All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
EtchyTWA is totally on the money here. It's fucking ridiculous to listen to Jewish people on this subject. They are conditioned to be extremely paranoid and perceive threats everywhere due to the irrational hatred of Jews. These threats are more or less nonexistent and Jews are safe in most parts of the world. It's a fear that is very much understandable due to not so distant history but the post Holocaust generation are cultivating this paranoia for political reasons and it is to the detriment of Jewish people and it is to do with the state of Israel and not to do with racism about Jews.
Anti-semitism nowadays is a political tool being used by Israel supporters, both Jewish and non-Jewish. It makes Jewish people mental. It is making a whole culture live in a state of suspicion vis-a-vis everyone else purely to make willing supporters of the Israeli state who will put their money up or their bodies to help murder Palestinians and steal their land. That's it.
Labour party anti-semitism is a nonsensical myth that's been created by people who are using anti-semitism as a political tool, just like the Israelis do. It's time for all people to call this shit out for what it is and Jewish people need to get a grip already and tell everyone that they are OK actually.
"I finally felt at home because the increased diversity of experience meant that I wasn't alone anymore"
that feeling of discomfort you felt beforehand is exactly how a native Canadian feels when he/she is around foreign immigrants. that feeling of comfort is exactly how a native Canadian feels when he/she is around an English speaking one. having experienced this, you should have empathy for the native
"I feel much more in common with other immigrants (particularly from my home country) than the White Canadian Culture"
of course you do, because you're not assimiliated. why would you feel affinity for a culture that isn't you? this is the same exact logic of the native, who feels uncomfortable with a foreign culture
"I am confused why the acceptability of immigrants should be judged on their apparent difference from the 'in group'"
I don't like the term "acceptability." everyone should be "accepted." what I'm speaking to is the reality that someone with cultural similarities/ethnic ties will have a likelier probability of assimilating and getting along with the natives than someone with no such similarities.
nations are just constructs that can easily be subverted by foreigners. foreigners pose a potential danger (including English speaking foreigners). and someone with cultural similarities/ethnic ties is a known commodity, and is thus less of a danger.
of course, foreigners can also potentially provide enrichment and new viewpoints, which is why it's dumb to discount them entirely. and like I said, strangers should always be treated respectfully. but they should be dealt with with caution.
"Who is the 'in group'?"
well the "in-group" depends on where you are. in greater Canada, the in-group would be native Canadians (i'm not describing First
"Nation...I mean people who were born and have lived in Canada for generations). in the tech world it tends to be immigrants."
"What are the customs? Who gets to decide them?
the nation has a culture spanning several centuries."
do I get to define the 'in group' or do I have to wait a few generations?
if you assimilate then you can be part of the in-group. otherwise you are "just an outsider
Why should they 'learn the customs' at all?"
why would you move to Canada if you don't want to be a part of the culture, unless it's to be a parasite on the nation that Canadians have constructed
"racism lite disguised as something to do with "risk assessment"
whether it's racist or not really has to do with the actions of the in-group person. someone can be racist and use my spiel as an excuse. another person can be not racist, but want to spend time with people who share customs/culture
"I'm not denying my privilege"
when you spend time in immigrant-rich environments, you feel more comfortable because you're around others like you. I would feel less comfortable around them. the fellow immigrants would get along better with you. does that mean you have some "immigrant privilege" that I wouldn't have? no, because that's a dumb concept.
you're better
I never said "better." I said more assimilable
[OP of "Me IRL"]
Comic "Only good fags are in the bog"
Brood parasites like cowbirds and cuckoos might be a better analogy.LGB folks spent decades building their movement(the nest). MtTs come along and want to piggyback off the movement(adding their eggs to the nest).
The hatchlings grow more quickly and consume more resources to the detriment of the original chicks in the nest(trans issues get 99% of the attention). Finally, brood parasites have been known to violently retaliate if their eggs are detected and ejected from the nest(TERF-bashing, "corrective rape" of lesbians, etc).
When, hmm? I was just disgusted at the metoo stuff by the trans. Its 'marginalizing' because they'd feel validated by it. They were beating around the bush, but what they meant was, we'd love to be sexually harassed because it will make us fell like desirable women..and being desirable is the most important thing a woman can be. Or they want the harassment, because they see it as an opportunity. After all, if prostitution is empowering, then selling your body to a wealthy man in exchange for a career must be more so.
They are demanding to be 'centred'. That metoo leaves them out. Women have bent over backwards for them, and now, when something real is happening, real changes...really powerful men are falling like skittles, yay, do the trans cry encouragement? No, they say, dont marginalize. But women can only bring the men to book by speaking up...so therefore, they mean, dont speak up. It makes us jealous, because we want to be seen a sexually desirable. Seriously incredible. Someone remind me again, just how supporting trans is good for women?
Common Trans Paradoxes:
Trans women: PUNCH TERFS! KILL TERFS! STAB TERFS!
Also Trans women: We totally won't attack you in female spaces or anything.
Trans women: WE ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN CIS WOMEN!
Also Trans women: WE ARE THE MOOOOOOST HARASSED AND RAPED AND MARGINALIZED PEOPLE EVER! CIS PRIVILEGE IS REAL!
Trans women: We aren't erasing women!
Also Trans women: Vulva cupcakes kill!
Trans women: We aren't harassing or erasing lesbians!
Also trans women: FUCK ME OR YOU'RE A BIGOT AND I'LL RUIN YOUR LIFE!
Trans women: We aren't just men in dresses or women in suits!
Also trans women: THIS HISTORICAL CROSS DRESSER WAS TRANS!
Trans women: Vaginas aren't female! Penises aren't male! It's not all about genitals!
Also trans women: Pleasepleasepleaseplease contribute to our GoFundMe so we can change our genitals or else we'll kill ourselves.
Trans women: It's not all about passing!
Also trans women: Pleasepleasepleaseplease contribute to our GoFundMe so we can pass or else we'll kill ourselves.
Trans women: It's not about genitals!
Also trans woman: That drag queen can't perform here because he doesn't have the right genitals!
I'm sure you folks can come up with plenty of other examples....I'm just so tired of this crap.
Little background: I have a 14 year old friend and her GF just told her she thinks she might be trans. We’ve all seen this before, lesbian feels like she might be trans... thing is we know what might have gotten her to that conclusion, my question is: How can we open a discussion to make her think about those reasons? How can we help her see the real reasons behind this?
But in conversation, cause it’d be easy to just list everything to her but I wanted to help her get to those conclusions herself. So far I’ve suggested my friend asks her why she doesn’t like her body and show her parallels on how all women are indoctrinated to hate our bodies and so that downs alw you trans, just means you’re being successfully socialized as a woman....Help!?
The DDR had much greater problems after the war than West Germany. For starters most of the war reparations to Russia were paid by the DDR. The allies cancelled reparations pretty quickly after the war which was a massive fuck you to Russia as the total damage during WW2 to Russia was estimated at more than $100 billion dollars. Much heavy industry was stripped down and transported to Russia.
The fighting was also much more severe in the DDR. There was far greater reconstruction that had to take place to begin with as the east of the country was historically underdeveloped compared to west Germany.
These factors meant that the DDR couldn't compete with west Germany in areas such as wages and consumer goods. The wall was built and border controls strengthened because huge amounts of working age people were leaving the DDR for a "better life". The DDR had given them free education and then they were simply leaving and it was having a major effect on their ability to develop.
There were also much more practical reasons for closing the border. The Germany was the centre of the cold war. Why would you let spies and saboteurs into the country. (There was evidence of sabotage to key infrastructure).
I think the Berlin Wall was justifiable considering the context of the situation at the time. The DDR was not he'll on earth the country offered affordable living, good education and had very high living standards in general. It just couldn't compete with West Germany because of the multiple issues that the country faced.
Paid protesters. There are ads for crisis actors that pop up before all of these events. There were witnesses in Charlottesville that saw both sides of the protest getting bussed in together. Look into Weather Warfare. Weather control technology has been around for a long time. I’m not saying it was Russia. But, it is possible these storms were not entirely natural.
The Las Vegas shooting was a false flag attack. There are numerous witness accounts of multiple shooters. Crisis actors were used for interviews. Our presidents are selected not elected. All of this “Russian interference” is deflection. They will blame Russia anytime they can because it’s easy. Do you really think they’re going to share high level dossiers with the general public? Come on.
My point is that what we are told is nonsense. It’s theater. It’s all about pushing an agenda. The main agenda being to keep us divided and distracted.
The protests are about division. They’re literally trying to reignite a race war. I’ve spoken to locals in cities with these protests and while there is still some racism in this country most people are not contributing to it. Most people are friendly with each other.
Major weather events are usually a distraction or if you really want to go down the rabbit hole some believe they are being used as warfare. We did it in Vietnam. That’s not even a conspiracy. It’s a fact. All these shootings and terrorist attacks are to keep people scared and convince them to clamor for more legislation to surrender our freedoms. The other reason is to get our support for the conflicts that serve their interests. North Korea. Iran. Russia.
We are being manipulated on a massive scale.
There's a lot of different angles on masturbation but I really want to start with the first one you mentioned: the young age portion of it. It seems that nearly everyone gets hit with it at a young age, and it just builds into a total addiction. I mean I know theres some that do it throughout the day and things to that nature but its just an addiction when you do it every day.
It's just that release people utilize, and it gets so built into the main frame of the mind that it becomes so hard to break because people from a young age get tied into it as being their release point at the end of the day. Its so rooted with lust that at any sign of lust people think that means "go masturbate" and it becomes such a point of addiction that people call it natural.
To your main question, the demonic (which is heavily intertwined with the addiction portion of it). To put it quite bluntly, masturbation is a demonic sex magic ritual. It sounds really ridiculous compared to the mundane of what you are actually doing, but that is what is happening in the spiritual realm. You are literally have your lifeforce (sperm) stolen away from you by demonic tricks in the mind.
The devil performs basically a ritual upon you that drains you of your lifeforce and energy, taking from your being (your soul). Its a heavily degrading act but it also is a soul tie to the devil and spirit of lust. But I tell you, even if you don't masturbate but you watch pornography, the devil has the absolute right to control your life. Yes, that seems as if its a stretch but its so true.
Fornication is a horrible sin, its mentioned as basically the worst sin in the Bible. Any pornography/masturbation puts such a strong demon inside of you that controls and manipulates your life. Your thoughts and desires get so twisted in that avenue that it just makes it impossible to make the right choices on your own. I tell you, in my mind its worse to watch pornography/masturbate/fornicate on a spiritual level than it is to do drugs. Society thinks quite the opposite in that avenue.
It's not God's will for people to get high - thats why people use it. It's pretty clear in the scriptures when it says Do not be drunk with wine but be filled with the Holy Spirit. This applies to any substance, you just can't get high or drunk.
When you get high you open yourself up to demonic infiltration. It's really not of God. I mean the fact of the matter is that there are so many poisonous mushrooms out in the wild and we know not to consume them. But God created the plants would be the reasoning for the marjiuana crowd which is just such an easy deception.
Weed just inhibits your relationship with God. You abuse the temple of your body wherein the Holy Ghost resides when you use it. You're not reaching where God wants you to be when you partake of it.
Sure, everyone references or quotes the 1960s Brookings' Report - "The implications of a discovery of extraterrestrial life." i.e. the collapse of the three pillars of society: religion, financial system and government, with the added aspect of global panic. Aliens have made contact with a wide range of cultures around the world, from farmers (I take it this covers your 'chinese rice paddy') in desolate and rural areas, to native tribes, scientists, the military and world leaders - MUFON and various authors/ researchers have documented these encounters.
Since the 1960s and the Brookings' Report, intelligence agencies have updated their assessments: 1) based on the technological superiority, the aliens aren't here to eliminate us 2) contact with us, isn't recent - it's been a long term engagement by them 3) the aliens are interested in our DNA, as a means of gradually evolving us 4) that it's by our decision that their presence will be known; this doesn't translate as "contact," when admission by governments deem it's time.
Point 4 is important. At any time the aliens could've made themselves known, regardless of how governments felt - they haven't. Are they complicit in the silence and cover-up? Yes. The conclusion is they'd have to be. So, the 1960s Brookings Report is outdated. What's holding back admission of an alien presence? Why 'cover up definitive proof of extraterrestrial life?' As an alien race, there's no way you'd interrupt a race that's engaged in multiple wars, genocide, etc. There's a good chance we'd use their technology advances to kill each other, if not attack them. Other than disable our nuclear weapons, which they've done repeatedly, as proof that they don't want us to really eliminate ourselves, their role remains mute in the big picture.
It's all about timing. Part of any advanced race is the ability to take care of themselves, as well as the environment they're living in. Sure they can step-in and stop wars, cure cancer and fix the atmosphere - we as a people, haven't learned the most important lesson; that we're one. We need each other. We need to show that we can respectfully work and trust each other, to clean up the problems we've created; to get our house in order. We're made to feel alone, controlled and contained, by us.. by our governments, for a reason.
I always believed they killed him because he knew too much about the UFO truth and was going to go public about it. Same happened to Marilyn Monroe because JFK had told her too much and they were worried she would go public about it too.
Pentacostal with a level head here. The practice of faith healing, while surrounded by skepticism, is scripturally founded. Isaiah 53 says that by Jesus' stripes, we were healed at calvary. In mark 16, Jesus tells us to not only go out and make disciples, but to go and heal the sick, raise the dead, perform miracles, etc. In James 5, Paul instructs people to lay hands on the sick and that they will recover.
I've seen many people healed by the power of prayer, be it mental or physical. I've seen friends walk into church services on crutches and leave in perfect condition. There are circumstances in which a medical outcome can only be attributed to God, for there is no physical explanation. Is it a perfect science? Absolutely not. Why does prayer not work sometimes? I couldn't begin to tell you. I do know, however, that there is healing power provided to anyone who believes for it. As for tongues being a sign of salvation, are you sure you're not confusing it with being an initial sign of the baptism of the holy spirit?
The demon was manifested in this woman as a drug addiction. I talked to the woman about her addiction, told her I'm going to cast out this demon of addiction and prayed to Jesus. After doing this, I looked her in the eyes and addressed the spirit directly. As this happened, the demon instantly manifested in this woman and took over her consciousness. After the moment of addressing it and during the process of casting it out, the woman herself blacked out and the demon took over. I saw hatred and evil manifest. I saw the look a rebellious and angry child would give to someone with authority. The Holy Spirit worked with me as I told it to enter this woman and cast out the demon like in the way that Jesus describes in Matthew 12:29. At this, the woman began making noises of great discomfort.
A minute or two then went by of me commanding the demon to leave and the demon being hurt by the Holy Spirit. It had pretended like it left a few times, but I affirmed whether or not it left by asking the Holy Spirit to give me a sign. When i asked the Holy Spirit to do this, the demon would again make noises of pain.
Finally, this demon was reaching its breaking point. At this time, it had been diverting its gaze from my eyes to avoid the authority of my stare and had begun laughing at me. I then lifted the woman's head to bring the eyes to mine once more and asked "what are you laughing at?? You have no authority here! Leave, NOW!!" and with that, it left. Very intense experience. The woman woke up as if out of a trance and just said she felt very tired. She agreed that it was a very real and powerful experience and affirmed that she felt as though something left her. She had no recollection of what had happened. I lovingly warned her to never touch drugs ever again and she left, exhausted from the experience. I'd now experienced the enemy in a way I'd only ever before seen in videos or heard in stories.
Albania - have you seen these people? I have and most of them have clear colored admixture. Kosovo as well is hardly homogeneously European overall.
We need standards.
Bosnia, while the Muslims there are still white overall, they also show some Turkic admixture and they are traitors to their European heritage and as such the white Croats and Serbs there.
Islam was pure cancer to Christian European civilization. These people have no home in a white ethno state in any case. Let alone something as regressive and idiotic as Islam overall.
A European speaking a European language coming to a European-derived nation is going to be in the in-group quicker than someone from an entirely different culture who looks different and has different customs. That's human nature, and it's quite normal and absolutely acceptable. From a risk standpoint, he is less of a threat to the in-group.
It will take the non-European longer to assimilate and be accepted, and it should, as he/she is a unknown commodity to the in-group. Perhaps this individual is special and will learn the language and customs so fast that the in-group will accept him faster than the European? Or perhaps the individual will struggle in this society?
What's unacceptable is not giving the stranger any chance whatsoever. However, he is an unknown commodity, and should be treated as such until the situation plays out.
1 Timothy 2:12-14 "I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man, she must be quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner." That's a New Testament quote, btw. God knew what would happen if we let women run out society, and look where we are now. It's time to start valuing the truth over political correctness.
Seeinng 5 different types of UFOs . The first one I seen in Prescott Arizona when I was 13 , I believe the occupants communicated with me telepathically. I was hiding and it/they told me " I can see you" and then I believe it did something to me because something happened and felt every possible human emotion in seconds it scared me so bad I almost peed my pants. The last one I seen was when I was 30 and 8 months pregnant with my daughter. Between that time I could go outside meditate and ask them to show themselves and they would show up in the sky .
The last one I seen when I was 8 months pregnant with my daughter, something/ it woke me up at 1: 45 in the morning and told me to go outside and I did and when I went outside there was nothing and I was Facing East and it sounded like a crack of a whip behind me or something touching electrical wires and I looked and I didn't see anything and as I stood there looking East One quietly and slowly glided Over My Head probably not even a hundred feet up in the air probably 50 feet up in the air above me and it had 9 parabolic mirrors underneath it the mirrors also double as lights, as it floated over me I could see myself in the reflection of the mirrors.
I won't say what happened or what I did when that happened at the risk of already sounding like a nut job but as it floated down the street over the neighbors houses I could see their cars and stuff in their yard in the mirrors. I have not seen one since nor have I been able to call them to show themselves and I'm 45 now.
Jews are known to help each other out, specially the ones who show some potential. Those receive unlimited support: finance & media exposure. They' are not that many, so they can afford to be really organized.
The most powerful lobbies in the united states an europe, are mostly jewish. and it's no secret. Another reason, is that jewish is an ethnicity too. Not all jewish people are religious, some are even agnostic. And they have culturally speaking a great urge to achieve dunya success.
Children can never be sexual in our society because they cannot consent
Children are sexual. Just because society attempts to reject that fact, doesn't make it less of a fact. There is also no evidence that consensual early sexuality will screw up a child's life. Consensual sex play (or even consensual sex) between children is generally accepted as beneficial by child psychologists. It helps them learn about sex and also helps them to accept sex as natural and not something to be ashamed of.
Age of Consent laws are a problem because they don't account for child sexuality. You may believe that an adult should not be allowed to have sex with a child, but two children should be able to have sex without both of them being considered rapist.
Fuckin' gross, dude. Children develop sexually and sexuality. Like their other various forms of intelligences, they start simple and grow over time, so that at any observed moment, their level of sophistication falls on a continuum.
This does not mean that a statement like "children are sexual" is in any way, shape, or form correct or, considering what the likely motivation behind such a statement is, anything less than fucking abhorrent.
Consign yourself to a deserted island, you shitty predator. Any adult who takes and active and undue interest in children's sexuality is doing so for self-serving reasons, and needs to be monitored and contained. If you don't take steps to keep yourself physically removed from sources of temptation (in this case, meaning those not yet experienced, mature, or savvy enough to recognize your advances and protect themselves from your overtures), society needs to do it for you.
Did you know that most babies (under 1 year old) learn to touch their genitals as a form of pleasure. They can't orgasm at that age, but they can find the sensation pleasurable. In many cultures, parents also touch the genitals to sooth and comfort a baby.
Touch is healthy, especially from people you are comfortable with. Babies perceive (edit: non-forcible) touch to their genitals as pleasurable, unless they are taught not to. In sexually permissive cultures, children can learn to masturbate (for pleasure) by the age of 6 to 8. Children begin engaging in coitus by the ages of 6 or 7.
We live in a society that deliberately teaches children not to be sexual. We create a taboo around sex and sexuality, especially in regards to children. So in our society children are perceived as non-sexual, because we teach them not to be. We teach them that they should feel guilt or shame about sex. Many are harmed by this view; adults who grow up with feelings of guilt or shame about their sexuality. Children who are imprisoned or on the sex offenders list because they acted sexually.
Also I'm not going to have sex with a child. I believe that in our society the potential for harm to her from external pressures (society, therapist, law enforcement) is too great.
Men don't need to be removed from women because they are a source of temptation and might rape them. I don't need to be removed from association with kids, because I will not rape them. In another society I would be willing to have consensual sex with a child, but not in this one. I'm not will to risk the harm that society would do to her if they found out, even if she was a willing and enjoyed the act itself.
is the very definition of predatory, no matter what nickerson and the other virpeds say.
The VirPed's (who are anti-contact - which is to say they believe sexual contact between adults/children is always harmful) do not say this. The pro-contacter's do (which is to say, we believe sex between an adult and child would be non-harmful and even beneficial if social and legal views changed).
Sexual education and the ability to form their own moral compass in regards to sexual activity is very important.
But society does not allow them to form their own moral compass. It gives them the moral compass. It starts when a parent pushes their babies hand away from their genitals and continues throughout childhood as children are actively discouraged from exploring their own sexuality and are not answered when they ask about sexuality. Sexuality and especially child sexuality are taboo in our society.
However, they should be able to discover these things in their own way, at their own pace, with their peers.
I almost agree, I would say with whomever they choose, rather than their peers. Let them form their own moral compass, let them act on that moral compass. Even if their moral compass permits sexual contact with an adult. As noted above, our society does not do this. Our society pushes them away from self-discovery, purposefully slows their pace and discourages sexual interactions with others (especially adults).
taking advantage of a child if they had physical relations.
Why? What makes sex so special? An unrelated adult can have a emotional relationship, a friendship, even a physical but non-sexual relationship. Or should all adults avoid unrelated children unless it is a professional relationship with that child?
stalin was the russian leader who brought the ussr closer to socialism then any russian leader before him, so obviously he will get the most flak from the west.
stalin did not kill millions, he wasn't some crazy dictator, and he wasn't a racist. he was a good person, just keep learning, and dont close yourself up.
Why escalate the language here. When all precautions are taken not to hurt anyone this is just classical sabotage. Still too dangerous to execute, IMO, because fires are uncontrollable, but hardly terrorism. There was a case from a dutch man in 2002 who shot a conservative politician partly over animal issues, but also on general cultural issues beyond that. On the other hand hunters have killed several protesters during mass sabotage actions.
Like any social movement I don’t think vegans should let themselves be divided by the question of violence. Nobody likes it, we shouldn’t fetishize it as a movement, but situationally it probably can turn out useful and we should stand in solidarity those who endorse or use it reasonably.
I believe the ends justify the means. Now you may not agree with that, but we probably can agree that it is at least a reasonable thing to believe. Also vegans are not pacifists. Some may be, but many are not.
What (ethical) vegans have in common is the desire to minimize harm to sentient beings. And again I think it is reasonable to believe that the harm caused to some few people by burning down their farm or lab is smaller than the harm that would have been caused to the many animals in those faculties.
Very very few vegans support bombs and arson because as you pointed out it risks harming people. Many do support non violent actions such as rescuing animals or property damage. It's very much a case of one man's freedom fighter another man's terrorist.
Plenty of revolutions have involved violence, apartheid and anti slavery for example, so I don't think the simple fact that a campaign uses violence makes it terrorism. Ultimately the ALF are trying to stop violence being inflicted on innocent and defenceless animals for no reason.
Jesus wan't a jew. He called jews satanists and hated them. nice try.
If you were bullied as a male, you ARE or at least were ugly. Period. I'm tired of people thinking that bullying is caused by shyness, social anxiety, coming from poor family or any other fucking stupid cope shit.
-Ugly shy male in class: lol creep weirdo. Let's steal his bag.
-Handsome shy male in class: Oh why doesn't he open more? Let's get to know him and introduce him to our group!
-Ugly poor male in a high-ish class environment school: lol you must eat from dumpsters or something. I can't let people see me with this loser.
-Handsome poor male in a high-ish class environment school: Oh he must be a genius or a hard worker if he is here and comes from a difficult poor past. I can always help him a bit when hes low on money if he wants snacks! Im sure I could get him a part time job at my dads company so he has some cash.
-Ugly rich male in a low class environment school: That pretentious shit fed with golden spoon, lets beat him and steal his money. Money won't get ya girls loser.
-Handsome rich male in low class environment school: Oh why is he here? looks like a prince! Hes so humble, he is rich as fuck and still is down to earth studying here. He must be some sort of young genius who makes tons of money trough some online thing right?
-Ugly foreigner student: can you even speak our language? lol go back to your country.
-Handsome foreigner student: So exotic! I always wanted to hook up with a foreigner. Tell us about your country, must be so interesting!
Every possible ideological/personality/socioeconomic clash is a COPE. Every clash will be mitigated and haloed by good looks. The only reason you are bullied is because you are UGLY period. LOOKS DETERMINE YOUR ENTIRE LIFE AND WORTH SPECIALLY AS A MALE. For girls bullying sometimes can come from social power, or things like some girl being bullied because of jealousy about something. But for males is always ALWAYS because of looks.
Here is a point I try to make with my liberal friends to begin to pry their heads loose from the trashcan of ideology upon which they consistently dine. Think about modern US politics. Even the most hardcore liberals would agree that there are legitimate things to criticize Obama for, however you will never see the legitimate criticism on Fox News.
All of Fox News reporting on Obama bordered on ridiculous. Think about those absurdities and the lies about the Clintons. No legitimate criticism to be found and he was very much the right wing's ally.
Now imagine Stalin and Mao. They led the two most successful socialist states in history. Stalin is the scourge of the bourgeois. They hate him worse than they hate Hitler. Michael Parenti is great on this. Leaders who served the Proletarians, from Julius Caesar through Stalin are always portrayed as Tyrants, monsters, murderers, demagogues.
Also, whenever a liberal uses the word Freedom and Democracy they mean Capital Freedom to move where it will and Capital Democracy, the right for Capital to make the decisions. I am still studying and I am not as well versed as other comrades so I welcome criticism or expansion on anything I have said. thanks.
Human rights are a bourgeois concept. They were thought up during the Enlightenment when a bunch of upper-middle class/upper class philosophers decided that that they thought was universal and right, just like the laws in the feudal era and the slave empire era.
There are many things for leftists to criticize Stalin for, but human rights violations should not be one, as that would be like criticizing Mao's China for having a one party state as "anti-democratic".
I'm sorry but to other comrades, can we not be satisfied with "it's all a lie" or "Stalin did nothin' wrong." OP is obviously a new guy. If you just say Stalin did nothing wrong, OP may or may not believe it, or if they do believe it, will have insufficient knowledge about the subject matter. On the other hand, it's true that Stalin didn't do many things wrong. He had mistakes, sure, but not many, and usually they were caused by the external conditions i.e. Stalin didn't really have a choice.
Let's talk about dekulakization and why it's not an atrocity. The kulaks were landlords who refused to give their land. Now, Stalin needed to collectivize land to bring up production due to the fact that a famine was beginning to occur. The Kulaks intentionally sabotaged production by burning wheat and whatnot, decreasing, for example, the amount of livestock during the first five year plan. So is it surprising that Stalin would want to get rid of them? Next, bourgeois media likes to spit on the gulags, shame them to death, when even American and most of Europe had forms of labor camps. The Americans kept labor camps in the Philippines and Cuba for example.
But when, under Gorbachev, the archives of the Central Committee of the CPSU were opened up to researchers, it was found that the number of political prisoners in 1939 had been 454,000, not the millions claimed by Conquest. If we add those in prison for non-political offenses, we get a figure of 2.5 million, that is, 2.4% of the adult population. In contrast, there were in the United States in 1996, according to official figures, 5.5 million people in prison, or 2.8% of the adult population.
The final thing is that Stalin did strive for democracy in the Soviet Union. He called for a secret ballot on an equal basis, saying that a peasants' vote would count as much as a workers' vote. It was true that on the ballot, there was only one party - the CPSU. But it isn't true that it was the only thing there. Evidently, other non-party organizations like citizens' groups and workplace organizations had their candidates on the ballot as well.
[OP of "ANSWER"]
On the poster: "Fascism is the solution to the problems Liberalism creates"
Honestly, sadly etc. They will reveal/disclose extraterrestrial existence as a threat once we begin to invest serious economy in space. Think about it: they are going to have to lower wages of the intrepid space traveling labor pool, or shit will get too expensive, far too quickly for their quota. Therefore, we will need a universal common enemy and thru the conduit of politic, we will have lower cost for space labor. Cheap labor is almost always the reason, for... well, everything.
The extraterrestrials must be following a very intense 5th dimensional rule and playbook, because otherwise - as every group has them - some jackass ETs would have "landed" on the White House lawn shitfaced on gas alcohol already. Perhaps the grandfather paradox is legit, or the many-worlds idea allows them to just skip over slices that they fuck up? Despite how intelligent they have to be, they definitely still have a reminiscent soft spot of an Achilles' heel for tomfoolery. With all that power, what left is there to do but amuse yourself?
I have seen UFOs and I "know" they exist, but I do not think that we will ever see definitive proof, i.e., a picture or video. To me, they very well could be "God-like" and be our future lineage that has managed to travel back in time for kicks. I do believe that their presence affects our minds and it wouldn't surprise me at all if our cameras literally cannot capture them as they truly are. Like a true unknown - something potentially hyperdimensional - all we have is our interpretation of what we saw and how our minds perceived them.
Very insightful observation. I think you're correct.
It's because the government bureaucracy is a control system. The system can't be shown to not be in control, because that obviates its reason for existence.
Government Spokesdude: "Folks, there are these things flying around the atmosphere, they kinda look technological, and they can and do violate our airspace even over our most sensitive nuclear and military installations. We don't know what they are or where they come from and we can't do anything to stop them. Any questions?"
Public: "Yes. Why are we paying you?"
Commence societal upheaval and bureaucrats losing their phony baloney jobs.
At least, that is the fear from the bureaucratic mind, I think.
It is essential that the government maintains the tacit transactional agreement with the populace that they remain in control and can protect them. UFOs represent a negation of this. I'm unsure as to whether this existential threat is explicit or implicit in government, but it does explain the behaviour toward UFOs over the last 70 years; they want to get ahead of the situation.
My conclusion from this is therefore that they haven't, and UFOs remain a mystery. I guess they have some pretty good gun camera footage and radar tapes secreted away, but that is about it. This is also one of the reasons I don't believe the Black Triangles are secret government craft, btw.
The Israelis are super familiar with UFOs (there's lots of stuff reports online you can find). I'd bet they knew what it was and didn't deliberately didn't send anything.
BRUTAL Truth. I've never seen ANY femoid helping a weak incel kid getting bullied by chad. Probably partly, because she is attracted to chad and chad can do no wrong. Women are horrible and vile creatures.
Women are the main cause of bullying. Normies bully the weak incel kids because women will stand there and laugh and give them attention. and then these fucking hypocrites will go online and write "bullying is bad and i suffer from bullying" because they got a mean comment on twitter. they will say stuff like "its not bullying, its just having fun grow a spine" when you get slapped or humiliated, but start crying when someone says mean stuff on reddit.
They ALWAYS lie. ALWAYS. about every fucking thing. No matter what argument you have with a woman she will always have a fake stroy relating to it. "Oh you think women like nazis? well, i lived near a nazi village and no one liked the nazis and dated them instead we dated the indian short janitors tihi"
They also would never help you, but take all the help they can from men. When is the last time a sub 8 man had a flight tire and a woman came and helped him? when's the last time a woman let a guy stay at her place because he was going homeless? because men do shit like that all the time for women, but women never do.
They have no problem taking advantage of men taking free dates and free money and robbing them in divorce. TL;DR women are horrible people and no truecel should be nice to them.
As a pedophile I must concur... As far as I've seen SJW's are the least understanding and most unreasonably hateful towards pedophiles.Takes AmesCG for a simple example. Sees pedophile; Immediately makes the comparison of pedophiles to child abusers as if there are the same thing.
Even though the vast majority of pedophiles are not child abusers and do not condone child abuse.
Scratches you off "next babysitter" list
Honestly, I make a great baby sitter (I have done so in the past and the kids almost always love me), I am excellent with kids (regardless of their ages or gender).
If your worried about me not being able to control my sexual feelings, just make sure none of the kids are girls between the ages of 8-13 - though I have watched girls in that age range and never done anything sexual with them. I'm generally not attracted to girls older or younger than that, nor to boys.
I do question the damage done to children. I agree the sexual assault and rape are harmful. As are forced or coerced sexual interactions.
But consensual sex between a child and adult is not always harmful. Especially in societies that are sexually open and permissive. There are studies and anecdotal evidence that indicate even in our society adult/child sex can be beneficial.
P.S. Since I guess I might argue this a bit, so for clarity. I am a pro-contact pedophile. I have not ever and do not plan to be sexually involved with a child (nor have most pedophiles; whether anti's or pro's). I believe that in our society (given current attitudes) the child is likely to be harmed (though it is not definite that they would be) and I do not wish to harm a child (I also wish to avoid jail time, but that is actually my secondary concern).
But I also believe that in a sexually permissive society a child can engage in a sexual relationship with an adult and benefit from it
I [21M] found some very sexual "modeling" photos of my sister [12F] on my brother's [16M] computer...?!
I think there are two separate questions; what to do about your sister and what to do about your brother.
The linkage of innocence with sexuality is a western one and a false one. Many children, especially those at/near puberty (12/13) are quite sexual. She can enjoy little girl things and also be sexual, the two are not mutually exclusive. Your sister may enjoy the modelling (the attention and the chance at fame). In her case, I think the important thing would be ensuring that she is choosing to participate in this activity freely. Maybe try to talk to her privately about it, or talk to her sister and see if she can talk to her. I don't think you should bring it up with others until you know if she wants to participate in the modelling. She may enjoy it and want to continue with it, even if she does find some of the poses uncomfortable.
In the case of her brother, only call the cops if you want to ruin his life. If your in the US, clothed images that focus on genitalia can constitute child porn; which potentially leads to being a registered sex offender. I don't think the collection in and of itself is harmful - though it is fairly strange. I doubt he has done anything with her (though I'd guess he has fantasized about it - fantasies can be more appealing when there's a small chance of them happening). If he had I'd think he'd be more cautious, not openly sharing the photos with friends. He may take pride in being related to a junior idol.
You are making the assumption that your sister is being exploited; that is obviously possible and something I agree you should look into. But it is also possible that she is a willing participant and enjoys the modelling.
I think she should be allowed to make the choice, to participate or not to participate. If she is being forced or coerced into the modelling you should do what you can to help her get out of it. But if she is willingly participating, I think she should be allowed to make the choice to continue.
Children are capable of making decisions for themselves. I think you should respect her choice either way. American culture does its best to view children as innocent and asexual, but the reality is that by 12/13 most children are well aware of what sex is (and many have participated in it, either alone or with others).
The only condition under which I would even consider having sex or sexual contact with the child is if I believed that the child wanted it (of their own free will) and would enjoy it (and probably also only if the child initiated it). I have never had that occur. If it did I would not consider it molestation and I would have no moral issues if I had sex with the child
You know whenever society goes "aww they are such a cute couple".... thats really just code for "aww they are equally attractive and probably wont cheat on eachother". Bonus points if they look like they will age the same way and decline in SMV at the same rate. Love is simply two people finding their physical looksmatch. Hypergamous couples cannot love eachother (tempation and jealousy will always ruin it)
Gold and fame digging couples cannot love eachother (the man who makes the most money or is the most famous will win the girl) Fat people can not love eachother (cause when one of them gets skinny the relationship ends. Ect.
It's sad and pretty enraging seeing women putting their fellow women (and by proxy themselves) down just for the sake of men...and yes, whether they're able to see and admit it or not, they clearly do see MtT as males/men (or, at the very least, as not the same as "cis" women) because they treat MtT way better than they treat women.
This is a function of the genetic and cultural distances between the host and minority peoples. The smaller the distance(s), the greater the percentage of said minorities that can co-exist peacefully and prosperously with the dominant host population.
Take Chinese society for example. Officially the country has 56 recognized ethnicities, with the Han being the dominant one at ~90%, followed by 55 minorites of varying sizes. With the exception of a few miniscule ethnic groups such as the Russians, Tatars & Tajiks, the rest at least all still belong to the Mongoloid race; the Uyghurs, a quite large minority is an exception to this exception, and will be further explained below. Additionally many of the more populous ethnic minority groups have become so assimilated/integrated into the mainstream Han society that they don't even have a separate language in use, such as the Manchus, the Huis, etc. The Hui people, a predominantly Muslim ethnic group, also provide a good contrast to the Muslim Uyghurs, who are a Caucasoid and Mongoloid admixed population, mentioned earlier. The Huis are peaceful, and well integrated (though not fully assimilated, as they still keep their own customs), whereas the Uyghurs represent a constant terrorist and separatist threat; many go to join Islamic extremist groups in the Middle East to train, then return to China to further their agenda via violence. It's not a coincidence that the former is ~93% Han in their ancestry (the remaining coming from West Eurasian traders who have traveled the Silk Road throughout the centuries), and the latter is only ~50% East Asian in ancestry.
Christianity (as well as some of the other religions) has established conditions that undermine the long term health and survival of the planet. The major driver is its influence on world population- starting with the efforts to ban abortion and limit the use of contraceptives, in addition to encouraging families to have lots of children (especially Catholics and Mormons).
It has also desensitized the public and public officials to the threat of climate change, mostly because it instills the idea that God will not let the planet get out of hand and that, anyway, Jesus is coming soon, so why worry about the distant future? Christians have been at the forefront of an effort to limit discussion of climate change in the educational sector.
Furthermore, Christianity tends to downplay the importance of species survival in favor of using the natural resources 'God' has provided- i.e. coal, logging, drilling oil.
One need look no further than the Christian-laden Trump administration in the United States, with their focused anti-environmental policies, to see that Christian belief, along with naked greed, is fueling the next wave of planetary abuse.
So, should we just live and let live, or address Christianity in whatever way possible to see it shrink in numbers? I used to say live and let live.....now, I say live and let die.
Just lol @ any BETA pathetic cuck that supports Feminism. Females already have far more privileges than men such as the ability to divorce out of boredom and take all of the husband's money, items, and children.
Modern Feminism is only about being able to fuck whoever, whenever. For example, sluts want to be able to go to the bar dressed 90% naked, purposefully drink until they're nearly unconscious, and then be able to blame "MUH PATRIARCHY" when they cheat on their boyfriends, which was truly their intent all along.
I went to the same indoctrination box that we call public education that you did. I choose to think for myself. What makes you think vaccine manufacturers wouldn't have an agenda to spread misinformation so they can continue to fill their pockets with billions of dollars of profit per year? I choose not to inject a toxic concoction into my body and it's MY right to choose what goes into it.
It's not my fault if your technology doesn't save you from the boogie man ancient diseases that have mostly disappeared in modern society due to slowly improving our immune systems through healthier diets and better hygiene over the past century. Disease rates were already steadily decreasing over 50 years before vaccines were created. Inject all the aborted fetuses into yourself that you please but don't accuse ME of endangering YOU.
Oh god. Another Pro & Against vaccine , GMO & organic vegan debate debacle. Can't we all see, on both sides, that this is what they want ?? They incite confusion in the 'science' so that we have no idea what to fucking believe.
All the quibbling over what is best just adds to their cause to bring down Veganism and adds to the reputation of the meat , dairy , egg & pharmaceutical industries. We're all pawns, fighting each other and benefiting their cause. Keep arguing - keep losing.
