new

So you think we are crazy? READ THIS

So I was doing some reading not too long ago and decided this data may be useful. To anyone coming here believing we are crazy, racist, stupid, or just plain full of ****, please, read on. Read this post fully before you decide to reply calling me a racist or a hater. If you can't do this simple task, you are a hopeless libtard.

First off, let's talk briefly about our stance. Many here feel we as European descendants should have a land to ourselves. The Chinese have a land to themselves. The Japanese have a land to themselves. Even Africans have a land to themselves. What about us? There is not a single country on this planet where "white people" can be at peace without other races bothering them. Why is this? That's an advanced topic we would love to share but we don't want to waste our time telling it to someone who will ignore everything said. If you genuinely want to know, feel free to ask and someone will explain it further.

"But that's silly! First off there is only one race, the human race!" Wrong. Yes we all belong to the same species (this is debated). However we are not all alike or equal. There are essentially three groups (usually referred to as "races") within the human species. The Caucasoid (White Europeans basically), the Mongoloid (Asians basically), and the Negroid (Africans basically). Each has their own traits that are quite different from the others. It is well known but almost never said that the Negroids tend to have the lowest IQs (well below that of either Caucasoids or Mongoloids) while the Caucasoids and Mongoloids tend to have the highest (an average of only a few points difference between Mongoloids and Caucasoids). The Caucasoids also tend to be more creative than either the Mongoloid or Negroid. There is very specific physical characteristics between the "races". We are NOT all alike. This is a complex topic that we also would love to tell you about, but would rather not waste time with someone who will ignore everything said. If you genuinely want to know, feel free to ask and someone will explain it further.

"Among white Americans, the average IQ, as of a decade or so ago, was 103. Among Asian-Americans, it was 106. Among Latino Americans, it was 89. Among African-Americans, it was 85. Around the world, studies find the same general pattern: whites 100, East Asians 106, sub-Sarahan Africans 70. One IQ table shows 113 in Hong Kong, 110 in Japan, and 100 in Britain. White populations in Australia, Canada, Europe, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States score closer to one another than to the worldwide Negroid average. It's been that way for at least a century."

For the record, mine is 132 (I have taken several tests and the range is 130 to 145).

"Are Jews white?" Yes and no. They are a mixed breed (typically a mixture of Caucasoid and Negroid with some Mongoloid). Any Jew claiming to be white is (usually) a liar. The only white Jews are converts. Why bring this up? It will be covered later.

"Why are you always picking on black people?!" They are the worst of the human species and I can prove it. For one, all evidence suggests that the typical Negroid is pretty unintelligent. With an average IQ of around 80 to 85, their mental capacities are just not that good. If one takes time to observe the Negroid, they will find that the Negroid is rather aggressive and prone to violence. They also lack impulse control. These two traits lead to them being trouble for other races. Here's some stats:

The city of Irvine California is considered the safest large city in the USA as of 2014. With a violent crime rate of just 46 per 100,000, it is pretty dang safe. What is the racial makeup? White alone - 98,118 (42.7%), Asian alone - 92,820 (40.4%), Hispanic - 25,573 (11.1%), Negroid alone - 3,559 (1.5%). The city of Detroit Michigan is considered the most dangerous large city in the USA. With a violent crime rate of 2,072 per 100,000, it's a pretty dangerous city. What is the racial makeup? Negroid alone - 570,808 (81.4%), White alone - 57,252 (8.2%), Hispanic - 52,421 (7.5%), Asian alone - 7,569 (1.1%). Hmm. Interesting. Of course you can look at almost any big city in the USA and notice the SAME trend: The more Whites/Asians and less Negroids, the lower the violent crime rate. The more Negroids and less Whites/Asians, the higher the violent crime rate. It is clearly seen, can be clearly proven, and is repeatable. You can take any city of any size that is majority White, flood it with Negroids, and the violent crime rate will go up. Even if you take out the same number of whites as you put in Negroids. Negroids are not even safe from themselves. It is a fact that the majority of Negroids murdered are murdered by OTHER Negroids.

"Well, crime rate is proportionate to poverty! Race has nothing to do with it, just happens there are a lot of poverty stricken blacks in the USA because of discrimination!" Wrong. When one takes a close enough look at the data, there is more of a correlation between race and crime than poverty and crime. A poor white neighborhood is a lot safer than a poor Negroid neighborhood. As for discrimination, Negroids in the USA are given MORE opportunity than whites and yet they still fail horribly at life. Is it a coincidence or is it because they lack the mental capacity to do well with the opportunities they have? If you have ever worked as a manager, you will know exactly what I mean. You will know from experience that the typical Negroid lacks intelligence and motivation. They tend to be lazy, especially when out of the sight of the superiors. If they think they can get away with something, they will try to. No intelligent person can claim that Negroids are not given preferential treatment now days in the USA. Despite such, they have made no progress in life and generally mooch off others to some degree. Some of course take it all the way and live on government/charity handouts. Some actually try and find work but typically remain poor due to bad decisions due to lacking mental capacity. Have you ever had to give instructions to Negroids? If you have, you can tell how low their general mental capacity is. The purer the Negroid, the dumber and more violent they are.

"But white people commit violent crimes too!" Of course. All races have some representation in crime. I'm not arguing that. What I am arguing is how much. The statistics and data doesn't lie. When you factor in their percentage of the population, Negroids commit the most crimes, the most violent crimes, the most rapes, the most property damage, so on and so forth. They are generally the bottom of the barrel. If you need further proof, just look at the riots that's been going on. A white cop shoots a Negroid they thought was armed but turned out they were unarmed. So a lot of the local Negroids go out and destroy their city/town. Loot, pillage, burn. However they fail to realize that Negroid cops shoot unarmed white people just as often as white cops shoots unarmed Negroids. White cops kill more white people than Negroids. You don't see us rampaging like angry gorillas and destroying our towns. Why? We aren't that violent or stupid.

Now maybe you have a little bit of an idea WHY we want a place to ourselves.

"Why did you let all these non-whites into white majority countries if you didn't want them there?" Well, we didn't. This is where the Jewish issue comes in. Anyone who takes a decent time to research the history/connections/heritage/genetics of those in high places will come to the conclusion our country and much of the world is run by Jews. The most treasonous laws ever passed had Jewish backers and was funded by Jewish money. Any treasonous law has Jewish ties. Almost all corruption can be traced back to a Jew. The Jews own all the media, they own all the television stations, they own all the radio, they own all the newspapers, they own the government (through bribes, blackmail, campaign funding, etc), they control what the majority sees. Why does it matter? The Jews have a mostly unspoken bond. Whether they are "practicing" Jews or not, they are all bound by blood (genetics) and they know it. A Jew will "scratch the back" of another Jew any chance they get. Openly they claim otherwise but the data doesn't lie. Spend any decent time researching and you will find a Jew connected to everything that is bad with the world today.

"You are beginning to sound like a Nazi! Aren't you ashamed that the Germans killed 6 million Jews?!" There is no solid evidence showing Hitler had any intention of killing ANY Jews, much less 6 million or any other figure. In fact, the Nazis severely punished other Nazis if they hurt captive Jews. Bet you never heard that one. As well, there is no evidence there were any homicidal gas chambers. In fact, the logistics of "gassing and cremating" six million Jews during the time Hitler reigned is impossible. Even modern cremation ovens can barely do 19 bodies a day (24 hours). Plus you have the issue with fuel (cremation takes a lot of fuel) and the remains left after cremation. Where did all those ashes go? "Nobody knows". The evidence does not support the claims for the Holocaust. Any intelligent and reasonable human being would consider evidence over rumor every time. Concerning the so called eye witnesses, any prosecutor will tell you that eyewitness testimony is some of the worst evidence. The mind loves to embellish and exaggerate memories. The mind is also not a perfect storage device. It may remember some basic things about an event but it almost never can remember details. Were there cremation ovens at the "camps"? Of course. People die. What do you do with the bodies of those who die? You can either bury them or cremate them. Cremation has advantages. In any group setting (such as labor camps), if you don't take care of the dead quickly, it can lead to issues for everyone in the group. The evidence supports that the camps were labor camps and typically had a range of pleasure activities for camp members to participate in. There were things like swimming pools, pianos, musical instruments, games, movies, so on and so forth. Bet the Jewish run media never told you about how many times Hitler tried to prevent war. Hitler tried numerous times to prevent war. The Jews pushed for it and pushed for it until they had it. Hitler of course made them regret it. Hitler could have won the war but he made some mistakes. That is not the point of this post though so you can look elsewhere for the data related to Hitler.

"If white people are so smart, why did they let the Jews outsmart them?" The Jews didn't outsmart our people. What they did do however is manipulate one of our weaknesses: compassion and kindness. Look at most Christians for example. Always giving to the poor, feeling pity for those less fortunate. These traits are common among our people. We also tend to be too trusting. We made the mistake of letting Jews reside among us because they looked similar to us and on the outside appeared nice. Little did we know how mean, sneaky, and manipulative they generally are. Are all Jews bad? Of course not, but most are. That is the main reason Jews even to this day screw us over. They use our weaknesses to manipulate us and they have nearly perfected how to brainwash us. This is why you should throw out your television (I did over a decade ago and it was one of the best decisions I've ever made).

"You seem to try to use logic, but what about all the Christians on your board?!" To each his own. We are not a unified body of "haters". Each of us has our own beliefs. I personally am not religious. Do I hate Christians? No. Could I ever be a Christian? Unlikely. I personally require proof and evidence and I just haven't found that in religion of any sort. Do I know what exists after death? Nope. Am I worried? Not really. Each of us is different but we are unified on some topics (such as wanting a territory of our own where we can live in peace among our own kind).

"What about homosexuals?" What about them? The evidence supports that homosexuals have a mental disorder. For a long time homosexuality was considered a mental disorder. However with time society lost their minds and began embracing people with serious and dangerous mental disorders. I will not delve into this too deeply here but being a homosexual puts you at a MUCH higher risk than the general public for dying at an early age. You as a homosexual have a MUCH higher risk of contracting an STD/STI. Statistics show as well that homosexuals are far more likely than heterosexuals to molest children. There are logical reasons to oppose the homosexual agenda. Are all homosexuals bad? Of course not. However I wouldn't want one living next door to me. The religious among us tend to point to their holy book when asked about homosexuals. I point to facts and statistics. Either way, homosexuality is a choice, is a mental disorder, and can be cured.

"Ok, so you don't like Jews, Negroids, or homosexuals, do you like anything?" Of course. We love our people and our heritage. Society (with the brainwashing from the Jew) is pressuring us to forget our heritage or even be ashamed of it. What is there to be ashamed of? If it weren't for our people, you all would still be living in huts/caves/tents. You wouldn't be typing on a computer because they wouldn't exist. You would be sweating like mad because there would be no air conditioning. You would be bored out of your mind as there would be no internet or even electricity. You would very likely live in a dangerous time with nothing better to do than try to survive. If it weren't for our ancestors, you would be living like the primitive tribes in Africa right now. Consider that next time you think about feeling ashamed about being white or the next time you try to make one of us feel ashamed. Our people brought civilization to the world. Wherever we are in high numbers, there is low crime, high civilization, and progress in the area of technology. Where we are low in numbers, there is rampant crime, no progress, and primitive tribal like gangs roaming around. I will never be ashamed of being white and I will never apologize.

The Importance of Appearances to Opponents of White Nationalism

I was recently watching the video made from a broadcast by William Pierce in which he discussed the dissolution of Haiti into savagery after the Blacks committed mass genocide against the Whites who had created a high civilization there. He discussed the three occasions since that time in which Whites came back to the island and rebuilt civilization, only to end up leaving again—fortunately not due to mass murder by the Negroes on these other more recent occasions. All three times the rapid decay of civilization occurred again despite the resource-rich environment and the priceless gift of a very large head-start to proceed from, making it pretty hard for liberals to support a rational argument that the miserable state there can be blamed on Whites holding the Blacks back.

The really interesting part, however, was Pierce’s paraphrasing of Hesketh Prichard’s book, Where Black Rules White, A Journey Across and About Hayti:

“To the Haitians, the imitation of civilization is as good as the real thing. They believe that if they are able to dress like White men and speak the White man’s language and mimic the White man’s institutions, then they are as good as White men.”

Blacks, and in fact non-Whites in general, lack the intellectual capacity to comprehend the difference between form and substance. Appearances are all that matter to them. A Black man who is dressed in a suit and handed a high position in society that traditionally belongs to a White man is, in the eyes of himself and his fellow Negroes, every bit as good as a White man would be in that position simply because their inferior minds cannot comprehend the deeper requirements and necessities of filling the role.

Barack Obama is a perfect example of this. Having been handed every advantage in life out of race-pity—so many positions of power entirely unearned and unmerited—he is seen by non-Whites as a success despite being entirely bankrupt of any meaningful achievements in those positions, from his utter failure to turn out even a single paper during his time as president of the Harvard Law Review, to the over 300 roll-call votes he neglected to participate in as a U.S. senator, to the Nobel Peace Prize he was handed within days of being elected president with absolutely no accomplishment to warrant it. The suit is his success. The title is his success. His actual efforts (or lack thereof) are immaterial to them.

The truly disturbing part of all this, however, is that those same empty appearances are also just as good as the real thing to a very large group of White people: liberals. We see this every day on Stormfront, where our opponents eternal lambaste us about “discrimination based on SKIN COLOR.” Appearance is all that matters to a liberal. The idea that race involves more than skin tone is beyond their mental comprehension. A White person who is spray-painted brown has magically transmuted into a person of African descent. His genes have changed. His ancestry has been rerouted. Nothing but bewildered agitation results when we show them images of albino Negroes who are still quite obviously members of the Black race despite an exceedingly light skin tone.

This inability to fathom content over appearance is a critical element of which we must be aware if we are to understand our opponents’ methods. As childish as it seems, as embarrassingly simple-minded as it may strike us, it truly is the very core basis of their approach to solving problems. For example, under the Obama regime, the National Crime Victimization Survey has stopped tabulating crimes by race because, to anti-Whites, if the truth of Black crime can no longer be SEEN, it no longer exists. Black-on-White crimes are routinely concealed from the public by the Jew-controlled media because, to the leftists, that makes those crimes rare. The fact that this does nothing about the actual crime rates escapes their comprehension. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and George Zimmerman were just two of the recent examples of non-Whites being portrayed in the media with photographic adjustments to make their skin lighter because, to liberals, that makes them White.

This thinking (if that word can even correctly describe it) fits with virtually every social reform the left has ever attempted or proposed. In affirmative action, the NUMBER of non-Whites employed in various fields is to be increased even though the individuals being handed these jobs are not competent to do them. Liberal teachers in secondary education have been caught repeatedly giving non-Whites passing grades even though their academic performance was below the requisite threshold because, to them, a student who is simply given an A is every bit as smart as a student who earned an A. Money is to be transferred at gunpoint to non-Whites because a large income means success even if the recipient of the income did nothing to earn it and entirely lacks the monetary skills to retain it or use it rationally.

And it goes on into every other realm of their interference: Homosexual couples are to be treated like heterosexual couples because, if they are spoken of in exactly the same way as the commitment-bearing, sane members of that greatest of Western family institutions, the enormous rates of homosexual promiscuity and venereal infection will cease to exist. Politically correct speech laws are to be imposed on us because not being allowed to say anything “offensive” is exactly the same thing as not disagreeing with liberals (according to liberals at least).

I think they are going to get an especially painful lesson from that particular mistake pretty soon. This, too, is something we hear from them constantly on Stormfront: They literally believe that if there aren’t throngs of Whites standing up and speaking against their destruction of our race and civilization, they have won the war. They honestly believe that our silence in public means we will forever comply with their agenda. It’s the cognitive attitude of a five-year-old child, but it is the very best of which they are capable.

Liberals are, in every way, the appearance people, regardless of their race: They are the ones who achieve beauty not through superior genetics, but through hair dye, breast implants, nose jobs, colored contacts, skin-whitening creams . . . and sex-change operations for their mentally ill masses who pretend that genetics changes when the outside looks different. Beauty to a liberal truly is skin deep (at least right up until the revolting, dysgenic children start popping out).

I recently watched a video in which the narrator was discussing the enormous number of instances of Black rappers whose “bling” is actually fake because, to them, wearing imitation gold jewelry made of plastic is every bit as indicative of success as being able to afford the real thing. The video went on to cite numerous instances of camera tours of actors’ multimillion-dollar homes where it turned out that the home being shown wasn’t even actually theirs. The expensive cars they are seen in are very often rented. In a recent incident in which a Black actress’s pearl dress for the Oscars was stolen and described as being worth as much as ten million dollars, it turned out that the pearls were fake and the dress's true worth was less than $200.

The same appearances work for intelligence: Taking a Black actor and shoving him in front of a camera parroting some lines of sapient dialog makes all Blacks just as smart as Whites. A false claim on Wikipedia about performing the first ever operation separating conjoined twins turns a mediocre Black surgeon into the smartest doctor ever. A list of entirely fictitious Black (or Jewish) inventions "proves" the worth of those parasitic inferiors to White civilization. Nobel Prizes handed out for political reasons make Jews smart. An empty assertion about "jobs Americans just won't do" (whatever the heck that even means) makes illegal invaders from Mexico a boon to our economy. I would bet a quadrillion Zimbabwe dollars that the subhuman citizens of that cesspit nation feel rich as they walk around bearing arm-loads of bills covered in zeroes that aren’t worth the paper they are printed on. It’s all the same thing.

So now you know why our opponents lie to us here all the time. To their weak, pathetic little minds, the lie changes reality the instant they utter it. Explains quite a lot, doesn't it!