This one is a turd sandwich so time to deconstruct it.
they didn’t even want to have the courtesy, after a man had been assassinated, who had such a wide influence on youth of this country, to honor what he had done.
Because all he’d done for the youth is spew right-wing propaganda to try and force their politics during their formative years. Since he’s dead and can no longer do this, the right wing wants to milk his death for all the propaganda they can.
And Rep. Jasmine Crockett said Caucasians […] only two Caucasians, she said, had voted “no.” In fact, if you include the presents and those who didn’t vote, there were quite a lot of proverbial white people that did not want to honor him.
I don’t know what the voting would look like, but since you’re using different metrics (“voting no” is not “voting no, present, or not voting”) I’d hazard a guess that you’re lying.
But all three of those representatives […] had one thing in common. They either did not quote or cite evidence that Charlie Kirk was a racist or, to the degree they tried to quote or refer to something he said, they did it inaccurately. Because he was not a racist.
He was a racist, and anyone who listens to him talk about black people in the workforce knows he was a racist.
In fact, there are plenty of clips when he is the master of ceremonies, and someone in the audience says he is a racist, a white supremacist, Charlie Kirk gets very angry and debates him and refutes him. So, it was just the opposite.
Racists don’t like their racism exposed at events that aren’t in racist company. Saying he debated people to refute that he was a racist only exposes that the writer is in on his dishonest tricks, such as:
- Say some controversial dogwhistle argument, the motte
- Pull it back to something more reasonable, the bailey
- Structure his upcoming arguments to make the motte seem more reasonable
He did not debate for the facts, he debated so he could have clips of leftists students looking like they lost the debate. This is why we don’t debate right-wingers: it only gives them a way to spread their hatred further.
You got to collate when this event, this callousness took place. This is at a time when Tyler Robinson just simply killed Charlie Kirk, murdered him, and was a hardcore leftist, and had trans issues.
It’s been proven that he wasn’t, but right wingers want trans shooters to be a thing so bad that they pretend he was anyway, knowing that their brainwashed flock take their word as law.
This was at a time when, we talked about earlier, Iryna Zarutska had been murdered by a 14-time released felon.
Of course this had to be in here somewhere, because right-wing influencers have latched onto her death, and will latch onto any similar story, and it’s way too early for them to let go.
This was a time when Luigi Mangione assassinated a UnitedHealthcare executive and was canonized by the Left.
Who the hell is treating Luigi Mangione as a literal saint around here?! [Skull Face]Who?!?![/Skull Face]