All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
Admit it women, you only want to be apart of chads harem
They want to be used by chads, they will put up with getting beaten, they would rather be chads cumslut than date a non Chad. This is what they want, they are evil by default. Nothing matters to them beside looks, don't delude yourself. We are dirt to them, I saw a woman crying today and I actually felt a little happy. She was probably crying about the chad who doesn't want to fuck her anymore
The positivity cult is a disease worse than the plague upon society.
Every day I wake up, I check Instagram. What do I see? Whores sharing their EXPENSIVE WINE and CLASSY clothes. I see whores on a nice vacation somewhere on the other side of the world. I see couples smiling. I see happy people. Nowhere is there any space for any emotion except positivity, but let's face it. People like US are doomed, we can not get our female partners, what is there to be positive about? Why do normans even think positive at all? Do they really think they matter?
People outright LIE to make themselves look as positive and as successful as possible. But here is the truth, you are NOTHING but a consumer. You are an ant, your life has no worth. You are one out of 8 billion people, look, if you were to be put in a jar along with 25 000 people, you would be indistinguishable. You are a part of a bigger system, you don't own a yacht, you are not a billionaire. Whilst you and your "lovely" girlfriend (that has a stinking breath every morning and naturally smells bad) are having a so called "romantic" evening at a restaurant built in the most efficient way possible to get as many customers as possible, the billionaires were partying in the Atlantic, pouring champagne on themselves and if the weather is bad then they'll just go to their private hotels to have a REAL luxurious meal.
So my saying to the normal person is, stop this madness, there is nothing to be proud of, you are nothing but clockwork elves ready to be replaced, you do not matter, you have ABSOLUTELY no worth. Your day consists of the same routines, your work is unappreciated. So my thesis is finally, unless you are a billionaire or have a net worth of upwards $50+ million, then do not think positive, ever. You are doomed to a cursed and sad life.
The positivity cult is a corrupt concept that needs to die off and replaced by rationality and logic.
[Comments under the post "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA" displaying a photo of Alberta Young Communist League members]
From MaunaLoona:
If you throw retards out of a helicopter is that cruelty to animals?
From Faragian_Future:
No, it's humane dispatch.
From Eternasphere:
Getting rid of dead weight
The surveillance state is absolutely associated with diversity. Because increases in diversity is overwhelmingly associated with increases in crime, it justifies greater surveillance by the state, not less. In fact all state interventions (read police) are increased when you have more ethnic groups in one place, because they are more likely to be in conflict, and less likely to have a common set of values (or incentive) to resolve their conflicts.
Haha, I do have a job. I work in a free clinic as a therapist for low income people and I love my work and my patients. I'm also what you would call a "rich white person" and a self made person. I started in community college and working as a cleaning lady. I developed a number of businesses, sold them, and then went into social work. I have a 3.98 GPA in a very competitive, very leftist university, and in all likelihood I'm headed to Columbia for my Phd in less than a year. I know you love to think any identitarian is a toothless idiot, lashing out at more fortunate people of color in a pathetic envious rage, but that is your mistake to make. Please continue to underestimate us, we'll all be tenured by the time you figure out what you've done.
I don't take my "pride" from other whites. I want everyone to be safe and have the most functional society possible. To do this we need to be honest about facts, and look what has worked and what hasn't not. We need to seek out information that challenges our worldview, and question the arenas of power that our morality defends. We need to look at the functional outcomes of our ideologies, not what we would like them to be. When we start from a basis of truth, we can make better decisions for our society. People of color do not benefit from the ideology you defend either. That is the whole point. No working class people benefit from schemes of endless third world immigration or forced integration. Everyone ends up less happy, poorer, and with weaker civic institutions.
I have deep pride in my people. I believe in their right to exist in their ethnic homelands and govern their ethnic homelands. I'm not ashamed of that. That doesn't mean that I derive my self worth from my race. I look to my ancestors for guidance, and I believe in my traditions.
You mischaracterize our founding fathers in favor of a revisionist history. You conflate 3rd world immigration with European immigration, to your own detriment. Make no mistake, American culture was intended to be majority white up until 1965. You taking liberty with historical facts and twisting words does no justice to your cause or your argument.
Today I received a word from the Spirit, I learned that Donald Trump and Milo Yiannopoulos are the Two Witnesses from Revelation. The perfect Love between them is a picture of the love between Daddy (Abba/the Father) and Jesus Christ the Son.
Donald, the President, is like God the Father who is King and Lord of all creation.
Milo is the suffering servant, he was stripped of his job and reputation just like Jesus was stripped of his clothes and crucified for our sins.
Together they have been speaking truth to power and challenging the reign of the evil one. Let us reach out our hands and pray for them as they do heaven's work in these last days.
And your rhetoric is exactly the same one some people had after Native Americans witnessed Nordic Europeans settling in the US. At first it was just a few Europeans arriving, some Native Americans resisted but many welcomed the trade, technology, culture, and religion. They couldn't care less if the Ohio valley turned more European, as long as the Europeans supported them against opposing tribes. Soon more Europeans came, and before they knew what was happening they lost all their land.
Don't be so naive. There's nothing wrong with maintaining cultural and ethnic hegemony. No one would have expected WASPs to yield the entire country to Italians, Polish, Jews, etc.
Most people seem to settle around 90%. I've never really seen anyone suggest lower than 85% or higher than 95%. A few people seem to think the one drop rule is a good idea, but those people are silly, because they would exclude most of Southern and Eastern Europe. And the Finns.
It depends on how much the non-European admixture affects your appearance and the determination has to be made on a case-by-case basis.
White + White = White
White + Mongol = Half-blood Freak who will never be able to fully assimilate with White society or Mongolian society. Mixing is never justified.
"Passing" is the cut-off. Generally skin color tracks pretty well with other genetics. I'd say that's about 1/16th, though. The fine distinction doesn't really matter at this point in time.
I've heard Asians described by whites as being Borglike, in that they simply assimilate and don't attempt to do anything else. No morals, nothing.
[From "A new alt-right sub is forming and their ideas are quite frightening." on r/Physical_Removal]
From srv340mike
Nothing says "peaceful way of life" like "physically removing" people who disagree with you. These people really are the scum of the earth.
From MightBeANovelty
Look at this thread. Physical Removal is the preservation of peaceful people and you make our point for us.
From Megareddit64
"Anyone who disagrees with me threatens my peaceful way of life and should be physically removed."
Just an euphemism for "suppress those who disagree".
From MightBeANovelty
Yea, people that want to seize the means of production, starve billions, and throw people in Gulags. If you believe in "punching Nazis" and not this you are a hypocrite.
From LGBTLibrarian
Serious question - once you "remove" these people where will you put them?
From MightBeANovelty
For a serious answer, read Hans Hermann Hoppe's Democracy: The God that Failed.
They would be removed by the Freedom of Association (a total economic ban on transactions with leftists) and self-defense methods if they get violent.
The ironic thing is if the standards were applied equally, we're among the only men that are NOT rapists.
Since the definition of "rape" has gone from "sex without consent" to "sex a woman does not enjoy" that makes all non-incel straight men rapists. The idea of a woman enjoying sex is for the most part male fantasy. Women use sexuality to get things (money, attention, etc.) but hate the act itself. That's another reason I want a sexless relationship, neither of us would enjoy it. I'm too black pilled to play such a childish make pretend game. If I'm gonna LARP I'd rather do so on the computer as a good looking 2d character from a Mongolian toilet repair series.
But I find it ironic that men who have engaged in intercourse (Or "piv" as millennials call it) an act that is inherently uncomfortable (and often painful) for a woman, who would rather be doing anything else... and then come here and call a group of kissless hugless virgins "rapists". And of course those comments get le upboats because this is reddit.
(Emphasis original)
Rape holds us back
Rape was only made to withhold us, lower value males to have our sexual needs fulfilled. During all history the guys took what they could by force or by desire, it didn't make a difference because the goal was to breed and create life. This normie society made up restrictions to restrain us from our rights. They cucked us. Our enemies are not the females, they have no other use than to spread their legs, our enemy is the society and the cucked restrictions aka laws who were put on us to restrict us from our true freedom. Morals and laws are only made to hold us back from going rouge. They brainwash us since kids, we are perfect mindless drones until we snap. If you follow laws and abide by moral code you are a cucked slave of the elites.
Honestly, the left really fucked us, and themselves. Without aggressive ethnic replacement programs, the west could be as accommodating towards minority groups as it wanted, hell even keep anti-white discrimination policies in place to get the warm and fuzzies. Now the stage has been set for a massive civilizational conflict, like Sunnis and Shia fighting over control of Iraq in zero sum fashion.
I hardly think pro-white advocacy is illegitimate, all other groups do it all the time. Difference is, your not going to sit in on an NAACP meeting and hear people talk about physically removing whites and instigating a race war. I don't get why this is so hard to understand that this is a dead end.
South Africa is a shitshow. The whites fighting to maintain apartheid have been pretty much vindicated (at least in terms of existential self-interest, if not morally) as it looks like the country is going the way of Zimbabwe. I suppose it just depends which side your loyalties lie. Just like Israel vs. Palestine is an existential struggle where good guys vs. bad guys doesn't matter so much if you have to live there.
To compare America to South Africa or Zimbabwe is way overblown, however. If you're sucked in to the 24/7 outrage news cycle, you might think the sky is falling. I've lived in a multi-cultural area for over 10 years, including shitty neighborhoods, and the legitimate episodes of racial conflict I've seen I could count on one hand and have most of my fingers left over. People for the most part get along. There are ways to advocate for white interests, or fight to assure white homogeneity in certain areas of the U.S., without having to adopt an absolutely sociopathic orientation towards non-whites, in a way that might actually work and seem fair enough to the average person. The alt-right as I see it, is not doing this, even though a simple raising of awareness of their ideology is pushing people to the right in favor of idiotic, delusional leftism.
Hitler worshiping neo-nazis have been around since George Lincoln Rockwell. They have accomplished absolutely nothing besides acting as a cartoonish freakshow that the enemies of the white race have successfully used to demonize any advocacy for white interests or assertion of white identity. The alt-right, if anything, has arisen despite this.
The rise of the alt-right, as I see it, can be attributed to a few things:
The boiled frog of demographic change has made whites more racially conscious and nervous about the future. The left has gone full-retard with blatant anti-white racism, by their own standards, and its obsession with ridiculous issues, like having 57 genders or sex change therapy for 10 year olds is easily mockable and repulsive to a large contingent of the population. The explosion of the internet has caused the media and academia to lose narrative control and the left's internal contradictions are collapsing on themselves when exposed to the light of day. Because of political and financial pressures weighing down on them, both major parties are totally delusional, corrupt, and unable to honestly address issues that people care about in a realistic way. The alt-right has stepped into this vacuum by providing insightful commentary and a compelling alternative interpretation, especially to whites who feel besieged in their own countries. P.C taboos have mentally handicapped political discourse, so the alt-right is one of the only groups contemporarily capable of examining societal trends intelligently and honestly. Trolling may have it's (limited) place, but the idea that the alt-right's rise is due to puerile bigotry, Hitler worship, or a singular obsession with creating white ethnostates, is just wrong. In fact, reliance on the above is a sure road to failure.
I was a fit, pretty attractive, very academically/career-wise successful guy who started getting a lot of attention my last year in college (I'm young looking so it took a while for me to mature). I went from hooking up with a new girl once every 6 months to once or twice a week. One girl was completely smitten. When I got a mysterious form of cancer, it was like all the positive feelings about me dried up overnight because I was no longer useful. As in, yesterday I was cool and they were all fans but today I was no longer cool so I deserved to be treated like shit. I was in a pretty desperate situation, yet my (former) friends used every ounce of my (understandable) neediness as an indictment against me. My male friends were very supportive, but my female friends were awful, especially the ones who had been attracted to me (give or take a few cool girls). I was shocked because this was the antithesis of how I was brought up, where women are these kind, nice creatures who treat you well if you treat them well first.
When I discovered The Red Pill and "Briffault's Law," it really stuck out to me. I started to see patterns in my female friends who were feminists. I'm Jewish, and I grew very disillusioned with the Jewish support for feminism which I saw as good intentions gone awry. As I got healthier, I started reading Chateau Heartiste and my game exploded. I realized that women had different biological attraction triggers. I got into the neoreactionary movement and started learning about HBD and shit. I knew there was some truth to it, because the part of my family that is Jewish all have +140 IQs and are very inquisitive, whereas my goy-ish family is more "White"-thinking but still quite smart.
:
I never let black women around my Dad, heard too many stories. Feel powerless and subordinate to white people your whole life - you can just torture one in their old age. Or you could educate yourself and do better.
[FAQ of the sub]
Is /r/Physical_Removal a hate sub?
If this sub is a hate sub so would /r/FuckRapists. Its no more a hate sub as it would be if it were a subreddit for how people don't like other people who violently beat and rob them, or others. If leftists don't want to be "hated" then don't try to steal our private property or go around causing harm to others.
But why remove them?
http://i.magaimg.net/img/m0.png
The same reason bar owners have security (bouncers) who will evict unruly citizens from their premises.
Anarcho capitalists, libertarians, and capitalists are NOT pacifists. We are against the INITIATION of force and violence. This means we will and must defend ourselves from your threats, or acts of violence. For you to implement communism it requires you to initiate force or agresss upon us, seize our private property to redistribute and abolish property rights. Private property owners may even feel threatened enough for preemptive defensive measures to ensure their safety depending on the severity of the threat. If you don't want to receive our defensive measures or threats to impose them, then don't threaten to seize our private property and implement communism upon us. Just leave us alone!
Why helicopters?
Traditionally the tool of choice (adpoted by Pinochet) was the helicopter. But its not absolute, nor the only method used to protect us.
Helicopter ride = x
Where "x" is whatever method of defense is issued by the capitalists or private property owners. This includes physical removal or eviction from the free society. Of course the market would devise the most efficient defense methods. Helicopter rides are just a meme example and is also fucking hilarious which helps get the message across. Leftists don't value free speech, thus logic and reason does not work. Historically, violence tends to be the language they comprehend the most.
This is also the logical reason why freedom loving people love being gun owners.
Are you fascists??
Protecting oneself from violence and theft of private property is simply called defense, not fascism. It should also be noted that fascism has historically never operated under or advocated free market conditions.
I assume this community supports Hitler's views?
Not really. Hitler was a socialist who hated jews. Although yes some jews created socialism and communism, it also doesn't not mean all jews are socialists and communists. We are not so focused on race here, merely the actions of humans.
Why the love for Augusto Pinochet?
In 1973 things got so economically bad in Chile the great General Augusto Pinochet (pbuh) decided he needed to seastead leftists into the pacific ocean. These actions prevented his nation from become a third world shithole, and subsequently became known as the great “Miracle of Chile”. His meeting with Milton Friedman and adoption of Chicago School Economic Theory improved the prosperity and economic conditions, and led to an improved quality of life for the people of Chile. All countries need a Pinochet.
Ideally, Pinochet's defense and security services should be privatized and provided via competing services within the free market.
A free society requires defense and enforcement of private property ownership, so that individuals can trade and live prosperously. Leftist ideology in its entirety is based upon envy which subsequently enables violating these basic human rights, as such they are a threat that needs to be defended against in order for society to optimally function freely. Statism was Pinochet's only "crime", although minarchists will argue defense is a valid role of the state. Ancap and miniarchist libertarians should support each other until we get to the point were police, military, and courts are all that is remaining of the state.
Augusto Pinochet's great deeds in this world caused him to transcended and evolve into an all powerful meme form, where he now serves Lord Kek in the afterlife.
Do you have to be an ancap to support physical removal?
No not at all. While there's a government (which will be the case for many lifetimes), its perfectly reasonable to be more sympathetic to any liberty or anti leftist politicians available who will provide the most free markets. Anarcho capitalism can be viewed as merely the end game or direction humanity needs to head into for the best outcomes for freedom. The new dogma for the right wing should be to seek positions of government and dismantle the state, and thus protect liberty by removing power from the left, which in turn brings back power to the people and to the invisible hand of the free market, where we are free to make our own choices.
What about the NAP (Non Aggression Principle)?
You can't defend yourself or private property (your liberty) without threats to defend, and a means to physically protect it if action is needed. When a violent mob of rabid commies threatens, attacks you or comes to steal your stuff, dogmatic moralist ideals and trying to explain the NAP to them won't get you very far. They don't even value freedom of speech for a start. Again, we are not pacifists! We must be capable to defend our liberty!
Why do you like Donald Trump?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOCvWx9Lusc
President Donald J Trump is like a great prophet who has enabled many people to finally see and realize the true nature of the left. He is the great triggerer and also one of the greatest internet shitposters of all time.
Anarcho Capitalists and libertarians need to be pragmatic if they are to have a respected voice and survive into the future. Sure Trump is not an ancap or perhaps even a libertarian, and we aren't realistically going to get an ancap president in our life time. So there's no problem in supporting his measures to cut and slash government as he (Trump) has stated he will. Don't forget under Hillary we would be almost silenced and pushed aside and labelled as crazy as they grew the government and took away freedoms. At least Trumps main audience support the majority of what we say, and the direction we want things to head towards. We now have a president who is a warrior for the private sector, aka the productive people of society who do the heavy lifting for all the parasites to leech off.
Why do you group leftists and liberals into the same group?
I'll stop identifying and grouping statism, communism, progressivism, liberalism, and socialism as being the same thing, when they stop confusing my money and private property as being theirs.
"It's because of your opinions on women" Do you think our opinions are written on our face or what?
"It's because of your opinions on women"
Do you think our opinions are written on our face or what?
Racist people have black friends and can hide their racism for so long...
Misogynists can have feminists female friends too.
Mind to explain?
It should be punishable by death for women to have children above the age of 25
All of us that get shit out of rotting vaginas are fucked FOREVER, for something we had no control over.
Fucking selfish bitches.
(Emphasis in original)
I used to have respect for ladies, but now I take it all back
I refuse to recognize females as human any more, we should open up breeding farms and let them exit it once they hit 18, this is beyond IMAGINABLE how a woman has denied me so hard as today, basically she lives a couple of miles from where I do. (We have never talked) So as a birthday surprise I thought I should visit her and declare my love for her.
7 PM I have waited for around 20 minutes in my car to go out and knock on the door. Alright, the time is now 7:30. I go out and knock on her door, an elderly man opens and asks me who I am, i tell him I am one of her friends and he invites me in, now all her family has gathered and a couple of her female friends. I see her coming down after a couple of minutes. ( I was cramming food into myself at this point.) She looks around and at me with confusion. I give her a smile and continue eating. After around 5-10 minutes she says something to her parents in a foreign language and they start looking at me, I pretend not to notice anything. They get up and tell me to come talk with them and their daughter, I go into the other room and they ask me who I am, I explain to them that I have followed their female around and I thought she was very cute so I thought I should come to her birthday party and declare my love for her, which I do. Her father gets INSTANTLY very angry and tells me to leave their house RIGHT NOW. I look in the girl that I like and I can see that she is a bit confused, I tell her, come on, I am a great guy, you can't do this to me, she says nothing and her father LITERALLY pushes me out of his house.
If you ever wonder why I hate women then this is one of the many reasons that they have sunk my pride to ABSOLUTE low levels.
Suggestion to the English word academy, change the name of women/females to hoochie
Plural would be hoochie groupie.
This is a final suggestion, it makes perfect sense.
Why do women want a stoic, emotionless rock?
This is one of the things about women that pisses me off a lot. Why do they want men to be these stoic, unmovable rocks who are all strong and masculine and there for her when she's sad and all (but without bending, of course), but when the man is feeling down about whatever, maybe to the point of tears, even, do women feel nothing but disgust that her man is a human fucking being? Who has feelings just like her? Why can't she be there for him to provide emotional support when he needs it? Why does weakness make him less attractive to her? Why can't she be a shoulder to cry on? It basically seems like that women want to be loved while not giving any love back. This is why men kill themselves more than women.
The other extreme is less obvious. Any people that allows large scale migration of capable foreigners will become dominated by them.
Look at the Chinese squeezing natives out in Australia, Canada and the Philipines.
Females use the "entitled" meme to justify slutting around with Chad.
Females on this forum always come on and say that incels are not entitled to sex but give it easily and freely to Chad. Females will never admit that that they are superficial and whores for Chad. Since they say that they are not superficial they have to come up with some sort of excuse why they don't bang Normans as easily and why they don't give anything to incels at all. The pathetic excuse they give to incels is that "you are not entitled to sex", this in their mind is virtuous justification.
Incels are meant to swallow this god awful pathetic excuse and just watch asshole Chads pump and dump willy nilly and tolerate females yelling at you for daring to question why Chad gets everything. When a female berates you for being "entitled" when you question them about whoring with Chad, tell them to cut the bullshit and just admit that they are sluts for Chad.
The TRUE reason why incels and former incels prefer younger girls is NOT because of bullshit like "purity" or "older are used up"
It's because of how we crave YOUNG INTIMACY. None of this patriarchy-like bullshit about girls who are virgins and pure and stupid shit. its just experiencing TEEN LOVE. Its getting to live the lost years, enjoying the magic and energy of love and intimacy with those young ages.
Normies misunderstand the reason why incels want young girls (i'm talkiing from 16-onwards, not pedo shit...) because lots of incels themselves don't understand the real subconscious reason why they want them and try to rationalize trough a sense of right, pureness or less degeneracy.
It's all about making up for lost years. It's all about young passion. It's all about feeling like a teen again. It's all about repairing the mind.
The 80/20 rule makes suicide reasonable
Basically, if you're not in the top 20% of chads your life will be miserable. Men only exist to do labor, raise Chad's offspring, and die. I feel, men should have a right to rebel against nature, however. 80% of men should be euthanized or aborted, do tests and analysis to see if the infant will be in the top 20%, if they will not, terminate the pregnancy. Think of all the misery that could be avoided if all non-Chads were granted the freedom of death! And, it'd make women happy, all the undesirable males she didn't want are now dead or never existed and only chad exists, they'd be thrilled! If not 80% of males, the bottom 20% of physical and mental defects such as myself should be euthanized soon after birth or prior to it.
Dancing is female way to be a complete slut without having sex
Although she does end up having sex anyway.
I almost feel sorry for the pathetic normies who pretend to be into it too and stupidly move their bodies to horrible music while getting blue balled by Party Stacies in hope that after 3 hours of orgy she'll actually deliver.
Probably only to find her making out with Chad or a luckier normie after the short trip to the restroom.
"But Norman, I was only dancing!"
So. much. fun.
Also fun are the Stacies who think that conveying their love for dancing makes them seem free spirited and special.
(OP by IFA_MTBL)
The fact that feminists find the men they claim to be against (non sensitive, hypermasculine, misogynistic alpha males) is proof that feminism is nothing but a massive shit test
(randomaccount22223)
This is why you pay attention to a woman's actions and not her words. She claims to want men who act like feminine pussies but loves to get fucked by the dominant 6'4 Alpha. Guys are told to shun traditional masculinity but this behavior is a repellant to females.
(OneDayMorePlease)
If you're a feminist in the west you're probably fucking retarded and a trash species. What a joke of movement for a joke of a species. The welfare species as I like to call it. Depending on men since the beginning of time. Females need to return to being Comfort Females. That is their sole purpose in the universe.
It's not economically feasible for a woman to continue having children while the male can leave and mate with another woman. A woman can only have 1 child at a time while a male can get many women pregnant. More responsibility falls onto the woman and that is why traditionally (and even now in the modern days) women choose a partner and sticks with them. If a white woman picks a non-white partner, then they will have mixed children going forward. Her white lineage is destroyed.
It's just biology. If you were breeding dogs and you wanted to preserve a specific genetic line, the exact same logic would apply.
Letting your male poodle breed with mutt females doesn't affect the preservation of the poodle line. Letting your female poodle breed with mutt males does.
Not that much better. The divorce rates for intraracial marriage are extremely high, only slightly less than WMAF. Besides there are countless Asian women who cannot divorce because they have no financial stability whatsoever. Not only that these children are completely new to this world and they have a completely different worldview and experience. The unknown is unknown.
I wish I could set up a commission to monetarily penalize any interracial divorce.
It's not about fetishes or whatever. People can downplay racial worship disguising as some sexual fetish, when we know the true answer to the relationships. A relationship in which women want to upgrade their lifestyles. This means Chinese women upgrade to Japanese or Korean men. Korean women upgrade to Japanese men. The statistics reflect that. Meanwhile in western countries the fall of the white man has led to both white women and men into East asian worship aka Japanese/Korean worship. The new Hierarchy is being created. Japanese men generally have little interest in foreign women because of obese caucasian women and rampant infidelity. Korean men are happy to take in masses of white women. The leftovers are in China. Sorry that's offensive but its the truth.
Interracial relationships are mostly about sexual conquests from the mans' POV into powerful cultures. Men are just like women and these men secretly worship East asians as superior. Japanese men know that they are at the top of the Asian hierarchy but some have also have secretly already internalized China's monumental dominance and are actually going for Chinese women instead of Korean women. That's how the world works.
Do you understand how sexual selection works? When push comes to shove, women are the last flag bearers of human civilization to create life. They are given the duty to weed out bottom of the barrel males. A man who is confident and well liked will not resort to the interracial marriage market. Very few instances are true love. You of all people should know this-love is not a kpop drama of fluffy wonder dream flying in cloud.
There's literally nothing wrong with racism or sexism.
Nope. If it ain't white, it ain't right. Yes, I'm willing to use DNA testing to filter out Jewish infiltrators and half-breeds that look mostly white.
I would like a nation where all Marxist and liberal policies are banned, so perhaps it wouldn't matter who is voting if such destructive policies aren't allowed. This will take some work to ascertain what is liberal and what is Marxist. The writers of the U.S. constitution did well to ensure they couldn't take guns away.
Marriage will be defined as a union between a biological male and female, and life starts in the womb will both be written into the constitution. Also, the purpose of the nation will be a European ethnostate where things are unequal and unfair. Fuck you, Marxists.
"There are more meaningful things in life"
This normie lie gets told every time an incel mentions how frustrated they are about not having sex. It's incredibly ignorant and selfish when a normie who has sex daily with a woman who loves him, or even worse when Stacy who goes from Chad to Chad, tells incels that "sex isn't all that". You wouldn't tell a starving child that food isn't that great. You wouldn't tell a homeless man that having your own place isn't all you'd hope it would be. Yet for some reason, the only biological purpose humans have is "overrated". NEVER having sex tears away at you and destroys any self respect you had. Normies I beg of you, before you think about responding to anyone here with your bullshit advice, please imagine your life never having anyone love you or think you're good enough for them.
Contradictory normie advice
The common advice I often see here is to "approach a woman as a friend, an equal, without expecting or wanting to get any sex out of it". Apparently, the fact that we don't do this is why we're incel.
But then I also see people saying that befriending women is a terrible way to get laid, and you need to be direct with her about your intentions from the start.
If you actually had an immigration policy like that we'd still effectively be an ethnostate. I'm talking about only allowing high skilled workers in and deporting all illegals forcefully.
Now lets assume an absolutist scenario where we only take on the best and brightest from Mexico, for example.
What happens to Mexico? We just took all of their bests doctors, chemists, physicists, and hardest workers; the people that would be able to make Mexico a better place.
The other 90% of the Mexican population? You just forced them to live in squalor because the only people that could make their area better just left for greener, whiter pastures.
So what you really want is the best of the best from each ethnicity, and "fuck you" to all the poor people in those countries that can't afford or aren't smart enough to immigrate.
And we get called the selfish ones...
Regarding why Civic Nationalism doesn't work aside from what I pointed out above: In reality the civic nationalists are still operating on some sort of altruistic mission. They end up opening the flood gates to immigration without the ethno nationalists to check them.
Civic Nationalism only works when you can maintain a 90% ish white majority (That's an ethnostate). Otherwise you're just getting people killed by low income, low intelligence criminals. If we need to worry about a criminal underclass, they had better be white.
As an LGBT person, I hate the LGBT community. Most of them Marxist snowflakes who want to kill all white straight men. But, I suffer from Gender Dysphoria. I recognize it as a disorder (sorry snowflakes, It is.) and I am against minors editing their bodies due to that dysphoria. That being said I do intend on transitioning as an adult if this dysphoria doesn't pass. Thanks for the concern. But don't worry, I'm not going to degenerate pride parades. Which are truly a disgusting corrupted version of moral elitism.
[Comments under "Map of World War Shows 4,500 Years of Global Conflict" featuring a greater concentration of conflicts in Europe]
@awe300
And this is why Europe shouldn't be afraid of the thing isis calls terror - the whole continent is born from millenia of suffering. What's a few shitty desert pigs?
One word, fascism. Nobody wants to have this system in Europe, but it would be most effective on removing ISIS.
[Comments under "The anti communist alliance" having as OP a pic featuring a Hoppean snake wearing Pinochet's cap and sunglasses, Pepe with a Nazi hat and a bird with the same hat as Mussolini]
@123xyz123xyz
Nazis and fascists are temporarily allowed as commie removal agents. But sadly their helicopters won't have enough fuel for the return trip. I'll miss u pepe.
@EternallyMiffed
They prefer walk-in ovens.
Nazis are National Socialists so they have to go too bud.
My Plan For Incels
I have devised a scheme for incels here that will give you all a happy life. I intend to become rich and save you.
I will round up incels and invite them to come to my private incel compound. It will be monetised and open to visitors to ensure we can live our lives in a luxurious manner. I believe that incels are truly repressed to not know love and I will try and save you all from that.
In the morning we will all meet in a grand hall to discuss and debate whatever we wish, in an organised manner. These debates will be recorded as a piece of history and will be uploaded to the internet. Incels are then given free time to do whatever they wish, I will provide gyms and private grounds to walk, access to the internet and literature, and even a place to talk to normies, chads, stacies, landwhales etc.
Each incel will have their own room. I cannot guarantee how big or luxurious they will be, but I can guarantee that all will be able to sleep in the grand hall if they so wish. Incels will all eat together in comradeship and will be encouraged to be open minded.
Willing females will be allowed in to certain areas where incels can interact if they wish. Those who do not may spend their time building, philosophising or creating art.
At 9pm we will all gather in the hall, and incels will pray to me and ask for better lives. There is no doubt that by publicising inceldom people will take notice and learn to be more inclusive. If not then we will gather enough incels and declare ourselves a new state. You will all slowly but surely become chads, and those with the best genes will be allowed to breed with women who also possess powerful genes. Our eugenics programme will eventually allow incels to function in society, and wipe out this plague that affects you all.
Sometimes my intelligence is hindering me from getting females hymen to carefully strap off
I have noticed it, whilst females are laughing about TV, I am thinking of parallel universes and Saddams torture methods, I truly am a man of magnificence. I think I was not meant for this world, I am a star that was destined to shine for a very short amount of time, and leave this earth in an amazing fashion.
I think my intelligence is just too much sometimes and I would gladly trade off 20 points of my IQ just so I could be on the same level as most normies.
When you get to the age of 20 without even having kissed a girl, you are a freak
Normies that tell me otherwise are lying. Read a thread on PPD regarding when it starts to get weird to be a male virgin. Most said 20 or 21.
When you get to my age without kissing a girl, with doing NOTHING with a girl despite wanting to, you are a freak. You are garbage, and no woman will ever want you.
Non-human animals have no moral worth. Only humans have rights.
Would that mean that, for example, torturing animals for fun would be morally acceptable?
It's undesirable, but it's morally acceptable.
Suppose communal living, or something of that nature, becomes popular and is determined to be better than capitalism in a society of free association. Would you mind this? I'm just wondering if acceptance of another system, if it is proven to be better in the free market and in the realm of free association, is an opinion that the others here and in the world share.
It would be consistent with my political system, but inconsistent with my value system. I don't like communal living, just like I don't like drug use or diversity. There are many immoral, undesirable things people can do that are still legal under libertarianism, I'll oppose them all.
I'm curious, what about diversity don't you like?
I value those more genetically similar to me and my cultural traditions in general. There's also the fact diversity increases social tension and conflict.
It's a spectrum, almost everyone prefers homogeneity over diversity at least a little. This is explained by evolution, it makes sense that people would care more when their community is more genetically similar. The empirical evidence backs this up, areas with greater racial diversity exhibit lower social trust, between and within races. Race riots in prisons and schools, the disproportionate Black on White crime, the fact most genocidal/tribal conflicts occurs within the same border, and the balkanization of groups under our democratic system of government suggests diversity is not desirable.
so you dont mind the conflict that occurs when humans interact with other species of animals. you like that kind of diversity, because your side always wins.
Animals are insignificant compared to humans, I don't attribute any moral worth to them. Humans share my genes and general behavior, as well as the fact we are a breeding population. I value the existence of some higher mammals, like Apes and Canines, but they have no place in my ethical system. I care about the lives of other humans, while I don't care if animals suffer at our hands.
