“It's the male instinct to have sex with as many women as possible, any way possible. Just because women don't want to have sex with me, doesn't mean I don't want to have sex with them. But you will never see me grab a woman's ass at the grocery store and start fucking her. There's laws against that which represses that instinct.”
No, sweetie. Laws do not repress instincts.
THe fact that your actions have predictable consequences do influence you to weigh the pros and cons of acts that your instincts suggest, but they’re still your instincts.
“Yet, the female sexual instinct is not similarly repressed. Their instinct is to have sex with the most dominant/good looking/criminal males they can possibly find.”
Which, even if true, is not illegal, as long as it’s consensual.
“That shouldn't be allowed.”
Why not? I mean, really, any reason at all other than you being butthurt that no one wants to fuck you?
“Queue some fat landwhale or effeminate numale telling me it's not comparable, because in the first instance I am violating someone's consent and therefore their rights but in the case of females, they are not violating anyone's rights because "muhh freedom of association".”
Um, yea. And it’s ‘cue,’ not ‘form a line.’
“WRONG. Let's explain why:
So let's say at some point I get tired of paying taxes and I just stop completely. Most people(with the exception of anarcho-capitalists) would say that's a crime and that I should go to jail for it. But who am I really hurting by not paying my taxes?”
Gotta stop you right there, hoss. Laws against drunk driving are NOT based on harm you actually do to other humans or property. It’s an attempt to prevent harm before it happens. It gives the cops the right to stop you before you actually wreck.
If you don’t pay taxes that you owe, you have broken the law and need to be prosecuted. Same as any other law. Your entire premise of who-is-harmed is fucked.
“Similarly, the female is not hurting any one individual when she chases degenerate men like criminals and douchebags.”
She’s not hurting anyone at all if she’s having the consensual.
“When women are whores for evil men, they empower them and hurt good men by depriving them of much needed affection.”
Nice try. They’re still not breaking any laws, just your hypothetical heart. Following this logic would have Christains blocking any other religion since that ‘harms’ Christainity in general. And vegans blocking all meat products for the harm to the biosphere in general.
“Further, men will themselves seek to emulate evil behavior to be sexually successful,”
So, you believe women give it up for evil, you would choose to be evil for the pussy. That’s at least understandable. But i think every single ‘coming of age’ TV series had an episode where the father told the kid, ‘Why would you even want a girl who wanted you to be like that?’
“making the situation even worse.”
If you’re that close to being evil for pussy, you’re going to be evil afterwards to get more pussy. It’s not a behavior that should be rewarded. Ideally, we would not give pussy to people who are evil by nature, but you’re claiming you’d be evil, knowing it to be evil, intentionally.
"When they are whores for only attractive men, they skew the natural equilibrium.”
There is no natural equilibrium, or else you’d be getting laid.
“Eventually, there is an inflated sense of despair and resentment in society, not to mention degeneracy, and society itself will collapse.”
Keep telling yourself that. NO one else is going to believe that you have to get laid or the stock market will crash.