All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
[An image of a burned-down playground with an intact plastic slide standing in the middle, captioned in top text/bottom text meme format to read "CALIFORNIA'S FIRES WERE CAUSED BY DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS - PLASTIC IS A MICROWAVE-SAFE MATERIAL"]
Trannies are mentally ill freaks who need to be thrown in asylums. Ever since we let fags marry, our people have been brainwashed.
Thanks to kikes and and liberals our people are being polluted. Little kids shoved into a life style they don't want. Our men emasculated. We are committing cultural genocide.
are homophobic assholes
I am proudly homophobic, it's not okay to be a faggot.
and should be silenced
Try mother fucker, you have the balls to silence me let's see you do it.
Let's see you use force against me to silence me from speaking, cold day in hell when that will ever happen.
Indians have no shame, it's truly insane.
ALL THE TIME, Indian spammers try posting about their "stone marble countertops" companies to /r/marbles , a sub about glass playing marbles.
They never read the side bar, they don't give a fuck, all they do is search whatever they're trying to get hits on, "marble", and whatever comes up, they post their shit on EVERYTHING THAT CAME UP.
"Oh, this way I will cover all the bases and not miss any exposure, best strategy!".
Rude Indian assholes, stop posting your fucking granite marble business shit on my /r/marbles sub for GLASS PLAYING MARBLES.
Transcript
greycloud: look at the age of first marriage and first child in the fastest growing populations. if you want your population to grow fast, you will have to get married and have kids when those people would. if your country delays getting married and having kids, than they are intentionally reducing their population growth. age of consent laws in western countries are part of white genocide.
EmbitteredManlet: Women have decided that reality doesn't apply to them, and being 35+ is the best time for children. Granted there are legions of St Single Mommies out there demanding some chump pay for their thug spawn because they can't figure out how to use birth control. The age of consent has nothing to do with it, women today are spreading their legs for refugees by 14 and snorting coke by the truckload when they are not in the tattoo parlor getting inked like a convict.
greycloud: http://www.ageofconsent.com/california.htm
scroll down to the "WHY SO MUCH ATTENTION TO STATUTORY RAPE?" section and read up. age of consent laws are about
reducing teenage pregnancy, which in turn reduces population growth. these laws are primarily enforced on white populations
hile minority populations are largely ignored. a white girl who sleeps with an older black convict will not run into problems, but if she was sleeping with a white professional worker, he would be thrown in prison. selective enforcement of the law, especially in urban cities is part of the eugenics anti -white agenda.
[Comments under "Naked and humiliated woman cries out in rage and anguish as an older woman comforts her while a mob surround them during an anti-Jewish pogrom. Lvov, July 1st, 1941 [466x640]"]
@Johannes_P
@SLB-ZZ
@madrock75
@SLB-ZZ
@Panzerker
@Johannes_P
Unfortunately, given how the Soviet "judiciary" worked, the "SS volunteer who tortured and murdered Jews" and the "anti-Soviet dissident" got the same treatment, providing the former with the opportunity to join the latter.
they were being punished for working with the enemy, i dont think the soviets gave a rats ass about jewish suffering
Considering how many Jews were high ranking members of the govt in the USSR, think again.
Wouldn't be so sure considering how Stalin centralised decision making during the war in his own hands. He had anti-Semitic and highly violent tendencies that likely inured him to Jewish deaths, despite what Jewish aides/advisors like Kaganovich might have said.
Literal Nazi propaganda. Stalin led a campaign against anti semetism in the 30s, was in a party full of Jews, had a mentor who also led a campaign against anti semetism, and frequently spoken out about it.
Before or after firing most of the Jews in order to make a treaty with Nazi Germany?
From SLB-ZZ:
I know it's hip to believe literally anything and everything you read about Stalin, but as you and the other commentors have shown the truth is far from what is common knowledge.
Read on the actual words of Stalin and those around him on these issues, not revisionists from decades later who'd much rather see him discredited at any cost.
https://espressostalinist.com/2014/08/23/the-jewish-anti-fascist-committee-and-the-anti-jewish-plot/
Your friend wants you to help them hide a body. No info provided. They "don't want to talk about it". Do you help?
Depends on which friend it was. There's like.. one person who I'm not related to in any way that I would blindly help.
Even with no information at all?
I think I'd help, but keep asking, and if they still wouldn't tell then I might need to consider my next move.
I trust this particular friend with my life. If he needed help, I'd help him.
What if it's the body of say....a child, like 5/6yo?
What if you'd heard one was missing in your local area and the parents were doing tv appeals?
Not wanting to be confrontational or a dick, just wondering how far your unconditional support goes...
At what point might you demand info?
But I know my friend well enough. It wouldn't be any of that. And if it was, of course id have questions and I would ask..but I'd still help him. God forbid I find myself in some kind of situation and would need his help. He'd help me just liKe I'd help him. He's a good person. Id trust him.
I probably would give him a day before I was demanding info.
On the contrary I don't think the 90% death figure would make a good case for the Aztecs having a 'Great society's. The worst plague I know of was the black death and that killed about a third of the people in northern Europe. Their medical understanding and their sanitation was horrible...but at least they figured out how to do simple things like quarantine. If Mexicans managed to lose 90% of their people to a plague then they must be very stupid.
The proof already spoke for itself. You can continue to deny it if you like. Democrats are well known for their anti-science stances (global warming, 47 genders etc).
Only about 10% of rural Oklahoma voted for anyone but Donald Trump. He is exceedingly popular there and only growing in popularity.
Tumblr chicks and leftist soyboys get triggered. Exceptionally well educated conservative manly men like me don't get triggered. You look ridiculous to suggest otherwise, not that that seems to bother you.
This conversation is over. Good day!
American Indians have been living here for even longer, and yet it's still not their country because they played almost no role in creating it.
This is a weird phenomenon that I don't fully understand, but have several theories. I'm an Asian male rarely hang out with other Asians. When I hang out with Alt Righters, they like me, even though I mainly tell them that it's White people's fault that White liberals suck and that they should stop blaming Blacks, Mexicans, and Arabs for their personal problems. Take personal responsibility, or at least blame the White liberals for putting these destructive policies in place.
Asian American girls are effectively liberal White girls in my eyes, while Asians in Asia have their own distinct culture that don't fit any of the Western-imposed stereotypes either. My hypothesis is that it's the masculine role to uphold tradition, while women are naturally xenophilic. This is why most cultures are patrilineal, and why it's typically the women who tend to prefer massive immigration of refugees.
So I don't really blame the Alt Right men. It's just a tiny portion of xenophilic Asian Women who took pity on some outcast men. Of course they would fall in love. The Alt Right isn't hateful; they are just naive. The nature of woman is to seek novelty and adventure. The Asian women they marry aren't traditional... in fact, they are the liberals who welcome rapefugees from the Asian perspective. In effect, Alt Right men tend to become the beta providers of their liberal Asian wives. That's some postmodern irony.
In a deterritorialized world, we can't live in tradition anymore, we simply experience hauntology -- a term coined by Derrida meaning nostalgia for a lost future. The Alt Right embodies postmodernism, whether they like to admit it or not.
The three big ones for me were realizing that racial IQ differences were real, illegal immigrants murdering my White best friend, and reading Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique.
After learning that I had a high IQ when I was 14, I wanted to know more about what exactly IQ is. And it was during that research online that I accidentally stumbled across the raging debate over racial differences in IQ.
I wasn't the average 14-year-old. Despite my parents being very liberal, they were actually very socially conservative in a lot of ways. One of the ways in which they were very socially conservative is that they didn't let my siblings and I watch TV because they thought that it would rot our brains. I also attended boarding schools that didn't let us have TVs in our dorm rooms. So, what does an insanely bored kid do when he can't watch TV or play video games all day? Read books all day instead.
I had already read all of Carl Sagan's books, all of Stephen Jay Gould's books, all of Stephen Hawking's books, all of Jared Diamond's books, and a small library of other popular science books by the time that I was 13. So, it's pretty safe to say that I was a massive science fanboy growing up.
That's why I was so fucking enraged to see these toothless inbred redneck neo-Nazi KKK pieces of shit dare try to argue that science and reality was actually on their side. I basically went full Kraut and Tea... I wanted to utterly annihilate their scientific arguments, and so I read a small mountain of books on the topic of IQ from both sides of the debate. I also read hundreds of online articles and blog posts and watched about a dozen documentaries on this topic before coming to the literally painful conclusion that the redneck neo-Nazi skinheads actually did have science and reality on their side, and that my liberal, anti-racist side of the debate was actually spouting bullshit half-truths in a desperate attempt to combat White Supremacy.
But despite that paradigm shattering red-pill, I still remained a loyal libtard for about 6 more years because I simply wasn't ready to join the "dark side" yet. My leftist indoctrination was way too deep to abandon the left overnight. In fact, I actually became more extreme politically over the next few years. Reading Noam Chomsky's books, among others, turned me into a proud Marxist. I was even borderline Antifa in my late teens and almost joined in on a lynch mob after this girl in my high school argued that not all Nazis were evil because they were just following orders (long story).
However, I was starting to become increasingly disillusioned with the left after traveling to current and former communist countries and seeing how fucked up they were, and because I was reading right-wing books and blogs in order to better understand my political enemies during the Bush era.
The straw that finally broke the camel's back was the brutal murder of my White best friend by a pack of 15 MS-13 gang members when we were both sophomores in college. Every single one of them was an illegal immigrant. While researching MS-13 online right after my best friend was murdered, I randomly stumbled across this blog post that was written several months prior by conservative pundit Michelle Malkin where she was basically condemning the open borders left for allowing MS-13 to spread to the Washington, D.C. area.
That blog post completely destroyed me mentally because I knew that if I had read it just a couple of weeks ago I probably would have written a comment under her blog entry telling her that I hope that she gets hit by a truck for being such a retarded and evil racist piece of shit.
I felt like my best friend's blood was on my hands because I had supported open borders, mass immigration, diversity, tolerance, multiculturalism, amnesty, sanctuary cities, et cetera. I was so far left that I even opposed the idea of nation-states themselves because I thought that they were extremely primitive, and because they supported the "othering" of foreigners by encouraging xenophobia, war, racism, inequality, et cetera. I was basically a globalist. A proud citizen of the world...
The murder of my best friend by brown-skinned illegal immigrants not only caused me to finally leave the left, but it also caused me to completely turn on my former leftist comrades. I'm now completely dedicated to tearing down the left's entire power structure because I finally realized that I had been manipulated into supporting my own racial demise. The left has already fucked up enough previously idyllic White communities and sacrificed enough innocent White people to the altar of diversity. They need to be completely destroyed before they completely destroy White Western civilization.
The murder of my best friend also cemented my red-pilling about racial differences in crime rates and overall standards of living in general. If we allow brown-skinned "Hispanics" (Amerinds/Mestizos) to take over America demographically, then obviously we'll eventually have the same problems that brown-skinned "Hispanic" countries have because their problems are largely rooted in their inferior genes. It's a very simple and glaringly obvious observation, and yet I wasn't capable of recognizing it because I had been so thoroughly brainwashed by (((modern anti-racist liberal ideology))) since infancy.
And reading Kevin MacDonald's books about 4 years ago is why I put triple parentheses around modern anti-racist liberal ideology...
I saw the commercialization of Humanitarian values by the Progressive Left.
There's a moment of realization, when it just 'clicks' that these people don't actually care about anybody else but themselves. They don't value human life. I've seen Feminists talk about neglecting their sons to "suppress their violent tendencies," and Black Lives Matter activists screaming about how they want cops to die. None of this has ever been about helping people- Progressives want the legally sanctioned murder and theft of Western Civilization to non-Whites. I see mothers abandoning their children, their marriages, for drugs and sex. Hell, my own mother took part in this. I've seen my mother 4 times in almost 10 years. She has adopted two new children from a more wealthy, and more young man. She wasn't searching for financial and sexual liberation- she wanted freedom from parenthood and responsibility until she could find a situation where the luxuries
erased the struggles.
I saw the targeted propaganda and social engineering, which was designed to make Whites hate themselves and denounce their culture.
Between Google being exceedingly creepy in its suppression of exposure to white males and white women, an education system that strips all intellectual discovery and cultural pride from whites and attributes it to blacks, Affirmative action to coerce corporations to exclude white males in virtue of "diversity", the labeling of "It's okay to be White" as a supremacy statement, etc..... Between BLM marching through cities and tearing them apart in their eager hunt for whites to brutalize in their own "Night of Broken Glass" and the emasculation and romanticism of psychological disease in white culture.... Between the revisionist agenda of film, in which Victorian Europe is re-written to have Blacks as the higher status individuals of European society with no Whites to act as their class peers.... There's a clear agenda. I refuse to take the hemlock past my lips.
I knew that I'd die before I let my blood, my name, and my culture be taken from me. If we're to be hunted down and killed like cattle, they'll be met with so much devastation that they won't be able to revise history to cover it up.
Apparently, God has abandoned us. It's time for us to take things into our own hands. It's why I'm making my way into politics.
My own nature. Always been I guess curious is the best word so I just wanted to learn the truth about human nature in every aspect.
The rise of the tumblr kind of feminism in like 2013 or so was a stepping stone. The wage gap, rape culture, every talking point they had I researched and found every single one of them to be based on fabrications or misrepresentations.
I don't really care about race realism anymore but that was also a stepping stone.
When it comes to a doctrine I can't say where my final position will be because I still have much to learn. I'm definitely sympathetic to Fascism and Monarchism. I also like the anti-technology, self sufficiency and survivalist 'anarcho-primitivist' kind of people, for example Uncle Ted and Varg Vikernes.
My curiousity about the world led me to researching what are the cores of human nature, whatever differences there are between cultures and ethics of different ethnic groups there remains basic truths. They manifest in our myths, our philosophies and religious teachings. The same few concepts have managed to be present in every culture across the world, these are 'primordial truths' that transcend the material world and guide humanity. The closer our ideology represents nature the closer we will be to happiness as people.
The most obvious example of this manifestation is the warrior/heroic spirit, this is what guides people to be drawn to Fascism's militarism and nationalism. The courageousness and willingness to sacrifice displayed by Fascist leaders draws men to them in a spiritual sense without them even realising. They are reminiscent of our own stories of old heroes, whether it be in Christianity, Norse, Roman, Greek, Persian or any other ancient belief system there are stories of great heroes. These heroes perform great tasks that only they can do, a city being terrorised by a dragon they are the ones to kill it where others could not. A 'damsel in distress' they are the ones to rescue her. This heroic spirit has always been and will always be something present in the human spirit and will eternally draw us to people that display those qualities, hence the popularity of the Third Position (Fascism, NatSoc, Falangism etc) leaders.
I'll be brutally honest, I genuinely don't care about breaking your family apart. Your reason for being against us is quite selfish, as you mentioned in your post you don't like the people in your race behaving like savages, yet you feel no need to help them. The burden of civilizing blacks will be placed on your shoulders. If we let every le based black man live with us, blacks will stay at exactly the same place. How exactly you will go about that, I don't know. The reality you should accept is the Alt Right is going to win, simply because it has the winning argument, which is so great that even people outside the White race can agree.
Sorry to put it to you like this, but... you aren't American. If I, as a white man, went to live in India, would you call me Indian? If I lived in China, would you call me Chinese? What about if I lived in Africa, would I be African?
Citizenship is different from ethnicity. Since the west right now is handing out free citizenships to the third world, it essentially means everyone can be "American." If everyone can be American, then there is no special identity with being American.
Whites settled the west and whites created western culture. In the 1960s and 1970s, western politicians passed immigration bills to bring the third world into our countries. The white public never once was given the opportunity of voting for this.
And now, white people don't even have a homeland. Africa is for the Africans, Asian is for the asians, but white countries are supposed to be for everyone? Why? Why can't we have our homelands? You, as an Indian, can always go back to your homeland if don't like mutliculturalism. But what about us? Where is our homeland? We don't want to become a minority in the lands that our ancestors settled.
White people have no stake in Asia or Africa, so why do Asians and Africans have a stake in white counties?
If Indians stayed in India, India would probably be a 1st world country by now. But it's not yet because the west keeps stealing the Indian talent, causing a brain drain. When immigrants come to our countries, we are forced to compete with them for women, for jobs, for schooling, for property, and demographics. And with equal rights and democracy, immigrants can now have 1 vote on the future of the country. So they just end up changing our laws and policies to benefit themselves.
There is a lot more to be said, but I'll leave it at that for now.
The "beauty fades" is major cope
Some things are meant to be enjoyed at some points in life. What you may enjoy at a toddler will not be the same as what you enjoy through your teens, 20s, 30s, 40s, etc.
Just telling someone that they should just "deal with it" is really rude and disrespectful.
[OP of "Relax, bigot, they are only 1%..."]
(muricunt)
modernism and liberalism ruined us
if it wasnt for these stupid marxist ideals, we would be living in a society like it was 500-1000 year ago. Most of us wouldve been married by now arranged by our parents and we would not be alone. There would be no stacies. Every woman would be submissive and know her place.
i wish there was a way to go back in time
(fschmidt)
The ideal was 100-500 years ago. Before that was the Middle Ages which was almost as degenerate as current times (in Europe).
(MarcLepinePBUH)
We will return to patriarchy or it'll be the end of humanity. This shit is not sustainable. Depressing part is we probably won't be around to see it.
(muricunt)
Also people did not care about looks back in the day. Even the most ugliest inbred person was able to find a partner..
That isn't the strongest (steelman) version of arguing for a European-American ethno-state, but I'll play ball. Who has paid most of the taxes to safeguard and build the nation? Who's culture is the foundation of law? Who has split and lost the most blood for it?
I'm all for creating a Black ethno-state as well as a Native american ethno-state, but Europeans have vastly contributed more than the other two. What would black american's live be like if they had never been brought over? They would be categorically worse, as they would still have been slaves, just to other blacks. Then their decedents would now be in Africa. What if they had been brought to North America and instantly freed and given half of a large island? it would be called Haiti.
Why not allow Black Nationalists to just have a land of their own, and let White Nationalists have a land of their own? Keep the Multicultural experiment going, just don't use the entire 1st world as the Petri Dish?
We need to publish an Incel Manifesto
Normies are convinced we are pedos, gays and want the death of women. This is not true for all of use, incel is simply someone who gets always rejected by women and thus wants a different society because he is depressed and lonely. We need a detailed manifesto in which we describe what the incel philosophy is and what its relationship with the blackpill and lookism culture. Thus normans can shut the fuck up accusing us and spreading FAKE NEWS.
Bowling alley report: Three Chads/Chad Lites to every one Stacey. When incels talk about this dynamic, it's 100% real
Incels are most certainly not making this shit up, or falsely applying Twitter dynamics to real life.
There's a bowling alley near where I live that is rather popular. I go there every now and then with a couple (male incel) friends of mine. Lots of college students through mid20s-somethings go there at night. We're creepy old men by comparison.
Plenty of college Staceys around. And there is never a free Stacey. Every Stacey there is with at least one Chad/Chad Lite. Most groups of multiple Staceys feature more Chads and Chad Lites than Staceys in the group; for instance, 4 Chads to 3 Staceys.
So overall, it's still a sausage fest - Stacey and her alpha orbiters.
If an incel wanted to use his amazingz personalityyyy to get laaaaaaid, bro, from this scenario, he would have to somehow come onto her while her alpha orbiters were present. He would have to steal her away from whichever Chad/Chads/Chad Lite/Chad Lites were guarding her. She's not available. Not for you.
Welcome to the real world, where women never go to a public place alone, unless it's at a supermarket or a bank and they're wearing a wedding ring and possibly have a kid with them.
On another note: I once shot 300 in front of a lot of people a few years ago. The Chads and Chad Lites around me were going nuts. "Holy shit bro, you're fuckin' awesome!" Not one of the Staceys gave a flying fuck.
Women do not care about anything other than looks.
Everything they say is a cope:
* men look better when they age
* beauty is in the eye of the beholder
* beauty fades
* life begins at 40
* There's a lid for every pot
* just be confident
Any more copes from these massive copers?
As a woman I have always said if you don’t give head you’re pretty much useless. But this is still quite tacky.
You have the right, as a human being, to control your fertility, to not be raped, to not be fourced to carry a child or get an abortion, to not have your fertility tampered with by others. You have the right, as a human being, to use your own resources to make medical interventions in your fertility. Your fertility is yours to do with as you will, but there is no right or even gaurentee of parenthood.
Being a parent (like having sex) is not in and of itself a human right, as there are other people whose rights are affected when you, the individual, excersize your "right".
Why are we coddling trans people? Why is their procreation considered a human right but other people's patently isen't?
As a personal example, a relative of mine recently found out that he was sterilized by the radiation treatments that saved his life. Where was his option to freeze his sperm on the public dime? He and his wife will never have children.
My mother's procreation was cut short by a radical hysterectomy due to undiagnosed, out of control, immensely painful endometriosis. She was never even asked if she wanted to pay for alternative fertility options, let alone receive them on someone elses dime. The doctor never even brought it up. She wanted three kids, but only has two.
If trans people choose to throw away their fertility, thats a price they have to pay for being trans. Why do they think they are so special that they can have absolutely everything they want all the time?
Sorry for the rambleing and the length, buth this shit makes me MAD.
The common mode of sexual intercourse is not even natural. Our genitals are not for pleasure, they are for procreation, and that occurs when two people are very much in love and wanting to reproduce. Nature takes its course when the couple are asleep laying naked and embraced. Procreation occurs by the vagina acting as a vacuum, drawing the flaccid penis inside to a climax and eventually, ejaculation.
The vagina then releases the penis, all the while not disturbing the peacefully sleeping couple.
Forceful sexual intercourse is unnatural.
[Op of "Forget death row inmates. Should it be legal to fuck female fetuses?"]
If abortion is legal, I see no reason it should not be legal for incels to fuck female fetuses. Remember, "it'z not a human life form, it's just a bunch of cells," blah blah blah.
If it's OK to slice open its skull and suck out its brains with a vacuum cleaner, shouldn't incels be allowed to fuck it?
[OP of "Should women on death row be forced to have sex with incels?"]
If the state is allowed to kill them, why shouldn't we be allowed to rape them?
Nature being demolished, ruins left for betas
image
[A "comic" of four images in a row. 1.: a photo of a pure white flower. 2.: a ClipArt image of a factory releasing smoke, captioned with "Modern culture, feminism, Hypergamy". 3.: a drawing of two rain clouds, one grey and one black, captioned "Chad" and "Tyrone" respectively. 4.: a photo of a Rafflesia flower.]
I hate fat women
Fat femoids are without a doubt the most repulsive, loud-mouthed, revolting and disgusting group of individuals that has ever plagued this planet. They're numbers are increasing rapidly each year and will continue to keep increasing until something is done about them.
They made a movement called "the fat acceptance movement" solely due to the fact that they wanted people to accept them for the disgusting and nasty creatures they are. Actually, these land-whales force people to accept them rather than giving them a choice. Instead of actually putting some work in and getting in better shape, they cover behind this movement and shame individuals, especially men, who tell them to stop being a bunch lazy cunts and work out. That's what the fat acceptance movement is all about. A bunch of land whales hiding behind a group because they are too lazy to do shit about their changeable predicament.
It enrages me how fat bitches are not being banned for using public transportation services. These bleached whales need two seats or more to fit their fucking fat ass's in - and it's the worst experience ever if an unfortunate situation arises where they sit beside you. God help us. Oh. have you ever seen these cunts walking down the street? Huge fucking piles of fat roles lumbering through the street with their mouthes filled with burgers and fries while their hands contain more fucking food that they eat up eventually. Absolutely revolting. Makes me really wish that I was carrying a harpoon with myself in those instances.
These cum dumpsters are also extremely entitled, shallow and hypocritical. They say how people shouldn't judge or shame fat people and how everyone should given them a chance, but these bitches will never date a man who is also fat as them. They will reject them and pursue men who are a few points higher than themselves. Hypergamy is can be seen clearly with these beef curtains. Fucking hypocritical scum.
Honestly, I'm sick and tired of these bleach whales. They need to keep their disgusting fat rolls and yeast filled pussies for themselves.
well let's use a more modern example then of actions==>consequences. anyone who is intellectually honest realizes that the "white privilege" meme will eventually lead to murder. And who knows what the backlash to that may be? Perhaps it will mean that mass immigration, affirmative actions, divesity requirements, etc. will be branded taboo. perhaps the pushers of the "white privilege" concept are doing more damage to minorities than helping them.
well the West's current zeitgeist is a direct backlash to the Nazis and WW2. The Nazis made European nationalism unpalatable. They also made White ethnocentrism taboo. Europe decided to reject its prior obsession with race and homogeneity, and chose to open up its societies (without ever imagining the damaging consequences of mass immigration and multiculturalism, because European leaders are functional retards). Not to mention that WW2 left Europe with a labor shortage, and so Muslims were imported to make up for this.
As for Germany specifically, the Nazis brought upon their people the destruction of many of their cities, the death of millions of young men, the rape of their women, and then 45 years of Allied/Soviet occupation. The Germans were forced by Americans to allow the migration of Turks as a source of cheap labor. And their guilt has led them to a state of total cuckoldry, to the extent that they have imported millions of nonWhites. There hardly even exists a cultural Germany anymore. None of this would have ever, ever happened without the Nazi's loss.
So it was a large gamble. Beat the Russians and the Nazis would have given Germany possibly the greatest nation in world history. But lose, and the Germans would become dispossessed.
a White person would never be given the benefit of doubt like this. and I'm not saying this from a place of white grievance, but just the truth---when Stephen Paddock murdered 50 people in Vegas (with no known ideological bent), it was imperative in leftist circles to call him a terrorist. The rush to call a White person a terrorist and the skepticism to call a Muslim a terrorist is a leftist attempt at narrative turnabout. While it may be rooted in good intentions, unfortunately it usually just results in racism against Whites or increased Islamophobia (due to perceived political correctness)
Gypsies have an 'us and them' attitude by and large.
If you're another Gypsy, then you're ok. If not, you're there to be swindled or exploited and you better not say anything about it.
I really don't understand the attitude that it's racist to say that their behaviour isn't acceptable and that they should be tolerated by society.
This isn't a group with ancient religious beliefs, they're people who like to live in caravans and don't like to contribute to the society they expect stuff from by paying tax.
Have you ever met a gypsy ? They are real bullies without boundaries so their children probably are as well.
I grew up in Cornwall and can remember a few occasions when they turned up and just parked themselves in a handy field with all their old bangers and trailers (no predictable "username fits" comments please), hordes of kids, mangy old dogs and rusty old machinery.
They would nick all the eggs from our bantams, go en masse to the village shop as a good cover for shoplifting, and knock on peoples doors trying to rip them off. They never stayed for long as it was quite a remote village and not enough pickings/people to rip off. They would leave behind utter filth, honestly - piles of human shit, old washing machines and car parts, abandoned vehicles.
Honestly, I know it's considered a form of racism by many, but I sincerely believe the only people who don't mind gypsies are those who haven't had to live near with them and deal with them.
They're basically feral - awful people who produce awful children. They pride themselves on stepping outside the confines of society and then wonder why that society doesn't want them around.
They take what isn't theres, cause nothing but trouble and being absolutely no benefit to those places they go.
I'm sure I'm in for some hate on this, but I don't care. I've lived within walking distance of a semi-permnanent site, I've lived near pop-up sites and I've seen the mess and trouble they cause. Unfortunately my old area used to be a huge destination for them
I've also worked with education authorities and seen the insanity that surrounds trying to get these kids something resembling an education.
All women are sluts
I've seen some Incels who are in the belief that there are some femoids left in the world who aren't cawk hunting skanks. This is clearly a cope that needs to be shattered and burned. Why? Because every bitch out there, regardless of their race, religion, virginity status, is a slut; it's in their very nature to be such. Don't even think for one second that just because a femoid was born in a certain country and raised religiously, that she would not engage in seeking hedonistic activities. Once these so-called "religious femoids" get the opportunity that they desperately seek and are exposed to the world, especially the western world, and it's activities, they tend to be the biggest sluts known to man. Basically because they find slutdom to be a new thriving activity and want to experience the pleasures that comes with it.
There are no cum dumpsters out there who doesn't succumb into degeneracy and slutdom. They are all slaves to their instincts. Every last one of them.
I was slightly sympathetic [towards trans people] at first, but now I'm pissed off. There are people who will actually be negatively effected by Trump, like women and people of color, but of course in transland, where nothing is rooted in reality, they're the eternal fucking victims. I'm really starting to despise these people, like I hate the fact that they exist.
Exactly. A kick in the nads is what they [trans teens] need.
Transactivism is Shiria law preached by men in dresses.
As an Asian I love whites and I believe you guys are superior
[Comment under ""Judaism wants world domination" Board from the Anti-Bolshevik Exposition describing Communism, Socialism, Freemasonry and Anglo-Saxon powers as puppe"]
@overthinking-it
@AlaeSwords
@overthinking-it
@AlaeSwords
There is quite a bit of truth to the idea, even though, it is considered heretical to say such a thing post WW2.
First of all let me point out that the 'disproven' Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was 'disproven' by the duplicitous Allen Welsh Dulles of JFK Assasination fame, Dulles also coined the term 'conspiracy theorist'.
Karl Marx was a Jew, as was Engels. Vladimir Lenin was arguably Jewish, and unarguably Jewish in the context of his familial background.
The Freemasons got a massive injection from the Rothschild banking family at around the time of the American Revolution. I believe a convincing argument could be made that the Freemasons are in fact the Church of the Rothschild / the Rothschild Imperial Cult as it were.
Socialism ofcourse, is a byproduct of Communist thought.
It is demonstrable that the bulk of the Bolsheviks were culturally Jewish.
AIPAC is the single largest lobby group in the US.
Israel is the single largest recipient of aid.
Facebook & Google were created by Jews.
Unfortunately Judaism has a belief, which adherants believe either deeply or not at all that they are, to quote the Torah: "God's chosen people." Sounds familiar? A little bit like Hitler's counter-ideology: "The Master Race."
It is not possible to explain away all of this without coming to the conclusion that, although perhaps not monolithic, there is a powerful Jewish faction with an unarguably massive amount of influence.
Now, I have objectively and calmly explained things which are true, and which are proveable, but there will undoubtedly be someone who calls me an Anti-Semite.
So in modern society the very subject of Jewish power has become forbidden to discuss and can invite ostracism or legal or financial penalties.
That is why people think Jews run the world. There is a certain amount of truth to it. You can't even openly discuss these ideas in the academic world, in newspapers (in the Western World) or on Social Media.
there will undoubtedly be someone who calls me an anti-Semite
Trying to preempt it doesn't make it untrue! Happy Hanukkah anyway!
I'm not anti-Semitic. It's that simple. The term anti-Semitic is largely used in a way that renders the term nothing more than a thought terminating cliche.
Sounds like something an anti-Semite would say.
As does referring to the Protocols as the "disproven" Protocols, with sarcastic quotation marks.
Posted by AlaeSwords
Look up the history of The Protocols. The so called 'conclusive' disproving of The Protocols rested on the testimony of one unreliable witness that Dulles found.
The friend zone is quite real. It's possible to get out of it...but...it's quite difficult. Much easier to let the woman know, from the start of your interaction, that you are a sexual being and you expect her to behave appropriately.
In a just world, the government would hold mandatory charities every few months for Incel men who are suffering from Inceldom. They would group two kinds of charity workers who would voluntary offer their services: one being, virgin femoids. And the second being, used up femoids who have a partner count ranging from one to ten. The Incels who hold anti-degeneracy views, like myself, would hook up with a virgin femoid, while Incels who don't give a shit about it would hook up with an used up femoid. A femoid charity worker would then be expected to be with an Incel for ten days providing him with sex, validation and emotional connection that has been deprived of his whole life.
Well let's talk about true Gypsies aka Romani or Roma people(Note : Romanians are not gypsies, but Romania have largest community of them in EU). Few centuries ago they "blessed" us with their presence(they came from India). Biggest and most problematic communities can be found mainly in Romania, V4 Countries(CZ, SK, PL, HU), but also in Spain, France, Italy or pretty much anywhere in Europe. Why do people hate them so much?
Becouse they live from social welfare and that is mainly the reason average gypsy family have 5+ kids. When they will get social welfare, they will buy lot of food, alcohol etc... and drink and eat for few days until there are no money left. And than trouble begins. They will steal literally anything they can. Farmers plant potatoes and gypsies will come, dug them and eat them. But ofc that is still nothing, let's get to the better parts.
They are Minority so our glorious PC EU protects them together with je.... media. So pretty much anything against Gypsies is RACIST! When gypsies kill old people for money, beat white kids, steal their stuff etc...nothing happens. But when white guy beats gypsie all hell breaks lose and he will go to jail for racist attack! Everyone is afraid of them even cops will do nothing. Fathers co-worker told him story how gypsies came to their house, killed their pig and eat it. When Police came they just said : that's the way they are! and boom case closed. Famous TV weather girl wrote on her FB : Fucking Gypsies are stealing our gutters during broad daylight! and she got fired next day for being a racist!
And there is much more evil they do across EU that will go unpunished. Politicians/TV people/news people etc make their careers on protecting these wonderful people from evil Whites. God Bless Them right? We need the US law that allows them shoot people who trespass on their land!
meh. It makes sense that they wouldn't want mass immigration/open borders. Just like we wouldn't want whites/Africans/Arabs coming into China or other Asian countries on a large scale. everyone prefers to live among their own kind. it's perfectly natural
When is hollywood going to learn we don't want liberal pc feminist bullshit? Every single movie out there right now is liberal and feminist in some way exceor for Dunkirk which happened to be the most successful movie. Its like they litterally don't care about making money anymore all they want to do is bombard us with liberal feminist propoganda. When is this going to stop?
