BoomersOdyssey #racist

BoomersOdyssey #racist deviantart.com

Yeah, no. Anyone that looks at Africa and then looks at Europe and says, "yup, these are the products of the exact same people," is simply an idiot. There's no way that anyone with a shred of honesty is going to look at blacks and Whites (or any other people for that matter) and say that they're the same species, let alone the same race. Chimps and bonobos? CLEARLY distinct species. Grey wolves, timber wolves and red wolves? All OBVIOUSLY separate species. Grizzly bears, polar bears and black bears? Only a fool would say that they aren't different. Various types of tigers? Even they get considered to be sub-species. Neanderthals and cro-magnons? Clearly recognized as distinctly different species despite having interbred with one another. Blacks and Whites? HOW DARE YOU SUGGEST THAT THESE ARE DIFFERENT?!?!?!?!111?!? Seriously, anthropologists can tell the difference between blacks and Whites just from their bones. Suggesting that they're the same because of your delusional political ideology is just dumb.

9 comments

Yep! A racist WC is clearly a different species to the rest of humanity: whether we are black, white, Asian or coffee-coloured. We are Homo Sapiens, but a dumb sunbaking dogturd like you is clearly a Homo Stultus.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Homo%20stultus

Sorry bub but your blinkered ideology is getting in the way of something called facts. The reason why Africa and Europe have developed so differently is climate. Europe is temperate so we've had to find ways to protect ourselves from the cold. Africa is tropical so they have to protect themselves from the heat. Europeans have to work around changeable weather, Africans not so much.
Guess you can't seem to get out of an eighteenth century mindset that those not like you cannot possibly be civilised.

Fun fact: Anything with the genus Homo is human. Within species, there is variation. Thus, there is variation within the species sapien. These variations seem to be split upon climate lines, but due to high mobility, they can be found around the world. Meaning...every homo sapien is a fucking person you fuckwit.

You have no idea about biology or the (blurry) concepts of species and subspecies.
At first: all wolfs you mentioned are members of the same species Canis lupus.
At second: humans are not devided into subspecies. Each member of a subspecies shares more genetic information with any other member of the subspecies than with members of other subspecies of the particular species.
That's not the case in humans - there might be local accumulation of certain allels coding for example factors contributing to skin color, but there are people in india, china and africa genetically more similar to you than your white neighbors - this wouldn't be the case between members of different subspecies.
In addition there are no sharp dividing lines between skin colors - it's rather a smooth gradient.
The skin color "white" (which isn't uniform either) is genetically surprizingly young, maybe just 10 to 15 thousand years, and other allels which are considered to be "typical white" like green and blue eyes have been around much longer - in black populations. The "default setting" for Homo sapiens was originally a medium brown - white as well as extreme dark are later adaptions.
Additionally the idea that neanderthals had been a distinct species is contested - actually the definition was that all individuals which can produce a fertile offspring and therefore are a procreation community belong to the same species - the fact that Homo sapiens and neanderthals did emphasizes once more that the term "species" is rather arbitrary.
Ironically if you are white you might have traces of neanderthal ancestry in your DNA - which according to your logic would make you less human than any "black" person.
However, in any case you are an idiot and those come in all colors and sizes.

“recent, superficial and irrelevant”

‘Subspecies’ are actually defined more by separation. The various groups of wolves and tigers are only considered subspecies because they can’t reach each other any more, except if humans do it for them (say by taking them away and putting them in the same zoo). So because humans are global, it’s impossible for them to be a subspecies at this moment in history. There are isolated populations of humans, but none isolated enough. There are always visitors from the outside eventually.

Wolves: the genetic basis of all canids.

There's an extremely good reason why Africa is known as the Cradle of Humanity.

Are you a Professor of Anthropology, OP...?!

Looking at two different populations of the same species from two different continents and then completely ignoring the context is going to lead to misleading conclusions no matter which species you are talking about.