Cameras, or any other technological device, do not reproduce on their own, but are actively created by factories built and operated by humans according to human-made schematics.
Humans are not manufactured but self-replicate by internal processes that are shared with lots and lots of other creatures, diverging in a pattern of nested similarity that roughly matches up with anatomical, physiological and genetic similarity.
Furthermore, this analogy from design really backfires if you don’t immediately terminate thought upon quoting the cliche.
Just like human technology, we observe that biology has “design traditions”, where the best explanation for why something is done in a certain way would seem to be “historical reasons. We see different traditions coming up with different solutions - sometimes even reaching the same solution functionally, but in detail using rather different anatomical structures. Looking in the larger picture, we find that these traditions are consistent with geographical history, and, just as archaeology and history of science gives us insight into the processes by which human technology gradually develop over time, the fossil record shows us various prior stages of development, including the manifold designs that, sooner or much, much later, failed or became obsolete.
And yet, one may notice that, unlike with human technology, there is little exchange between different tradition, nor jumps of innovative combination.
If life is designed it is not the monumental masterplan of a transcendent intellect, but the continuing independent improvisation of endless generations of blind and deaf tinkerers (i.e. mutations, tested against natural selection).
