“Atheist evolutionists are anti-knowledge”
Okay, knowing how creationists ONLY accept science they can fit into a literal reading of Genesis, they’re pretty anti-knowledge. Same way they don’t know anything about any of the religions on Earth, including Islam, Wiccan, Buddhism, except that they’re all Satan-worshipers, they’re anti-knowledge.
Being labeled that way by those mud-fuckers is not a terribly useful attack.
“Atheist evolutionists like to label those who believe in creation and reject ToE as being anti-science.”
Demonstrably.
“But there is something greater than science. It is called knowledge. Knowledge includes more than just science.”
That part of knowledge which is not subject to scientific evidence and analysis is called ‘Superstition.’
“Knowledge can be attained in the natural and the supernatural.”
Not reliably. There’s only one electricity in the world, but there’s 50,000 supernatural interpretations of the World.
“Supernatural simply means beyond the natural, just as supersonic is beyond the speed of sound. Atheist evos such as Dawkins want to restrict science to the natural."
That’s the definition of science. Not anyone’s opinion.
“But this excludes any knowledge available from the supernatural.”
BY choice, by design, by nature…
“Therefore, the atheist evos want to limit knowledge to the natural and exclude knowledge from the supernatural.”
So that we can repeat it to other people, and depend on the observations, without having to invoke the great Gitchee Manu for test results.
“They are therefore anti-knowledge. Narrow minded.”
HAHAHAHAHA! You should have started with a definition of knowledge, then. And a definition that includes myths, fantasies, and made-up-on-the-spot justifications