“Fish to mankind evolution is anti-science."
Twenty quatloos says you don’t know what science really is.
“Here's what is science: It's observable,
Yes.
“repeatable,”
No. The OBSERVATIONS need to be repeated, not the science. QUick example, your definition of science would mean that CSI can’t prove a murderer’s guilt without killing someone else by repeating the method.
“biological,"
Really? SO, you just junked all computer science, map theory, information theory, meteorology, astronomy, gravity, and GPS.
“scientific fact: that no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of: fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, birds remain birds, viruses remain viruses,”
Virii are alive, now?
“amphibians remain amphibians, and so on.”
Okay. Now, show me the science that establishes this as a fact?
“I.e., it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact there are barriers that evolution cannot cross.”
And the evidence for this verifiable science is found…??
“In spite of this, evolutionists pretend there ARE no barriers, and give reasons to believe in it.”
Well, you haven’t given any reasons to believe YOUR statements.
“Evolutionists:
(a) Ignore that scientific fact”
Because it’s not a fact.
“(b) Make up a belief contrary to that scientific fact”
Still not a fact.
“(c) Where that belief never happens and hence can't be called science anyway but demand it be called science and contradict what IS observable scientific fact.”
You’re doing everything EXCEPT support this ‘fact’ you’re insisting on.
“Fish to Mankind Evolutionism is nothing but a complete distortion of science and observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact.”
You’re distorting the scientific method egregiously. Where’d you get that, a Hovind site?