“I have a reason to use the word “anti-theist” rather than atheist.”
Sure you do, sweetie.
“The person who would hold to traditional atheism as a belief system”
What system?
I don’t believe in any gods. That makes me an atheist.
Done.
“is insistent that no compelling proof exists for him to believe in God.”
In any gods, frankly.
“The atheist claims to be neutral when considering the evidence for the existence of God, but his “neutrality” is disingenuous, because he absolutely has no intention of abandoning his atheism and submit himself to God if and when that undeniable proof for God is discovered.”
OOooh, a telepath who knows more about my motivations than the average bear.
“Thus, in reality, the supposed atheist is against any and all evidence that would point to God.”
But this is all in your head, not mine.
“His attitude is one that is opposed to God as an anti-theist, rather than a neutral observer waiting around to see if God shows up.”
Again, this is your problem, not mine.
“I have a personal example of this attitude when I had an atheist challenge me to take his “god detector” test. … His response demonstrates clearly the true heart of the atheist:”
No, as an American, he suspects you thought up a technicality or a cheat, so he won’t commit to the results unless and until he can verify that they MUST indicate a god, not just you having a magnet handy.
“It is one that is opposed to God, rather than one honestly looking for God.”
OR, he’s honestly looking for gods, but the believers have lied to him before, or trickd him, or some other chicanery.
“He offered a simple test, but if the criteria of his test were actually met, then he would change the criteria until it was no longer a valid test in his mind and he would have a further excuse to justify his unbelief and rebellion toward God. Such is the heart of the anti-theist.”
No, you’re still projecting. There are other interpretations of his hesitancy.