Except maybe for UBI, I’m pretty sure that the general public is at least 45% of the way there on all of these. (“Work or don’t eat, even at the cost of your own future” is still considered moral imperative in much of the world.) In the case of “Maintained internet anonymity”, assuming I guess right what is meant here, I’m pretty sure the public is at least 80% of the way there, but there are some pretty powerful interests holding it back. (Further complicated by the fact that the internet is international in nature, and people demand that all reasonable steps be taken to prevent terrorism.) In a vacuum, it’s very easy to find people who agree with at least some of that.
But given where the message is coming from… you don’t get to use it to claim the righteousness of inceldom, or whatever your angle is here. The time and opportunity to recover from depression or trauma and engage in self-improvement without being penalized for doing so - certainly. The ability to withdraw from society as a useless leech in exchange for not causing trouble - less than ideal, but it’s going to happen for a tiny portion of the population anyway, so sure. To revel in the fact that you are a worthless subhuman and in the idea that society should compensate you for your very existence, and repeatedly poke society in the eye for your own amusement or the offense of being born? Bad human, get off the counter.
(I am aware that the preceding paragraph ignores the existence of disabled people. That’s on purpose to keep the message simple.)