“So first we disprove their little liberal evolution theory on the basis of unsatisfactory evidence,”
That’s not a disproof. That’s just you rejecting evidence because you don’t like the conclusion. Not QUITE the same as showing an error in the methodology or that fraud was involved.
“and suddenly POOF, they have more fossils which just happen to perfectly fit into the huge holes in their theories.”
Feel free to find any sign of fraud in the theory being validated as factual…
“You have to be pretty naive for fall for such a simpleminded trick!”
Hmmm. Reality knocks on your door. You’re under your bed, head in a football helmet,screaming, “I’m TOO SOPHISTICATED for that!”
“You choose to mock God”
No, I mock a superstitious belief that you cherish over reality.
“ but yet you have no problem believing in such idiotic monstrosities as diplodocus or stegosaurus or archeopterix.”
Which have withstood rather a LOT of scrutiny. Feel free to show any fraud…
“I mean, come on! If you're going to fool people, at least TRY to be convincing.”
Well, about 95% of all scientists are convinced.
“Evolution theory is simply laughable.”
Hebephrenia is treatable.