So this means that science is also a "godly" process of knowledge discovery, so there should be no problem with accepting facts discovered about our origins too?
And "I like big butts and I cannot lie" is "godly" because they cannot lie and big butts are divine, obviously.
But does any crackpot claim also come from "God"? As others pointed out, if there are contradictions in "teachings" does it mean that it's a deceptive deity? The claim that "he" cannot lie is itself conflictual.
For me, because there is lacking evidence for the existence of any deity and that humans have created many, it is more plausible that no knowledge would come from a deity. This also explains all the contradictions, which you can't just deny away if being intellectually honest.
Let's consider the Eden fall stories of Genesis mythology. Humans "created" with the will to be free and with curiosity are tempted with an irresistible fruit that they're forbidden to eat. This setting alone, other than an "omnicient deity" that could be able to predict anything, appears to show a deceptive deity. If you claim that they fell due to Satan, YHVH was still powerless against it or could not predict it. Or it was YHVH's deceptive machination, perhaps having fun with his little puppets.
Then there's endless apologetics literature in attempt to justify that somehow that's all rightful and "he" would really exist but meanwhile we're still suffering waiting for "his" intervention that just doesn't happen, ever. Being told that this is all part of a big divine plan to prove that Satan was wrong, while at the same time claiming that the devil rules the world, doesn't satisfy everybody, it's a self-defeating justification of evil, suffering and lack of divine intervention.
Also convenient that the forbidden tree was the one of knowledge, which would possibly expose that deities were human-created? Thus the human would become like a deity or do away with imaginary deities, realizing that we must deal with reality and legal codes and that only humans can design and run the process? We could wait forever for more magic rules from the sky to miraculously appear, but that only happens in mythology, too. Thus any ethics is also human ethics and that always part of the human condition from the point where great apes had a large enough brain to consider these matters of complex social animal living.
What we really have is communication, culture and tradition. This also explains all the problems with the scriptures and the fallacy of appealing to them as ultimate authorities. Afterall, we can even know how those traditions formed and were transmitted. It also explains why we divelop knowledge that exceed and contradict ancient humans and what their elites promoted and preserved with scripture, literary traditions (and before that, oral traditions).
Alternatively, realizing when one is naked is "divine knowledge"? Isn't hiding knowledge that could be attained deceptive? Isn't a mythology about such innocence that we're unaware that we're naked, metaphor? And what of people still living naked? What of ethics not demonizing nature and sex?