@GabrielLaVedier #25963
Jesus fuck, what crawled up your inordinately tight, pedantic, supercilious ass and died? Arguing Semitic semantics is fucking stupid just as a base level. And misunderstanding "hey, fucking stop being shitbiscuits just because the UN was stupid about dumping people places" makes you look like a fucking asshole.
Ugh, and to think I just used to nod along because your name was nice. Fuck off, yourself.
Really, Gabriel? Is this how you want to play it?
Fine. Let’s play.
The only thing the man you have graphically insulted did was correct Swede, and he did so well. Yes, the term ‘anti-Semitism’ has a commonly accepted usage, and that is “prejudice against Jews”. This is not anti-Palestinian. This is simple fact, nothing more. You will notice that he didn’t attack Swede, he didn’t argue that her opinion is broadly mistaken, he merely made a couple of polite corrections.
And you, my friend, flew off the handle as if he personally insulted your mother.
I’m not even going to go into your claims regarding history, or the unadulterated idiocy of a statement like “Ugh, and to think I just used to nod along because your name was nice. Fuck off, yourself.”
@GabrielLaVedier #25963
Because you short-form shat on two people for the crime of being insufficiently pedantic about semitism and wanting consultation before you violently beat and murder people off a patch of land they were living on. It wasn't okay when whitey did it in America, and no religious manifest fucking destiny makes it okay out in the desert. Why are you supporting land grab claims coming from the Big Book of Multiple Choice, asshole?
This does not even make sense.
1) No, he only corrected Swede’s use to what is commonly accepted as a definition of what anti-Semitism is. This part did not address DLaurier at all. It also says nothing about his opinion on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
2) @GabrielLaVedier #25963
wanting consultation before you violently beat and murder people off a patch of land they were living on.
Where, oh where, did Bastethotep ever argue for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians? You have the ability to search posts on this site. Go on. I’ll wait.
Hint: The answer is never.
DLaurier, however, has unambiguously argued for the ethnic cleansing of Israeli Jews both in the past and the present. This is actually quite easy to prove, simply by searching for their old posts on FSTDT.
You went ballistic for no reason at all, you misrepresented what Bastethotep said, and you put words into his mouth. Meanwhile, you did not say a single word against somebody in this thread who unambiguously, openly called for ethnic cleansing.
I have to say, these two posts have opened my eyes quite nicely as to who you really are. As with DLaurier, I’ll ask you to please continue. Go on, I’d like to hear more of the filth coming out of your mouth. It’s nice to know where people stand.