an underdeveloped thought:
Thoughts? Opinions?
13 comments
“Thoughts?”
Honestly wish I could see any sapient thought put into this, that is however not the case.
“Opinions? “
You obviously cannot into logic. Or disagreeing points of view. Or indeed reality.
- God isn’t known to exist.
- LGBT people are known to exist.
- Conclusion: LGBT lives > God’s Word?
You are absolutely right.
It is an underdeveloped thought. I don't think many fundies can match that clarity of reflection and honesty.
Now, you don't seem to realize why exactly, which is unfortunate.
Here's a hint. Premise one isn't demonstrable and premises 2 and 3 are opinions based off a dubious premise.
The god of Abraham is an abusive, incredibly immature and confusing father figure. Not love.
I’m not sure bigots really understand what love is.
Your 'Opinion' can be destroyed by this superior thought:
Romans 13:1-7.
2013 Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act.
Obergefell vs. Hodges.
Rainbows prove that your 'God' is having very gay Love.
Josh Buggar & Roy Less - via their homophobic 'Opinions' being destroyed by what was revealed about them - mean that the whole concept of 'Sin' has no right to exist.
Conclusion: The fact that your 'God' only has the right to STFU in perpetuity because even he doesn't have the right to have 'Opinions' means that you only have the right to (check one):
[ ] Be like a hyper-tolerant Unitarian Universalist and admit that LGBT people - consenting adults - have more than every right in the world to Love as they want: and you only have the right to agree with them
[ ] Be like an Atheist like me: admit that your 'God' never existed in the first place, and natural shit happens with certain people. Oh, and this Atheist - a straight man - is pro -LGBT rights
Choose wisely, OP.
My thoughts? Fine, that’s quite the leap in “logic” (and I use the term loosely) just to reconcile your bigotry (which is fear and hatred) with your faith in God (which is supposedly love).
Here’s a hint, an easier way to be faithful to a loving god is to NOT be a bigoted douchenozzle.
@Anon-e-moose #86797
I legitimately cackled like I had just gotten a new dalmation puppy-skin coat when I heard what Duggar got caught with. (I refuse to use his first name as it's also my brother's name. Fuck this mumple, he doesn't deserve my brother's name, I shall call him Vladislav.) It's horrible what he did, it's always horrible when he does things, but it tickles my schadenfreude just right when the "Moral Majority” gets caught with their figurative and literal pants down. Mummy and Dadsy can't send this creeper to a farm upstate to dodge consequences this time, can they? I hope he gets the Epstein Suite, with Bob Murray as his guard.
It won't mean a damn thing to the GQP monkeys, they'll wave their banner for these monsters right into the yawning abyss just for the dopamine tingle of pwning duh libs, but it's still so fucking nice to know how right we were about these scumbags.
Logically this goes:
1. A = B
Your argument is logically incoherent.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
