“Creationism is a far more investigative science then evolution. The reason, is because it sets out to prove something.”
No, that’s the opposite ofinvestigative.
Science advances when people try to find out how things work.
Creationists already know the conclusion they want, they work backwards to identify what evidence supports that conclusion.
“ Evolution ultimately makes up theories that appears to make sense in keeping with the theory.”
Isn’t that what you are claiming creationism does? Setting out to prove something, in this case evolution? Good when you think creationists do it, not good when evolutionists do it, though. That’s a bit of a conundrum.
You’re stepping on your own dick, here.
“It's harder to try and prove something without changing the original premise (the Bible)”
Actually, no. You just don’t tell anyone of problems.
Literally.
The big Creationist organizations have a Statement of Faith. All their researchers sign a promise that they’ll never publish anything that does not support a literal interpretation of Genesis.
So if they ever find an upper limit to DNA changes, something that would make evolution impossible as it’s currently described, they’ll tell EVERYONE. If they ever find solid proof that man evolved from other primates, they’ve already promised not to tell anyone. Not difficult at all. Burn the results and on Monday start on a different topioc.
“than it is to make changes to a theory not bound by any concrete belief.”
You should lookup Piltdown Man.
When he was discovered, he matched all the best theories and validated all the science.
As time went on, though, more and more discoveries moved the theories away from what the hoax was literally made to fit. People stopped seeing it as a missing link and started to wonder if it was a sport, a single weird mutated individual. More and more science was published without referring to PM at all.
Until someone finally had the thought that it might not even be real. Because that wou'd explain everything…
Or the history of continental drift. The first time it was proposed, the guy had the thought, but no evidence. I mean, he saw that continents fit together, but that was it. A lot of the people that rejected his theory did so because the Bible itself says the Earth doesn’t move.
He went off, went looking for evidence, found it, collected a shitload of it, and presented the idea again. This time they had to accept it, OR disprove all the evidence for it.
It’s not ‘easy’ to change theories, but they do change. WIth work and the right results.
Superstition doesn’t change at all.