“Kirk was not trying to justify shooting deaths. He was saying freedom is worth it.”
That is literally justifying the gun deaths. Do you not understand what ‘worth it’ means?
“It is an intellectual approach.”
No, it’s not, it’s emotional. Charlie was trying to maximize the value of a freedom by minimizing its impact on schools, concerts, malls, crowds…
He was trying to reject any intellectual approach to gun control by concentrating on a misunderstanding of the amendment entirely.
“That is why the left might not quite get it.”
We GET you, we don’t agree with you.
We CAN legislate some gun control without destroying the freedom entirely, but the nutburgers in the NRA won’t allow any intellectual effort.
“The rigjt uses very logical approaches while the left cant even begin to form arguments.”
The Right (JESUS learn to goddamned use a beta reader!) uses emotional pleas and bad history.
“Its all just emotion, primarily hate.”
Yes, that’s about all you have.
“Should we ban all cares because we people die from a car accident?”
We have a great deal of car control in place, don’t we? Age restrictions, education requirements, testing, regular renewals… Doesn’t take much to get your license suspended, or permanently removed. So,YEAH! Let’s use the car model to control guns! I’m in favor of that! As you say, they’re both dangerous. We don’t need to BAN cars, but we do limit people’s access after they misuse them, don’t we!
Yeah! Let’s do that!
