“Interesting thing I keep seeing in this thread: over and over it's stated that evolution is true,”
Meh. Truth is philosophical.
“ a fact, real science,”
Yes, that’s accurate.
“ etc. How absurd.”
That you don’t understand it or are unwilling to accept it is not evidence against it.
“Not one shred of evidence is available for evolution, and I find it interesting how much people will stand on evolution as fact, almost in a panic.”
We’re not the ones in a panic. Denying ALL OF THE EVIDENCE is pretty impressive, though.
“Also stated is that Creationism is anti-science.”
It needs the supernatural. Science is purely naturalistic.
So, yeah. by definition.
“Oh, and of course, evolution IS science, right? Wait, neither were observed."
That’s not the requirement for the scientific method. Repeatable observations do NOT require an eyewitness. If they did, no CSI could convict without an eye witness.
“Neither have been repeated."
Again, you misunderstand ‘repeatable observations.’
“So if we didn't see it happen and we can't make it happen, sorry folks, neither is science.”
Wrong.
“Both are a BELIEF OF ORIGINS.”
Wronger.
“So where does science come into play? Simple: we can use science as a tool to test our theories of our beliefs. Over and over the evidence to support Creation is overwhelming to the point of saying "enough already with the fairy tale of evolution".”
Oh, your starting premise is overwhelming? How surprising.
It’s just not science.
“But, the evidence for evolution? Totally NONE, and that's admitted by some evolutionists.”
No, it’s really not.
“ It's time you be honest with yourself and seriously ask why you Rebel against our Creator.”
With or without a Creator, evolution is real. The evidence is ever-mounting. You just need Genesis to be literal for no reason i can discern.