new

Darwinism should have been thrown out long ago, because there is no evidence to support his beliefs in the progression of an ameba (so to speak) to all that we see around us.

1. The sun, shrinking at a constant rate, would have been much to large and close to provide the right atmosphere for life to begin. Especially start on their own.

2. Dating method has been proven wrong when we date the rocks that we saw form on the eruption of Mt. Washington to be between half a million and 2.8 million years old.

3. Again, when talking about the parent elements and dating based on half lives, scientists assume that the daughter element means that the parent was 100% parent and not a mix, which would indeed throw off the dating. This happened in the Mt. Washington case when we discovered too much argon in the rocks.

4. The "Geologic Column" has not been proven as of yet. For example a man in China found a crustacian from the Cambrian period and guess what was found just a few layers above where it wasn't supposed to be. A Tiger.

All that I am saying is that based on equal research, I don't see much credit in the Theory of Evolution, for example again the most complicated cells have propellers that propel them and have to work together at an enormous rate... The chances of that just happening, even over millions of years seem ridiculous...

And yes, I understand that just because evolution might be wrong, that does not mean Godidit.

(there's much more stupid where this came from)

"Oh this Evolution crap again!!!

How many times has it been proven that an amoeba's genetic system no matter what mutagenic substance it becomes exposed to won't mutate into that of a nematode, for crying out loud! I just can't imagine this crap becoming a theory in the first place. it shouldn't have gone past the hypothesis level. Since transforming one genetic system into another will probably never be accomplished in the laboratory, anything that this evolution crap assumes as an amoeba "evolving" into a multicellular organism should only be taken as mere speculation and nothing more.

And these evolutionists even have the guts to classify Latimeria sp. as a "Lazarus taxon." HAHAH LMFAO. What? Something resurrected from the dead? HAHAH LMFAO. The bewildering resurfacing of the coelacanth (Latimeria sp.) is what i think to be the proverbial nail that seals the coffin of this "theory" of evolution. This lobe-finned fish and its cousins were thought to be the source of the missing link for fishes & amphibians. they first appeared during the Devonian Age and thought to have been extinct since the Cretaceous 6 million yrs ago. Unfortunately for evolutionists & atheists, a coelacanth species appeared off the coast of S Africa in 1938, after a long, long absence from the 'evolutionary' stage, amazingly unchanged after millions of years of existence, proving that its genetic system has remained stable through all those years. I'm sure a lot of evolutionists have been scratching their heads ever since. HAHAH LMFAO

The theory of evolution is just a HOPELESS DELUSION of atheists. I'd like to be counted as one among many who strongly advocate that this alleged "theory" be only taught to graduate students of SPECULATIVE BIOLOGY! It's really nothing more than stupid religion for those with "amoeboid consciousness." HAHAH LMFAO"