An alleged "heathen" that didn't exist at the time of the mythological character Solomon? Not the best argument to begin a serious discussion... Imagined things... like you just did? Falsehoods are "absolute truth" that people should somehow center their life around? People stand against your imaginary deity, an obvious personalization of human weaknesses, because that is evidence against its divinity and power? Or they perhaps believe in a benevolent one above that savagery? You're right, it's okay not to obey you, especially when you falsely claim to represent god and to know what it wants. If you would like a special favor, ask for it politely, instead of trying to dictate and coerce. If you would like an intellectually honest discussion, yelling judgmental demonization sermons from rooftops is something else... You refer to ethics while ironically being unable to realize why your approach is not ethical. Just like your are tainting the reputation of your particular god, with human bigotry and by violating some of the most popular sayings attributed to your prophet. Inconvenient, isn't it?
(Added in another edit)
Unfortunately it happens in the real world, that people justify savagery using cherry picked verses from tradition. For it to be a bit less dramatic and more entertaining, let's imagine the creation of a video game character's "moral" with choice questions:
<n>) You hear a rumor about your neighbor. Faced with hunger, they stole for 1/4 shekel of grain to feed their family. Thou:
a) wonder if it could happen to you in times of hardship and decide to inquire if they can now meet their needs.
b) stone the wretch.