#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

Pomidor Quixote and Mr Justice Hayden #sexist #wingnut dailystormer.name

[From "British Judge Says Sex With Wife is a “Fundamental Human Right” and Everyone Loses Their Minds"]

The Jewish media puts sex everywhere to make people think about it constantly, but the Jews also make heterosexual sex much more difficult to achieve by introducing convoluted ideas about “consent” and about what marriage is supposed to be.

One man is taking a stand against that bullshit. This judge is bringing old ideas and common sense back into the discussion about the role of marriage in our society, and he’s doing all of that by… saying that a husband should be able to have sex with his wife.

RT wrote:

A British judge has invoked the ire of online commentators, activists and politicians after remarking that it was a man’s “fundamental human right” to have sex with his wife during an already controversial court case.

I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife… I think he is entitled to have it properly argued,” senior High Court judge Justice Hayden was quoted as saying during a preliminary hearing on a case involving a married couple of 20 years.

The wife has learning difficulties and her condition is deteriorating, prompting social services to raise the alarm about the potential for sexual abuse in the relationship as they felt the woman was no longer able to make decisions about whether she consented to sexual relations. Social services ultimately brought the case to the Court of Protection in London.

The husband has pledged to no longer sleep with his wife but prosecuting lawyers are still pushing for a court order barring sexual relations to prevent the woman from being raped.

Let’s get something out of the way first: all women have learning difficulties. It’s just a matter of how severe those difficulties are.

That said, if she can say yes or no to a question such as “do you want some ice cream?” or “do you feel like watching a movie?” then she can absolutely consent to sex.

This whole “consent” thing is a retarded Jewish invention that overcomplicates basic male-female interaction. If a woman doesn’t want to have sex, she resists, if she wants to stop having sex while having sex, she makes it known. If she for some reason decides to pretend to be okay with having sex while not feeling like having sex, then that’s her problem. Literally something that happens in her mind that can’t be measured or proven.

The insanity of this story is augmented by the fact that even though the poor husband pledged to no longer sleep with his wife, prosecutors still push for a court order to officially make him unable to have sex with his wife.

Do you understand how insane that is?

If a man can’t have sex with his wife, why does he have a wife?

[...]

The idea about marriage that most people have in their subconscious was put there by tales of old, by their grandfathers, and by the Jewish social-engineering media machine.

If marriage doesn’t ask anything from women, and gives them half of your stuff or more whenever they please, it not only does nothing to stop relationships from breaking down but it actually provides incentives for relationships to break down.

These whores will destroy your life if you let them.

The moment they feel they’ve secured you, that you have no alternative front-hole, and that you’re socially and legally prohibited from looking for their replacement… that’s the moment they’ll decide to stop having sex with you. Sex will become less and less frequent. She’ll never be “in the mood,” she’ll always be tired or with headache. She’ll never treat you the same. She’ll look at you with disdain. She’ll resent you. She’ll feel trapped by you even though you’re the one that’s really trapped. She’ll feel you’re abusive even though she’s the one being abusive.

She’ll file for divorce and she’ll take as much from you as she possibly can, and then she’ll tell everyone you know about how terrible you are. She’ll go fuck some loser that can’t compare to you but that will have more than you because she’ll share the stuff she took from you with him, and they’ll laugh at you every time you go get your kids on the weekends.

Your kids won’t understand why daddy looks so poor now while mommy and her new boyfriend seem so well off. You’ll want to explain to them… but you won’t be able to. You wouldn’t even know where to start.

As time passes, you’ll see how your own kids prefer mommy’s boyfriend. They’ll tell you how funny he is, how many great things they do together, and how much time they spend together. Every time you send them back to her house… you’ll feel like a shadow. An empty human husk trapping the echoes of the man that you once were and mixing them with the cries of the man that you wanted to be.

All because you thought marriage meant something other than your doom.

jazavac #sexist incels.is

(what is the female sex drive)

It's an instinctive need to acquire the highest quality seed possible while ensuring the survival of the offspring. Anything that she instinctively sees as signs of quality seed will be seen as attractive. Dual mating strategy and betabuxxing comes in when the quality male doesn't want to take care of the offspring. Today, it only comes down to looking good because provider males became unnecessary and people have sex for gratification, not reproduction.

Modus Coperandi #sexist incels.is

(what is the female sex drive?)

foids sex drive is just as visual as mens. that's why chad wins.
it's all about how you look.
if you don't look sexually arousing you will never be able to witness a truly horny foid.

foid sexuality seems to be dependable on her state of mind, the thoughts your image causes in her is what matters.
if you fuck a foid and all she thinks about is how she is gonna decorate the apartment while you plow her pussy, she will never orgasm.

foids seem to be unable of selective thinking. so if you show a flaw it will instantly occupy their mind.
foid culture is one of constant mogging and bragging.
if you do something un-normie the first thing she thinks will be: "I'm gonna tell my friends about this!"
lots of foids have no ego. they're merely extensions of their in-group thinking.

so what really matters for you: don't be ugly + don't be obviously abnormal.

foid sexuality is a mind game. it's not about physical contact.

ultimately to be long term successful you need to become a part of her fantasies.
which will obviously never happen for creatures like us.

Various incels #sexist incels.is

(what is the female sex drive?)

(Animecel2D)
Seeing a chad

(LordDylan)
Feeling dominated by chad, foids are so shallow they all have the same preference.

(Napoleon de Geso)
Femoid sex drive is outdated, they choose primitive chad instead of evolved gracile man like Elliot

(Hikikomori)
I'm not sure that it matters, we're incels and will never pleasure them anyway.

(CrookedOzCel)
They want low inhib thugmaxxed gigachad to beat the shit out of them

(Macrocephalus)
Being treated like a piece of meat by a very good looking man

Some incels #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.

image

(C0nserve)

I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come

Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already

(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.

Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.

(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.

(Deoxysxx)

I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father

I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.

Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.

(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.

And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.

His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.

(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks

Andrew Anglin #sexist #wingnut #psycho dailystormer.name

[From "British Politician Sargon of Akkad Calls for Women to be Raped"]

"100% deal with it."

UKIP candidate Carl Benjamin stands by his comments that he "wouldn't even rape" a female Labour MP and tells Sky's @KateEMcCann to "deal with it".

Get more on this story here: http://po.st/5WnwrX

8:00 PM - Apr 18, 2019

You might remember Sargon of Akkad from YouTube.

And you may have been thinking “what the heck happened to that lad?”

Well, he’s a politician now.

And he is based and redpilled, and is calling for women to be raped.

This is quite awesome.

Aside from exterminating Jews, the main thing that I have always wanted was for women to be raped. For years, we have not had a single politician in a Western country that was willing to call for women to be raped – even while this is a very popular position in Middle Eastern countries.

It’s yet to be seen if Sargon will be able to enact his policy of rape once elected, or if he will pull a Donald Trump and build a few miles of groping and call it rape.

What is certain is that Sargon will win the election for Prime Minister of the UK based on the promise that women will be raped.

Rape has overwhelming popular support as a policy among the public, with up to 98% of people supporting it. However, thus far, no politician in the West has had the nerve to run on a rape platform.

I salute Sargon of Akkad, and wish him the best.

The Daily Stormer is officially endorsing Sargon of Akkad as Prime Minister of the UK.

RealRice #sexist incels.is

Hmm, well let's think about it logically.
I cannot think or comprehend of anything more cucked than having a daughter. Honestly, think about it rationally. You are feeding, clothing, raising and rearing a girl for at least 18 years solely so she can go and get ravaged by another man. All the hard work you put into your beautiful little girl - reading her stories at bedtime, making her go to sports practice, making sure she had a healthy diet, educating her, playing with her. All of it has one simple result: her body is more enjoyable for the men that will eventually fuck her in every hole.
Raised the perfect girl? Great. Who benefits? If you're lucky, a random man who had nothing to do with the way she grew up, who marries her. He gets to fuck her tight pussy every night. He gets the benefits of her kind and sweet personality that came from the way you raised her.
As a man who has a daugher you are LITERALLY dedicating at least 20 years of your life simply to raise a girl for another man to enjoy. It is the ULTIMATE AND FINAL cuck. Think about it logically

Orlov #sexist incels.is

Having a daughter is the worst thing that can happen to a man

Just imagine it, you feed and nurture this fucking thing with a hole for years just so it can grow up and become a cum dumpster for Chads and normies. You feed your baby girl, teach her how to walk, talk, she goes to expensive schools... and then she hits puberty, goes to high school and college and she randomly swallows gallons of cum at parties and thinks she is smart and strong and emancipated for doing it.

Only thing worse than that is having multiple daughters. Females are worthless scum, you nurture them just so they can betray you and whore themselves out. If you have a daughter you are raising a play toy for Chad and normie-scum. There's really no decency in it whatsoever, even if she is a straight-a student she is still a fucking degraded whore who would let Chad shit in her mouth just for validation.

SlayaCaleb88 #sexist incels.is

The Different types of Chads and Staceys

I have pretty much seen enough in my life to narrow them all down to this

CHADS:

Conservative/Christian/Self Righteous Chad(my most hated one)

These Chads are most likely people with top genetics that love that piece of shit called Jesus, most notably (Paul Joseph Watson, Alex Jones, Ben Shapiro,) they will often say incels are entitled and spoiled rotten, bashing incels makes them feel stronger and morally superior.

Party/Jock/Celebrity Chad

These ones are just your typical hollywood produced Chads, they bully incels because they think its fun to do.


Abusive/Criminal/Tough Guy Chad

These people are what women piss their panties with cum thinking about are great guys, only the deadshit fucked up foids go for these types of Chads, these are the type of Chads that the Conservative Chad does not want his daughter around.


STACEYS:

Rich Girl/Celebrity/Popular in Highschool Stacey (Higher Tier Foids)

These are foids that have been living on recruit dificulty most of their life and have never gone thru hardship, they only want the top guys to fuck.


Normal average looking women that still count as staceys (they aren't ugly or hot)

These chics are what most of our looksmatch are at, they are just average foids.

BECKY'S (Society is real fucked up thinking these foids deserve any one)

Bash the Fash Becky:
This is your typical foid that loves to get up on a soapbox and be an activist for some ideology that can easily be debunked, mostly feminists as well.

Beta Orbiter Becky:
This is just some below average looking foid that gets Incel Tears hard, not even I would go for any of these fucking disgusting animals.

Autistic Becky: (Now this one really fucking makes me angry)

Why the fuck should an Autistic Becky with my fucking looksmatch be able to get any fucking guy? Autism doesn't even exist for these types of foids and its a joke to them really, This goes to show how easy women have it compared to men.

HumanTrash #sexist #psycho incels.is

[LifeFuel] Every second a foid dies somewhere in the world

Just thinking about this makes me feel so much better, right now when you are reading this a filthy chad-worshiping cunt dies somewhere :feelsautistic: Doesn't matter if it's a baby or a 120-years old granny, they are all whores and they will all die.

Templar 331 #sexist mmo-champion.com

If you pass out - say, you are sunbathing on the beach and fall asleep - and I see you are unconscious, and rape you - you accept that it was irresponsible of you to fall asleep?

Blacking out drunk isn't the same as sleeping on the beach, unless you are a REAL deep sleeper. In which case I don't think you should be sleeping on the beach. :/

Do your coworkers have the right to run a train on your unconscious body?

I work with several guys that would do that when I'm conscious. >.> To be fair it would be, I hope, an accident.

Or does it only apply to alcohol?

We have a WINNER!!!

You knowingly put a substance into your body that has a side effect of making you unresponsive for long periods of time while in a place surrounded by people you don't know who are also imbibing the same substance.

If so, have you ever been very drunk? Where you would have been unable to resist, slurred your speech in your refusal so that it was unclear, or have you ever passed out while drunk?

Nope. You know why? BECAUSE I DON'T FUCKING WANT TO BE RAPED!!!! (even though I'm a guy it can still happen)

I get drowsy after half an ale, so I know it wouldn't take much for me to be out for a while.

Or it seems you're saying drinking alcohol is tantamount to 'consenting' to rape.

What we, or at least I, are saying is that when you put yourself in a situation where you are vulnerable you share part of the responsibility of what happened. It's not your fault that you get raped. No one should be raped, but if it does happen and you helped facilitate it then you should grow up an learn that your habits need to change. Drink with friends, drink at home. Don't got to frat parities or bars and get shit faced by yourself.

theantifeminist #sexist theantifeminist.com

For most of human history, females would be impregnated as soon as they were able to be. On the male side, the winning reproductive lottery ticket goes to the man who is able to attract and keep a girl who is just starting puberty (and preferably other such girls too). Everybody alive today is the genetic result of our ‘paedophile’ sex predator ancestors.

Isn’t it ironic, that this whole paedohysteria over ‘sex predators’ is about stopping men doing what is most natural to them, and most essential to the survival of the human species – mate bonding with young teens?

theantifeminist #sexist theantifeminist.com

As you can see, he actually claims that a woman reaches her peak sexual market value at the age of 23 (presumably, Tomassi thinks peak female fertility occurs at that age). This always struck me as complete and utter nonsense. A peak fertility of 21 or 23 (if that age is correct, and might not always historically have been so and is likely influenced by age of motherhood itself) means nothing other than it is the age at which women are most likely to give birth at after sex. It might say something important about likely female sexual strategy or preferences, it tells us little or nothing about what age a man would be expected to prefer in a sexual partner. In a society or culture in which some form of mate bonding is the norm, a man who is attracted to 15 year old girls will have a massive advantage over somebody attracted primarily to 23 year old women. Not only is the former choosing a female with far more reproductive years ahead of her, the 15 year old girl is of course far more likely to be a virgin. I’m not a regular reader of Rollo Tomassi, but I can assume he is aware of the importance of the ‘mummy’s baby, daddy’s maybe’ maxim in male evolutionary sexual strategies. Therefore, evolution has produced men to prefer young pubescent girls.

As the quote says, the most optimal mate seeking strategy for men would be to find a female who has only just begun ovulating, or is soon to start ovulating. In other words not yet pregnant, but about to be so (with your sperm if you can capture her heart (or father’s blessing) first). For most of human history, females would be impregnated as soon as they were able to be. On the male side, the winning reproductive lottery ticket goes to the man who is able to attract and keep a girl who is just starting puberty (and preferably other such girls too). Everybody alive today is the genetic result of our ‘paedophile’ sex predator ancestors.

PotatoAccount54123 #sexist reddit.com

Headline: Why are so many feminists obsessed with their genitals?

A lot of feminist stuff is associated with female genitalia. There are vagina monologues, vagina hats, vagina boats, paintings using period blood, yoghurt made out of vaginal yeast, etc.
You don't see MRAs do anything similar. Even the most extremist people in the manosphere don't do anything involving penises. The closest I've ever seen was the Wiener's Out thing in South Park, which was a parody.
I wonder why. The expected answer is that women's sexuality is oppressed and stuff, but I really don't see any social situation where penises are more appropriate than vaginas. In fact, it's the opposite: Female nudity is more socially acceptable than male nudity, whether it's in art or in real life. Women who flash their boobs or vaginas are met with cheers, while men who show their penises to people are arrested.
Granted, men do draw dicks on walls, but they don't really do it out of celebration of their masculinity, and it's considered more of a childish thing. Drawing dicks is mostly associated with juvenile humour, while the feminist vagina thing is supposedly classy and deep.
What are your thoughts?

towncel #sexist incels.is

Femoids just hate men but don't wanna completely shatter the delusion they bring fourth so they go for chad

If femoids weren't genetically sexist and condescending to males (they completely focus beta males, target normies a little and are nice towards chads) then they wouldn't only go for chads and shit test so much

Itisamuh #sexist mmo-champion.com


I often see grown men eyeing up girls school girls. Is this wrong?
So I moved to a new area a while ago and basically it's located nearby a secondary school (high school) so I bump into a lot of children in school uniforms on the morning commute where I can't help but notice adult men checking girls out. There is something wrong with this imo, like the girls where I live wear knee-length skirt and usually don't wear any tights with it so men tend to get an eyeful on the bus/train and 8 times out of 10 you can expect an adult male trying to eye the bottom of a teenage school girl.I think it's disgusting.


So you think people are not supposed to look at attractive members of the opposite sex when they are at their most prime age? Good luck avoiding that. And it is not just adult men and teenage girls. Middle aged women will scream and whistle and throw their panties at good looking teenage male stars.

Sex to me is a lot more than just biology. Just because someone is capable of breeding doesn't mean they're mentally prepared for it. Some may "grow" up faster than others but under 18 is still a child in my eyes. Hell, even 18-19 is still a child in my eyes. Personally I'd make the aoc 21 but the law disagrees. Either way I think its wrong and predatory for older people to go after people at such a young age.

I have the opposite view, that the age of consent should be much lower because people much younger than that are going to be having sex. Why make it illegal for no good reason when they are going to do it anyway? When you try to judge whether someone was mentally ready for it, whether they were seduced or used and so on, you are throwing way too many subjective factors in for it to be decided by an arbitrary cutoff.

Anon #sexist dalrock.wordpress.com

For those who had any doubt about how women are hurtling on the path towards obsolesence :

Feminists demand that only scientific research that furthers feminism be pursued.

The precision to which female psychology is diametrically opposed to the principles of a free, advanced, and enlightened society is just uncanny.

Fungi #sexist incels.is

People aren't less social because of technology, they are because foid rights.When you give women all these liberties they oppress %80 of the males. So the rewards of gettin socialized are only there for chad.

When foids only choose chad it also creates a class system among men because chad, the high class male aint hanging out with low classes. You may not detect it easily today because low class men already excluded, the exclusion started at late highschool.

Low class males aren't even entitled to working like a slave anymore because they look disgustin therefore everything they'll do will come as creepy. Your only chance is loosing everything thats a manlike from your system, become a betabug yesman so highly privileged foid might allow you into the society.

There is also an interesting thing, performing some acts, wearing some clothes or anything like that can be seen uncool by the society but when a chad or a foid does it, it makes them cool an different, nonchad men who decide to cuck themselves by going outside get oppressed like this if you do uncool things youll be riduculed by them. You cant leave your uniform because you are not a chad or a foid. You cant do different things while staying social. There are instinctive taboos and morals put against you because how the animal human works.

Givin foids any liberties meant going decades back.

andthejokeiscokefizz #sexist reddit.com

Oh, not to make this even longer than it already is, but I just wanted to add that you 100% have the right to be skeptical of men.

It’s a gut instinct to fear men, because they, as a class, have never done anything to give us a reason not to fear them. They wouldn’t tell us we're overreacting if we said we’re skeptical bears, because obviously bears are dangerous creatures and humans have every reason to fear them. Men have raped and killed far, far more women than bears have killed humans, yet women are somehow shamed for fearing men.

DoubleXcrew #sexist reddit.com

Those hateful pricks are on OUR turf. Despite how disgusting and awful the whole 'trans' turd mix is, it does make me smile that feminists, and lesbians, and lesbian feminists get in their way so much and give those filthy gobstix of shit and bile so much of the rage!

bluecollarCEL #sexist incels.is

I went back to college last year for a semester at 30yo. Had this little 18yo cutie in my class. I thought she was innocent. Boy was I wrong.

I was 30 at the time. So I decided I wanted to perhaps break out of shitty jobs. I got my ass back into college. I'm sitting across from this 18yo girl and she just looks so young and innocent to me.

I'm not gonna lie guys as the roll call sheet was passed around I looked at it a little extra and figured out her name.

I do have to admit my intentions were to jerk off to her pictures on Instagram.

I went into it with the mindset of being some old perv jerking off to this innocent little thing.

Her main instagram was innocent and I felt guilty for doing the herky jerky but a man has to release himself.


A few weeks into the semester I stumbled upon a second instagram of hers.

I knew it was her by the moles and tattoo she had.

Here I am thinking this chick is innocent and what do you know she has an instagram of her cosplaying in various outfits.

Ass hanging out, see through shirts, wet shirts. Just crazy stuff.

This 18yo whoring herself out on the internet. My old 30 year old ass just couldn't believe it. Society really has gone in the fucking toilet guys.

Incel Prime #sexist incels.is

We were all born in the wrong era.

Not our fault boys. Dont ever think that. Blame the era you were born into. This is the absolute worse time period to be a man. Guess what? The generation after us will be even worse. Feminists are attempting to revoke our rights and make it how it was pre feminism except men are on the bad end of the stick this time. It will be much worse though. Even before Womens rights men still treated Women well and werent monsters to them. Women will be dictators to us. Castrate us. Only keep chads dick around to breed

3D Face Analyst #sexist sluthate.com

Women want men to be delusionally confident

Why do women they say they like "confidence"?

It's not because they find "confidence" to be sexually attractive.

Women want men to be delusionally "confident" about their sexual attractiveness, for manipulation purposes.

If you see pictures of couples that are mismatched, with the woman being better looking that the man, there might be a mismatch between the facial expressions between them. Often the woman will have an fake smile and the men will have a big genuine smile.

A good example is JebusNormalFa6.

image

The woman had a fake smile. Take note on her eyes. There is no expression of any smile in her eyes. In contrast the man had a genuine proud smile on his face. The man is proud of what he believes that he has a beautiful wife who is mutually attracted to him as much as he is to her.

But several months later, the woman confessed that she was unfaithful and cheated on him with a white man.

Keep in mind that the man makes a decent $60,000 a year, twice as much as the median worker earns. The man takes her out to trips and buys her gifts.

And the woman claims that she likes how his face looks.

Back to the main question: Do women want her partner to be delusionally confident?

Yes.

She want the man to believe that she is sexually attracted to him as much as he is attracted to him. She wants to "make him happy".

She wants to "make him happy". She wants to do everything in her power to stop him knowing the truth, to "make him happy". She wants to do everything to make him believe that he is good-looking, even lie to him, to "make him happy". Women want their partners to be delusionally confident about their sexual attractiveness, to "make him happy".

But in reality, by "making him happy", it's used as a cover up to hide her true feelings towards the man. She probably longs for the days she was single and was able to get fucked by Chads. She is probably frustrated by the fact that she settled for second-rate man that she is not actually attracted to, for the money and family. She wants to hide the fact that the man that she is currently with is inferior compared to her ex-boyfriends, let alone her Chad fuckbuddies.

She will lie that she is sexually attracted to him, to make him "feel confident". She will fake the smile in pictures of him and her, to make him "feel confident".

Making him feel delusionally "confident" is a cover-up to conceal her true feelings towards him.

If he knows her true feelings, he will lose his delusional confidence. Then he will stop taking her out to dates and spend money on her. The man will not beta provide for her if he loses his delusional confidence.

This is why women want men to be delusionally confident.

Other pictures of mismatched couples. Take note on the differences of the facial expressions between the men and the women. The women seem to have a fake smiles. The men seem to have truly happy smiles.

image

image

All of the men are probably beta provider slaves.

See this message posted by a woman on a social media site:

image

Take note on his sentence:

"I decided to give him a chance because he had a good personality and was confident."

Why did she mention that she likes his confidence?

It's not because his confidence was SEXUALLY attractive. No. She actually admitted that she was not sexually attracted to him in her message. His confidence was not SEXUALLY attractive to her, yet she says she likes his "confidence."

Why?

It's because she likes how he was delusionlly confident about his sexually attractiveness. Therefore it would be easily for her to hide her true feelings for him and manipulate him to do favors for her. She has actual romantic feelings for another guy that she is actually detracted to, see the below message:

image

It is a fact that women have true romantic feelings only towards the men they are attracted to.

She had true romantic feelings towards another man that she is actually sexually attracted to, even though she was in a relationship with the beta! He liked the delusional "confidence" in the beta only because his delusional "confidence" makes it easier for her to cover up her true feelings to manipulate him.

Women say that they prefer "confidence" not because they find it sexually attractive, but because they like delusionally confident men. Delusionally confident men are easy for her to manipulate. That's the reason.

Women are attracted to men who are fearless and risk-taking, but that's different from "confidence". Women do not use "confidence" in the same sense as being fearless. What women mean by "confidence" is being delusionally confident about one's sexual attractiveness. Otherwise women will just say that they like men who are "fearless" or "risk-taking." But they usually say that they want a man with "confidence", in the sense of being delusionally confident about one's sexually attractiveness.

This is also the reason why women lie about not liking classically handsome men.

Eugenicist #sexist sluthate.com

@mvp

thats the blackpill

thats why they like low iq males
...............

elliot rodger was clearly high iq

im high iq

You were the one who said they're breadth, and not depth. Yes. They're used to having things made for them. They're not meant to be builders. They're meant to be narcissistic, and accept only anything if its hand crafted to perfection for them. That's what happens when they're accustomed to the resource distribution of alphaness. WHen the alpha would hoard them.
Either it puts out perfection, or its doomed to rejection.

Women like low iqness because they're pure practicality, and don't waste time doing anyhting intelligent.Shows how society would be if it were ran by them. They just want power. In the here and now, and fuck the creative process.

America is the ultimate reference point in history, with all the videos/ coverage/ evidnece of the redpill that if another time comes where we've had enough, then we can justify the slavery of women.

Anonymous MG #sexist incels.is

Foids never had the bad end of the stick at any point in history, as all they've been expected to do is raise children and be a homemaker. Men had to do all the work, pursuing, and take all the responsibility. Now that those restrictions are lifted from foids, and males still have those expectations, the current power of foids is disproportionate. With the current trends, I wouldn't be surprised if cucks allowed all desirable men to be put into slavery and incels to be executed due to perceived lack of value to foids.

bluecollarCEL #sexist incels.is

This is something that hasn't been around for a long time, so we don't know the long term effects of this yet. Now with Facebook/Instagram women have instant access to see what is happening in the lifes of EVERY SINGLE ONE of her ex boyfriends. Before Social Media unless one of her boyfriends became FAMOUS (read about them in a tabloid magazine at the checkout in a grocery store) she would have absolutely no idea what is going on in his life. She would have to essentially hire a PI to spy on the motherfucker and find out where he lives, etc.

So what i'm saying is this: Lets say she has had 7 boyfriends before you, your number 8 and you two are married. Most likely all 7 of those guys are on her FB/I and if they aren't she can find them in about 5 seconds. So what happens is EVERY success that comes into those guys lives is like a SPOTLIGHT shining down on your existence. It will plant a seed of doubt in her mind and she will question why she married you when this other guy could of gave her a better life. All 7 other guys are married now. All it takes is 1 doing better than you for this to happen.

They have a bigger house, better car, better job, has a boat, has a pilots license, more money, guy has a successful business, they go on a kick ass vacations, kids are in private school, etc. This can go on all day. You can be RETROCUCKED by 7 other guys. And this isn't even including guys who she just FUCKED so add another 13+ guys for that one. And this is relationships that lasted more than 3 months so those short term boyfriends don't count either.

WarriorSkull #sexist incels.is

Women are susceptible to language and insecure in themselves internally. It isn't just about being mean however you want. It is about using emotional language that women are influenced by and attacking themselves, not what they do. I can almost guarantee, no incel is capable of attacking women in a way that is actually effective because they do not understand how to use emotional language nor understand that how to attack the person instead of their actions or their thoughts or something else not directly them.

Trust me, you likely will never be brave or low inhib enough to test it, but you have to be really fucking mean. The more juvenile and emotionally charged it is, the better. Women don't use logic. They use emotion. Dominate them emotionally and they will crack. Granted, why would you do this unless you wanted to psychologically fuck with some foid, because that is about all you will get out of it as an ugly incel. I'm telling you guys, their minds are weak and any man has it within his capability to break them if he is willing to push hard enough.

The End #sexist incels.is

The main thing that women want is good looks, and they will tolerate being treated like shit by Chad. We know women enjoy being treated roughly, and even degraded, when having sex; so maybe being treated badly is something they enjoy even outside sex.

If a man is mean to women they instinctively feel that he is strong, confident, and desirable. The attitude is, "I can have any woman I want - you play by my rules." Also a temper is (somewhat) indicative of high testosterone.

Women frequently say that they want a man to stand up for himself, so that he will stand up for her as well. That's absolute bull-shit though.

So if Chad treats a girl like shit, does that make him even more desirable? Are they rewarding ass-holes with sex?*

*does negging by Chad increase his desirability? is another way to think of it.

Tobysgirl #sexist feministcurrent.com

I know this is not a popular viewpoint, but I have a real hard time with women who want to think they are men. I have sympathy for the terrible things young women go through, but to want to become a member of the oppressor class disgusts me. The "rights" of trans-identified females mean nothing to me. When they accept that they are biological females, their rights and needs are of paramount importance to me.

various commenters #sexist reddit.com

Just Be A Neo Nazi Bro

image

(StunningResearcher)
That's impossible. I know women, and women wouldn't do that. You altered the picture. There is another story. Women can detect hatred and awful personalities and they judge you harshly on these things. That's why you're incel. I know these things.

(movielover2018)
Personality detector fails again.

(KhalilYousuf3)
Chads jaw always jams it.

(R1415)
Only works for SS-Nazi-Chads.

The racist incels-in-denial who sit in their rooms all day posting Hitler memes aren't getting shit.

(copekoro)
they must have great personalities right IT

(JelqFrost)
In just the last couple weeks I've seen posts here from incels who describe their politics as "so left [they're] practically an anarchist", moderate, apathetic, and there was even one dude complaining about getting banned whenever he tries to explain why he agrees with nazis.

A man's political beliefs don't affect his chances with women in the slightest. You might get kicked out of certain online discussions, but it's your face that determines whether or not you're IRL fuckable.

(Ploard)

Yeah, she's a bad person...

we have: one girl supporting a nazi, one guy who IS a nazi.
And incels use that as a reason to hate women....

The premise of it is that the Nazi is actually bad. And the point you are missing is that there's no such thing as an "irredeemably bad personality" if you are good looking. Sure, not every girl might be into you, but you'd still have plenty of girls throwing themselves at you. "Plenty" as in "more than any average or below average guy could dream of".

https://imgur.com/a/iGcL9

(Crazylikethatglue)
It just shows 1 example of many of womens hypocrite behaviour. You don't get to advocate for womens vile hypocrite behaviour.

(StunningResearcher)

Or not OP because, you know, nazis are scum

Whatever women accept sexually will, by the simple reality of life, be what is passed on to the next generation.

You women really choose well...

JSM #sexist unz.com

Gents, let me explain something to you. In 1974, Congress passed and Gerald Ford signed “Equal Credit Opportunity Act.” Supposedly to “stop discriminating against women in getting credit.” “How terrible that a married woman can’t have credit in her own name” blah blah blah. Prior to ECOA, to qualify a married couple for a mortgage, a bank could only consider the husband’s income, because it’s common sense that, even if the wife is working now, when the kids show up, she’ll be a stay at home mom, so we can’t write loans for 30 years for income that won’t continue that long.

So, when Congress (more men than women, you’ll note) in its infinite wisdom of bowing to feminist pressures, decided to make it so that the wife’s income could be considered under ECOA, that very act is what has utterly destroyed the American family.

As my dad (a home builder) pointed out at the time, all this will do is drive up housing prices. Because, since a couple CAN borrow more now, the sellers will demand more money. And, as we see, that’s EXACTLY what’s happened. Such that, nowadays a family can NOT buy a house in most cases unless the wife works too to pay the mortgage.

But, a full time job and full time motherhood are just incompatible. It’s just too hard. And since houses in neighborhoods with “good schools” (i.e., safe, i.e., White) cost so much that the wife has to work to make the payment and since motherhood and full time work are too hard to do at the same time, American women either don’t have kids (cuz they’re NOT gonna put em in bad, i.e., minority, schools) or have to leave kids in daycare, where godknowswhat will happen to them.

So, decry the feminists, by all means. But let’s heap the requisite share of opprobrium upon the MEN in Congress (only 16 of the 535 members of Congress were women in the 93rd Congress) who are, in actual FACT, the ones responsible for the single most destructive act against Affordable Family Formation that’s ever occurred.

rafaelvicuna3 #sexist incels.is

Daily Reminder: The perfect summarized definiton of AWALT (All Women Are Like That)

Women are like books with different beginnings but the same endings. Don't be fooled by "NAWALTS". They don't exist.

(Emphasis original)

Britannic Nationalist #sexist stormfront.org

Re: ONLY Patriarchy Builds Nations * / & other UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS

So, what do we do with a woman who is too headstrong and intelligent to cook and clean all day? If your only response is to scream CUCKCUCK!!!! then don't reply. I'm looking for serious discussion.

Sometimes one must look at the bigger picture.

We seemed to manage these issues for thousands of years without terrible trouble and built the most advanced civilisation our species has produced into the bargain. It's only since the 1960s that things have gone south big time in this regard.

Was everyone happy, was there no injustice, was every individual about to fulfill their potential etc, during all this time? No. But that's utopian day dreaming. We can't now either. The problem derives from our societies obsession with individualism, wanting each person to be able to 'fulfill their dreams' even if society as a whole goes to hell in a hand basket.

We need to start seeing the wood and not the trees a bit more. Individuality isn't something to be thrown out wholesale, but it needs to be reigned back in considerably in favour of a more collectivist outlook.

Fulfilling our individuality needs to set within the parameters of what is good for society. This idea that each of us can 'be whatever we want' needs to go. Some people are not suited to certain things and we shouldn't sell pipe dreams to people, especially if those dreams can come true and we all suffer for it.

Individual meritocracy with certain logical restrictions for the good of society. That's basically where it's at.


I also think that people tend to mentally conform to the standards and expectations of their time. For example, peasants in the 1500s were not desiring or aspiring to be Lords or Parliamentarians. They knew it was far beyond their station so they didn't factor it into their calculations. They weren't all day-dreaming about it and becoming depressed that they couldn't become those things. Likewise, women weren't becoming depressed because they couldn't become great warriors or master craftsmen.

The feminist narrative that women have always desired these things and that it was only 'patriarchy' holding them back and oppressing them is false. Patriarchal society was a reflection of the natural gendered differences between us and people, women included, conformed to these norms. They weren't getting depressed because they couldn't be 'shieldmaidens'.

The idea of women being 'liberated' implies they were suddenly able to fulfill the dreams they had been having all along. In reality, it simply meant that the expectations of women changed and they began desiring things they had not seriously desired before - things that would ultimately prove disastrous for society and in many ways not ultimately fulfilling for themselves, because these desires were largely implanted in them by post-1960s society, not natural reflections of their nature. Left to their own devices, without restrictions or prompting from society, women and men overwhelmingly choose things which we would think of as typical traditional pursuits. In Scandinavia, the most gender-free society yet made, women are choosing traditionally female occupations and the same for males at the highest rates, much to the confusion and dismay of feminists and sociologists. And this is still with some promoting from society for women to enter traditional male domains. In some areas, such as with politics, there is huge societal prompting for more women to enter these fields (and sometimes all-women shortlists, I think) so that would explain why there are so many women in some fields. However, where the promoting is much less, such as with engineering, women aren't bothering.

Unfortunately from the 1600s on as political philosophy grew ever more individual-focused it started giving all sorts of people ideas that would ultimately prove detrimental to society as a whole. Factor in the Jewish role later in the 20th century and it went from being a tenuous situation to a suicidal situation.

evilsmurf #sexist #psycho incelocalypse.ru

A father is supposed to teach his daughter how to be a woman that services a man's needs. All of a man's needs. After helping to give her life, raising and supporting her, it's only fair that the father gets something in return. The best gift a daughter can give her father is that tight young virgin pussy. All dad's deserve it. A dad works hard so that she is taken care of that feeling of that tight pussy gripping his cock is well deserved. She is his property. Her place is at our feet, cooking our meals, washing our filthy underwear cleaning our toilets and draing our balls. Just imagine slipping your full grown daddy dick into that tiny pussy stretching her to the max before giving you a new daughter to molest

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson #sexist incelocalypse.ru

In the past, one might have argued, "You shouldn't have sex with your daughter because it would be better for her to marry someone closer to her own age, who has a different set of genetics and can therefore produce better kids."

This argument always did have the problem that some girls just happen to prefer older men. But whatever.

The problem now is, the typical girl is not going to get married at 13 like in the old days, but will instead become a slut. She'll get fucked by some Chad who will dump her, and then she'll end up getting fucked by lots of other guys, and have a kid outside of wedlock by one of them. If she ever does get married, the marriage will probably fail.

It isn't just trashy girls who are like this; middle-class girls are the same way. Not only that, but even if she does have a seemingly "successful" marriage (i.e. she and her hubby don't split up), she'll still probably only have like one kid -- not enough to sustain the family line. Plus she'll probably cheat on her husband.

Rather than let all that happen, it's probably better, if you have a daughter, to have a quasi-marital relationship with her, starting when she's at a young age. One may as well be the one to pop her cherry and repeatedly get her pregnant while she's still in her teens. That will be good for her kids, too, because they'll have the benefit of having lots of siblings to play with. Plus they can go hang out with their grandfather whenever they want, because he'll be the same man as their father, who lives with them in the same home.

The only problem is, the mother may get in the way of this plan. What you have to do, then, is maybe wait till the kid reaches a certain age where she's no longer breastfeeding, and then bump off the mom. Maybe tell your kid's mom, "Honey, let's go on a romantic getaway, just the two of us" and take her on a vacation to an exotic Caribbean island, where you will teach her how to scuba dive through a 17th-century shipwreck. Unfortunately, a tragic accident will befall her in which her scuba gear gets tangled up and she becomes trapped in the wreckage. You, of course, were running out of oxygen yourself and had to surface, leaving her there. By the time you returned to try to rescue her, she was already dead.

With the mother (who was probably starting to get kinda old and wrinkly anyway) out of the picture, you can then become the sole parent of your daughter, and molest her at will. It'll be the same scenario as in the novel Lolita. Hopefully, though, you'll get to her when she's young enough that you won't have to deal with some interloper like Quimby.

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson #sexist incelocalypse.ru

What do you think of using Gandhian tactics? Like saying, "I'm going on a hunger strike until I'm given jailbait pussy" and then doing a new YouTube video every day about the progress of the hunger strike, until dying of hunger?

I've gone on many hunger strikes. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't.

Combatant 14 #sexist stormfront.org

A nation that makes the unfortunate transition from a strong patriarchal society with pronounced traditional roles, to a matriarchal society with pronounced cultural marxist elements present, is basically a society waiting for a grave plot. By that time it has been overrun, mongrelized, taken over and colonized.

The third wave feminism we see today as a rallying cry for equal rights among the gender binary is nothing more than another -ism located within the leftist political spectrum. It's a root to a very rotten tree. They are not so much about gender equality as they are about gender transcendence. Within this push for a gender role transplant, lies the blueprint for a nations destruction.

Male feminists, white knights, even those on the racial right, can not sit there and tell me that women in power is a good thing. It is never a good thing, because it goes against the natural order. A woman has her sphere of dominion at the soul of the hearth. That's it. That's the limit. They don't belong in the military, they don't belong anywhere else but the core of the hearth.

People will call my above post very misogynistic, to which I would retort with well.. that is what nature intended. Nothing from nature needed political backing. It just is. So why a push for this leftist control?

Destruction of cultural identity and a total data wipe of white civilization. THATS what feminism stands for.

TrueAlphaMale #sexist incels.is

In 2018, you are either a sex slave or the girl is your sex slave

Relationships in 2018 are like that. Either you have to be a girl's toy or she gets to be yours. There is no balance.

This has to do with feminism. Women rose in power so now they are in control. They choose who they get to have sex with and who they don't. They choose, not the men so relationships lack the natural balance which stemmed from the trope of the man confidently approaching the lady and treating her with repsect while at the same time maintaining his personal self respect and pride.

And because women are immature and holeric, they either decided to make a man their slave or become slaves for their man. They lack the necessary empathy and humanity to form healthy relationships and they always have to take things to the extreme. It has become absolutely necessary to control these wrethed creatures for their own good and the planet's in general.

Robo Sapien #sexist incels.is

How can you still want a long term relationship with a foid despite knowing their nature?

I often ask myself how a blackpill guy could still desire a long term commitment from a foid despite knowing a foid's true nature? How could you still trust her knowing that she doesn't want you, but instead wants chad? How could you be at ease knowing that the money you give her will somehow be reallocated to Chad? How can you still trust her when she tells you she's late at the office, but she's getting pumped by Chad? How could you peacefully raise your kids knowing that the rate of cuckolding is as high as 30%, and that it's most likely Chad's? How can you?

I only ask this because I see guys claiming that they want "romantic" relationships. Yet, these same people know that true love only belongs to Chad. A woman can't love a man for anything more than his utility. Chad has a physical utility. You don't. She can't physically love you. She can only love the stuff you do for her. That's why a woman will make sub-Chad males do stuff before she reciprocates even the slightest sexual interest. In the case of incels, she reciprocates nothing without an express and binding contract. Everything an incel does is transactional. So why then, despite knowing this grim reality do you continue to kid yourself about every being loved?

FrailPaleStaleMale #sexist incels.is

Femoid Organ Donors should be given to incels ASAP after death for sex

By definition the Vagina is an organ. It is one of the femoid reproductive organs right. The vagina is always discarded and never used after a foid fortunately dies. Therefore it makes sense to me that foids who are organ donors be given to willing incels while the body is still warm and ripe for sexual purposes. This of course would only apply to foids who allow ANY organs or tissues to be donated. This would be perfectly legal as the foid has already given written consent. This way the leftover body, looks and vagina of deceased foid wouldn't all go to waste and could be used up by incels before the rest of the body is salvaged afterwards.

This obviously won't be ideal for some cels, but it could do wonders for those who would be willing. This is the kind of post that would put people off but consider, if every other organ can be used, then what possible reason could there be for not letting one specific organ be used for its primary function.

RageAgainstTDL #sexist incels.is

Why MGTOWs are right and you are just coping.
You will never be a 6' white ripped Chad model.

Let's get that out of the way up front.

Women will also only continue to change for the worse with hypergamy escalating annually.

If you can accept those two points are factually correct, then MGTOWs are correct.

The only type of "relationships" you might ever get will involve you paying the girl, spending 20-30 hours a week emotionally supporting her and doing activities she wants with her to keep her happy, "dead bedrooms", or will involve her being a gross landwhale.

The idea that most of us can ever do better is a lie. If you can't accept that and move on that's your failure and your weakness.

This is why MGTOWs are right.

Kurdish_Incel #sexist incels.is

You are just a status-object

Chads looks bring status to a girl. Guy with money brings status to a girl. Guy with status brings status to a girl.
Once she finds some other guy who is able to give more status she will go for him.

You're nothing but something to gain value from.. femoids are nothing but parasites. The only thing you're getting if you somehow ascend is pussy and someone who obeys your commands.. cucktears don't even have the second, they just get pussy time to time and think they're chad not knowing they are currently getting cucked.

Femoids will never be able to love you for what you are. Even if you ascend femoids will 'love' you but not the love you want.
One thing I learned from RedPill sources = A man will never get the 'love' he expects. A girl will never be able to give the love a man expects.

That confident ugly af normie with good personality? He is fun to be around and he sometimes get pussy so girls can keep them around. Pussy is just currency nothing momre

WitchyWombyn #sexist reddit.com

After a recent discussion on GCdebatesQT I've been thinking about the characteristics male animals demonstrate before being allowed in a group of females. To enter female spaces a male has to:

Demonstrate that every member male who is joining the females is not an active threat to the females or their offspring.

Demonstrate that there is some benefit to the females for allowing males to enter said group.

Demonstrate that they intend on ensuring that they will place no burden on the resources the females use for themselves or their offspring.

In regards to point 1 TIM's have refused to even acknowledge any of the dangers to women if they are allowed in our space. In nature if a male was threatening a female or young member of the in group you wanted to be a member of the males would kill it to protect the females and young.

In regards to point 2 I would say that there is clearly no benefit to women to allow TIM's into our spaces and instead of offering us anything they demand access because they believe we owe them protection from males and validation for their identity.

In regards to point 3 just look at their demands to use women's resources for rape and suicide counselling.

So my question is, setting aside the fact that they are attempting to colonize womanhood, how different would our conversations go if they had cared to meet any of the requirements that any other female would require?

caamib #sexist #wingnut #psycho incelocalypse.ru

I am a limited political pedophile.

What does this mean?

I am not attracted to female children below the age of 12, but I would still have sex with a modern Western female even younger, even a toddler.

Why?

Because I hate almost all modern Western women and don't care what happens to them. I know they will all become worthless sluts who will fuck the dirtiest men around (actual omegas - http://www.coalpha.org/Misuse-of-terms-l...95159.html) and that they will reject any male who will be interested in a serious relationship, let alone marriage. They might marry a beta when they're 35 or so just so he can feed their disgusting omega spawn but even then they'll fuck dirtbags who will still have them.

I don't care what happens to almost any Western female toddler (excluding women from sane groups in the West, like Amish, Mormons, Mennonites or Orthodox Jews). Would I get hard on 3 year old female toddler were I to get one? I don't know, I honestly haven't been with one before. But even if I could not, I'd still try to lick its vagina or something like that, just for experiment. I suspect it would be easier with some developed girl who is like 11. I have no doubt I'd be attracted to her and would fuck her well.

The point isn't attraction. Were I attracted to below 12 jailbaits I'd be sure I could get it hard even for a 3 year-old, but I can't be sure of that right now for reasons I've mentioned - a) I am not attracted to them now b) I have never been with somebody who is, like, a toddler.
The point is something else completely -as a modern Western female, you have no rights in my eyes. You are lost, broken, tainted, worthless. You will never be anything than a public urinal. You have no capability of being a good wife or a mother.

On the other hand, I'd never act in ways I described with a female from a non-feminist country !

So in that sense I am a political pedophile, in a limited sense (I am not a political pedophile toward non-feminist women).

Any questions?

TrueAlphaMale #sexist incels.is

If you don't hate women you are a cuck

"Nature made women like that. It's not their fault. It's how they are programmed to be".

Women and all living things by extent, are a physical manifestation of nature. They are an expression, an embodiment of nature as per say. They are one and the same.

Nature is an abstract concept. We, humans, we are not abstract. We are material. Our emotions and thoughts all always expressed towards things within our level of perception and within our plane of existance, our reality.

If a girl rejectes you, you get angry. You get angry because despite all the effort you have put in her, she denied you. It's only natural you feel this way. Her behavior is natural selection in action and her mind is part of the larger female hivemind which consitutes the everlasting mechanism that decides who gets laid and who doesn't. This mechanism is one of the many limbs of nature on this world. Hating women=hating nature because they are one and the same.

FrailPaleStaleMale #sexist incels.is

If a roastie dies prematurely

Just had a thought, doubt its practical but if a roastie dies at the funeral you'll hear all about what a "perfect" person she was. It should be our duty to turn up and let everybody know what a cunt of a person she was and how much of a cum guzzling whore she was, also let people know what a service she's done to society by dying.

Next page