“Scientific truths often turn out to be false,”
Really?
Um, are they actually OFFERED as truths, though?
Or do they use phrases like ‘current theory’ or ‘present understanding’ which means it’s not so shattering if we find evidence that falsifies it?
"However, let's look at some of the scientific truths that turned out to be anything but.”
“Archaeoraptor, the new missing link featured in NationalGeographic, later turned out to be a skeleton of different species of birds and dinosaurs struck together by man.”
And they printed a retraction, right?
Has anyone who ever championed any of the 19 or so Burial Shrouds of Christ admitted that their relic was a fake?
“The following were all hoaxes: Java Man (1891), Piltdown Man (1912), Nebraska Man (1922), Peking Man (1926), Neanderthal Man (1929).”
You’re a lying sack of shit.
Piltdown man was a hoax.
Nebraska man was a mistake.
The rest is just bullshit claims by creationists.
“The following quote is from evolutionist D. Watson: "The theory of evolution is universally accepted not because it can be proven, but because the only alternative is special creation (by God), which is clearly incredible."
Yes, science cannot use supernatural elements in its theories.
This is not a flex, it’s how science works.
“The explosion of Mount St. Helens left sediment layers that look just like the geologic sediments that evolutionists said took millions of years to form.”
Now, just find a geologist who cannot tell the difference between sedimentary rock and volcanic deposits.
“Darwin expected that millions of transitional fossils would be found - animals changing into other animals, but they have never found one.”
‘Darwin expected’ isn’t really a ‘scientific truth,’ though. Darwin was wrong, we know more about evolution these days. We know that every fossil is a transitional form.
“Hawaiian lava only a few years old”
You do know that the rock coming out of a volcano existed before the eruption, right?
“Conversely, a creationist view of the universe has not only never been disproved or found to be a hoax”
Paluxy tracks come quickly to mind.
“Do not dismiss the Bible in lieu of unproven theories that have been shoved down your throat since grade school.”
No, but naturalistic science (part of hte definition, really) dismisses magic.
“hink about it. Does the human body with the brain and all its amazing functions scream intelligent design or random chance?”
Trial and error is a design process, not intelligent nor is it random.