False witness. Presents a straw man of "atheism" as a type of nihilistic cult. Pretends that society was somehow harmed by it, when it's actually little influenced by atheists who are a minority. It thus confuses the separation of church and state, what allows them to practice their religion, as "atheism".
Also very implausible considering that while not impossible to suddenly embrace delusions, especially when psychologically vulnerable, atheism is usually also linked to critical thinking. These "conversion from atheism" stories are like the "conversion from evolutionist" ones in ultrafundamentalist misleading propaganda, where the straw men presented expose their ignorance and falsehoods.
Very interesting, about "the right religion", which supports the above analysis that it's propaganda targetting those in a particular cult. Also interesting, the claim that an atheist could never be happy. Apparently because some people need to be told how to think and need fantasies to evade reality?
How could "true desire to see God" manifest in someone who does not believe in the existence of supernatural beings? It confirms that "atheism" here was only a straw man. What about those like me who did seek the supernatural only to realize that it was human delusion and fantasy? All that they need to believe is evidence, but it's lacking. Virtue? What about all of the evidence where religious rhetoric was used to justify evil?
I still consider myself agnostic, though. I cannot say that I was happy when I was hoping for the supernatural to solve my problems and it was failing, a more reality based approach is more constructive and achieves results. Being free from superstition and related fears is liberating, however.