“When I commented: “No atheist can even slightly support atheism intelligently,” Elizabeth Dresser responded with “Why so arrogant, Ray?””
Arrogant? I suspect it’s a lie.
Ray is preaching to the choir, not actually debating with atheists, and telling the faithful what they want to hear. His arguments with atheists are carefully edited.
“It’s not arrogant to say that atheism is foolishness. The Bible says that (see Psalm 14:1, Psalm 53:1, Romans 1:22) and Sir Isaac Newton (“the Father of Science”) rightly called atheism “senseless.””
That’s not supporting your opening statement, bananaman.
“Should a man be called "intelligent" if he believes that a 747 could be the result of an explosion that threw it together?”
NO one believes that. This is an example of Ray telling untruths for effect.
“Everyone knows that explosions don’t produce order,”
This is incorrect. Forensics can tell a great deal about what caused an explosion because there are things that can be expected to occur for different types of accelerant and fuel. That’s order.
That’s also not the sort of ‘bang’ that BBT describes, but again, facts are not your goal.
“let alone engines, wings, an electrical system, seating, carpet, air conditioning, row numbers, doors, instruments, etc.”
Strawman.
“Such a man is a fool in the truest sense of the word, and those who think he is intelligent are just as foolish.”
Still not supporting your initial claim, are you?