions of a dragonfly is difficult.
Doesn't mean it's super special though, usually its just an issue of all the fine biological bits being super hard to make out of gears/sockets/etc and to be powered.
Eric Hovind disproves human intelligence!😱
Watchmaker analogy fallacy and Intelligent Design pseudoscientific religious arguments like Specified Complexity and Irreducible Complexity. Ignorance about the mechanisms that allows diversity and adaptation to many environments. Also, there is actually evidence making improbable the intervention of an inventor. Organisms are more complex than needed for a particular "task" and their evolution history leaves evidence, not only via morphology and fossils but also their DNA, the DNA of their mitochondria, etc.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
