All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
The only thing of any value a woman can offer a man is an untouched vagina. This goes without saying and anyone who is looking for anything more from a woman (love, companionship, etc) is only kidding themselves. It has been/is/and forever will be a business exchange of provision and protection for sex and offspring.
There are a miniscule amount of virgins in 2015. View Terence Popps video where he calculates the amount of penis (in miles) and sperm (in gallons) the average woman today will have absorbed in her life.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CQkWUTDrWas
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NLQ7DSgYwkY
So essentially women today are public vehicles. But rather overpriced public vehicles.
Take the cost of a date, dinner and movie. I'd wager, it's about 20 bucks per person including refreshments for the movie and dinner at a decent restaurant will run you about 60 bucks per person bare minimum. That's $160 right there. Throw in about 10 for transportation and you are up to $170.
Now imagine waiting for a city bus, an older city bus that has been ridden by many. But you start in the morning when the bus has just come from the garage clean. Imagine when it arrives stuffing that $170 in the fare box. Anyone sane would think you mad. But you don't get a ride, instead the money goes down into the fare box but the driver ejects you from the bus before you can even step beyond the white line.
The bus goes on its way. You wait there at the same stop for the same exact bus to reach the bottom terminus, come up the other side towards the top terminus then come back down to you. You then take another $170 and stuff it in the fare box. Same deal, driver doesn't let you on. You wait again for the same exact bus to go down, come up the other side and then come back down to you. Not all dates cost $170 and we also have to factor in gifts. So this time you stuff $250 into the fare box. Driver doesn't let you ride. You wait again for the same bus to come back to you.
By this time it is already afternoon and the bus has already been patronized by many others. It comes back down, you drop, say, another two bills in the fare box, but this time you get to ride (sex). But as the bus has already been ridden all day your seat is dirty, maybe even wet! Everyone else got to ride for 3 bucks but you've already dropped nearly EIGHT BILLS in the fare box (that's about 4 dates and 2 cheap gifts) only to sit on a seat where many others have sat.
Rinse. Repeat.
This is what dating modern women is and we have millions of blue pilled men doing this and in many cases dropping a lot more money into the fare box only to get in return, a ride aboard a public vehicle that many others have ridden and paid far less a price to ride.
All it takes is one. Remember, an untouched vagina is all a woman has to offer a man. It takes only one person to get infected. Women shame men all the time for not wanting to pay full market value for a used NYC taxi or an RTS from LA. This is more than just about cost/reward but about health. They want you to not only date/wife up these sperm recepticles, subsidize said recepticles but above all risk your health on them.
My health, my choice.
Hope this puts dating into perspective, lurkers. You are better off hiring a professional. You get what you pay for.
Anyway you slice it. Women are a rip off! ?
YouTube user Turd Flinging Monkey breaks down the cost of dating/marriage vs MGTOW: https://youtu.be/2Al91Xbg_3s
YouTube user Tito the fresh exposes the truth about the "cleanliness" of females today:
The fact that many boyfriends and husbands have indirectly and unwittingly tasted another man's DNA was the final nail in the coffin for me. That second video will shock some sense into you. Lurkers and newbies, don't even pretend to think you'd be able to tell the difference either.
And as a side note, do not spend more than 40 dollars on a woman. Beyond that she becomes more expensive than a prostitute. At least with the hooker, those 40 bucks do not go to waste. You save yourself time and spare yourself the female BS.
What? You thought women are capable of love? When are you guys going to get it through your thick heads? These posts are starting to get on my damn nerves.
I think humans are flawed beings, and are still animals. We are only 1.5% away from being a chimp. So while we try to rationalize our opinions and decisions, a lot of it is driven by our instincts and biology. The basic goal of biology is self-preservation and procreation. Males’ role in the ancient nomadic life-style was that of hunters and gatherers – so men’s biology leans towards self-preservation a little more. As humans started organizing into small groups and then into societies, the definition of ‘self’ in self-preservation expanded to include everyone else that belong to the same group as them. Being self-preservation-oriented thus came to mean to guard those of their own and to destroy any threats. So men became more comfortable being in violent situations, and engaging in life-risking behaviors. The negative side of male nature, if there is one, is this: being open to violence, that we’d let a confrontation escalate to fists being thrown, because we really don’t find much of a problem with punching our differences out. The primary victims of male nature, thus, are not the other gender. It is those who’ll stand in our way to securing a safe future.
However, it is a different case when it comes to women. The primary victims of female nature ARE men. Women’s nature is procreation oriented, because it is their bodies that carry the wombs to gestate and deliver the next generation. It seeks to secure a stable inflow of resources while being incapacitated in the process of child-rearing. This makes men,the resource-procurers, the primary targets of female nature. In this paradigm of things, there is no incentive for the women to actually give a damn about the well-being of the man/men providing for her; in fact, it is in her best interest to not be attached to a single man in particular, but keep monkey-branching to a stronger, better provider.
Lionesses don’t particularly care when the male of the pride is killed by a new, younger male and then kills the cubs. They go on about like nothing’s changed. most women are not evil, they are un-empathetic to men’s plight, and heartlessly oblivious to our suffering.
So, naturally we have the odds against us, but the gynocentric westerns society turns it up several notches. Every harmful aspect of male nature are restrained and kept well-checked by the law. That’s why most men are not murderers, though many men are perfectly capable of murder. Any and every aspect of male nature that’s unsuitable for the modern civilized life have been outlawed, with severe repercussions if engaged-in.
But no such social or legal protection exists against harmful aspects of female nature- women’s tendency to take advantage of men, their actions that drive men to harm themselves and others, and the systems built over men’s corpses for the exclusive benefit of women. Combine this with the fact that women are unsympathetic towards men, and we have the perfect recipe for disaster. Women are oblivious to the harms they cause, and any voice trying to educate them are muffled and marginalized, and women are encouraged to engage in their careless ways by the society, of course, at the expense of men. So, no, I don’t hate women—. they are just completely, and irredeemably unlovable.
The only logical thing for men to do is to educate themselves and each other, and stay away from women as much as possible. Find ways to discipline one’s sexual neediness- through practices like martial arts, meditation or things like working out that’ll leave you too tired to be horny. But what ever you do- do not touch a female with a (your) ten-foot pole.
Way ahead of you, bro.
I am actually no longer attracted to females. I haven't looked at porn in over a month. I can't look at them without a deluge of Red Pill knowledge coming to mind. It's great. I find it completely dishonourable to my mind, body and spirit to be bound sexually to such creatures therefore I took care of it with brute force and it's done. Actually, it has worked too well. I don't have any feeling towards women. I do not recognize them as complete human beings but unevolved persons. I am completely and utterly free and feel like a kid! (remember back before puberty when this garbage didn't pollute your mind?)
I also memory hole every male I even suspect of blue pillery. White knights are immediately discarded and believe me, misery indeed does love company and they'll always come and try to convert you back. They are sort of like the character of Fiddler from the movie Roots. Fiddler was in charge of overseeing the new slaves fresh off the boat. He was cocky and arrogant because the white master gave him such a job forgetting that he himself was a fucking SLAVE.
[Regarding penis size]
Good one. Although penis size is not the outcome of one's life choices (unless you decide to chop it up or something :x) and vaginal tightness is absolutely the outcome of one's life choices. So they basically give us shit, for how nature made us - something we have no control over. There isn't THAT much we can do in this regard, while they can just not be sluts. They choose to be sluts anyway, though. Guess they just don't care.
Racism is a concept made up by cultural Marxist intellectuals at the Frankfurt School in the 1950s as a thought-terminating and shaming cliche, in order to silence dissent against their efforts to infiltrate the institutions of western civilization, with the long-term objective of converting the entire west to communism.
So, as it turns out, there really are two ceremonial meals in the Jewish religion that have traditionally involved the horrific consumption of the flesh and blood of gentile children. What's even more shocking is that these practices continue today.
The first example of ritual Jewish cannibalism is the hamentashen eaten on the Purim holiday. Jewish children learn that the triangular pastry is a replica of the triangular hat worn by Hamen, the arch enemy of the Jewish people. The truth is that the pastry is actually meant to look like Hamen's ear, not his hat. These pastries are filled with poppy seeds, apricots, chocolates, and other sweets, but many Jews throughout history also filled these pastries with the flesh, fat, and blood of local gentile children kidnapped and murdered in a ritual sacrifice of revenge.
Second, the afikomen. This special matzah is hidden during the Passover seder. After the ceremonial meal the children of the home seek out and find the hidden piece of unlevened bread, they return it to their father for a reward, and then everyone eats it for dessert. All fun and games, right?
No. This ritual is symbolic of the tenth plague: the slaying of the first born. Jews teach their children that "God" killed the Egyptian pharaoh's first born as a punishment for not releasing the slaves. This is not entirely true. Jews also teach that God works through the actions of men. The Israelites were the real perpetrators of the mass killing of all Egyptian first born children.
This includes Egyptian children born to women in Jews' own homes. Most slave families of that era had at least one child in their household fathered by the Egyptians. This is symbolized by the vacant seat at the seder table, the plate of uneaten food, and the feigned ignorance of the whereabouts of its intended occupant, "Elijiah."
What's the truth? The male Jewish head of household murdered his stepson, baked his flesh into the matzah, put his blood into the 4 cups of red wine drank at the seder, and rejoiced in the murder of the innocent child of the pharaoh. Jewish children are ritually trained to hunt, kill, and eat non-Jewish children at an early age.
Many Jews still use human flesh in Passover meals. While baked goods containing human flesh are not widely distributed, certain rabbis continue the practice. During a Seder at a Hasidic congregation in Chicago I followed a rabbi into the kitchen and stole a bit of his pastry. It was much different than a traditional matzah. It looked more like a hunk of halavah. I took it and ate it. He told me not to. I asked him, "Is this what I think it is?" He told me yes and scolded me. It was bland and tasteless. The entire experience was surreal.
This is nothing new. Jews are notoriously cannibalistic. In ancient times, killing and eating the children of their oppressors was the Jewish path to freedom. They have unfortunately continued this tradition in the modern day. It appears cannibalism and child sacrifice are imbedded into the DNA of the Jewish species.
I was a victim of this practice. I was adopted by a Jewish family. While I was raised Jewish, I was also badly abused. In addition to daily torture I was given allergy shots as a way for my body to produce antibodies and hormones. Then my blood was drained from my body and consumed by my mother, who is a longtime student and practitioner of occult witchcraft.
I know this all sounds hard to believe, but it's true. Jews claim to be the "chosen people of God," yet their religion permits this heinous practice. While blood is not kosher for consumption, human flesh shockingly is. Nothing in Jewish scripture or tradition forbids Jews from kidnapping, torturing, killing, and eating gentile children.
Child sacrifice is a cornerstone of Jewish faith and culture. There is no doubt that the methods of this ancient Jewish tradition have evolved, but the core practice remains.
And I find it sick.
Muslims have slaughtered more people than probably all other religions, combined. Their holy book tells them to, and they also do it for sport. They're savages. (Their racial make-up might contribute to this, but the religion encourages it, too. It's almost as bad as nigger culture.)
[On Nazis: "Do you really think that on November 25th 2015 there will be even a remote possibility of a fascist invasion of the United States?"]
It'll come in the form of reasonably argued liberalism. Ban shchita [kosher slaughter] first. Then ban bris mila [circumcision ceremonies]. Then tell the schools and parents how to educate their children. Shame them into allowing female rabbis. Let WOW break down the mechitza at the kotel..
Recent posts here have sparked debate about the Jewish question. A lot of the comments by communists and others have triggered me, but no more so than the NatSocs and Fascists who refuse to realize Jewish control over the much of the world currently and historically. Many of you keep asking for hard facts over and over(As if you cannot find unlimited amounts of it everywhere online for yourselves) and when presented with the hard facts completely disregard the information because of the medium by which the information is presented. I would like to present some hard facts in this post.
Keep in mind Jews are 0.2% of the world population, no one is claiming that all Jews are participating in the control of entire States, but Jews have a sense of tribalism that connects all of them to each other with a common principle throughout the centuries. They discriminate against others and help each other rise higher, but the 'heavy lifting' if you will, is done by the giants that control banks, Media outlets, and hold political office. Being in these positions of power allow them to rule over unfortunate goyim who are trained by the Jewish media to believe that Jews are an ever persecuted race for no fault of their own and that anything questioning that narrative is evil. They are also trained to believe that even researching or questioning whether Jews hold power is evil. Now, Jews are not just the communists, they are the Capitalists as well. Jews controlled capitalist countries first and created communism later. Regardless, all societies that were not communist, but still controlled by the international Jewry all facilitated cultural Marxism. The Jews can work with either Capitalist or Socialists economies, but only with left government. That is why National Socialism and Fascism are the only systems that are invulnerable to takeover by Jewish Oligarchs.
If you do not like the site because facts coming from the Ziomedia hold more credit than any other site presenting the same facts, then look up every name for yourself, and remember, 0.2%:
http://www.subvertednation.net/jew-lists/
Edit: Since there is some confusion, what I stated before the link is my opinion, the link contains the facts.
A feminist, an MRA, a RedPiller and a MGHOW are stranded on a desert island.
The feminist begins harping about how the men are privileged with upper body strength and so any food they hunt must be taxed, with the tax given to her.
The MRA counters by saying any law created must be equally applied to both sexes and any man-only tax is unfair. The MRA and the feminist continue arguing back and forth until the MRA, exasperated, takes out his gun and shoots himself committing suicide.
The RedPiller looks at the body of the late MRA, shakes his head and goes up to the feminist. He backhands her sending her flying. He viciously beats her and tells her to learn her place. The feminist is quiet and subdued. Satisfied, the RedPiller turns around when the feminist takes a rock and hits him on the back of his head - knocking him out cold.
The MGHOW looks at the unconscious RedPiller, the body of the late MRA and shakes his head. He goes up to feminist and the following conversation takes place :
MGHOW : I am conducting a social sciences study as part of my thesis at Harvard University. Would you care to volunteer?
Feminist : What is this study about?
MGHOW : It concerns the abject failure of men in satisfying women through receiving fellatio.
Authoritarian leftists have grown up, of course. They no longer physically destroy comic books. They do it virtually, by infiltrating their way into positions that enable them to change straight white male characters into females, coloreds, or degenerates. The motivation has always been the same: to destroy western civilization.
Feminism was a mistake. Yes, we're getting maybe 30-60% of pre-existing male productivity from females, but it's not worth the shit we currently have to put up with.
[On J.J. Abrams casting a black lead in Star Wars 7]
If the character's already been established (in a book, etc.) then its defining traits must obviously be maintained, as in the case of Hunger Games.
No such situation applies to J.J. Abrams, because he had free rein to create characters from scratch. And yet he chose to create and cast non-white characters (in leading roles) exclusively. This is racism. This is white genocide.
You seem more interested in derailing from J.J. Abrams' racism than condemning it. This makes you just as racist.
Sweden is Saudi Feminabia, a hive minded (like Reddit) quasi-socialist state with too much 'humanity' in its heart that it's providing humanity to inhumane islamo-fascists, and feminazis.
I hate to admit it, but most of the younger women here - including myself - do not feel much empathy or compassion for men. Instead, we generally use men as a mirror to reflect our own vanity. And often we provoke their desires in cruel and capricious ways, simply for our own self-gratification. Only our children can inspire a true feeling of love within us - at least if we have normal maternal affections.
In reality, our primary interest in men is obtaining a life of comfort and security - both for ourselves and our children - which is why we still value marriage. And since younger men are becoming increasingly reluctant to marry, many of us are proclaiming to be anti-feminists to help assuage their fears and secure a long-term commitment.
Fortunately for women, men's sense of chivalry is still strong. Men are still eager to believe that women have a caring and unselfish nature. So by feigning compassion for men, we are likely to find a husband with good financial prospects - a husband whom we can always divorce if we become dissatisfied, while continuing to enjoy an affluent lifestyle.
That I'm afraid, is the real nature of women. Perhaps this page should be renamed, "The Myth of Female Beneficience". And yet, even though I am revealing our inner motivations, most men will despise me because they prefer a beautiful lie to a painful truth. However, in spite of my selfish instincts, I have spoken the truth - fully aware that you shall only heap derision upon me.
If your concept of testimony is blindly following any religious idea without scrutiny or inference, then everyone would be correct. Including Christians, Jews, Atheist, etc. Belief is based on logic, otherwise what is the point of dozens of verses describing nature? Faith in this context would be firm belief and knowledge in the existence of God.
On the other hand, Atheists seem to have trouble application using logic to infer the existence of things he didn't see when it comes to God, despite its constant use in daily life. For instance I reject the bible since it is written by unknown men at unknown places at unknown times, and edited by unknown men at unknown places at unknown times, along with Christianity embracing inherently contradictory concepts such as the Trinity (Jesus is God, Holy Ghost is God, God has three persons, The father doesn't have three persons, the Holy Ghost is not Jesus, ugh.. you get the idea).
I believe in what is possible, on the other hand Atheists believe on what is impossible, because Atheist faith absolutely collapses logic and self-evident truths; might as well say 1 + 1 doesn't equal 2 since objectivity of logic, existence of free will, and existence of morality is denied.
We also have scenarios of the evolution of sexual pairs, in which you need to deny the existence of purpose in every detail starting with sperm, egg, fertilization, movement, nutrition, womb, to a birth. We have claims that milk evolved from licking sweat. We have amusing make-believe stories about useless wings evolution gradually through comical and fictitious mechanisms. We have racoon being ancestors to blue whales. We have poor people actually deluding themselves into believing DNA and life are simple stuff. There are countless impossible scenarios and dilemmas that are an absolute laughing stock.
I reject the existence of your great grandmother since there is no empirical evidence of her existence.
To sum it up:
I have valid reasons to support what I believe (authentic testimony being sufficient).
You don't have valid reasons to reject what I believe (and if you do it is question-begging for me).
You should make logical objections such as questioning the soundness or validity of my position.
Please. They aren't conservative. They just use that name. They are "cuckservatives", just one side of the leftist ruling elite who are painted "conservative" but they are not so.
I mean do they do politics like it is 1880? No? Then what is conservative about them? They don't even do it like it is 1950 or 1980.
They are part of the Mainstream constantly swimming left.
If they were at least a few decades behind they could be somewhat conservative, because that would mean they are a bit to the right to the mainstream. But they aren't.
What you used as an example is a violation of the Rule of Law: a leftist violation of a conservative principle.
A conservative liberty, equality, fraternity violation would be something like: borders closed, welfare ended, no-fault divorce stopped etc. a system focused on what historically worked: a patriarchical system of actually working, not welfare drawing, yet 2-4 kids having people of well-integrated, compatible ethnic groups. I.e. to actually make a country and its people able to survive. Like in the past.
I've been tested as being at 145 IQ since before high school and when I was a computer programmer many of the other guys put up similiar numbers. So it's not anything unexpected to encounter another bright guy.
But then I look at those numbers and realize what a small percentage my IQ level and above represents in the overall population and it makes it really clear why things happen as they do.
My calculations say out of 320 million Americans only 2.5 million are at 140 IQ and above.
Most people are just really stupid.
I'm not saying this as an insult, but a realization of why things like political correctness became accepted by so many.
Emotional indoctrination literally rules over weak minds.
Women are weaker than men as well.
To be a master race... all those "masters" should have high IQ.
Hey I got an idea... what if you allowed a type of "natural selection" to give advantages to... yeah you know where I'm going...
Too bad the high IQ doesn't guarantee reproduction. (a slight problem)
Well, we have to wait for designer babies before we fix politics because stupid people will always choose stupid politics.
Maybe require a certain IQ (100 or above) to vote?
France is gone...The only person that can save it is Marine Le Pen.
I feel really bad for the regional ethnic minorities like the Bretons, Basques, Catalans, etc...They didn't do anything to deserve this, in fact they have never had their own states. This is disgusting, leftist monsters. All this immigration is reminiscent of Stalin's population redistribution in the Soviet Union.
If whites were going to African countries, establishing themselves in their cities and breeding to the tune of 30% of newborns, the left would be up in arms talking about genocide through population replacement. They'd say that even if we paid lip service to the idea of respecting the local culture and integrating with it, ultimately we couldn't help but be more attached to our roots and our religion, customs and way of life. They'd claim this is colonialism by softer means.
Suddenly though when it's blacks and arabs doing it it's all fine. Whites should just accept that their race should become a minority, that their way of life should be altered, that their traditions be replaced by foreign ones. They should accept that there ought to be no nation for whites, even as every other race has an uncontested right to their own territory.
Fuck - that - idiocy. White civilization has created most worthwhile things in the world. It's the fruits of white civilizations that the niggers and the arabs are using to come here: motorboats, cars, smartphones. It's the fruits of white civilizations that they are using to breed: stability, prosperity, advanced medical care. But it's not to white civilization that they contribute back. They take and they feed their shitty, tribalistic, anti-innovation cultures of oppression. We are literally bleeding the white race to feed all the others.
Women will choose to be self-serving over group interest. A male sociopath is closer to a woman's neurology than a neurotypical male. To put this in context: westernized asian women would choose to take the easy route by dating/fucking white men for social acceptance/status, rather than taking the long road of establishing ethnic respect by sticking with asian men instead of being sellout whores. When encountered by enemies, how many women would fight to the death or kill themselves, rather than simply submitting? A man's ego is intricately tied to that of his group. You challenge the group, you challenge the man. Men dominate, women are dominated.
Women may be able to grasp the concept of honor or loyalty, in the abstract sense, however they will never truly feel it the way men do. You and I may enjoy or understand quantum physics at a surface level, but will never truly understand the machinations behind it all, the same way that a quantum physicist would.
So, I downloaded a movie yesterday. Yes, I pirated it because movies these days are rarely worth sitting in a dirty, overpriced theater for.
After spending way too much time watching this crap movie, I reflected back and could see all the subliminal messages disquised as "a needed thing for the future".
The first obvious one would be that the dad is a NASA engineer that had been laid off but his teenage daughter is way smarter than him and can fix electronic devices that her engineer dad couldn't. Or that she uses drones and know how heavy machinery are wired. Total BS. Nowhere in the movie did it show this teenage chick watching Netflix or eating a tub of ice cream.
All just a push of the Feminist agenda to make believe that women are great engineers who know how to fix things and work technology other than their latest iPhone.
The second is in the movie, the parellel dystopia is a metaphore for how the United States was founded by some of the greatest minds in history but has been corrupted by a "negative outlook". This causes the sons of these great minds to neglect their fantasy paradise and it is becoming run down. So, who do they need to find? Dreamers. Hmmmm....where have I heard that word from? Oh yeah, they call illegal immigrants, "Dreamers". They are trying to talk you into passing the "Dreamer" bill so illegal squatters can become legal without having to go through painstaking process like the rest of the legal immigrants that actually want to be here and will work for it.
Yeah, so pass on this movie unless you like seeing men being shown as people who give up and are negative and bad guys. While women are the future who know karate and James Bond stuff.
For those of you who just say "Why are you watching TV any ways?" or want to brag that "you don't watch TV any more", I say good for you.....moving on.
Don't listen to the leftist lies: both Zoe and Anita (assuming she is a citizen of the United States) have committed a felony by explicitly and directly lobbying foreign governments for the abolition of Net Neutrality and the "licensing" of internet content providers.
What if I told you that all the power the PC seem to have is nothing more than a superficial construct? They would have you believe that they are in control of the social media and everyone is on their side.
But that’s not true. Political Correctness is its own biggest lie. They make you think they can: destroy your reputation if you say the wrong thing, rewrite history, adjust our youth’s minds in an effort to support their agenda and you should conform because no matter what you say they are the ones in 90% of the schools and they determine the mindset of the next generation of voters.
Well here is a newsflash: that isn’t true anymore. Last year a secret revolution occurred that allowed republicans to win the midterms; and it’s the same reason why Donald Trump has retained so much support. Last year when sales of Grand Theft Auto V (the latest addition to the most Politically Incorrect video-game series of all time, Grand Theft Auto) reached nearly a billion dollars in on its first week on the shelves; the highest elites among the Politically fled from their thrones of influence.
Since then the PC have lost all influence on social websites such as YAHOO! No longer may user accounts be suspended for homophobic, sexist, or even racist comments. From this point the majority of the PC have devoted their time to social media trolling. But now the threat of the rise of the PC over the Video-game Industry, which will lead to the boycott and eventual banishment of the Politically Incorrect chauvinistic, sexist, racist, video-game series known as Grand Theft Auto, and a totalitarian conquering of this nation, must be countered with a new national conversation (White people are the real victims of slavery, Imperialism, racism).
From past observations of the PC Administrations of influential Campuses, they have been planning to destroy the video-game series known as GTA for a long time. One school principal threatened to call the police on parents that let their kids play Grand Theft Auto. And know the final piece in the prophecy has arrived. On November 10, 2015 the video-game known as Fallout 4 will be released.
These video-games may become a symbol for the left. They have already become a tool for spreading liberalism into the minds of our youth. Fallout was once the Post-Apocalyptic Pulp Fiction of video-games, but now it has become no more than a message for liberalism in general after the PC Bethesda Game Studios stole the copyrights to the Fallout series from its original developers Black Isles.
In Past years BGS has injected messages into its videogames: Green Peace/Animal welfare, Feminism, gay rights, racial equality, income equality, anti-war, anti-military, and more recently Marxism.
Here are the Leftist messages in the FO games:
The Evidence:
Green Peace is about the world is coming to an end because of humanity and they put it right inside of a videogame that takes place after a nuclear war.
The very theme song of FO3 is a testament to the left- “I don’t want to set the world on fire”. This very song utters the doom and gloom over global warming and urbanization.
FO3 there is a NPC known as Harold who appeared in previous FO games. But when Harold appeared in BGS’s Capital Wasteland they just had to add a PC swing to him. In FO3 the character Harold (already exposed to Forced Evolutionary Virus and having a tree named Bob growing out of him) has become fused with tree growing out of him, his legs become roots. . He was discovered by several people who began to worship him as a god, and a small and exclusive cult known as the Treeminders began to form in secrecy. Bob began to blossom and many plants grew in this area, which became green with life, a stark contrast to the outer wasteland. Tree minders is just another term for Tree huggers, which is exactly what the new game designers from BGS are.
FO3 also uses fear tactics to promote alternative energy. FO3 scares gamers into becoming advocates of energy efficiency. After playing, gamers are likely to think that if we don’t move towards alternate sources of energy we’ll run out of oil and gas and our world leaders will nukes us over the last remaining natural resources.
FO3 storyline pertains to the fight for clean water, and echoes the fear expressed by those in California. The truth is that the agriculture industry uses over 80% of the water in California. Most of the water in California is being used to clean almonds. So any attempts to cut down on the amount of water used by residents will never solve the issue.
In FNV there is an area known as Hidden valley bunker, on the outside of the bunkers are peace symbols and messages that display the anti-nuclear war mentality of the 1960’s through 1990’s (Before it became about anti-toxic waste, save the whales, and human beings are the scourge to nature, and where all going to die because of manmade Global warming).
There are messages about income inequality that appear in both FO3 and FNV. Outside of Fallout shelters lay signs once carried by the now dead protesters who thought screw the wealthy 1% because they can afford to enter the bunkers.
Animal Welfare has appeared in the FO games since the beginning. Animal Welfare groups believe that animals should be protected. While the radicals, Animal Rights activist believe that animals should have the same rights as people.
The intelligent deathclaws in FO2 bring about the issue of Animal Welfare. Products of the Enclave’s experiments these deathclaws had the ability to talk and fight closely alongside humans. These creatures cause the player to feel sympathy, for at one point in time the player must destroy the base containing most of the intelligent deathclaws, and later an NPC ( non-playable-character) bombs the shelter made for the last remaining surviving intelligent deathclaws.
The Enclave also becomes a target for doing unethical experiments on animals in FO2 (An Enclave scientist works in a sound proof room because of the unsettling screams of his test subjects. The player in disguise of an Enclave Soldier, has the option to kill the scientist in complete secrecy because the room is sound proof)
The Animal Friend perk in multiple FO games is clear evidence of Animal Welfare. With this perk certain creatures never become hostile towards the player, who may not want to fight them in the first place. With the second perk, animals will come to your aid against non-animal enemies.
FO3 - there is a NPC known as Moria Brown, who is based off a real life Marine Biologist of the same name. The real Moria Brown is a hero of animal huggers, who watch shows like whale wars and channels like Animal Planet. The in-game Moria Brown is openly opposed to violence against the creatures of the waste.
Anti-Animal Welfare/Rights: To appear as a neutral game FNV has the thorn. In the thorn the user can wager money on creature fights, compete against creatures for money, and set up custom fights. The user can also embark on a series of quest focused on fetching eggs for the thorn. With each quest the type of creatures the player most take eggs from becomes deadlier.
FO3 Galaxy News radio is a propaganda machine that encourages players to fight the good fight and bring down the U.S paramilitary industrial complex (known as the Enclave).
FO3 quest Tenpenny Tower is an obvious reference to the civil rights movement. The ghouls represent important black figures throughout history. Hence one ghouls has the name Bessie, the same name as a well-known African American singer of the period of time in which people started to think about the social injustices.
FO3 - Civil War in the Brotherhood of Steel because the BOS wanted to help the people of the Capital Wasteland (unlike the Enclave, which is the true U.S Government as depicted in these games)
That one song that appear in FO3 Galaxy News radio loop that goes something like bongo bongo bongo I don’t want to leave the Congo oh no no no no no! fenko finko funko I don’t want to leave the jungle I refuse to go!... That song obviously represents the anti-urbanization ideology of the far-left green movement; If you listen closely to that song you’ll hear them singing about how they don’t like the bright lights of the flashy cities and the noise of cars in their ears ; and no matter what you say I’ll stay right here! Dun dah duda duda dah duhda! Deeeh!!!
FNV: The communist NCR faction in FNV was once a constitutional republic; until Bethesda made it into a totalitarian communist faction that seizes private property for annex and makes farmers work in communes.
FNV: Caesar’s Legion is just a subliminal message meant to turn male and female gamers into feminist by using women as slaves. Caesar’s Legion also represents the feminist view of Las Vegas as a disgusting town of ill repute where women are forced to use their bodies to please men. They could not have made it more evident.
Most of that is in the last 2 FOs alone. The Enclave in the FOs smears the line between the U.S and the Nazis.
The Greatest evidence that FALLOUTGATE is not a conspiracy:
Black Isles studios (the original Fallout developers) refused to completely conform to their PC PR team, for example the original and present day logo of FO is a white guy with blonde hair known as the vault boy that actually represents president John F Kennedy; who is popular among the populace as he is thought to have prevented the first Nuclear War during the Cuban missiles crisis; and the Brotherhood of Steel a paramilitary organization that appears throughout all of the Fallout games with the goals of protecting humanity from advanced technologies by hoarding them all to themselves represents Kennedys deep-seated interest in advanced technologies before his death .
But then they included a vault girl (for obvious reasons), and the one time the game designers from Black Isles try to include a logo that would appear in the karma status for evil players that killed children, It was omitted from the original game cause it was a sketch of the vault boy kicking a pregnant vault girl in the belly.
This situation caused a firestorm among their PC PR managers, and the designers ultimately omitted it from the game before its release. Not only was this sketch offensive to women because it demonized them for having abortions, the PC claim that black isles studios shouldn't have given players the power to kill children in the first place. In the 1990’s games like FO2 were more realistic, which made them feel more unethical, but they included ethical storylines in which the players fought against Nazi like enemies in the name of peace, liberty, and freedom.
BGS never allowed children characters to be killed in any of its games during the time of Black Isles. And sense then BGS (for its PC desire that video-games become something more than just mindless violence of uncensored proportions) has gained the copyrights to the FO games.
Since then all child characters in Bethesda games have become invincible (accept in the case of ‘two’ carefully scripted ‘situations’ in Fallout 3 involving an Undetonated nuke destroying an entire town (which can be prevented by the player who will becomes immediately idolized by locals afterwards) and a low orbit ballistic mini nuke strike capable of targeting only one of several optional locations based on the characters choice( one of which was an enemy air force base that was the intended target for that quest and the others being pedestrian zones and the final choice being the headquarters of the protagonist party of the game. But you never get to watch a child character die in real time. They don’t show it.
In FNV there is a character known as Mr. House that reforms squabbling tribes into civilized societies after a nuclear war. What Mr. House actually represents is how the PC transformed a collection of uncensored videogames and their companies into meaningful experiences for those people that would arrive from the American cultural wars prior to 9/11. If you really go through the game and look at what Mr. House really is in his true form, you will see an old grotesque being clinging on to life with the power technology, popularity, and his final ledger states that he just wanted to improve humanity. But just like Mr. House PC hides you from the truth to protect you and make you see the best of things, and when you finally see the true nature of reality and how it all works it is hideous. In a way Mr. House is a perfect representation of PC.
In a way FNV may have just been an entire game structured off of PC. From the Republic of Dave and Dukov’s place in FO3 (Which I’m pretty sure by all observations that Dukov was a representation of either older FOs or GTA hidden inside FO3 and Cherry is a representation of FO3 itself. Dave from the Republic of Dave mocks GTA, which does hog all the attention but still GTA deserves all of its popularity by its own accord) to Rose of Sharon Cassidy and the xenophobic artillery hogging, ammo hoarding, grenade lobbing, explosive loving group known as the boomers in FNV (which represents what the PC imagines when they think of republicans).
In FNV it all makes sense once you look hard enough. If you still don't believe me look at what Bethesda Games was prior to 9/11 (see Elder Scrolls 2 Daggerfall for more info).
The video game cultural objectified women up until that point but then they realized that this wouldn't work out well in a new and reformed world with empowered females that would for the first time start to become curious about video games.
You see the computer games of the 1990's were never meant to be played by girls or women because just like Las Vegas and Caesar’s legion in their game Fallout New Vegas, Bethesda Games objectified and exploited woman in their games for social misfits that were curious and felt the need to play out their Fantasies in exchange for profit.
Why else do you think old video games are always represented as Nintendo and arcade games? Because the history of computer games is one of erotic fantasy and lust of which the likes could not be tolerated in today's society.
Look at moder sties. The first video game modifications always include nudity and sex because computer gamers are obsessed with that kind of stuff. They were conditioned to love it buy the games of the 1990’s. On 11/10/2015 who would be willing to spend their money on the PC anti-slavery, Marxist videogame Fallout 4? At the end of the day it’s about money. But no one really hates the ideas of slavery, because it made this nation, and no one is going to buy that video-game Fallout 4.
On paper it sound good, you walk around trying to improve a post-apocalyptic society while fighting slavery and liberating the underdogs of the new world. But that’s not right. The truth is for a world to begin again there has to be slavery and imperialism.
Some of you like video-games like this, you think in what world is the greatest nation formed off of centuries of slavery and mass genocide. But in time you’ll come to the conclusion that there is no real need for Political Correctness and Slavery is not that bad. When you go to bed to night you will not spread the message of #Fallout4Equality via social media.
This video-game will not become a symbol for the left. And all of the other disturbances that have occurred on the internet in the past weeks over this issues will be resolved and all will return to normal. I have several points that prove why Fallout 4 will not sale in one month, enough copies to beat the two day sales record of Grand Theft Auto V.
And on November 10, 2015 I will prove that black lives, LGBT rights, women’s rights, and all other social injustice hoaxes are non-issues when the most PC videogame of all time doesn't reach a billion dollars in sales on its first week on the shelves. And then we will know that Political Correctness is just an unnecessary joke that we don’t need in our private lives.
They aren’t the majority
In the Culture War between the PC and the Video-game industry, the PC are not just the 1%, but the .0000001%. The social minorities that they would look to for support love to play GTA. That’s why it sold 880 million in just 2 days. And GTA is just one of many video-games. The PC war with the video-game culture, Is as futile as trying to westernize the entire Middle East in 1 year without the use of violence. It’s like trying to peacefully colonize the most diehard, nationalistic, society via PC. It won’t work.
The PC are not attracting the correct audience to their video-games
Most of the PC in the gaming industry are the social majority that prefer RPGs.
The strength of the Social Justice Authoritarian message lies not in the message itself but in its delivery.
Social Justice Authoritarians deliver their ideology only via positions of power. They do so in college classrooms from Professors who can destroy students. They do so via Videos that are advertised widely with comments banned. They do so where they can control the moderation of the commentary. They do so via outlets that don't seem as though they are Social Justice Information Portals at first glance.
Consider the Cracked.Com model. They publish articles with a strong Social Justice Authoritarian bias. If you protest this bias (or their belief structure) in the forums they provide they ban you or sanction your comments. So this attracts an ever growing mass of people who think largely the same way.
But they don't ban people from the comments section so much. Here's why: A forum post, overall gets significantly more exposure than a single comment post. This means that the "mass" of SJA can target individual comments (as they are a group) and downvote and demoralize opposition thinkers who are never afforded the same kind of platform the Authoritarians themselves are.
All the while, Cracked, operating as a "humor" magazine isn't recognized as a platform for propaganda. It has a stable of writers that agree with the ideology, and it gives those writers a massive platform to disseminate that ideology under the guise of "humor".
They took their evil, hateful pill and coated it with sugar and innocuous jokes. Remember, these aren't simply "true believers". They're college educated, intelligent and they've had decades to refine their tools.
In SJW circles, pedophilia is the new transgender.
The black and arab lads are fucking French girls liek crazy. Boatloads everyday. There is a record number of Mulatto and Halfarab francais. French women love that black and moslem cuk. Mandingos and Young Abdullahs give the women the francaise tizzles.
European women love Afreakan cock in general. If a bunch afreaken men went to Europe, each would be fuking 2+ Euro women per day. Lucky lads, getting the mandingo treatment.
Amazing! Wouldn't it be awesome if Hungary decides to leave the EU and erect huge walls around it's self like Israel? Then they decide to pass a law, so that Whites can have a homeland, only allowing white immigrants into it's country. Imagine in the year 2050, every bordering country is an islamic shit hole, while Hungary is a pristine nation of White Christians/Atheists w/e!
(Why oh why are so many feminists transphobic? WHY!!??)
Might have something to do with feminists being more likely to see through men's bullshit, and trans ideology is another iteration of men's bullshit.
Might also be that feminists recognize a misogynistic male when we see one, and a significant number of trans women massively hate women and let it all hang out online.
And, don't forget, feminists are likely to be the least self-sacrificing of women, at least when it comes to sacrificing our rights and our attention and our labor for the benefit of males, and it just so happens that the trans movement wants us to sacrifice all three for their benefit.
But, yeah, it's a total mystery.
The only way you can date, let alone, live with a single mom is to devour her offspring like lions. But it would take less effort to just not date her in the first place. I mean seriously, you might chip a tooth munching on their skulls and femurs.
Because you are making false assumptions.
If we let feminism "win", they'll try to control men by throwing all men in prisons and using them only for breeding.
Then some other culture will start a war against the country, most likely the muslim people because they are the most patriarchical and power-hungry around, and they'll win, because woman don't have enough ability to defend themselves, and they don't even understand the importance of an army (they'd abandon the army most likely). Then this other culture would subdue the feminists and we would be at a patriarchy.
If no other culture attacked, they would most likely be able to keep themselves alife (it's not hard with todays tools), and having enough babies would be easy to achieve too.
But anyway, they'd not be able to force all men into prisons, because men would win in a fight. The pendulum would swing back, and women would be subdued.
I don't want to be killed or imprisoned. Because most men feel the same, feminism can't win. Even most women disagree with the goals of feminsim.
There is just no way feminism can win, that's why we can't let them win, because it's impossible. Feminism can only be successfull, if they have mens support, which they do right now. But since they can't reach their goals with mens support, they can't win.
(Research Suggests That A Woman’s Body Incorporates DNA From The Semen Of Her Casual Sex Partners)
I've always felt that The Enlightenment ingrained a sense of narcissism into humanity that will be our eventual downfall; the day we thought we were wiser and more intelligent than our ancestors because we are "enlightened" was the day we took a deadly wrong turn. Thousands of years of human experience valued a woman's virginity and Aristotle was even trying to explain why, yet progressives dismiss it as patriarchal hogwash from the dark ages simply because a "we are enlightened, they were not". It never ceases to amazes me what knowledge the ancients had.
Let's assume that a modern woman becomes sexually active at 15. If she sleeps with 4 guys a year, her notch count is already at 20.
She would only be halfway through college. In my college days, the average girl was sleeping with a different guy way more often than once every 3 months.
You can easily double or triple her notch count if you count only oral sex. This is what is leading to a head and neck cancer epidemic. HPV rates were exploding before the vaccine.
Gattaca-style genetic engineering will eventually be the norm (I miss my old username). I suspect genetic fitness will improve over time. Moral fitness...yeah...that's another matter.
Don't forget that modern women are just sexbots, anyway. :D
No matter how much of a feminist a man might be, he doesn't actually respect women's "accomplishments." He'll respect an actual great career but nobody respects the schlub who makes 77% of what he does. He's never seen a woman who's actually worth respecting and so he doesn't even know what she'd look like. When he sees women who's earning shit ruin the life of the child she irresponsibly single mothered at age 32, he'll think that's what a respectable human being is.
Women have successfully pushed for men to respect them for bleeding out their cunts, fingering themselves, sucking dick, and getting fat. In other words, for fucking existing. Mere existence is the be-all-end-all of a woman's life and the big struggle she must go through. There's a self-perpetuating cycle. First, men hear the myth of the respectable woman and then they force themselves to see her. That lowers the standards for women, so women take it even easier. Men have to overcompensate again to keep the myth alive and that leads to another quality drop. Truth is: if women weren't like that then wouldn't constantly be told to respect women.
When a man is incompetent, his world crumbles. He can scream that he's empowered all he fucking wants but he'll have to answer to his disposability. You think he's gonna get laid just because he can blame his shit on a glass ceiling? He's accountable for his failure and so he tries damn hard. He might never succeed against all the barriers put before him but unless he's really fucking blue pill, you know he's gonna try.
A woman's world isn't like that. She's got no incentive to struggle because she can live comfortably off a psychologist's salary whether she gets promoted or not. An unsuccessful woman will get laid via reproductive scarcity while in group biases provide her with friends. Is she really gonna care about earning another 60K – or at least, will she care enough to work 15 extra hours every week and have a job she hates? Not when 40K's enough for her to enjoy the finest Manhattan has to offer.
If she ever wants her "own" money to spend then she can find a provider and when she wants it to truly be hers then she'll divorce him. Women have absolutely no stake in their own success or respectability and that makes them the unwavering champions of incompetence. When one group's got that ironclad frame, the other has to adapt. Men adapt by trying harder and harder to see the myth and by giving more and more to these women to mask the true reality of incompetence. The less competent women are, the more respect they get and the more perks their given.
The Red Pill is the last stronghold of man's collective frame. Women can fuck up all around us but at least the ones in our lives will have to answer to that guilty feeling she gets after getting fucked and chucked. If they want to collectively devalue themselves to a worn out fleshlight and an expired uterus then fine, but we're not giving them our paycheck and a whore's sure as fuck not getting my commitment. Red Pill Men are a rare breed in that we're men who actually value our own lives and well being enough to pursue and prioritize them. Feminists stole that self-respect from the aggregate of all men but they'll never take it from us; the world might crumble to support the myth but we sure as hell won't.
No kind of representative government e.g. "democracy" or "republic" can work without ethnic, cultural, and religious unity.
The US has been fucked ever since giving blacks the vote, actually even before that, by allowing large numbers of Jews in to corrupt a society which was initially built by WASPs and based on English Law. Moving to a "secular" state concept, which was never envisioned by the Founders, ruined all hope. All the societies of Europe which have followed suit are fucked as well.
(one can also make an argument that even with homogeneity, the idea of universal suffrage is flawed and at the very least there should be a literacy test and a means test to avoid conflicts of interest - I think the history of the US shows clearly that letting women vote was a mistake)
Japan's "right" keeps winning because they don't have 7 million Jews living in their political, financial, and media capital cities, nor did they have Jews making a "long march through the institutions" and polluting their schools for almost 100 years.
Also, they never had 12-15% of their population as sub-Saharan African imports who could never aspire to actually participate in society, yet who were granted full suffrage, nor do they share a long land border with welfare invaders who, while less violent than Africans, are also unable to fully participate.
Sanders is giving progressive proletarians a respectable way to express their natural anxieties about the deluge of Third World laborers because such people are unable to admit to holding reactionary prejudices. He's rediscovering the Old Left's demotic strategy of appealing to selfish, tribal impulses by using the language of selflessness and solidarity at a time when America's white workers feel left out by the New Left's obsession with minorities.
Asian men will not learn on this sub and will still keeping believing not all women are like that. Which no shit Sherlock, not all women are like that because humans always have outliers in every single group. Obviously your mother and sister are different because you do not have sexual relationships with them.
All women are like that. You're not exactly mapping the genome here. It's in their nature. Their nature! Men can learn to rewire their nature yet notice all is quiet on the female front in that regard. Hmm I wonder why?
You fucking idiots it's because they know they're like that and don't want to change! Wake up! ALL women are like that. And no, I don't want to hear about the 0.0001% of women who aren't.
Problem with not all women are like that is that any woman can posses some qualities of the idealized woman you have in your mind. But to be a myth you must have all of those qualities. But as far as any discussion goes people discuss only one single quality at time, so clearly there might be a quite large group of women who have such quality but in essence there is no such thing because they're not the perfect woman. Hence they will never be your allies.
The amount of cringe, entitlement, and saltiness in the average SJW tweet personality is off-putting to women, who generally just want to have stress-free fun with no obligations with a high value man, who they feel will take care of them and is in control. No one wants to be serious or talk about serious shit at 3 am saturday night.
If a woman says she does, she is putting up an anti-slut defense plausible deniability to justify herself after her one night stand with Chad Thundercock ("Oh it just happened! We really had a connection over orphan children...yep that's why!"). But I guarantee you that same woman is not going home with a 5'5" ugly fat awkward slob, regardless if he tweets about Syrian refugees and affirmative action.
Single mothers are complete and utter mother fucking subhuman scum 99.9% of the time. If she's not a widow, she's scum. The statistics for kids raised by single mothers shows all manner of dysfunction (poverty, mental illness, crime) for kids raised by single mothers, but not widows. So as far as I'm concerned widows are cool it's not their fault the dad died, they're not making bad decisions but shit happens.
But single mothers - they play the victim angle like a motherfucker and all the SJWs/politically correct bluepillers make the wild fucking assumption that it's not the woman's fault, revoking all agency or blame from the dumb silly bitch who chose to raise a kid alone. But the sheep don't see it like that, they start making all these wild accusations that the father was probably abusive or violent and that's why she raised the kid alone.
It's presumed the mother is a victim of circumstance even though 99% of the time she created the circumstances she's in not only for herself, but for her kid(s.) And it's presumed the father is an asshole, but most the time he was a horny guy begged not to use a condom and told she was on the pill when she wasn't. So she gets pregnant and keeps the kid. Sometimes these guys don't even know they have a kid until they get a child support notice out of thin air. Then the poor guy gets fucking berated for being a deadbeat when all he did was fuck a woman under the presumption it was recreational sex and that no baby would be born.
If bitches are deceiving guys into fatherhood, and then crying victim when it backfires because he refuses to defer to her deceit, tough shit for her. The only victim here as far as I'm concerned is the child. She tricked the guy she fucked, tried to force him to become a parent, and when he wouldn't, tried to ruin his reputation and extract wealth. That is some fucked up shit. But hardly anybody sees it from that perspective, do they? Naturally, bitches be crazy and society is all jumped up on the sycophancy of feminism and the woman are wonderful effect, so she's blameless and he's just a cunt. People are so single-minded and intent on blaming the father it's unbelievable. If your father is never there for you growing up, there's a good fucking chance that's your mothers fault.
But no, everyone acts like she's this marvellous creature for forcing her kid(s) to struggle for THEIR ENTIRE LIVES. And that the guy is probably some dark triad woman/kid abusing asshole.
It's total fucking bullshit. Very few men are violent or abusive, that's complete lying utter horseshit used to smear the male name and justify the child abuse that is raising kids without a father.
No, the truth is, mummy was somebody's plate/one night stand and thought it would be a wise idea to not use protection AND THEN keep the kid. Her body, her choice, right? Does this oft gloated feminist principle not fucking extend to the responsibility of giving and raising life too?
It makes me sick how everybody rallies to the aid of single mothers and exclaims how hard they have it and how everyone should feel sorry for them. Fuck that. Fuck them. They had a choice didn't they? I mean a whore has a fucking choice to take a pill, or get an implant or terminate. Or a million other things. The kid had no fucking choice to be born and go through all the dysfunction that awaits it. The kid is a total innocent and the mother, a cunt.
I reserve all my sympathy for the boys and (to some extent, the girls) who grow up fatherless and fucking despise the child-abusing fucks that single mothers are. They are total fucking scum contributing to the complete and utter degeneracy of our society morally, spiritually, socially and economically. Total fucking scum. Again, it is total bullshit that the huge amount of kids who have no father all had asshole fathers who abused the mother/kid when most men in society are complete fucking betas. That's just not plausible. This is simple female blame-shifting mixed with misandry.
I have 0% empathy for these broads. How the fuck can I when I see how they destroy their children? Only the children are blameless. Their sons are welcome on TRP and their daughters, RPW. If you are the son of a single mother, don't worry. We got you. And single mothers who for whatever reason read TRP, you're like HIV - a fucking pathogen.
Exactly. At very least my dad was a sinophile and japanophile and respected the culture more. Little did he know we are poorly suited as individuals, as Hapas, let alone half of a "nice white guy" to compete in the modern market.
Asian men brought it on themselves by still engaging in society. Your daughters, your flesh and blood are mattresses for conquering races. Yet you allowed his by contributing their birth.
Do any women feel distressed by the thought that the female emancipation essentially leads to the destruction of society and the unhappiness of several men?
With feminism and the sexual liberation , women were able to achieve certain "rights" (or whatever you call them)like being able to be politically active, to choose who to marry and who to have sex with , to own property etc. but this essentially means that a significant amount of men get left out . In other words women don't have to depend financially on certain low SMV men so they don't consider them as sexual options. This also means that essentially marriage is declining too , there are lower birth rates which causes economic problems and if we continue like this Western Civilization will probably be weakened mainly because of female liberation .
Knowing this , how can women continue to live their lives and be motivated to succeed in life if it is in expense of other people and civilization in general ? Assuming you don't want to live individualistically , how can you find the motivation to look for a job, to vote in the elections or even to find a relationship knowing that these privileges destroy civilization and create so many frustrated individuals ?
Just don't work yourself to death and become a beta provider dad. There is like 100% chance that their daughter would turn out to be one of these white dick riding ho's. You would rather be deadbeat than be one of those Asian dads.
The willingness of many people to publicly accept the liberal agenda is done only out of fear of punishment by the liberal media and government -- behind closed doors their real opinions are shared. They are forced from a very young age to accept it by all of the voices of authority in school and media, at threat of very clear punishment, to the extent that many live dual lives of secrecy. Eventually things will be so destabilized by the increasing absurdities of liberal oppression (such as the mockery that is same-sex marriage), that conservatives will shift rightwards very rapidly and a populist right-wing movement will arise, which will also have basically all of the guns. The Internet has done a lot to deconstruct old media hegemony and allow for free-thinking people to escape the obligatory programming. At this time of reckoning, the proponents of liberal agenda will be revealed as the enemies of God that they are and handled appropriately.
I have no respect for our government or its "founding principles." I uphold traditional Christianity, not Enlightenment, anti-Catholic liberalism, which has resulted in the disgusting, fallen society we have today. Toss the Constitution out, and institute a Catholic monarchy over the United States.
The founders and many of the early Americans were heretics and schismatics and outright non-Christians like Jefferson, I don't put much weight in their opinions or their tolerance of a "diversity of beliefs" which has now reached its inevitable logical end and come to accommodate outright, literal Satanism.
None of the present-day liberal activists have any respect for our founding fathers, either; they constantly critique their personal morality, their decision to allow guns, their tolerance of free speech aka "hate speech", support for religious liberty, etc. so if you think what I'm saying is particularly evil you should consider their views are basically identical, except they want to replace the US with a socialist state instead of a Catholic one.
So far as I can tell, nobody takes the failed American experiment seriously anymore aside for a handful of old boomers, who won't last much longer. Due to this rejection, everyone's gone authoritarian in one direction or the other, and I've made my choice in this regard.
To be clear, I am not exactly Humphrey Bogart myself. I grew up to be even less of a man than I thought I would. I don't go to office. I don't wear a suit. I don't go to see the philharmonic, smoke a pipe or wear pajamas. I have not read one book about the Civil War. Instead of disciplining my son, I explain why his misbehaviour won't get him ahead in the world. My son is two.
What I didn't figure on, however, was that the rest of my generation would mature even less than I did.
I am a grown man and I am regularly asked by other men - some of whom are 40 or older - if I've seen movies about the Hulk, Captain America and Thor. Some of these men proudly tell me they frequent comic-book stores. People are aghast when I don't know current rules governing vampires and zombies. I go to dinner parties where I am served cupcakes. Every time I'm excited about a new restaurant opened by one of the world's most talented chefs, I find out it is selling burgers, pizza or hot dogs.
I live in a society in which childless adult couples see Pixar movies on dates, get married inside Cinderella's castle at Disney World, play Angry Birds on their phones and read The Hunger Games. Dad I know go to Phish concerts where they do drugs, dance pass around giant balloons and listen to fucking Phish. One guy I know who has a great job and a great wife also has a great life-size Star Wars Stormtrooper in his screening room. Even before the Great Recession, it was totally normal for people to live at home for a few years after college and then, after moving out, remain on their parents' cell phone plan.
In no society in history would I be an acceptable adult: I write penis jokes (almost) for a living, can't fix anything in my house and have a vocabulary that consist mostly of the words cool, awesome, psyched and bummer.
Modern popular culture is even worse than reality. Sure, the heroes of Judd Apatow movies mature, but they clear a pretty low bar: Seth Rogen gives up pot to raise his baby; Jason Segel gets married after five years of engagement; Steve Carell hides his collectible toys to lose his virginity at 40. If our grandfathers could see us, the wouldn't beat us up. They'd spank us.
We are indeed the softest generation. If we'd have to fight WW2, we would have come up with reasons the Germans weren't that bad. That's right: We have become so soft we're French.
To be clear, I am not asking men to be History Channel reality-show stars- hunting, camping, heli-logging and doing other things that don't have much to do with history. I just want them to read a book without wizards in it, listen to a song that isn't about going to a club and sometimes wear clothing other than jeans. It's gotten so bad that even the president of Iran doesn't wear a tie. And Iran is not casual country.
This extreme childishness wear better on women who can get away with cutesiness longer than we can. Sure, they can go too far and wind up as one of those ladies who go pack the back window of their cars with Beanie Babies. But the abnegation of responsibility is the antithesis of manliness. And yes, that's how adults are supposed to talk.
So how can we become a men again and reverse this pussification?
I do not know.
