“Denying God takes effort.”
Really? How much effort do you put into denying Loviatar, the Finnish Goddess of Agony? Or Zeus? Or the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
“So the claim that atheists/evolutionists make that there is no proof of God is bogus.”
All the evidence and arguments I’ve been offered for any god are equally uncompelling. Either they only work for presuppositionists or they work equally well for ALL gods.
“In order to deny God atheists/evolutionists have to:”
And right there, tying atheism to evolution, shows that you’re an idiot. What follows must be a strawman.
“1) Make up another story for the origin of man”
You accuse evolutionists of making up evolution.
Um… Yes. But only because of the evidence for it, not to deny Ki, Summerian Goddess of Nature.
“2) Changing history and inventing a new history of the Jews to claim that the first man wasn't Adam. That takes a great amount of effort.”
No, we just discount religious myths. Like what’s-his’titan stealing fire from the gods. Next.
“3) Making up new events that happened in Jerusalem to claim that Jesus didn't show his divinity through his words and actions.”
By ‘Making up new events’ you mean knowing that the gospels were written sixty to a hundred years after the events they supposedly witnessed? Yeah, that’s not a big effort.
“4) Spending thousands of hours trying to figure out how the earth was formed,”
So, you accuse scientists of doing science rather than memorizing a myth.
Yep. You got us. Uh-huh.
“5) Trying to figure out why all the disciples and apostles would give up their lives for a lie.”
THe motivations of myth characters are not really important if you’re not doing literature analysis.
“6) Claiming there is no intelligent design using contradictory claims that chance causes cause-effect in the universe.”
You don’t realize that intelligent design proponents support evolution, do you?
“7) Claiming that energy can be converted into mass when energy doesn't contain mass.”
Contain? Do you NOT KNOW what the word ‘convert’ actually means?
“8) Claiming that sex between humans is bestiality because they claim that humans are animals;”
That’s a connotation you’re adding because you understand bupkes.
“or claiming that bestiality is sex between humans and animals, but denying that sex between humans is bestiality even though evolutionists claim that humans are animals!”
Actually bestiality does not cover ALL sex with ALL animals. You’re just having a tantrum.
“9) Atheists claiming that they know better than eye-witnesses what happened at an event that atheists themselves didn't witness.”
You wanna claim that whoever wrote, say, Matthew in the late first century was an eyewitness? Why? I mean, based on what?
“10) Trying to explain the sedimentary rock layers all over the world in any other way than a flood including a world-wide tsunami.”
Geologists doing geology is not the god-denying effort you claim, either.
“11) And even with all their effort, no one has still been able to explain the existence of the first living organism, the first plant, or living being. Yet atheists refuse to admit God's existence.”
Atheists can say ‘I don’t know’ without shame.
“So the above scenarios are deliberate denial of God because they take a tremendous amount of effort to conjure up.”
It just burns your ass that we’re living life without that much concern for your superstition, doesn’t it?
We simply MUST be in desperate denial, rather than just moving on.
Kinda like i stopped trying to work out how much time Santa saved as midnight passed over the sparsely populated Pacific, to cover his actions over London and New York and LA…
Meh. Not an important part of my life.