Hate and discrimination against the disabled
Nope.
Autism is a developmental disability. That means we often share more in common with children that neurotypical adults. Any reason to “dislike” a child is also something disabled adults do. Vocal stims are noisy. Sensory seeking behavior can be gross. I’m not going to treat a vulnerable minority badly because of something they can’t control.
If you can’t even stand to look at a baby, your issues are deeper than your disability.
(Article was originally posted on December 23, 2025.)
Safalta Kartik, a visually impaired woman from Jabalpur, is on the verge of becoming a teacher after completing her final B.Ed exams – an achievement carved out through years of struggle against disability, poverty, and indifference.
But last Saturday at the Prince of Peace Church in Jabalpur’s Kattanga area, Safalta was allegedly abused verbally, manhandled, and publicly humiliated by Anju Bhargav, the BJP’s district vice president, while attending a Christmas lunch with around 200 visually impaired students from the government-run Andhmukh School. Bhargav allegedly went so far as to say Safalta should be born blind even in her next life.
[…]
Safalta went to the church along with her eight-year-old niece. She recalled, “We went there, listened to some songs and were sitting peacefully when suddenly I started hearing loud noises. My niece was sitting next to me when a woman approached her, held her hand and asked why she had come there.”
Safalta intervened immediately. She said, “I told her to talk to me, not to the child." That, Safalta alleged, triggered a volley of abuses.
“The woman started shouting at me, saying, 'Despite wearing sindoor, you have come to a church to convert. You seem to be into prostitution, and you have brought this child here for that’,” alleged Safalta. “She told me I was blind in this birth because of my past deeds and that I would be born blind again in my next life for coming to a church.”
When Safalta asked her to stop misbehaving, the woman allegedly turned violent. “She tried to grab my hand. I held hers to stop her, but she kept abusing me. Then she grabbed my mouth while shouting. I tried to push her hand away. Only then did someone intervene and stop it,” claimed Safalta.
I think BPDemons would mostly stop existing without males, too. Most BPDs have been understandably conditioned to feel insecure, because their attachments legitimately are insecure, and/or they were raised by mothers who were conditioned the same way. Obviously after living like that for enough time, you can’t ever go back to normal, but I bet if you disappeared men from earth, BPD would be “cured” within 2 generations.
BPD should be renamed born with penis disorder, because it’s a male patterned operative. Excessive fixation on external validation and acceptance, phobic of rejection, neurotic about maintaining attachments, constant shit testing to ensure security. Basically, describing a small gamete’s default relationship with a large gamete. BPD is just NPD without leverage, and NPD is what scrotes get when you artificially give control off the egg over to the sperm.
Misogyny and patriarchy basically flipped the roles of the sexes and forced women to be dependent on transactional male validation, which can be revoked at any point for any reason, and often is, and usually only manifests in exploitation. Males offload their BPD on women whenever they get the chance, and upgrade themselves to NPD. Remove males and the world will heal in more ways than you can imagine.
DarthCloakedGuy: Some people are parasites all their adult lives too, but all joking aside
I consider life to begin at conception. It's the only milestone that makes logical sense to me. Some would say it's when the heart starts beating, but you can be a human without a heart, and that's just one organ of many. Some would say it's when neural activity begins-- and that makes much more sense, but at the same time it's hard to gauge when it happens, my understanding is it's a fairly gradual process.
Others say it's when the baby exits the mother, which is the most bizarre to me, since it's just a change in location, nothing intrinsic.
But conception is the moment it meets all the criteria to be a unique, distinct, living human lifeform.
I disagree. Embryoes especially aren't unique and distinct. Hell, identical twins disprove the "from conception" argument, since the separation occurs one to five days after conception. I also find it hard to declare a parasitical bundle of cells provably distinct or living. Tumors are also distinct and living, but they aren't human. Chimeras are technically two unique and distinct living human lifeforms combined into one, and we don't consider them two people, though we do consider conjoined twins two people. It's way more complex than that.
And the fact that we can keep a braindead body "alive" or that you can be clinically dead but then come back to life makes it illogical to me to think that the sheer existence of DNA makes something human.
projectisaac I think we can all agree n-n-no human deserves any inherent right to exist, no-*burp*-thing gives a crap about anyone, and that all life is m-meaningless and painful anyway.