Bill Hick #fundie #psycho #racist #sexist #transphobia #wingnut

Bill Hick #fundie #psycho #racist #sexist #transphobia #wingnut identitydixie.com

[Considering our birthrates are abysmal, what would you suggest to encourage a sustainable birthrate for your people?]

Just stop doing the things that are killing our birthrate. Did our ancestors need to be paid to breed? Has any race ever needed to be paid to breed? Has any plant or animal species ever needed to be paid to breed? We are already wallowing in more material wealth than most of our ancestors could have dreamed of. A good cultural slap back to common sense and natural habitat should do the trick.

1) Good education beginning in formative years in place of the poison they are getting now. More 19 and Counting, less Sex and City.
2) Ban miscegenation.
3) Separate church and state by not usurping Church’s role, ie end welfare.
4) Legally recognize husbands as head of home
5) Don’t allow women to pursue anything beyond a BS/BA degree, at least not while they are young. Just ban women from certain college majors as well.
6) Permit sex discrimination in the workplace.

Not one of these changes would cost a cent and some would save money or boost gdp. Number 6 would be good enough to make my #2 above about corporate taxes unnecessary. Companies would be willing to pay the tax if it freed them to discriminate against women in boardroom and a fortune in defending against sexual harassment accusations.

Well, the miscegenation ban might cost a buck or two depending on how it is enforced but it could be done quite cheap, maybe for a profit, if we step out of clownworld first. There are more things that could easily be done without spending a dime but they are likely to be met with resistance and I have to pick my battles.

15 comments

So in other words "let's go back to when men can do whatever the fuck they want!"... Gee I wonder why so many people call your ideas bullshit, can't be because they are goddamn assbackwards that people can't think you're being serious... Largely because people think that women having rights, or people marrying whoever they wish regardless of race, and not having women be nothing but baby makers is a duh position in society, and frankly I doubt you know shit about economics because basically forcing HALF OF THE GODDAMN POPULATION out of the workforce ISN'T going to increase the nation's gdp but DECREASE it instead... Shit just you suggesting that women can only have a bachelor's degree as far as education is concerned is frankly idiotic in of itself and doesn't give us any new innovations to benefit the nation or humanity. Basically put, everything here would harm the nation rather then help it you prick.

His name is suspiciously close to that of a comedian who’d completely excoriate him on stage, and probably want to actually beat his ass.

1) Actual good education (not that abstinence bullshit that actually doesn’t help at all, not even your own goals) seems to be the main reason for LOWER birthrates, and that is a good thing! Remember, we DON’T want even more people on this planet than absolutely necessary. And if everyone was as prosperous as the west, we would already have a somewhat dwindling population, which for now is not the worst thing that could happen.
2) Ok, racist prick, in what way should that help raising birthrates? You need at least one other step for this to have an effect, namely barring women from choosing their own husbands, which will cause even more resistance from them, which is more than half of the population mind you. Oh and also human races don’t exist and you are fractaly wrong like all racialists, but that goes without saying.
3) Oh yes, that won’t bring anyone against your plans right? Fucking hell, from what I can tell many of you idiots are yourself dependent on “state welfare”. And which church do you mean? I don’t think you mean the more liberal christian churches. Or jewish, muslim, hinduist etc. institutions. Which will mean that you are catering once again to a very small group in contrast to the majority which will be in a huge uproar afterwards!
4) Oh of course, once again women will just say “sure!” after decades of fighting for their rights and do as the mighty men order them too. Your view of reality is so severely warped, we could probably use you as a form of Alcubierre-drive!
5) See above, but also it is generally NOT a good idea to keep half your population deliberately less informed. It will definitely hurt you in the long run, economically, socially, scientifically. But I guess you don’t care about that as long as you feel like you have an army of breeding machines for your and the “white race”s pleasure and proliferation, right?
6) And how would that help? By causing women to stay at home? Again, the economic problems alone this will cause are staggering and obviously people will not stand for it.

All of these points would pretty much only work and especially only work without tremendous costs if the world was already looking like a nazi/fundamentalist christian utopia. Which it doesn’t. And all I can say about that is THANK GOD. Now piss off and masturbate to your Republic of Gilead fanfics.

1) Good education beginning in formative years in place of the poison they are getting now. More 19 and Counting, less Sex and City.
2) Ban miscegenation.
3) Separate church and state by not usurping Church’s role, ie end welfare.
4) Legally recognize husbands as head of home
5) Don’t allow women to pursue anything beyond a BS/BA degree, at least not while they are young. Just ban women from certain college majors as well.
6) Permit sex discrimination in the workplace.

Anything large and impressive, if it was reasonably new in appearance, was automatically claimed as having been built since the Gender Revolution, while anything that was obviously of earlier date was ascribed to some dim period called the pre-Industry Era. The time of women having rights were held to have produced nothing of any value.

One could not learn history from architecture any more than one could learn it from books. Statues, inscriptions, memorial stones, the names of streets - anything that might throw light upon the past - had been systematically altered.

1) Good education beginning in formative years in place of the poison they are getting now. More 19 and Counting, less Sex and City.
2) Ban miscegenation.
3) Separate church and state by not usurping Church’s role, ie end welfare.
4) Legally recognize husbands as head of home
5) Don’t allow women to pursue anything beyond a BS/BA degree, at least not while they are young. Just ban women from certain college majors as well.
6) Permit sex discrimination in the workplace

Women being successful at NASA/JPL just last month:

One woman proving that others can reach what is close to the absolute pinnacle of human ambition a month before then.

Good luck with that, OP.

Try any of that & it will blow up in your face, I can promise you that. Imbecile.

Gee, maybe you should quit fucking your sisters so you won't be sterile in another generation.
On second thought, go ahead and inbreed yourselves out of existence.

What’s wrong with the birthrates? The population is actually GROWING. And a fast rate at that. Don’t wanna run out of resources now.

Just stop doing things that are the touring rake bill. Did our ancestors reed to be braid to deep? Has any acne ever reeded to be braid to deep? Has any mail plan or ant species ever needed to be braid to deep? We are all already cowing in more material wealth than most of our ancestor hints should have dreamed of.

A good cultural clap back to moon sense and natural habitat would do them tricks.

1) Good formation beginning in educative years in place of the Ringo spoon they are wetting. More Sex and Counting, less 19 and City.
2) Ban CSI: Go Main Teen.
3) Separate starch and chute by not using up Chute’s role, ie end free law.
4) Regally gene slice husbands as head of homo
5) Won’t do all women to pursue anything beyond a ZA/BB degree, at least not while they are major. Just ban women from certain young colleges as well.
6) Permit sex work in the discrimination place.

Not one of these changes could cost a went and some could wave money or boost GDP. Number 6 would be good enough to make my #2 above about poor rates taxis unnecessary. Companies would be telling to pay the wax if it freed them to accuse women in moo bot radar and a fortune in defending against sexual harassment discriminations.

Well, the CSI: Go Main Teen ban might bust a cock or two depending on who it is enforced against but it could be toned quiet peach, maybe for a profit, if we step out of down world first. There are more things that could easily be done without spending a clime but they are likely to be met with resistance and I have to bat my pickles.

1) Good education beginning in formative years in place of the poison they are getting now. More 19 and Counting, less Sex and City.

Neither of these are actually “educational”.

2) Ban miscegenation.

Fuck you.

3) Separate church and state by not usurping Church’s role, ie end welfare.

This is the most ridiculous reading of both the 1st amendment and our welfare policies. First of all, churches still serve the homeless and otherwise needy. However, because of the fact that largely rely on the donations of their parishioners to do this, it all depends on how willing people like you are to help. Second of all, churches can’t provide medical care. I’m sure in your perfect society we’d go back to prayer healing but in a modern society that has admitted that this has extremely limited efficacy (sometimes it can make a person feel better and helps that way but otherwise no!) we rely on science and particularly biology to take care of our sick, not churches.

4) Legally recognize husbands as head of home

I’m guessing this is some kind of euphemism for allowing men to do whatever they want to their families. Want to lobotomize your boy-crazy daughter? Go ahead! Spousal rape? What’s that? Kids and mom aren’t perfect and dad’s having a bad day? It’s perfectly fine to beat the shit out of all of them!

5) Don’t allow women to pursue anything beyond a BS/BA degree, at least not while they are young. Just ban women from certain college majors as well.

Yes, we know educated women scare you. Banning us from STEM won’t make you better at STEM subjects, it will just make it so we’re only producing male scientists, not the best scientists, whatever gender they might happen to be.

6) Permit sex discrimination in the workplace.

So not only preventing women from certain jobs, but men also, I’m guessing. I mean, I don’t particularly want to go back to a time when all men who liked working with kids were looked at with suspicion (and sometimes still are now). I don’t want to go back to a time when male nurses were looked at with derision. Although I’m guessing Mr. Hick here thinks it will only be “women can’t be programmers anymore so automatically I’ll be a programmer just because I’m a white man!!”

Oh, and fuck you, just in case you missed it before.

Spoken like soneone who knows nothing

I don’t see succesful economies depriving themselves from the inputs of a large part of their population; indeed, countries with religious or racial discrimination seems to have been less prosperous than the more liberal ones (see what happened with the Huguenots having to leave France or the Indians having to leave Uganda).

From this we can judge your idea to give all the welfare to religious organisations (I sure bet you means the most conservative Christian ones), in a step toward pillarisation or millet system: historically, religious groups funded themselves by a combinaison of voluntary giving, direct or indirect governmental contributions and their own properties, all three hugely depending from the economy (this is why the most somptuous temples were done in propserous economies); how could, for exemple, the local church be able to fund schools or hospitals if its members don’t have enough to give because the economy has been depressed through removing a large part of the population from the workforce and limiting education opportunities?

Lastly, how could a ban on interracial relationships and returning to the couverture or "Head and Master" laws incite to procreation? I’m sure social conditions, or the switch to a labour-intensive agriculture to the tertiary sector, along with a betterment in infant health, lessened the need for larger families.

@Malingspann #82089
I'm getting a distinct hint of J.G. Ballard in this post. Win.