www.identitydixie.com

Harmonica #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "Notes on the Third Reconstruction"]

Previously, I took the view that there were three periods of Reconstruction on the South. The First Reconstruction began in 1865 at Appomattox and ended in 1877 with the withdrawal of the last Reconstruction soldiers from Dixie. The Second Reconstruction began in 1954 with Brown v Board of Education and ended in 1972 when George Wallace forced Richard Nixon to embrace an anti-busing position, something I previously outlined here. The Third Reconstruction began in 2015 with the Charleston Church shooting and is going on to this day, having picked up considerable steam in the past few months. However, the more I study, the more I am convinced that there are actually four Reconstruction periods. The first two Reconstructions remain unchanged, but I now realize that there was a Third Reconstruction during the 1990s, beginning in 1991 and ending in 2001. What I previously considered the Third Reconstruction is actually the Fourth Reconstruction (our present situation).

The true Third Reconstruction began in 1991, one of the most important years in human history. It is this year that the Soviet Union fell and Marxists had to abandon their economic focus and shift fully to the Culture War – embracing anti-racism (anti-Western civilization), feminism (anti-masculinity) and the alphabet soup identities (anti-procreation). It was also that year that, with the fall of the Soviet Union, globalism was left unchallenged . In the U.S., 1991 would also see the emergence of the Clinton takeover of the Democratic Party, completing the transformation of what was the pro-worker, pro-Dixie, virtually Christian Democratic Party of my grandfather to a party that was willing to sell out workers for free trade and celebrate infanticide. And, more directly related to Dixie, it was this same year the NAACP issued a proclamation condemning the use of the Confederate flag.

Part of the reason I didn’t think the 1990s constituted the Third Reconstruction was how idyllic that time period appeared to be when I was growing up. It was a world where the Old South still lived, Confederate flags were commonplace, and we still had men like M.E. Bradford with us. “Unreconstructed” was a compliment in those days. But, as I have studied the era with clearer eyes, I realize things were not as rosy as they appeared to be. It was a decade of several significant terrorist attacks, a ton of racial tension, and horrific school shootings just to name a few. It was also a time when the Republican Party began to win elections, outside the presidency, with some consistency in Dixie. While a surface level critique would suggest that this was simply the result of the national Democratic Party moving leftward and that Dixie just replaced conservative Democrats with conservative Republicans, the truth is much more complicated as there was a distinct difference between the conservative Democrats of Dixie’s past and the conservative Republicans of the 1990s onward. The former was a conservatism of a particular people and their preservation, the latter was a conservatism of corporate profits and military spending.

It was during the 1990s that these newly elected Republicans began to dole out the incentives to come to Dixie, under the auspices of “creating jobs” and being “pro-business.” It worked for a while, but with this job growth came new people that did not share our values. Until the 1980s, virtually the entire native population of Dixie could claim membership in the Sons of Confederate Veterans or the United Daughters of the Confederacy, now we’re being pushed out by newcomers to such a point that we joke if Atlanta is even still in the South, and how in Florida the farther south you go, the further “north” you get.

[...]

Now I see that what occurred in the 1990s helped create the political climate of today and what victories we did gain was merely an illusion. We lost because we allowed the subtle subversion of our culture to take place, the fruits of which are being felt today. I liken what happened during the 1990s to AIDS. When the body is first infected with the HIV virus, the person will have flu like symptoms for two weeks before they recover. That’s when the virus is working its way into the body. Years later, the problems really start as the immune system has been ravished. And, such is the case with Dixie (along with the rest of America). The battles we were fighting were small potatoes compared to what had gone on before, but it was even more destructive in many ways as it destroyed the long-term ability for Dixie to push back.

When future historians write about how efficient the Fourth Reconstruction was, I think the events of the 1990s will be seen as particularly important. Yes, I know the history of the Fourth Reconstruction has yet to be completed, but it isn’t looking good and that they were able to push things this far is remarkable and frankly frightening. It would have been unthinkable at any point in the past and it didn’t come out of the blue, it was simply the 1990s baring fruit. It was the era when we were promised that in exchange for assimilation, we could become wealthy. Far too many of our people took it, especially the politically well-connected. Due to the problems of that decade, Dixie was unable to produce a new generation of leadership to guide her during tough times, and boy are these ever tough times. The 1990s may have looked great at the time, but good times don’t forge strong men – were living through that now. The good news is that tough times do forge strong men.

Keep the faith. We’re not dead yet.

Tom Shackleford #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Belgians in the Congo"]

We’re not the only ones getting our history defaced and then destroyed. This pre-genocide process recently claimed a statue of Belgian King Leopold II, which after being vandalized, was removed by the government because he did racisms in the Congo. The government then issued a groveling apology to the Congolese President and announced a “formal investigation” into their colonial racism activities.

I spent a decade abroad, although I’ve only been to Africa once. I firmly intend to never do that again. I actually had an offer a few years back that would’ve involved relocating to Lagos, Nigeria. It was explained to me that expat professionals could live pretty well since the cost of domestic help was so low. I envisioned myself getting dismembered by an angry mob and immediately declined.

There was a church I went to where I was basically the only white guy and everyone else was an imported Filipino factory worker. The priest was from the Congo. Although everyone was speaking English, they were basically mutually unintelligible. It was pretty funny actually.

The Congolese priest was quite an amiable fellow. Sometimes, we would drink with each other in the evenings. He had some rather interesting stories. The gist of his take on his homeland was that Congolese generally aren’t up to very much, but if they get agitated, then well yeah, there’s going to be some rapine cannibalism. It was a fact of life kinda thing for him and he didn’t seem terribly worked up over it.

In another place, I had some associates from Malawi and Burkina Faso. This was quite a hot location, and in that sort of weather I prefer drinking vodka tonics. When I offered them one, a look of shock came across their faces. According to them, Africans who ingest vodka in hot weather put themselves at risk of spontaneous combustion. They figured this was self-evident science that I should’ve known since there were black people in my country.

One thing I’ve never heard from the Africans I knew was that their continent would be Wakanda if whitey hadn’t screwed the place up. This was long before that Black Panther movie came out, so maybe their opinions have changed. However, I doubt it because they were always clear on causality.

Even though they were from different countries they had rather consistent opinions on most things. A big one was that the people of their countries weren’t exactly industrious or well organized. They also shared an amazement at the sheer amount of free stuff that black people get in America. They pointed out that folks in their country do nothing and have nothing, but you can also do nothing in America and live like a king compared to Africans who don’t even have running water.

Joe Wasp #wingnut #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Political Parties and Counter-Revolutions"]

The fiery piece published by Padraig Martin on June 19th [Submitter's note: see here] inspires a fire unkindled in the Southern heart for a number of generations. A short but sweet entry, his essays proposes the long overdue idea of walking away from the Republican Party. Seemingly preposterous on the surface to cede political power to the Left, this could facilitate a monumental political move if undertaken correctly. The issue then asserts itself: Southerners simply have no idea how to foment a rightwing, political, and cultural counter-revolution anymore. This short piece provides an answer to Padraig’s rallying cry to leave the Republican Party and also addresses the idea of how the Right should respond to the leftist overthrow of Southern society within the modern age.

Unlike our current predicament, where leftwing radicals are actually engaging in revolutionary violence and with widespread impunity, it must be made clear that it is not the intention of this article to inspire or condone violence. Rather, that peaceful and legal counter-revolutionary defenses and processes must be implemented, and with great haste. Rightwing dissident literature does not have the luxury of an impartial review.

Every vacuum must be filled. Leaving the GOP will create a vacuum and genuine conservatives need a party to insert political capital and energy into. This necessitates the formation of a new party, especially in Dixie. The issue facing third parties is twofold: everybody still wants to cling onto political power they fool themselves into believing they have by voting Republican, as well as the fact third parties aim far too high. A third party must focus on local elections and aspire no further than state level elections.

[...]

One particular overthrow of a widespread leftist regime took place during the 1870’s. Every Southern state, via a myriad of means, overthrew the Radicals which had oppressed them politically since the passage of the Reconstruction Acts of 1867. The *only* way they managed to do this was through the *establishment of parallel institutions,* not simply voting at the ballot box. The counter-revolutions took place at local levels and prepared for gubernatorial elections, not presidential ones. This not only necessitates the establishment of a new party but the establishment of interconnections among those of conservative persuasion, while excluding malicious and volatile actors. This means establishing Orania, South Africa influenced colonies in Dixie and ensuring members of the aforementioned new party procure positions within the political system at the local level. Other noteworthy rightwing revolutions were the Wilmington Insurrection of 1898 and the Red Summer of 1919.

Southerners have obsessed over voting for Republican presidential candidates in order to prevent the lesser of two evils from occupying the imperial office since the establishment of the States’ Rights Party in 1948, a party which would have found great success at the local level had it stuck around after the presidential election of that year. A vote for evil is still a vote for evil. Recent events have necessitated third party establishment. Yes, these supposed parallel institutions need monetary funding, but that has not stopped them from taking place in the past in grave situations. It is time not only to leave the GOP but to also build something to replace it for our people.

Padraig Martin #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "The GOP is Not for Me"]

It is time to face a tough fact: the South has no political home in the United States of America. The Democratic Party long since abandoned the South. Its strategy is clearly aligned with (largely urban) minority constituents, sexual degenerates from across the LGBT+ spectrum, and Marxist indoctrinated cat moms. However, the Republican Party was supposed to be the conservative option. It was the retooling of a Dixiecrat bloc that shared some traditionalist ideological camaraderie with Yankee elites. That was a happy fantasy that has long since died.

Today, as monuments are torn down, our heritage is vilified, and politicians race to out-virtue signal each other on the backs of our deceased kin, the Republican Party – from Trump down – has proven that the South is on her own. It is time to walk away from that party. It is time to show those within the party that our loyalty to them comes with a price: loyalty to us.

Since the Republican Party has broken its agreement with the South, no self-respecting Southerner should vote Republican.

I am not suggesting you vote Democrat. They are in full-blown Bolshevik mode. I am suggesting you do not vote for any of them – period. Walk away.

For a long time, I have believed that the best path forward is a free and independent South. The South is the last Godly Nation-State in the West. Her people are overwhelmingly Christian. Her people have a rich heritage that is distinct from the rest of the United States. Much of that heritage – for good and bad – is often tied to a war for her own independence in the mid-19th Century and the post-war oppression of Reconstruction. These unique attributes and cultural idiosyncrasies define a unique ethnicity.

Southerners are not generically “American,” Southerners are Southerners.

The Irish Nationalist in me recognizes these beautiful people for what they are – a people worthy of her own destiny. She deserves better from a country to which she has given a disproportionate amount of her native sons to the beaches of the Pacific, the jungles of Vietnam, and the mountains of Afghanistan. Now, as monuments to her departed kin are defiled and destroyed, she deserves protection from the one voice to whom she empowered to be her protector through the vote: the Republican Party.

And how has the GOP honored the South’s unwavering commitment to the party? Silence – at best.

The recent riots throughout the United States, perpetrated by Bolshevik extremists and antifa terrorists, are an indication that the country is lost forever. It is hard to imagine that anyone can re-piece this jigsaw puzzle together.

[...]

Instead, we got Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott groveling to the family of a man who was robbing a pregnant woman weeks before he was killed. A Republican Senate that has its majority because of the South, just voted to rename historic bases that honored Southern heroes on Southern properties. We have a Georgia House Speaker, Republican David Ralston, is now spearheading “hate crime” legislation that would effectively make it illegal to voice an unpopular opinion. The list of anti-Southern actions by Republicans grows daily.

At almost every turn, Republicans are betraying the very Southern voters who put them in power – all to placate a mob of violent radicals in the hopes that they may be able to hold onto approximately 10% of the Black vote in future elections.

[...]

I still believe Southern independence can be achieved through a peaceful separation of states – but not with the GOP as the vehicle to implement that change. Conservative, Godly legislation throughout the South on matters such as religious liberty, abortion, and pre-pubescent transgenderism would stand in such stark contrast to that of ungodly, leftist degeneracy in the North and West. Such a stark contrast would eventually force an amicable divorce. Even Bill Maher seemed to agree.

[...]

Do I believe the Left will take advantage of such an opportunity if we gift them a super majority? Yes, I do. Might some believe I am a political accelerationist? Probably, but images throughout the country indicate accelerationism is already here, and the GOP has done absolutely nothing to stop the country from being destroyed by antifa terrorism or state sanctioned anarcho-tyranny. In such an environment, I would rather we face the devil in front of us than the one stabbing us in the back. And the Republican Party stabs us in the back at every turn.

Harmonica #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "The Spanish Distinction"]

I recently finished reading The Last Crusade: Spain 1936 by Warren Carroll, it’s a history of the first year of the Spanish Civil War written from a traditional Catholic perspective. Unlike secular historians, Carroll covers the religious motivations of the Nationalists during the war in a more serious way.
[...]
One of the strengths of Carroll’s book is that it discusses the realities of the battle for control in Spain. He describes how unlikely a coup would be successful. The Popular Front took control of the Spanish Navy, traditionally the most prestigious of the branches of the Spanish military. They used the Spanish Navy’s humiliation in the Spanish-American War as a pretext to upend it (oddly enough, Franco was from a traditional naval family, but the decline of the Spanish Navy convinced him to join the Army instead). Too popular to dismiss them entirely, the Popular Front then proceeded to make sure the most conservative, Nationalist generals were deployed out of mainland Spain. Franco, for example, was deployed to the Canary Islands. To stage a coup, Franco would have to find a way to get to mainland Spain from the Canary Islands without naval support.

Fortunately, the Republic overlooked the power of aircraft, mostly because the technology was so new at the time.
[...]
It’s a great story, but it is also a sobering one. Nationalists in the United States are in a far worse position than the Nationalist Right of Spain in 1936. If you have been on social media for the past several years, you’ve no doubt heard someone talk about the possibilities of a new civil conflict. The Normie-Right usually takes comfort in the hope that, “the military will have our back.” On the surface, it makes a lot of sense. It is a sentiment I once shared. I have since changed my mind. There are several parallels between 1930s Spain and the modern U.S. A key component is the exploitation by the Left of a historic and humiliating defeat to take over a traditionally rightwing institution, the Spanish Navy in the first case and the American military, as a whole, in the second. But, there are several differences and they don’t bode well for traditionalists in the American Empire.

For one, the American Left has been working on this a lot longer, and thus done a more thorough job than the 1930s Spanish Left. By 1936, they had only completed the takeover of the Spanish Navy. By contrast, the leftist takeover of the U.S. military has been far more effective. If you ever want an example of this consider the differences between the early 1990s and the late 2000s. When Bill Clinton tried to repeal the military’s ban on homosexuals in the 90s, the top brass fought him tooth and nail, eventually forcing the “don’t ask, don’t tell” compromise. Flash-forward about two decades and the political generals have been in open revolt over Trump’s plan to ban transsexuals.
[...]
One of the most impactful actions Obama undertook during the early part of his presidency, and one that has largely been ignored, even by most of the Right, was a purge of the military leadership. Largely using the disaster of the Iraq War as a pretext, Obama dismissed the older, more conservative generals in favor of more leftist ones.
[...]
There is no element of the U.S. military that is overlooked. It is a seamless, interconnected series of services. Air has been an important part of warfare for over 100 years and its ability to carry cargo has greatly improved. The Left knows this and will not allow such an oversight to happen this time. The American political Left has grabbed control of all facets of today’s U.S. military. Members of the U.S. military cannot provide any private or public commentary favorable toward traditionalism or Nationalism, unless they want to be removed from the service. Rightwing enlistees and officers have learned to keep quiet and follow orders.

Considering the modern realities, an American Franco waiting in the wings to lead a rightwing coup against a leftwing government is pure fantasy. It almost feels like a secular version of Christ’s Second Coming, where the good guys are saved at the last moment. Yes, Christ will eventually come back. Yes, Christ promised us that, “the gates of hell will not prevail over my Church.” But, to hope for this is an incredibly poor strategy. Christ’s promise was to the global Church, not locally, and no man knows the day or the hour when Christ will return. Neither stopped several intense persecutions of Christians in the past 2,000 years and nothing will stop it in the U.S. either.

If your plans rely upon a savior from within the U.S. military, you are set up to lose. Likewise, if your plan is to hope an American Francisco Franco will rise up, you are setting yourself up for failure down the line. There is no American Franco coming. Don’t expect Trump to reverse this trend, either.
[...]
The history of the American military makes it sound like a ripe breeding ground for our own Nationalist Franco, but the fact is the military, or at least the leadership, has gone through a significant change and the Right must adjust accordingly. There is no Franco on the horizon. It is a sobering thought, but a necessary one. The political Right, and especially Southern Nationalists, must accept a stark reality: the military is no longer a conservative, Nationalist institution. It is now conquered by the Left.

Tom Shackleford #racist #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "The Protagonists’ Part"]

While watching the statue of St. Junipero Serra get pulled down to the cheers of a mob in a San Francisco park, the first thing that came to my mind was the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War. From what I’ve observed, everybody in our sphere had similar reactions.

Despicable actions committed nationwide with impunity aren’t a harbinger of smooth sailing ahead. My surmise is that we’re on stage “bad” right about now. “Very bad” and “worse” are yet to come. Most of us have reconciled ourselves to that on an emotional level over the past few years and now we’re starting to see how horror is going to play out in practical terms.

However, there’s an enormous group of people who don’t see things that way. Scientists classify them biologically as White Shitlib Idiots. To these people, the looting and wanton violence are reactions to a racist country which must be reformed. It’s for a just cause so it can’t be condemned.

Weekend social circumstances find me frequently in the company of such individuals. When discussing sensitive matters with them, I never refute their underlying premise because that would shut down the conversation and piss them off. I need these people to like me for various reasons which have to go unexplained.

The Great Cheeto is a bigoted dictator, blacks face systemic racism and police brutality, etc. I give them the impression that I’m on board with all that absurdity. That’s actually not hard to do since everybody around them is like them, so they assume that I am as well, as long as I don’t say the wrong things.

Over drinks, what I debate them on is why they think violence is an acceptable method of addressing social and political disputes. My point is that, historically, once this gets green-lighted, something that the people who initiated the violence will come to deeply regret (if they survive) gets set into motion. Weimar Germany and the aforementioned Spanish Civil War are two of the examples I usually cite.

[...]

I don’t suspect that a civil war is coming. That would require two sides who are allowed to organize in order to engage each other in combat. The only rightwing organizing for violence is done by the FBI for the mentally ill and disabled in order to create narrative headlines. I don’t expect any fight from the Right beyond lone wolves who snap.

But, we now have legitimated violence coming from the Left and a set of stiff penalties applied politically by the legal system against their targets. So, we don’t have anarchy since the police will act against people who attempt to defend themselves or property. However, a more serious societal breakdown which destroys what remains of our country’s 1st world functionality will naturally progress from this point.

In an implosion scenario driven by racial antipathies, White Shitlib Idiots will find themselves subjected to violence that they currently believe is acceptable when directed towards “white supremacists.” It seems pretty likely that many of them are going to find out the hard way that their villain status is determined by skin color, not their moral and sophisticated opinions.

When they’re getting yanked out of their cars to receive mob justice, I hope it flashes across their minds that this was what they supported all along. However, I could hope my life away so I’m trying not to bother.

Sonora Jack #homophobia #transphobia #fundie #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "Modernity’s Moloch"]

At the end of the month of March, the LGBTXYZ community celebrated their “International Transgender Day of Visibility,” which may or may not be some kind of holiday for ritualistic occultists. March 31st was dedicated to “raising awareness” and recognizing the struggles, “sucesses” (infringements), and daemon worship of the transgender community. Well, maybe not that last bit, not openly at least (for now).

The grotesque tradition began in 2009, and has spread to different countries and communities across the globe in the decade since then. The alarming speed at which they are normalizing this kind of thing is certainly enough to give one a degree of worry, but more interesting is the macabre, occult element that is rather undeniable, especially within the realms of entertainment and the high offices of the land.

Many are familiar with the name Moloch or Molech, even if from some kind of fantasy or sci fi trappings. Briefly, Moloch is the biblical name of a pagan Canaanite god associated with child sacrifice, specifically with fire. This figure is identified as Ba’al Hammon by Greco-Roman authors, equated with Cronus from the Hellenistic traditions. While some scholars suggest that much of the depictions of Punic child sacrifice to bloodthirsty gods is war time or post-war propaganda on behalf of the Romans, the attestations to Canaanite/Phoenician gods demanding child sacrifice in flame predates the Roman accounts by several centuries.

[...]

It would thus indicate that even among Hebrews, who had been commanded to turn away from such sacrifices by God, Canaanite influence was strong even in Jerusalem; Kabbalic traditions only strengthen these occult undertones. It may be hard to fathom, but there is sufficient coincidence to suspect that the sacrifices to Ba’al Hammon/Molech never quite ended. From the classical era unto modern times, the Jewish people have been associated with ritualistic cruelty and abuse of children, specifically those who belong to the populations they immerse themselves in, such as the “blood libel” controversey in Europe. While maintained that these stories and records are anti-semitic propaganda, there is a very odd and very inseparable bond between the Jewish diaspora and the mystical, the occult. Even the self declared atheistic ones engage in, or state admiration or interest in such things, even if guised as a hobby or eccentricy.

[...]

Which takes us back to the LGBTXYZ movement and their machinations. Many will note that what began decades ago as “please dont beat up gay people” became “sell us cakes and services even if you dont want to” and “we just want to get married.” Many Republicans and socially conservative Democrats let these things slide, more or less, because they were promised that it would not lead to a slippery slope like those evangelical bible thumpers were worrying it would; fools that they are, they believed the lavender mafia and their leftwing stooges would keep such a promise. Fast forward 10-15 years, and it is completely undeniable that said promise wasn’t just broken, it was entirely shattered into dust. Drag queen story hours, the sexualization of teens and children only grows more open and promoted.

Is this to say that modern leftwing parents are knowingly sacrificing their children to this apparatus, this devouring Beast? Knowingly, likely not, but willingly, entirely so. A keen thing to keep in mind when it comes to the occult and sorcerous matters is that intent often matters just as much as actual action; these parents who place their children on the altar of social progress, to be fed into the fire pit of acceptance and equality, are doing something that in their mind is a good thing: their children are expected to become tolerant, friendly, and altogether, moral. But this instinct of theirs is the result of a manipulation, a perverted lie repeated ad naseum to completely saturate and indoctrinate those it is targeted at. Parents are baraged, be it at their chidlren’s schools, their public libraries, or even the children’s networks on television, to relent to this “progress.”

Even liberals who are uncomfortable with the idea quickly find themselves shamed and alienated into position; after all, you wouldn’t want to be one of those bigoted cisheteros, would you? It would displease Moloch to have your child grow strong of mind and body, pure of heart and soul. That cannot be; in order to truly advance or even maintain one’s place in society, you *must* render sacrifice to the gods. You must place your own flesh and blood, the blessing of your own creation, onto the altar to be burned. So sayeth the undercurring theme of the progressive movement and their attitude towards children.

Dixie Anon #racist #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "George Wallace and the End of the Second Reconstruction"]

Dixie has gone through three distinct periods of Reconstruction. The first and most famous began in 1865 with Appomattox and ended in 1877. The second began in 1965 with the passage of the Voting Rights Act and ended in 1972. The third began in 2015 with the Charleston shooting and is going on to this day. The story of how the First Reconstruction ended is well known and how (or even if) the Third Reconstruction ever ends remains to be seen. The story of how the Second Reconstruction ended is a story that has not been fully explored. And, the central figure in it is also the central figure in the struggle to maintain home rule from 1954-1965, Governor George Wallace.

In the disastrous [i]Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education[/i], the Supreme Court held that not enough was being done to end segregation, mostly due to “white flight” from the major cities into the suburbs in the years following Brown vs. the Board of Education. The Court thus allowed for the government to take some kids from white neighborhoods and put them in majority black schools and take students from black neighborhoods and put them in white schools. This was done in order to more quickly attain the goals of the integrationists. It that white parents had to be able to afford to send their kids to private schools, which were at the time either de facto or de jure all-white, in order to maintain some semblance of the old order. Simply moving to a white neighborhood was not enough.

It was a deeply, deeply unpopular ruling. And, not just with white people but also with black people. The hatred of forced busing was widespread in the North, as well as in Dixie. It wasn’t just a matter of those mean racists not wanting their daughter to date a black guy either, but because they correctly saw it as destroying organic communities, putting more strain on an already overworked school system, and ending any sense of neighborhood pride.

[...]

For Wallace’s base, he was the perfect candidate. As Samuel T. Francis would point out two decades later, blue-collar white workers are essentially caught between the two parties and will vote for the one they see as less hostile to their interests. Though they hate the Democrats for destroying the role of religion in public life and forcing multiculturalism on them, they also hate the Republicans for outsourcing. They fear both parties for forcing mass immigration on them. Wallace was a man that promised to fight all of it, he was a man willing to smash orthodoxies he saw as harmful to those he represented. It is fitting that he, more than anyone, helped end the Second Reconstruction. Though busing never really ended, after Nixon used it to damage McGovern in 1972, no politician was willing to touch it. As such, it was never as enforced as it looked like it would be in 1971.

Almost entirely thanks to Wallace’s efforts, busing went from something almost every mainstream politician was afraid to oppose to being one almost every mainstream politician was afraid to support. When Joe Biden’s more liberal rivals criticize him for opposing busing back in the day, they are unaware of how unpopular busing actually was. Remember how I said Nixon hit George McGovern hard on that issue? McGovern lost 49 states that year. McGovern lost Cook County, Illinois that year – that’s Chicago. Biden and almost everyone else wouldn’t touch that issue with a 10-foot poll because of that. Wallace was the first to show any courage opposing it.

Had it not been for Wallace, the Second Reconstruction would have kept on going and grown more radical. Without Wallace, Dixie in 1980 could have looked a lot like Dixie in 2020. I don’t want to even imagine what Dixie in 2020 would have looked like in this timeline. For those of us who grew up in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and even the 2000s, we were surrounded by the sights and sounds of Confederate glory – a world where the flag still flew proudly and describing oneself as “Unreconstructed” was a term of pride.

We must thank George Wallace.

John Q. Publius #sexist #racist #dunning-kruger identitydixie.com

[From "Toxic Avengers: The Return of Aspirational Masculinity"]

Following the de-platforming of Republic Standard by the host, I’ve decided to re-post some of my favorites from my time there for your reading pleasure. Enjoy!

[...]

Did anyone expect, when we were hurtling toward Y2K and the late Senator Ted Stevens’s pneumatic tube-powered Information Super Highway that we would be discussing “trans women’s periods”? Instead of colonizing Mars? As the Soviet general in The Camp of the Saints lamented between sips of vodka: “We’re caught in the clutches of the great hermaphrodite, Zackaroff. We’re all its serfs. And we can’t even cut off its balls!” Yes, the neo-liberal project has given our civilization opioids and anti-depressants and a steady diet of appointments with the local psychoanalyst; it’s blessed us with hormone blockers for prepubescent children and demon-drag-queen story time and soon IUDs for first-graders. Lothrop Stoddard’s Revolt Against Civilization is in full swing:

Congenitally incapable of adjusting themselves to an advanced social order, the degenerate inevitably become its enemies—particularly those “high-grade defectives” who are the natural fomenters of social unrest. Of course, the environmentalist argues that social unrest is due to bad social conditions, but when we go into the matter more deeply we find that bad conditions are largely due to bad people. The mere presence of hordes of low-grade men and women condemned by their very natures to incompetency and failure automatically engender poverty, invite exploitation, and drag down others just above them in the social scale.

Such inequities can only be compounded by the ever-growing throngs of the maladjusted and violent who are mostly unable and/or unwilling to adapt to or maintain the rigors of success in the West. The victim mentality creates a power vacuum that will inevitably be filled by a more self-assured group or groups; thus assuring our conquest, the West will have been reduced to nothing but a bunch of genderless, species-less trans-abled amorphous blobs incapable of lifting a finger in self-defense. Otherwise, and perhaps a more likely outcome, in these conditions of fractured tribalism the country will “require” the installation of a ruthlessly totalitarian government headed and staffed, of course, by the managerial “elites”—and for the few hold-outs, as Frank Carter sang on Gallows’s “The Vulture”: “If the horses won’t drink, drown them in the water.”

This idea that it’s all men, or that it’s “toxic masculinity” that is the root cause of violence in our society is preposterous. It’s pretty simple, really—the Left finds itself unable to perform even a rudimentary analysis of the perpetrators of violence. Part of it is that modernity is making people crazy, but biological sub-groups (ie-races) differ dramatically in violent and anti-social behavior. The black share of homicides nationally has actually increased while their population share remains relatively static, and of course the vast majority of those homicides are committed by black males. This simple instance of a legitimate “toxic masculinity” is not a possible explanation, however, “because racism.” Therefore, the Left twists itself in ever-more absurd contortions to explain really rather simple explanations (another example is the “gender pay gap”).

We know that, on average, black children hit puberty first and Asian children last, which may have something to do with the advanced physical development of many blacks, which is particularly pronounced in the teen years relative to, say, whites or Asians. The ramifications in terms of brain development and verbal acuity and spatial reasoning remain somewhat less known, but we can draw inferences based on the available science. Ignoring fundamental differences between people, not to mention the wealth of quantifiable data that show strong correlations between specific behaviors and outcomes, is not going to lessen our problems. It’s going to make them worse—as we’re witnessing.

These “debates” are absolutely drenched in Leftist moralism, to the point where even pointing out well-established science is cause for professional and social termination. Rather than bending over backwards to find “hate crimes” and “systemic racism” to explain away black underachievement, would not a consideration of cognitive differences liberate the whole nation from this ceaseless pearl-clutching? There is no white conspiracy to marginalize blacks (at least none that I’m aware of), but there are evolved differences in intelligence that exacerbate group differences in an increasingly cognitively-intensive economy. These difference are no one’s fault but Mother Nature’s, unless of course the actual mother made poor in utero or child-rearing decisions (for example, black mothers are thirty times more likely than white mothers to give birth to a child with fetal alcohol syndrome, and are much more likely to use corporal punishment on their children, which is proven to affect cognitive development). Nevertheless, Leftist dogma renders an honest discussion impossible.

Haiti has been an independent country longer than Canada, New Zealand, Australia, or Ireland—all four were products of colonialism—and they have turned out just a little different I would say. The United States has only been independent a couple of decades longer than Haiti. Do you want to keep on blaming colonialism? How about Ethiopia, which minus five years has been an independent nation for millennia? We have been conditioned to accept equality of outcome when the biological inputs are so wildly divergent. This is patently absurd. As all populations increasingly have access to the same technologies, amenities, and advancements as everyone else, and the global economy becomes more cognitively-intensive, with an honest appraisal we can only expect the disparity in outcome between humanity’s haves and have-nots to widen ever-further without a full-bodied globalist tyranny.

Likewise, in the interests of furthering what’s mutated into the paradox that is modern feminism’s prudish Epicureanism—indeed in erasing the distinctions between man and woman by un-coupling gender from sex, which sort of defeats the purpose of feminism—the most appalling manifestations of totalitarianism are necessary to force the supremely unnatural, in the process destroying both masculinity and femininity by turning each sex into a shitty facsimile of the other and never the twain shall meet. Or is it the opposite, a melding of pregnant men and women soldiers into the Androgynes of the Future?

[...]

Women like sociologist Lisa Wade are too preoccupied with President Trump’s “carpe pussy” comments from over a decade ago to understand that the immigration restrictions/overhaul the majority of Americans support would stop immigrants and “refugees” from intractably misogynistic cultures from coming here and bringing their regressive attitudes toward women as chattel, barbaric practices such as female genital mutilation and honor killings, and a lack of restraint from sexually assaulting women either through non-existent impulse control or cultural entitlement.

[...]

To expand on the red pill metaphor, it is not just an awakening from The Matrix, but that red evokes the notion of consanguinity, or shared blood, the bonds of which, indeed, are thicker than water (typically colored or referred to as blue). The “red,” our republic’s life-blood, cannot survive without its people. The ultimate demise of the founding Roman noble families roughly corresponds to the time Caracalla extended full citizenship rights to the entire empire. “Democracy in action,” we might say, but without an aspirational core of true Roman families on which the empire could rest, the decline was not long after, for what is a Rome without Romans? Further, in the absence of expansion, the momentum of the empire ground to a halt, and its focus turned inward, both in conflict and in navel-gazing hedonism. This is not to suggest that the key to reviving the American nation is through resuscitating “54 40 or Fight,” but that after planting our flag on the moon we wasted trillions of dollars and decades of energy on “equality” and dragged (or in the case of Afghanistan and the Middle East are dragging) our military through morass after morass instead of securing the border and re-directing our eyes back to the heavens. This aspirational masculinity is at the heart of Western civilization and it drives our conquering spirit both literally and metaphorically. It is time we stopped cowering before inferior cultures and entitled parasites and re-assert what makes us the most spectacular civilization in human history. “Man up,” indeed: there is a very powerful message here, one which we would be wise to heed.

Henry Delacroix #racist #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "So You Want To Build A Mannerbund"]

It is one of the most used terms in our sphere. It is something that frightens the left. It is a means to build a tribe, develop a society and seed a civilization. It is a way for men to raid, control or dominate a territory. It is something many segments of the dissident right discusses building offline. It is the mannerbund.

Whether explicitly using the term or not, all pieces of the right that are on the edge of the Overton Window our outside of it discuss attempts at networking that involve building what amounts to a trusted mannerbund. It would be useful to research what it takes to make a mannerbund work. It cannot just be beers and a posting career. For no more than ten dollars, one can read up on, arguably, the greatest mannerbund created of all time: the [I]Afrikaner Broederbond[/I].

The Broederbond was a secret society exclusively made up of Calvinist Afrikaner males. Its origins were very modest. It was eighteen young men coming together to discuss the state of the Afrikaner people. In 1921, they decided to make it an official secret society with roughly forty men. This was a society of men who within a generation would capture a national government and proceed to run it for the next forty years.

This was a group that transitioned from a more culturally focused society to a secret society that was bent on capturing power and using it for the benefit of its people. Who were its people? In short, the Afrikaners were the bad euros of South Africa who worked the land, were sharpshooting frontiers types, and pioneers who were battered and eventually defeated by the British Empire in a series of events. Major cultural and social events were the Great Trek or Voortrek, when Boers first were expelled from the Cape Colony by Anglos, and the two, brutal Boer Wars, when Boers were finally crushed by the Anglos all thanks to diamond and gold discoveries. For a recent historical survey of South Africa’s formation, Diamonds, Gold and War is a fair book on this process. These were tough people tied to the land ruled over by an occupation government of Anglos who imposed their culture and ways on them while lording political power over the economically and politically dispossessed Afrikaners.

[...]

The year 1948 is the key for the Broederbond. In that year, the 1948 election allowed them to assume control of the national government and not look back until they stabbed their people in the stomach decades later. Each Prime Minister or President from 1948 until the end of apartheid had been a broeder. Once they won electoral victory, they took the nearly 3,000 Broederbond members and dispersed them throughout key government agencies. These men also knew other politically reliable or sympathetic men to place in charge of key nodes. These nodes were often nodes in control of hiring and firing employees. They removed obstacles and unreliable individuals. Personnel is policy. They had the personnel to enact policy.

[...]

They made mistakes, too. They did not have ideological firmness. They softened up. They allowed the thirst for cheap labor to suck in bigger immigration populations that created more problems. They tied their rationale for rule to a church, nominally their church, but ultimately, outside of their total control. This would hurt them later on as apartheid became a hotter topic. It is curious to read how the global ostracism in sporting events bothered them. One could argue they should have allowed mixed teams for PR purposes to the globe or that they never should have cared for lame international global events for something as dumb as sport. They also fell for the dumb right wing idea that you leave the opponent’s institutions intact because principles or something abstract. They did not shut down Anglo universities. They did not shut down the Anglo press. In short, compared to the communists, they did not have the will to neuter their internal enemies or encourage them to emigrate.

Some observers note how the Afrikaners gave in just before they could secure sovereignty as the commodities source for China as the industrial giant grew. China did fund communist insurgents, but the situation was changing in the ’90s for China. South Africa sending resources to neuter the effects of BDS by the West would have worked. The end of apartheid was right before China took off, but even then, BDS did not cause the Afrikaners to give in. They did it to themselves.

The Broederbond was at the vanguard of ending apartheid. Their leaders had been softening for years, supporting policy changes and debating others that a decade earlier would have never been considered. In 1978, their leader Gerrit Viljoen had decided with the inner council that transitioning to a future with a black president was going to happen, and they would lead it. This was an elite betrayal of the population it had proclaimed for decades to be representing. The year 1978 is interesting as this was the year when the big leak of Broederbond internal documents that was the source for the major news expose and book on the Broederbond was released. Thousands of members were doxed, so to speak, and one wonders if this was a coordinated operation by the inner council to put a shinier face on their secret organization as things heated up in the republic. One believes they ultimately wanted to be accepted by the West more than lead and build an awesome civilization of their own. Rather than a hermit kingdom, they chose to be enriched by the global elite as they knifed the small Afrikaners in the back.

Nero Augustus #wingnut #dunning-kruger #psycho identitydixie.com

[From "What Makes a Man?"]

Slaves and Citizens
Wow, look at you. Mommy’s big boy, all grown up. You can do anything, now that you’re an adult. You can eat all the cake, drink all the craft beer, and watch all the porn into the wee hours of the morning because nobody can limit your consumption now that you’ve shed the trappings of childhood and become a man. Or, have you?

Take a step back and look at who you have become. Today, the average American male is a pale specter of manliness that was present just a few generations prior. Grip strength tested today is down 20% over a span of 30 years. We spend more time indoors and are sedentary, our short-term memory is basically non-existent and we’re sicker than ever. Compare yourself to men of the past and ask if you really deserve the same title as them.

Comparing the Greek words Aner vs Anthropos reveals us how a distinction that once existed between men and the rest. Real men have been, and will always be, rare – while all others will just be shadow figures. While both terms described human males, aner went farther, to distinguish said men as those who were more than just the base. Consumers, and modern NPCs, all fit the definition of anthropos. They do not rise in any discernible way past the flesh heap of common man. Therefore, they do not deserve any higher title than that. Why then would there be no further distinctions between the two?

Slave Societies and the Military State
The great slave societies of the past included, but were not limited to, the Greek city states, the Roman Empire, and the antebellum South. Each of these civilizations maintained large slave populations that constituted significant portions of their labor force. Sparta stands out as one of the most stark examples of a slave society in that slaves, or helots, constituted around 80% of Sparta’s population. The slave population, at its peak, in Dixie constituted around 33%, despite being a mere 13% of the total U.S. population. Being that Sparta, and to a lesser extent other slave societies, contained so many slaves, there were constant and realistic fears of slave uprisings that could threaten the lives and business interests of the rest of the population. It is no coincidence that each of the great slave societies maintained strong military traditions and standing forces at the ready to check against uprisings.

[...]

The South, like other great slave societies, was not just a militaristic one, but the sort of society that simultaneously fosters a culture in which social refinement blooms. Southern poets, authors, artists and statesmen were, more often than not, the leading talents in their fields, even after the end of the War. Southern military schools did, and have continued, to produce leaders in many fields disproportionate to their competitor schools. The Southern military tradition even continues today with over 50% of the combat forces of the United States being produced by the Southern states, wholly disproportionate with the country’s population.

[...]

As in the novel Starship Troopers, you could not vote or become a citizen if you did not complete your military service requirements. The end product of this agoge and military service allowed the numerically disadvantaged Spartans to reign over their more numerous helots with an iron fist, while simultaneously warding off enemy nations. Compared to the heroic Greek soldiers of other city states, the Spartans were, for the most part, the professional elites. Not only this, Sparta was also home to some of the most iconic artists and architects of the time, something that similarly occurs in other great slave societies. The agoge was such a revered system that nobles, from all around the Greek world, would fight for a chance to send their child through the same system.

All this and more was required just for Spartans to attain the rights and privileges that you, as that special grown-up boy that you are, think you are entitled to. What though have you done to earn said rights? While you may believe that the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are inalienable, and God given, can you really believe that all men are equal? Can two individuals of different size, or even importance, be entitled to the same share of finite resources within their country? Why should a self-diagnosed depressive, bipolar lgbtqaipsuv demikin have the same rights and privileges as someone who contributes to society? Why should the average person even have the right to vote?

I’ve written before about chattel slavery and how the absence of self-mastery would result in your enslavement. How then, can people who fail to master themselves, have responsibility to weild a tool to oppress others?

The byproduct of the great slave societies’ need for military tradition bore out the pleasant side effect that those who bore through the rigors of said systems were rarely below average and often outpaced their contemporaries.

Bob Whitaker #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Archie Bunker and George Wallace"]

All In the Family premiered in 1971, right in the middle of the George Wallace phenomenon.

The reason that Lear was so upset with working class white people in 1971 was because liberals had completely tamed the Republican Party, but they were terrified of Governor George Wallace of Alabama. Wallace got ten million votes for president in the 1968 election, and he very nearly took the Democratic nomination for president in 1972.

The year after All In the Family premiered in 1971, Wallace won the Michigan Democratic presidential primary with a solid majority. He was far ahead, and leading in the Maryland primary. If he had not been shot, there would have been no left wing McGovern candidacy in 1972.

Republicans were happy in 1971 because the military was enormous and Nixon was defending the interests of business, and those are the only two things Republicans really care about. Working people’s kids were being bused and ethnic neighborhoods were being broken up, but that didn’t matter any more to Republicans than it did to Norman Lear.

The only people who were upset at liberal policy were Southerners and Northern ethnics. Lear had always hated white Southerners, but a Northern white person who deserted the liberal Democrats was even more evil in media eyes. The Archie Bunkers had been obedient little leftists under union supervision, but now that the unions were betraying them, they were leaving the Democrats and going to Wallace.

And their names were not like “Archie Bunker.”

I met hundreds of them, and they were Sullivans and Kowalskis and everything else that was white but not Anglo-Saxon. They actually represented diversity. Lear had to rewrite that, so he had Archie hating Poles and Italians and all the other groups he actually represented. No liberal can ever allow reality to intrude too much.

[...]

What they were afraid of were things like this:

• That soon there would be hardened minority quotas in hiring that would exclude white working people from jobs;
• That, as a matter of public policy, the government would enforce the breakup of white ethnic communities;
• That busing white working people’s children into ghettoes would become routine nationwide and no one would seriously object but the parents; and
• They knew a lot more was coming, but they couldn’t have guessed, as one example, that anyone who objected to giving welfare benefits to known illegal aliens would be portrayed as anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews by the media in the future.

In fact, the only people who really saw the future in 1971 were those who were fans of Archie Bunker.

Padraig Martin #racist identitydixie.com

[From ""Distinguishing Southern Nationalism"]

Over the last week or so, I have received criticism for my attacks on generic White Nationalism, the so-called Alt-Right and Nazi LARPers. Generally, these are attacks from weak keyboard kommandos and obese geriatric geldings, some of whom mistook the original intended target. Regardless, given the reaction, it seems I struck a nerve. Good!

The vast majority of those who threw threats in my direction could not bench press an AR-15. Some of those who took shots at the latest round of strategic posts are intellectually too soft to see past their myopic understanding of our current predicament. Bowl Patrol? If you cannot see that someone like Dylann Roof would have done more strategically for “White People” by not being a psychopath, actually engaging in positive networking and community fellowship, then you lack strategic clarity. You are inferior in every single way – mentally and morally. You are useless. Go back to whatever leader du jure of your movement is taking pictures of himself in his underwear.

If you are serious about doing something for your people, let’s take an honest look at the differences within the movement: Southern Nationalism vs Generic White Nationalism.

Identity Dixie is a Southern Nationalist content producer. That is who we are. Generally speaking, ours is a fraternal group that seeks to build a Nationalist consensus within the South. The goal is to intellectually and emotionally lay the ground work for an independent South. Some members of Identity Dixie are also members of other groups that have aligned goals, but at their core, Identity Dixie contributors work the Southern zeitgeist. We are not the guys on street corners or running around in the woods playing Rambo on the weekends. We are the guys who convince the normie Southerner that he has a better future in a Free South.

What Identity Dixie is not is a generic White Nationalist entity. We obviously do not hate White people, but not all White people are the same. The Whites who call themselves Anti-Fascists are not my White people. Nor for that matter are Boston Brahmins. I went to graduate school with Boston Brahmins, they hate you and me. Generic White is simply not a good enough distinction.

I will root for White people in other areas of the country to do well, but they are not my own. Not all Whites are made equal. The German-American descendants of the 48ers, who comprise the rank and file of both AntiFa and the Alt-Right, have very little in genetic common with me other than skin color. The only ideological difference between the two groups is their brand of genocidal collectivism (one being crusty anarcho-communism, with a simmering hatred for Heritage America, and the other some form of authoritarianism, as long as it’s pro-white). Otherwise, they are almost identical. Their general hatred of Christianity and their support for socialism are entirely foreign concepts to me.

One other key similarity between AntiFa and the Alt-Right is their assumption that they will save the United States. True Southern Nationalists have no interest at all in saving the Empire. The United States is dead. It is a stinking, rotting carcass. The smell of its decomposition is evident in the Affirmative Action company commander, with an 85 IQ, leading your Southern enlisted sons into battle. She graduated with a 4.0 GPA from West Point because her Marxist professors wanted to achieve a social justice objective. White people did that. More specifically, Northern Whites empowered this marginally literate officer. Had she gone to the Virginia Military Institute, her inferior self would have transferred to Richmond Community College before she completed Hell Week. Now, her Communist Chinese counterpart is laughing, confident that he can beat an army led by incompetents in a week. He is right.

You can thank Northern Whites for your modern country.

And before you give me a diatribe about the JQ, just stop. Whites founded America. Prior to its existence, it was a massive forest comprised of wild savages, hunting and enslaving one another. They were conquered by Europeans. Towns and cities were erected by Whites. Institutions were established by Whites. If we assume Whites are superior, how did they let everything get taken by a tribe of Khazar gypsies? Let’s face a cold hard fact: three percent of the population did not weasel their way into power. Heritage Americans got lazy and gave it away – the same as they did when they sent their manufacturing to China. Specifically, Northern Whites gave it away. If I want to be even more specific, a cabal of Boston Yankees and German 48ers from the Midwest and Pennsylvania gave away the country that Anglo-Saxons and Scots-Irish built.

Why in God’s name would I want to align myself with the same Whites who get an occasional generational itch to dismantle the South?

Northern Whites first dismantled the antebellum South, a White dominated society, through a mass invasion. Northern Whites literally raped, pillaged, and starved Southerners, compelling them to remain in a Union against their will. Then they not only freed the slaves, they empowered them in local positions of governance throughout Reconstruction. Suddenly, I am supposed to look past their history and find myself aligned with their descendants because we share the same skin color?

Less than one hundred years later, the grandparents of these same generic White Nationalists lamented segregation. They demanded that the 101st Airborne march into Arkansas and impose integrated schools. It was a Wisconsin White gunman, Arthur Bremer, descendant of a 48er, who shot segregationist, George Wallace. Northerners later fought to reduce his sentence and they succeeded.

If the apple does not fall far from the tree, why would I now suddenly align myself with the grandkids of Midwestern Marxists? No thank you. Rather, I will align myself with my father’s people, many of whom fought and died to protect the Anglo-Celtic society upon which the South is based.

The fact is, the Alt-Right is full of socialists. They were raised praising Sherman, Grant, and Eisenhower – men who destroyed the South. They love themselves some Lincoln. They have nothing in common with Southerners. They cannot be trusted. So what if some guy in Vermont or Pennsylvania flies a Confederate Battle Flag? How edgy, bruh! That may resonate with your fellow militant egalitarians who equate imagery with purpose. It simply tells me the guy has nice taste in flags.

At the end of the day, generic White Nationalism is a fool’s endeavor. It is bound to fail. Southern Nationalists know they will have to go it alone. The socialists who comprise the majority of the rank and file of White Nationalists want to revive an American corpse.

In sum, keep your generic White Nationalism. Keep your bowl patrol. Keep your pagan imagery. This is not about optics for me. This is not about some short term edgy phase in my life. The Southerners with whom I daily interact are the legacy of a multi-generational quest to establish their own country, predicated on hierarchical stratification, Anglo-Saxon norms, and Christian values. We may not be perfect, but at the end of the day, we are not LARPy pseudo-Nazis.

Good luck and enjoy your pool parties.

sonorajack #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "Thanks to the Wizard of the Saddle"]

Nathaniel Bedford Forrest now joins the likes of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson in having a holiday to commemorate him, newly proclaimed in law by Tennessee governor Bill Lee to be on July 13th. Forrest’s exploits are legendary to students of the War of Northern Aggression, as he is known as the fire breathing cavalryman who dove into combat and shattered Union lines time and again.

This is not a biographical piece on the man, however, this is the story of how Nathaniel Bedford Forrest brought me into the fold of Southern Nationalism and Identity Dixie. It was June 2015 and the controversy over the Confederate Battle Flag was raging, as was the debate over the monument to Forrest. At the time, I was still just a generic “American” treading water between right libertarian and emerging crypto fash elements of the “movement.” More than anything, I was an avowed student of military history, and in particular those firebranded cavalry commanders from Attila and Alexander up to Forrest and Patton. It was around this time that I saw other people, who were normally my ideological colleagues, expressing apathy or outright contempt for the memory and person of Nathaniel Bedford Forrest.

“Who cares, he was just some racist army guy,” or “I don’t really care if they take down a statue of some slave trader guy,” type of remarks peppered our discussions and I grew in outright hostility and fury towards people I formerly considered friends and cohorts. I began a spirited defense of Forrest in the form of several essay length effort-posts in various social media groups, arguing on his behalf. I was so zealous and aggressive I got myself banned from most of them. But, it was in this crusade that I was plucked up by others like me, who offered me a place among them, a place I accepted and have grown in gratitude and appreciation for.

In this way, Nathaniel Bedford Forrest has altered the course of my life rather dramatically. A history nerd’s hobby horse paved the way to an entire new world of intellectual and historical thought, a journey that has ultimately led me to where I am today. So, while many among Southern Nationalists and historians favor men like Lee or Jackson for their numerous admirable qualities, I will continue to find myself a zealous and passionate acolyte of the Wizard of the Saddle. He is to me forevermore the father of my nationalism, the way Lee and Washington are for so many others.

So, I say God bless Governor Bob Lee and I hope you enjoyed July 13th!

Padraig Martin #homophobia #transphobia identitydixie.com

[From "They Push Too Far: The LGBT Movement"]

The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) movement is falling apart. It may not seem so, with all the pathetic corporate pandering and the endless stream of gratuitous gay characters on television, but it is. They have pushed too far and now public opinion is turning faster than ever before. This is especially true in the Godly South.

It is seemingly inescapable. Everywhere you turn you are confronted by detestable quasi-rainbow flags. I use the term “quasi” because that is what they are. The rainbow has seven colors; the gay pride flag has six colors. This is no surprise to those who know the Bible. The rainbow is a manifestation of God’s promise to Noah that such destruction will never befall His people again. Thus, what greater means of co-opting a Biblical narrative than using an emblem of God’s promise? But as in all things Satanic, the pride flag comes just short of a Godly promise.

Satan does not create, he imitates – and he always does so in a way that allows the Christian to see with clear eyes his deviancy.

Of course, there is something else that Satan does as well: he always pushes the envelope too far. The beautiful cherub described in the Book of Ezekiel never knows his limits. From contesting God to turning men from Christ, Satan, the father of lies, eventually gets what is coming to him. He always loses.

Satan’s latest manifestation – the worldwide acceptance of unnatural sexual deviancy and the eradication of masculinity – is not new. In fact, the Bible is quite clear on the subject of homosexuality. Leviticus 18:22 calls homosexuality an “abomination.” Leviticus 20:13 calls for something else.

Of course, Christians will point to the fact that Christ has borne our sins and therefore, through Christ, one can repent and not be killed for such depravity. But there is an inconvenient caveat. The operative word is “repent” – as in, to feel truly sorry for the act and to ask of God’s forgiveness. Continuing to engage in homosexuality, consequently, is not only an act that suggests one has not repented, but that Christ was never truly embraced in the first place. 1 Corinthians 6:9 is quite clear about the sinfulness of homosexuality. Gay pastors like to point out that 1 Corinthians 6:11 follows up with a note of Christ’s eternal forgiveness: “And that is what some of you were (gay). But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.” They forget the conditional modifier in the scripture. Paul uses the term “were,” as in formerly gay men who – thanks to Jesus – are no longer gay.

Thus, when so-called gay rights activists call out heterosexual Christians for also sinning, it is just Satan trying to mislead with twisted truth. Of course, we sin. Jesus died for those sins. But none of our churches should welcome the continuation of those sins, nor would the truly repentant Christian continue to celebrate his or her sins.

The absurdity of so-called pro-LGBT Christian churches and congregations is laughable. Name a pastor who is exalted for being a known murderer or rapist. Name a church that puts out signs saying, “Welcome My Whoremongering Brothers!” Name a church that puts out a flag indicating support for its adulterous congregants. I have yet to identify the Methodist Church that has “Thieving Thursdays.”

God forgives sin; Satan glorifies in it.

However, all of this may be coming to a head. Support for LGBT “rights” and acceptance is dropping like a stone. A recent study by the Public Religion Research Institute showed that LGBT support among Millennial Republicans dropped from 74% to 63% – eleven basis points or approximately 15% in one year. Among the reasons cited were the outrageous behavior of homosexuals at gay pride events, transgenderism, and the societal bullying of individuals who do not support LGBT actions, such as conservative Churches or bakeries.

[...]

In a USA Today article referencing the same poll that GLAAD used, world leaders were surprised by the swiftness of the drop in LGBT support. Perhaps that is because LGBT “rights” are seen more clearly by less politically correct and more honest world leaders. Brunei’s Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah wants gay men stoned to death. Kenya’s High Court just upheld laws criminalizing homosexuality. Not to be outdone by obscure brown countries, Poland’s Jaroslaw Kaczynski, leader of the conservative ruling party, called the LGBT movement an “immoral invasion” that “threatens the Christian Nation.” If anyone knows what an invasion looks like, it’s the Poles.

[...]

From Texas to Virginia… from Florida to Arkansas… the South once again rejected Satan.

By contrast, the states with the most pro-LGBT marks were found in the Northeast, the industrial Midwest, and unsurprisingly, the Pacific West Coast.

The LGBT movement may fool themselves, but they cannot fool God. The South, which overwhelming accepts Christ’s message, is not blinded by ostentatious displays of sexual depravity. God will not allow the South to be blinded by the beauty of Satan’s glow.

For now, be happy that these perverted freaks are pushing away the very normies who empowered them. No one who loves their children thinks “transgender story time” is a good thing. No one who loves their children takes them to a parade where simulated sodomy is the norm. Americans, as a whole, seem to be waking up.

In a Free Dixie, we will have freedom from the LGBT community. Their degeneracy will not be tolerated by a Godly people.

Overkill Award

BestCarolina #racist #psycho identitydixie.com

[From "5 Reasons Atlanta Needs the Death Star Treatment"]

It is tempting to say that Atlanta, Georgia – the crime and corruption-ridden sprawling urban hellscape which symbolizes the dystopian nightmare of the New South – should be nuked from orbit by powerful spaceships. However, we do not wish to saddle the good people of Georgia with a large nuclear wasteland. Therefore, it would be much better to simply blast the awful metropolis with the Death Star (single reactor ignition should work).

Then, allow Georgians to reclaim the area as farmland. Maybe they could make a nice state park there. Something wholesome and traditional should surely replace that which is ugly, degenerate and post-modern, should it not? With that in mind, here are five of the top reasons that Atlanta should be blasted with lasers from space.

ONE Extensive Federal investigations have revealed rampant corruption that extends throughout the highest levels of the Black Democrat-governed city. Under the recent Kasim Reed administration, Atlanta was mis-governed like a banana republic. Former Chief Procurement Officer Adam Smith pleaded guilty to taking bribes and was sentenced to 27 months in prison. Mitzi Bickers, a political consultant who led Reed’s campaign efforts and was later appointed head of his Human Services Department, has been charged with taking $2 million in bribes to give city business to certain contractors. These examples just scratch the surface when exploring corruption in the city.

TWO Atlanta is crime-ridden and many areas of the city are dangerous. In 2016 it was named a top 20 murder capital in the American Empire. That year, the violent crime rate in Atlanta was 173% higher than the US national average. Gang violence is a growing problem in the city with Hispanic gangs from Mexico and Central America among the leading culprits.

THREE Around 17% of the 6 million people of the metropolitan Atlanta area care so little about assimilating into our culture that they do not bother to speak our national language. Over half of these foreigners speak Spanish, while a rapidly-growing immigrant population speaks various Asian languages. Taken together this is a huge population. If these foreigners in the Atlanta area were a city unto themselves it would be bigger than the entire metropolitan area of Columbia – the capital of South Carolina!

FOUR The soundtrack for the dystopian concrete jungle of Atlanta is undoubtedly produced by the rap or hip-hop music industry centered in the city. Atlanta has for many years served as a major capital of the US rap scene. Georgia leaders have linked that scene with gang violence and criminality. Rappers have even been shot and killed by fellow gang-bangers while in studio recording albums. The city has long been regarded as the “Black Mecca of the South.”

FIVE Atlanta has an out-sized impact upon the politics of the traditionally conservative Southern state of Georgia, pulling it sharply to the Left. As the city continues to grow, drawing in huge numbers of non-Southern transplants and Third World immigrants, the political future of the Peach State is threatened. Former conservative, mostly-Southern White suburbs are being rapidly transformed by the influx. Cobb County is one of the most populous counties in Georgia and is a prime example of this sad transformation. In 1960, it had about 114,000 people. Today, it has nearly 757,000 people. It voted overwhelmingly for moderate Republican candidate for US president Mitt Romney as late as 2012. That same county voted for the radical Black Leftist candidate for Georgia governor Stacey Abrams by 9 points last year. Demographic revolution, centered in Atlanta, make it a near certainty that Georgia’s traditional conservative majority will lose power at some point in the near future and be replaced by hostile leftists.

CONCLUSION There are many compelling reasons why the awful city of Atlanta should be blasted with lasers from space. The above list could easily be greatly expanded. We do not need Atlanta’s corruption, crime, un-assimilated foreigners, rap culture or radical leftist politics. Dixie – and, indeed, the entire world – would be better off if a hulking battle-station (“that’s no moon, DeAndre!”) reduced the offending city to rubble.

Fear will keep the other Third World cities of Dixie in line. Fear of this battle station.

Padraig Martin #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Enough is Enough"]

Generally speaking, I do not really hate Blacks. Rather, I simply want them to stay out of my life. I would like them to pull up their pants, stop yelling so loudly (especially, their women), quiet that obnoxious cackle, and give the victimhood crap a rest. All of that stated, the more often I interact with them, the more I drift towards an angrier place.

Recently, at a library, I had the “pleasure” of several Blacks students meeting for a high school assignment. Per their usual inconsiderate ways, they could not suppress their personal volume. Of course, the polite and quite librarian tried her best to quiet them to no avail. As is typical of them, they lacked manners for their elders, and their treatment of the old White lady was indicative of their primal mannerisms. Finally, I piped up and told them to either be quiet or find another room. They acquiesced, probably because I am physically large, and they did not have the overwhelming numbers they require to fight a big White Man. As they retreated into a small conference room, I was thanked by several White people who silently endured their nasty treatment. While I politely nodded my head and went back to work, I became angrier at the silence of our people.

Therein lies the problem with our people: we fail our societal obligation to correct anti-social and transgressive behavior.

In some cases, Whites have been conditioned to fear Blacks. That is understandable. They are a wild people with almost zero regard for the rule of law or decorum. Consequently, if you are a law-abiding White person, you have no idea how they will react to even the politest request. Whites should know that with colored people, their bark is usually far worse than their bite. But how about the “smart ones?” Let’s address that myth.

For some reason Whites give far too much leeway to semi-literate Blacks, cheering them on for the most minor intellectual accomplishments. To be sure, there are some intelligent Blacks – usually those with a hefty dose of European DNA. By and large, however, Blacks are marginally above primates in terms of intelligence. IQ tests consistently rank that race close to “retard” level (70 IQ or below). Quoting American Renaissance, an organization that has done a number of studies on the damaging impact on functional society by blacks, we see evidence of their inferior intelligence:

“Despite overlapping intelligence distributions, only 16 percent of blacks have IQs of more than 100, the white average. Whites are six to eight times more likely to have scores in the ‘gifted’ range of 135 and higher, whereas blacks are six to eight times more likely to have scores in the ‘retarded’ range of 70 or lower. At the very highest, genius level IQ scores, blacks are hardly to be found at all.”

No where is this more evident than in the Halls of Congress.

The worst kind of Black is one with power. It is not that he or she threatens me. They are not that sophisticated. Rather, every time I have to suffer their sub-intelligence it annoys me to no end. Their attempts to act as though they have a greater intellectual capacity than they do, always fails. The morons that comprise the Congressional Black Caucus are the greatest single collective example of Black intellectual inferiority. Watching those idiots cobble together marginally coherent sentences further solidifies my belief in the genetic superiority of our people. Take your pick of a representative buffoon. Whether it is Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Sheila Jackson Lee, Elijah Cummings, or Frederica Wilson, the stupidity of these people is insufferable.

[...]

How did they get this powerful in just a few decades? The answer: Whites failed our moral obligation to maintain civilization. We should never have pretended they had a right to such positions of station or stature. Tragically, we are now tasked with correcting civilization.

The problem is that our social structures, designed to maintain civilization for both races, were destroyed by the North. It took a while, but Jim Crow added back the structure Blacks need in an advanced and stable society. Detroit and Atlanta are evidence that they cannot manage themselves. Of course, true to the Yankee way, Northern elites stopped Jim Crow, too. Despite Bull Connor’s best efforts, one of our own – Lyndon Johnson – sold us out. May he rot in hell.

It is time for our people to reclaim our civilization, order must be restored. It is time to yell, “Enough!” If not, expect the decline to continue in Dixie. If not, expect the normalization of the Third World on your doorstep, your schools, your infrastructure and your basic government services.

Take your business to Southern establishments. Encourage your children to enter Human Resources positions. Point out the glaring dysfunction of minority-controlled cities over and over. Constantly red pill drip with statistical evidence of their criminality. Share articles regarding genetic traits that make them less intelligent, but more violent. In sum, marginalize, isolate, and control through your narrative and interactions.

Do not give in, do not submit. We are watching society crumble around us through misplaced fear. Correct the anti-civilizational forces around us that are unchecked.

Enough is enough.

Joe WASP #racist #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "The Men of Magnolia"]

What often comes to mind when thinking of Mississippi? The images are most likely not very flattering and often tend to be a bit stereotypical. The Magnolia State receives much criticism and condescending feelings from many who do not live there and from a few who do. While the beliefs and ideas espoused by normies is typical as per their brainwashing, what perplexes the mind is the lack of admiration for and lack of attention that Mississippi receives from Southern Nationalists, possibly due to it sending fewer men to fight than other states in the Confederacy or having very few known leaders or generals during that war.

Maybe it is because of the lack of notability of much of its political leadership following the War until at least the 1960’s. Perhaps it is simply a lackluster state. Despite the lack of attention it garners, Mississippi produced many of the best and staunchest Southern Democrats of the 20th Century. Many were firebrands and did drum up the ire of social media and the government in their fights against the communist-backed Civil Rights Movement and worked diligently to stave off its success, one in particular even writing a book in defense of segregation. This article seeks to shed some light on a few of these great men and justify why Mississippi is the most underrated state in Dixie among Southern Nationalists.

John E. Rankin

John Elliot Rankin served as a state representative to the House for sixteen consecutive terms from 1920 to 1952. What makes him stand out among the other men mentioned on this list is his willingness to work extensively within, what was at the time, the liberalizing Democratic Party in order to benefit Mississippi, as well as, ensure segregation remained in effect without butting heads with other congressman. While he worked to ensure his state’s voice was heard in Congress, much to the chagrin of the many liberal northern Democrats, he supported FDR’s New Deal programs as an attempt to spur development and investment in poor rural areas, even coauthoring the Tennessee Valley Authority. He also supported the Serviceman’s Readjustment Act of 1944.

Despite his support for the New Deal, he supported the Serviceman’s Readjustment Act of 1944 being distributed in a decentralized manner to the states, thus allowing Jim Crow laws to be utilized when enforcing this act in the South. He hated the UN, seeing it as a threat to America and stated, “The United Nations is the greatest fraud in all History. Its purpose is to destroy the United States.” He was also known for his hatred of communists, even helping establish the House Un-American Activities Committee. He did all this and much more in his passion to fight against communists in the government, as well as, maintain the representation of his people within the government, a trait far too uncommon today.

Fielding L. Wright

Fielding Lewis Wright never served any offices above the state level. Following his service during World War I, he served in the Mississippi Senate and House and eventually went on to be lieutenant governor to Thomas Lowry Bailey. He took the position of governor when Bailey died in 1946 and was reelected as governor in 1947. He governed Mississippi during a time of drastic change. The South, being heavily rural, was working to industrialize and modernize its economy following World War II. Wright worked to ensure this happened. He also focused greatly on the Civil Rights issue, states’ rights and segregation, which ultimately resulted in his political wins as governor.

However, he did not always achieve success. Wright is most well known for running on the vice presidential ticket for the Dixiecrat Party in 1948, a party which failed to win the election and disbanded shortly after. He did not succeed politically following the end of his governor term in 1952 and was defeated, returning to his old job of law practice.

Theodore G. Bilbo

Theodore Gilmore Bilbo served two non-consecutive governor terms, once from 1916 to 1920 and a second time from 1928 to 1932, and was later elected to the US Senate from 1935 to 1947. Prior to this, he served in the Mississippi Senate and was lieutenant governor. His term as governor was quite successful in implementing progressive policies, managing to organize state finances, reform education policies, build a charity hospital, create a board of bank examiners and ban public hangings. He earned the nickname “Bilbo the Builder” because of his success in authorizing a state highway system, building lime-crushing plants, establishing new dormitories at the Old Soldiers’ Home, constructing a tuberculosis hospital and working toward the eradication of the South American tick. His political career is filled with many projects, events and ideas he undertook.

Despite having done so much as governor, what he is most well known for were his racial attitudes, as well as, his time in the US Senate. He spent much of his time feuding with other members of Congress, especially another Mississippi Senator by the name of Pat Harrison. Bilbo represented the poor tenant farmers, whereas Harrison represented the upper-class planters and merchants. Bilbo also drew much criticism for his outspoken views on racial segregation; in fact, he is the only person on this list who was a member of the Ku Klux Klan. However, like most other Democrats, he did support FDR’s New Deal administration and even proposed an amendment to the federal work relief bill that would have deported millions of blacks to Liberia. He came up with the idea out of inspiration from beliefs espoused by black separatists such as Marcus Garvey.

He may have done quite a lot in regards to upholding segregation and supporting it orally, but the staple of his racial legacy was his book Take Your Choice: Separation or Mongrelization. In this book, Bilbo summarized his views on race and segregation. Unfortunately, he died in 1947 not long after the book was published. Interestingly enough, on his deathbed, he requested the black editor of the newspaper Negro South to publish the statement, “I am honestly against the social intermingling of Negroes and Whites but I hold nothing personal against the Negroes as a race. They should be proud of their God-given heritage just as I am proud of mine. I believe Negroes should have the right [to indiscriminate use of the ballot], and in Mississippi too—when their main purpose is not to put me out of office and when they won’t try to besmirch the reputation of my state.” He was quite an interesting man indeed.

Ross Robert Barnett

By far the most notable person on this list, Ross Robert Barnett was the Governor of Mississippi from 1960 to 1964. This man was a firebrand and carried that image anywhere he went; his gubernatorial campaign included its own song, based off the state anthem “Go Mississippi.” He garnered spotlight for being an outspoken, staunch segregationist, especially for being a governor with those views during the most intense leftist Civil Rights push. He allowed for the arrests of various Civil Rights activists and Freedom Riders and was a member of the Citizens’ Council. He also fought in a vain attempt to keep Ole Miss, his alma mater, from being integrated. On the eve of the Ole Miss riot of 1962, he attended the Ole Miss vs Kentucky Wildcats game. The crowd numbered roughly 41,000, waving countless rebel flags and unveiling a huge rebel flag on the field. When the student body shouted “We want Ross!” he stepped out onto the field and shouted the now famous sixteen word speech: “I love Mississippi! I love her people! Our customs. I love and I respect our heritage.”

Barnett continued to work against integration, but to no avail. Interestingly enough about him, he was a Baptist Sunday School teacher and often espoused Biblical views on racial separation. He made statements such as “The Good Lord was the original segregationist. He put the black man in Africa. … He made us white because he wanted us white, and He intended that we should stay that way.”

Unfortunately, Barnett would only serve one term as governor. He served in other lower positions and areas of influence, but never again saw the same level of political success and popularity as he had during his time as governor. He is the only person on this list to actually live to see the Civil Rights Movement’s conclusion and is one of the few Southern politicians who lived afterwards for several years to never renounce or backtrack any of his previous racial views and stated, “Generally speaking, I’d do the same things again.”

Mississippi produced some of the finest men in Dixie and still does. It may not have shined during the War of Northern Aggression quite as much as states like Virginia or Tennessee, but it proved its mettle and worth during the Jim Crow Era, specifically, the latter part of it. Mississippi is a beautiful state with a long history of hardiness and stalwart men who refused to cave to the ideals of the weak and evil men. These weak men now control much of the government and more continue to flood here, fleeing the messes they made of their homes in the North and on the West Coast.

It is quite unfortunate that the Magnolia State does not receive the love it most certainly deserves, as the Men of Magnolia were truly some of the best.

StugLife #racist identitydixie.com

[From "For Pity’s Sake"]

There is a saying often seen in the Dissident Right when there is a revelation of some pretty young girl who has made the poor decision to engage in a “romantic” relationship with a man of color. Often, the saying is, “Burn the Coal, Pay the Toll.” These women often end up pregnant, battered, abandoned and, sometimes, even dead. It’s a sad and sorry state of affairs we only really observe in the fallen material hellscape of the American Empire.

I take no issue with warning against these dangers. The NAXALT (Not All X Are Like That) argument can be made, of course, and it will be, as a defense to these women’s poor decisions. The chances of a native Christian woman ending up with a black man is about 15% as of 2010 (Pew Research), however, most whites in an interracial relationship are Hispanic/White or Asian/White, despite the surge in White/Black relationships in almost every television commercial you see.

The domestic violence rates among minority marriages (Black/Black, Hispanic/Hispanic, etc) is over half (56%), whereas whites sit at about one in four (25.6%). A relatively recent study displays how this works out. An interracial couple is 1.5 times as likely to have domestic violence (over monoracial minorities, twice as likely as whites) and over half are cohabiting or dating, compared with 47% reporting they are married (5% of 10,000 couples sampled to make comparisons between monoracial and interracial couples).

So, while it is perfectly sound to warn young impressionable women to steer clear of minorities, the schadenfreude often displayed at their misfortune is honestly disheartening. We hold ourselves to high standards of morality and ethics, but the first chance we get to run someone’s nose into their mess we jump on it, especially for the dead. We shouldn’t be approaching near celebratory glee when we see a story about a young woman, who has been all but programmed to make this horrific mistake, make the mistake. It should be mourned and used, as best as possible, as a dire warning to other young women who received the same indoctrination in the propaganda camps (what we call schools and media).

Use arguments against this in a way she will understand and relate to, if you just simply call it disgusting – the woman is likely to be defiant and go into it with more enthusiasm and find herself in a wood coat waiting for the Resurrection. If she is Christian, there are multiple verses that can be used to argue your case. The most simple is in a nice handy list of things the Good Lord wishes for you to follow fully. It’s simple and easy to remember, “Thou shalt honor the mother and father.” The separation of nations in Genesis can be used as well. If they argue back with, “No Jew nor Greek, Man or Woman” ask why God created the various nations and put them in their own lands. Do they know better than God?

If she is extremely materialistic, simple economic arguments and the rate of single motherhood of mixed ethnicity children and the dysfunction in those homes is a simple argument. It’s hard to enjoy material pleasures when you have a mixed race child to support and are alone.

Our modern dystopia has already destroyed the patriarchy it hates so much. Women disregard their fathers’ advice as it’s not pertinent to them in the age of strong independent women. If, and when, Tyrone beats them, they will come crawling back to those old protections they desire so much. What happens then depends on the strength of the men in the family. Do they turn away what is their own “prodigal son” returning home? Or, do they take her back in after her failure to honor them and her family? This is a question I am thankful I never had to answer with my sister.

As Christian men we must do what we can to bring the morality of our families and, especially, of our wayward daughters back to the foundations our ancestors and their ancestors laid before us. Being Christian is meant to be a difficult life, not an easy one.

JC_Hinson #fundie identitydixie.com

[From "What is Southern Fascism?"]

Southern Fascism is showing up with your legally armed and regulated militia to protest the proposed building of a mosque in your town, succeeding in shutting the muslim colonizers down, and later that night enjoying your victory around a bonfire. Southern Fascism is walking into an invader owned store just to tell them to get the hell out of your state, and then driving the extra miles to support your fellow White man, thanking him for his service each and every time you frequent his business. Southern Fascism is denying the charities for Haiti and North Africa, in order to donate to your own folk when they need a helping hand.

Southern Fascism is stonewalling the pompous blacks in the gym, and seconds later shaking a White elder’s hand, smiling warmly and always referring to him as, “Sir.” Southern Fascism is lifting heavy in the morning and pickin’ and grinnin’ at night. Southern Fascism is walking through a crowd of invaders in a parking lot, forcing them out of your way, and then stopping to help an older White lady load groceries into her sedan. Southern Fascism is holding the door for your own, and only your own.

Southern Fascism is pissing on Abraham Lincoln’s grave, and then defending the Robert E. Lee statue from being torn down. Southern Fascism is shooting holes in the, “I’m with Her” signs, driving across town, and shooting holes in the Trump signs too.

Southern Fascism is pulling into the largest White Nationalist meeting held in 15 years, riding in a giant White truck proclaiming, “UNRECONSTRUCTED” in large White letters on the back window, the bed filled with proud White Southerners, the Stars & Bars flying high.

Southern Fascism is laughing at the mexican walking down the side of the road, and then pulling right over to tow your fellow White man out of that damn Georgia red. Southern Fascism is shaming wiggers and never embracing an alien, no matter how, “based” they look in their “Rebel” hat.

Southern Fascism is waking up early to wet a line, but arriving promptly at 11:00 a.m. to take your Granny for brunch at her favorite buffet. Southern Fascism is baked chicken and hot sauce, green beans and yams, NO potato salad, NO cobbler. Southern Fascism is iced tea, NO sugar.

Southern Fascism is naming the JEW, and calling the state of Israel what they are: a den of vipers. Southern Fascism is going to a church where your scholarly and righteous pastor preaches both sides of God’s true nature, and does so with a loaded 9mm under his vest. Southern Fascism is disciplining your children when they err, and blessing them when they make you proud.

Southern Fascism is correctly judging when a dog must be put down and not hesitating to do so, but weeping the loss of a loyal friend later. Southern Fascism is making “Jack Hinson did nothing wrong” memes and always referring to the “War of Northern Aggression” by this only acceptable title.

Southern Fascism is courteously explaining exactly what you love and support, and everything you stand for, with NO compromise and NO apology. Southern Fascism is joining the Sons of Confederate Veterans and refusing to disrespect your forefathers that bled for their people and this land by flying that damn federal flag over their graves.

Southern Fascism is being the only man to loudly protest White dispossession in your city council meeting, while everyone else insists upon sitting there “politely.” Southern Fascism is waiting patiently when arguing with an urbanite, only to better prove them wrong when they falter. Southern Fascism is telling your woman what to do and how to do it, and maybe giving her some loving later, if it’s not hunting season.

Southern Fascism is loving your people more than any other earthly possession. Southern Fascism is the unrelenting preservation of our sacred heritage and rich culture. Southern Fascism is respecting the people that brought us here, and the men that fight for it now. Ultimately, Southern Fascism is us; one united brotherhood, the heirs of a pioneered inheritance, and the mentors of the future South.

Identity Dixie #fundie #racist #wingnut identitydixie.com

[From "Alt-South Lexicon"]

American/Federal Empire

Refers to the United States since forcibly annexing the Confederate States in 1860-64. Hated in the South for sending Southerners to fight in futile wars for interests not their own. More concerned with pushing a globalist agenda to benefit the oligarchy than acting in the interests of its native population. Synonyms: The Great Satan, Zog.

Bug-Men

“Small-souled creatures that look barely human, believe strongly in having modeled “rational” takes, and are defined completely by their choices as an alpha-consumer. (Courtesy~Borzoi Boskovitch)

Churchian

A person who holds the beliefs of their particular church or denomination to be sacrosanct. They will often reject teachings of the Bible that don’t align properly with their church’s ideas concerning modern societal issues.

Cuckfederate

A person who purports to be a Confederate, but is in actuality reconstructed. These people are easily identified by excessive posting of the battle flag in Facebook groups and a need to signal to everyone that they are not racist. They can often be observed to condemn the racist viewpoints of their confederate ancestors. Favorite phrase: “Heritage, not hate.”

Dindu

A negro. Referred to as such because they dindu nuffin. All criminal and degenerate actions they take can be explained away because of the systematic oppression inflicted upon them by the evil white man.

Dixian

Also called Southerners (esp. when affixed with “unreconstructed”), Southern people, Dixians, Dixie people, Dixie nation, Confederates. A European-derived, Christian nation and ethnic group native to Dixie, biologically descended primarily from the British and Scots-Irish peoples who settled the region during the Colonial Period and Plantation Era, who remain distinct from other branches of the British diaspora and without significant admixture from African or Amerindian races. Ethnic Dixians speak their own widely recognized dialect of the English language and retain other cultural distinctions apart from the North Midlands and East Anglia derived cultures of North America.

Numale

A modern male with a low testosterone level who acts with beta tendicies. These “men” include but are not limited to male feminists, soyboys, and beta orbiters.

Reconstructed

A term which refers to people or things that were originally Southern in nature but have fallen prey to the policies imposed by the federal government and progressive culture post Civil War. A physical manifestation of this is the removal of confederate monuments and memorials to appease minority groups and progressives. A cultural manifestation of this is people, who are Southern by heritage, apologizing for the racism of their ancestors.

Unreconstructed

A term which refers to people or things that have not capitulated to being reconstructed. Southerners who are unreconstructed eschew modern societal norms and mores in favor of a more traditional culture from the antebellum South.

UrbaNEET

An urbanite who is also a NEET. A NEET is a low agency individual who usually still lives with their parents and whose sole ambitions are obtaining food and playing video games. A genetic dead end, as they will likely never produce offspring.

Urbanite

A person residing in an urban area. These people usually have beliefs modeled after the progressive trends of modernity and are deeply afflicted with the sickness that is Cultural Marxism. They tend to view Southerners as a recalcitrant people whom they must force to do what they perceive to be the right thing.

Larry Ridgeway #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Give Us Us Free: A Story of Stupidity"]

In my life I have seen many things. Things, often times that I cannot help but ask myself “How?” or “Why?” Recently though, on the morning of July 8th, I read something that would make the most stoic man rise in anger. Shall we beat it into the heads of the eternal normie that these colored hordes have no sense of justice?

In the morning hours of July 5th in Savannah, Georgia, three blacks were out on the town for a drive. Not the kind of drive our people are accustomed to though. Not at all. They were on the type of drive where they go find members of another warring tribe within their race, shoot at them from their vehicle (ignoring the safety of others) and speed off and break numerous traffic violations to get away from the scene of their latest crime. Yes, a drive-by shooting.

Three colored males were injured in the shooting. After the shooting, the driver, 17 year old Jerry Chambers, led police on a chase that ended with the fleeing suspects wrecking at the intersection of Bay and Barnard street into a pedestrian-filled sidewalk. In doing so, they killed one and injured five. The man killed was a general manger of a downtown bar called “The Grey” – the man’s name was Scott Waldrup (white man). He was thirty years old.

It has been said by several witnesses at the scene that he jumped in the way of the vehicle, pushing children out of the way and saving their lives at the expense of his own. He died a hero. Mighty white of him.

The two other sub-human chimpanzees occupying the crashed vehicle also died. Can I get a hallelujah? It’s less monsters out on the street. Jerry Chambers was arrested and charged with three counts of murder.

Now the story I just told would be triggering enough if that were all. It’s not.

Turns out that Jerry (send him to the gas) Chambers was the same animal charged in the armed robbery last summer – his victim was a 63 year old woman. He and another suspect (who was not charged) beat this woman mercilessly and when she fought back, they shot her. He turned himself in two days later.

The police said they had what they thought to be a good case, but he ended up being found not guilty for a number of dog shit reasons. His attorney argued that he was the only person charged with the crime and the victim’s statement said she slammed her trunk on the fingers of one assailant. Chambers had no corresponding injury and that he could only be charged as a “party to the crime” at best. Since I can’t find the name of the attorney and the fact that those are some obnoxious and bullshit arguments, arguments that make the pursuit of justice an impossible goal to attain, I’ll just assume the attorney was some (((slime ball))).

Chambers was tried for attempted robbery (they couldn’t pursue the armed robbery because they couldn’t verify that money was actually taken, if they got nothing, they beat and shot this woman for no reason) and he was found NOT GUILTY. Yes, not guilty. He walked free to kill a man last week and injure five others.

Are you sick of reading or hearing about these same fucking stories week in and week out? Every day you hear talk of injustice for the black man, injustice for the spics, injustice for the sodomites and, dare I forget, injustice for the fucked up people who don’t know their own damn gender.

What about justice for the white man? The fact this piece of shit is charged with three murders is absurd. Murder implies you are taking the life of another human. These other chimps weren’t human. They were scum. Gang members, drug dealing, old-woman-beating-apes – is all they were. This punk should get a medal for killing them and then be promptly led to the gallows.

The fact of the matter is, and it’s shown every fucking day, that black people and having nice shit cannot happen. A stroll on the sidewalk does not make you exempt from their carelessness and violence. Let Scott Waldrup, a selfless hero, be all you need to understand that we cannot peacefully coexist with them.

I’m sure, however, that this will continue and whitey will turn away from it.

Continue on.

Jedidiah Van Horn #sexist identitydixie.com

[From "Sexual Utopia in Power"]

It is well known to readers of this journal that white birthrates worldwide have suffered a catastrophic decline in recent decades. During this same period, ours has become assuredly the most sex-obsessed society in the history of the world. Two such massive, concurrent trends are hardly likely to be unrelated. Many well-meaning conservatives agree in deploring the present situation, but do not agree in describing that situation or how it arose. Correct diagnosis is the first precondition for effective strategy.

The well-worn phrase “sexual revolution” ought, I believe, to be taken with more than customary seriousness. Like the French Revolution, the paradigmatic political revolution of modern times, it was an attempt to realize a utopia, but a sexual rather than political utopia. And like the French Revolution, it has gone through three phases: first, a libertarian or anarchic phase in which the utopia was supposed to occur spontaneously once old ways had been swept aside; second, a reign of terror, in which one faction seized power and attempted to realize its schemes dictatorially; and third, a “reaction” in which human nature gradually reasserted itself. We shall follow this order in the present essay.

Two Utopias

Let us consider what a sexual utopia is, and let us begin with men, who are in every respect simpler.

Nature has played a trick on men: production of spermatozoa occurs at a rate several orders of magnitude greater than female ovulation (about 12 million per hour vs. 400 per lifetime). This is a natural, not a moral, fact. Among the lower animals also, the male is grossly oversupplied with something for which the female has only a limited demand. This means that the female has far greater control over mating. The universal law of nature is that males display and females choose. Male peacocks spread their tales, females choose. Male rams butt horns, females choose. Among humans, boys try to impress girls—and the girls choose. Nature dictates that in the mating dance, the male must wait to be chosen.

A man’s sexual utopia is, accordingly, a world in which no such limit to female demand for him exists. It is not necessary to resort to pornography for example. Consider only popular movies aimed at a male audience, such as the James Bond series. Women simply cannot resist James Bond. He does not have to propose marriage, or even request dates. He simply walks into the room and they swoon. The entertainment industry turns out endless images such as this. Why, the male viewer eventually may ask, cannot life actually be so? To some, it is tempting to put the blame on the institution of marriage.

Marriage, after all, seems to restrict sex rather drastically. Certain men figure that if sex were permitted both inside and outside of marriage there would have to be twice as much sex as formerly. They imagined there existed a large, untapped reservoir of female desire hitherto repressed by monogamy. To release it, they sought, during the early postwar period, to replace the seventh commandment with an endorsement of all sexual activity between “consenting adults.” Every man could have a harem. Sexual behavior in general, and not merely family life, was henceforward to be regarded as a private matter. Traditionalists who disagreed were said to want to “put a policeman in every bedroom.” This was the age of the Kinsey Reports and the first appearance of Playboy magazine. Idle male daydreams had become a social movement.

This characteristically male sexual utopianism of the early postwar years was a forerunner of the sexual revolution but not the revolution itself. Men are incapable of bringing about revolutionary changes in heterosexual relations without the cooperation—the famed “consent”—of women. But the original male would-be revolutionaries did not understand the nature of the female sex instinct. That is why things have not gone according to their plan.

What is the special character of feminine sexual desire that distinguishes it from that of men?

It is sometimes said that men are polygamous and women monogamous. Such a belief is often implicit in the writings of “conservative” male commentators: Women only want good husbands, but heartless men use and abandon them. Some evidence does appear, prima facie, to support such a view. One 1994 survey found that “while men projected they would ideally like 6 sex partners over the next year, and 8 over the next two years, women responded that their ideal would be to have only one partner over the next year. And over two years? The answer, for women, was still one.”[1] Is this not evidence that women are naturally monogamous?

No, it is not. Women know their own sexual urges are unruly, but traditionally have had enough sense to keep quiet about it. A husband’s belief that his wife is naturally monogamous makes for his own peace of mind. It is not to a wife’s advantage, either, that her husband understand her too well: Knowledge is power. In short, we have here a kind of Platonic “noble lie”—a belief which is salutary, although false.

It would be more accurate to say that the female sexual instinct is hypergamous. Men may have a tendency to seek sexual variety, but women have simple tastes in the manner of Oscar Wilde: They are always satisfied with the best. By definition, only one man can be the best. These different male and female “sexual orientations” are clearly seen among the lower primates, e.g., in a baboon pack. Females compete to mate at the top, males to get to the top.

Women, in fact, have a distinctive sexual utopia corresponding to their hypergamous instincts. In its purely utopian form, it has two parts: First, she mates with her incubus, the imaginary perfect man; and, second, he “commits,” or ceases mating with all other women. This is the formula of much pulp romance fiction. The fantasy is strictly utopian, partly because no perfect man exists, but partly also because even if he did, it is logically impossible for him to be the exclusive mate of all the women who desire him.

It is possible, however, to enable women to mate hypergamously, i.e., with the most sexually attractive (handsome or socially dominant) men. In the Ecclesiazusae of Aristophanes the women of Athens stage a coup d’état. They occupy the legislative assembly and barricade their husbands out. Then they proceed to enact a law by which the most attractive males of the city will be compelled to mate with each female in turn, beginning with the least attractive. That is the female sexual utopia in power. Aristophanes had a better understanding of the female mind than the average husband.

[...]

Fallout of the Revolution: “Date Rape”

A few years into the sexual revolution, shocking reports began to appear of vast numbers of young women—from one quarter to half—being victims of rape. Shock turned to bewilderment when the victims were brought forward to tell their stories. The “rapists,” it turns out, were never lying in wait for them in remote corners, were not armed, did not attack them. Instead, these “date rapes” occur in private places, usually college dormitory rooms, and involve no threats or violence. In fact, they little resemble what most of us think of as rape.

What was going on here?

Take a girl too young to understand what erotic desire is and subject her to several years of propaganda to the effect that she has a right to have things any way she wants them in this domain—with no corresponding duties to God, her parents, or anyone else. Do not give her any guidance as to what it might be good for her to want, how she might try to regulate her own conduct, or what qualities she ought to look for in a young man. Teach her furthermore that the notion of natural differences between the sexes is a laughable superstition that our enlightened age is gradually overcoming—with the implication that men’s sexual desires are no different from or more intense than her own. Meanwhile, as she matures physically, keep her protected in her parents’ house, sheltered from responsibility.

Then, at age seventeen or eighteen, take her suddenly away from her family and all the people she has ever known. She can stay up as late as she wants! She can decide for herself when and how much to study! She’s making new friends all the time, young women and men both. It’s no big deal having them over or going to their rooms; everybody is perfectly casual about it. What difference does it make if it’s a boy she met at a party? He seems like a nice fellow, like others she meets in class.

Now let us consider the young man she is alone with. He is neither a saint nor a criminal, but, like all normal young men of college years, he is intensely interested in sex. There are times he cannot study without getting distracted by the thought of some young woman’s body. He has had little real experience with girls, and most of that unhappy. He has been rejected a few times with little ceremony, and it was more humiliating than he cares to admit. He has the impression that for other young men things are not as difficult: “Everybody knows,” after all, that since the 1960s men get all the sex they like, right? He is bombarded with talk about sex on television, in the words to popular songs, in rumors about friends who supposedly “scored” with this or that girl. He begins to wonder if there isn’t something wrong with him.

Furthermore, he has received the same education about sex as the girl he is now with. He has learned that people have the right to do anything they want. The only exception is rape. But that is hardly even relevant to him; he is obviously incapable of doing something like that.

Frank Einstein, MD #conspiracy identitydixie.com

[From "Dr. Gerberding or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Vaccines"]

Welcome my fellow goyim; my name is Dr. Frank Einstein and I am here to calm your uneasiness on the question of vaccines. Many of you may or may not know that here recently a lady was jailed due to the fact that she refused to follow the court order to vaccinate her child. The child thankfully has since been vaccinated. Nothing like a little government intervention to give Progress the boost it needs from time to time. Just imagine where the South would be if there had been no forced integration back in the sixties.

Now lets start off with the most ludicrous claim: vaccines cause Autism. As many of you know these claims have been around for quite sometime now and there have been countless studies debunking this fraudulent accusation. The fact that they refuse to do Double Blind Placebo test for most vaccinations is totally irrelevant. I mean how negligent and uncaring would our government have to be to mass-produce vaccines for the public without actually testing them for side affects, if they were potentially that harmful. If you want an example of the wrong way for a government to handle it look at Japan. They just simply banned the MMR vaccine after noticing a large part of the population started developing adverse affects (only including a few instances of Autism, blindness, and death). But what would you expect from a country that allows its schools to use Mein Kampf as “teaching material”. Another argument these delusional people will make, is that the minuscule amounts of heavy metals somehow cause it.

It’s not like the stuff is being injected directly into your child’s bloodstream. If anything this abrupt rise in Autism is a genetic defect due to homogeneous societies. Diversity, our greatest strength, will undoubtedly solve this within a few generations.

Of course there are a few other concerns like how the vaccine industry is set to make $61 billion dollars in profit by 2020. So what if international corporations make a lucrative profit off what you’re injecting into your children, just think of all the refugees they’ve saved by allowing them to acclimate to our society through the miracle of vaccines. Or how we have the highest rate of SIDS in the industrialized world and we are also the most heavily vaccinated. It’s just another freak coincidence my fellow goy, giving these coincidences too much attention can be dangerous. Before too long you’ll be buying into all these conspiracies about globalism and our greatest ally Israel. Speaking of this blessed race the American Jewish Committee gave Julie Gerberding their first ever Woman’s Global Leadership Award. She earned this from not only her tenure as the director of the CDC, but also her current career at Merck where she is the head of their vaccine division. She is truly a champion of global industry and health.

In closing I know there are a few things still not covered such as the infamous “vaccine court” among other things. Yes, there will still be naysayers, people not convinced by the facts so conveniently placed before them. This short essay will in no way placate all the emotional soccer moms enraged at the fact that their precious child may never become potty trained much less start a family of their own. They will have to search a little longer before they can so easily lay the blame elsewhere. I’m just here to remind those of you who aren’t yet too far gone that vaccines are 100% absolutely never ever going to be dangerous.

Don’t look into it. There’s no need. After all you can trust me, I’m a doctor.

Silas Reynolds #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Bob Goodlatte: Make the Shenandoah San Salvador!"]

It never changes does it. If you’re a student of Virginia politics, you know full well that most of the state is being demographically and politically transformed by both internal (think Yankee shitlibs, cucks and transplants) and external immigration (think Third World refuse). Most of our Republican leadership isn’t even made up of actual Virginians. See the ugly mug associated with this article, it’s none other than Massachusetts native, now a Virginia trvecon, Bob Goodlatte.

What globalist tricks are the cucks up to this time? Displace the current native Virginians, as well as the rest of the country, with one million low-wage, foreign guest-workers. If the globalist shills have their way, these indispensable new serfs will be granted citizenship and likely vote Republicans in office (end sarcasm).

[...]

We all know these cucks want to make Pedro and Francisco citizens, because that’s what cuckservatives do – they displace the native population because of their Chamber of Commerce (or in this case, Big Agriculture) overlords and “muh economy” reasons. Never mind the actual Virginians in Goodlatte’s district of Roanoke, Lynchburg, Harrisonburg and Staunton that could use actual employment opportunities.

Further from Breitbart regarding this demographic Russian roulette that Goodlatte is playing:

The bill is designed to provide the food industry with many cheap workers — while also preventing those imported workers from becoming U.S. citizens, or from having children born in the United States. That worker-to-citizen process has proved deadly for the Republican Party in Democratic-run California but also in Goodlatte’s home state of Virginia, where a large number of immigrants has turned the once GOP state into a Democratic-leaning state.

[...]

Obligatory reminder on immigration voting patterns.

[Immigrants vote for Democrats]

American Farm Bureau Federation President, Zippy (sounds like a real dickhead) Duvall, said the proposed guestworker visa program, “would bring much-needed improvements to the current system while addressing the needs of our current workforce and providing a streamlined visa process for skilled agricultural workers in the future. Although Farm Bureau members have concerns on certain points, such as capping the number of visas, we stand ready to work with Chairman Goodlatte and members of Congress to refine these provisions for the good of all U.S. agriculture.”

We all know the score – cheap brown labor for Big Business, while the natives indulge in Welfare and opioid addiction, that’s the prevailing opinion among our enemies anyway. But, unfortunately, there’s some truth to it as well. I mean, it’s not like Virginia has any opioid problems, right (click link)?

The real issue here is the cabal of globalist and weak men, in this case a transplant Yankee (carpetbagger, really), don’t give a damn about us. Instead of statesmen working on providing employment opportunities for actual Virginians, we have traitors like Goodlatte looking to score points with Big Ag by legislating a Third World invasion under the guise of poor poultry workers.

When the Shenandoah Valley starts looking like San Salvador, we can thank the Yankee from Holyoke, Massachusetts .

Larry Ridgeway #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Minneapolis: A Response to the Chimp"]

So on July 15th, Justine Ruszczyk,40, was gunned down by Mohamed Noor, a Somalian immigrant “cop” (fucking diversity hire) with what seems to be no provocation, from the passenger seat of his police cruiser while she was engaged in conversation with Noor’s partner. We know this. I wrote an article about it. Of course you read it—.

Since the shooting, a certain Minneapolis City Council Member, Abdi Warsame, has been “pushing back” against the media, racism and Islamophobia. Well I, Larry Ridgeway, am here to “push back” against him and his brown hordes who wish to come here and colonize our country.

[...]

Well, Ali Baba the thing is that it is unclear why officer Noor shot this woman. This white woman. This white woman in pajamas. His backwards desert cult culture that believes women should be covered from head to toe in what is basically the same as wearing a cloth garbage bag (garbage bag for garbage people) probably has nothing to do with this situation? Give me a break.

[...]

Okay, so it is now a moral imperative to take into consideration the east African community when we recognize the differences in culture and the incapability these literal savages exhibit when it comes to basic societal interactions? Get fucked. This is the white mans country. We owe you no explanations as to why we notice the incompatibility and feel animosity towards your community. The browner this place gets, the shittier it becomes. Your IQ (which is so low most of you won’t be able to read this) makes you unable to be in a high trust society.

[...]

You are assuming that because this brown being masquerading as a human has papers “legalizing” his “American” citizenship makes him American. Nothing could be further from the truth. You people bring you mental inadequacy and shit tier culture from the mud huts in Africa and through your inability to assimilate and not commit violent acts makes this, in a much broader sense, a Somalian problem. You people should not be here, much less hold positions of authority.

Any authority. You people definitely should not have access to firearms.

The white cops you are whining about are actually American citizens. They have been here for generations and since they operate in their daily lives without violent outbursts, they can be trusted to uphold the laws they don’t fucking break. This is common sense, but it’s not surprising mud people with an IQ below the equivalent to a resting heart rate can’t understand this.

[...]

Ever since imported Africans became considered citizens (how they became people truly baffles me) there has been a race problem. Not in the sense you mean, it but in the sense that more than one race exists in this country. You really ought to leave. Experiment is over.

We all know Islam is out of the question and has always been a problem. Fuck the outliers. Also, fuck you.

This is the attempt at colonization by these people. It begins in the mind of the host. By planting the idea that race is just skin color and we can all exist in harmony, the parasitic entity convinces the host to make concessions that weaken itself and attempt to put the parasite on the same level as the host. First the mind, then the land.

It is important for the residents of not only Minneapolis, but the United States as a whole, to know that its okay to push back at these people. We are defending our posterity’s right to a home, to exist and to continue as a race. The system our ancestors created will not exist if we allow the infiltration of our institutions by these Third World heathens.

Larry Ridgeway #fundie identitydixie.com

[From "Take Your Place"]

Through the years a war has been waged. Racially and culturally. Whites, a once proud people, have been handed defeat after defeat it seems since the 1960’s. The country our grandparents lived in and enjoyed is vastly different than the one we have today. A person conscious of this, yet not on our side, would ask himself why this is. Why is it that things seem to be getting worse? Also, why is it that such seemingly small numbers of people are the only ones willing to do anything about it?

As history has shown us, Whites have been a people that flourished because of their ambition to pursue the interests of their race. They accomplished great things for the sake of themselves and their people. There was a sense of racial awareness that made this all subconscious to them, but it served them well. The reason for their existence was to improve their lot for the sake of future generations.

The push forward. The more ground they could traverse for their family, the further ahead they could place their race, the better. Well, what happened?

Truth is, there are many things that have happened.

Through integration in the 60’s many Whites have been brought down to the level of Blacks. Many adopt their music as if it is their own. Many dress and carry themselves like their black counterparts.

Through these things come the attitude of the Black. The mentality of the eternal underachiever. The White has learned how to exist without ambition, like his Black lesser than.

Since the late 50’s and early 60’s the momentum has changed hands in this struggle. Where in the past they always were focused on progress, now we as a people are fighting to preserve history as well.

Since we approach this conflict in a defensive manner, forward progress is inhibited by our desire to fight to preserve – instead of attack and take.

[...]

The brown hordes and their communist overlords have us on the defensive. We plan rallies around the idea we are preserving history, instead of planning marches through once white areas that are now inhabited by the brown plague. This is how we show solidarity for our future.

We are the most hated element of society. People flock to strength, not weakness. While we are not a weak people and Charlottesville is going to be wonderful for morale and our cause, it is at its core a defense of our people. We are conquerors. We always have been.

In our position we should agitate to make our position attainable. Go places we aren’t welcome. Large White marches through areas now populated by Muslims, public pro-White demonstrations and a very vocal position on all social matters pertaining to race. This is our fucking country. We have been charged with the task of taking back what is rightfully ours for the sake of our children and future generations.

Defending won’t always be enough. Especially when literally everyone is coming for part of what was created for you.

How do some in these circles say it? Retake Everything.

Larry Ridgeway #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Bull Connor: History’s Unsung Hero"]

Looking back on my childhood, I remember the names of men put forth as men that were worthy of looking up to. I remember the story of how Lincoln freed the blacks and how Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act and was told that these men were heroes for their heroic deeds. Upon further examination though, it is not these men that are heroes, it is the men who stood against them that are the real heroes. Men who stood up against the tide of, not only federal overreach, but the breach in contract with the laws of nature – blacks are lesser thans and, if anything, should be subjugated. When opposition to the “muh Civil Rights” movement comes to mind, one can think of none other than Bull Connor.

[...]

In 1934, he entered and won the race for a seat on the Alabama House of Representatives on the Democratic ticket. During his term as a legislator he opposed increasing the state sales tax and increasing licensing fees, while voting to raised the poll tax (a measure to keep poor whites and blacks from voting. Hallelujiah).

[...]

During his time in this position, he did many things I consider to be badass (to say the least). In 1938, he ordered the attendees of the Southern Conference for Human Welfare at Municipal Auditorium not to “segregate together” causing a scene with the-then First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt (who was intensely disliked in the South at the time).

In 1948, his officers arrested a U.S senator from Idaho, Glen H. Taylor, who was running for Vice President on the Progressive ticket alongside Henry Wallace, for attempting to speak with the Southern Negro Youth Conference, thereby violating the city’s segregation laws. This is pretty fucking sweet if you ask me.

Also in 1948, he led a walkout at the Democratic National Convention by southern delegates in protest of Harry Truman’s civil rights policies. He also ran unsuccessfully for governor in 1950.

It gets better though. He hated commies. He is stated to have said, “There isn’t enough room in this town for Bull and the commies.” In 1950, he helped get an ordinance passed in the city making “communication or voluntarily association” with a communist party member a misdemeanor punishable by a 100 dollar fine and 180 days in jail. FUCK YEAHHHH! He also told those commie scum they had 48 hours to vacate the city (for real).

[...]

He came back in 1956 and was not fucking around. He organized a raid on that agitating scumbag Fred Shuttlesworth’s house during a “destroy the white mans country” meeting and arrested them for vagrancy, a crime you can be held without bail for the first three days of imprisonment. The federal government was all like, “Hey, were going to investigate.” Bull says “Fuck you.” As Bill The Butcher says, “That’s how you stand up against the rising of the tide.” Bill The Butcher also did nothing wrong.

Afterwards, he was elected as Democratic National Committeeman for Alabama in 1960.

In 1962, in an attempt to have the city portrayed in a better light on the national stage, the voters changed the form of government in the city by having the mayor work with a separate city council, instead of with two other city commissioners. This push was spearheaded by none other than Chamber of Commerce President (((William Smyers))) after he said he was in Japan and saw a picture of a bus in flames near Anniston, Alabama. He was just so traumatized that the white man was standing against integration and the destruction of their way of life.

Before leaving office, he held court with the agitators once more. In May of 1963, Martin Luther Coon was planning protests citywide, Bull was not having it. He ordered police to arrest and jail hundreds of violent black adults and children, let the dogs loose on them and employed the use of fire hoses to quell the disturbance brought about by those actively and openly disrupting the way of life of white southerners whose ancestors settled the land and made it prosperous.

When asked if he could maintain segregation in its current capacity in Birmingham, he responded, “I may not be able to, but I’ll die trying.”

The public outcry nationwide against the events in Birmingham led to the hastening of civil rights laws by our malevolent federal government. With the cucking of the entire country secured, the powers-that-be pushed through their legislation and court mandates ended commonsensical segregation in the South. A sad day indeed.

[...]

Bull Connor foresaw the problems we face today. He did all that he could to keep Birmingham free from these problems and in the end came up short. The fact he was never willing to cuck to the federal powers and was relentless in his pursuit of the preservation of the southern way of life should make him a hero to all.

For what is it about the American spirit that makes us different?

It’s the will to stand up and be defiant in the face of those who abuse their power. To seek the best life for your people as there is possible. He remained constant and consistent. Theophilus Eugene Connor was, is, and always will be a hero in my eyes.

BULL CONNOR DID NOTHING WRONG!

Next page