#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

Pomidor Quixote and Mr Justice Hayden #sexist #wingnut dailystormer.name

[From "British Judge Says Sex With Wife is a “Fundamental Human Right” and Everyone Loses Their Minds"]

The Jewish media puts sex everywhere to make people think about it constantly, but the Jews also make heterosexual sex much more difficult to achieve by introducing convoluted ideas about “consent” and about what marriage is supposed to be.

One man is taking a stand against that bullshit. This judge is bringing old ideas and common sense back into the discussion about the role of marriage in our society, and he’s doing all of that by… saying that a husband should be able to have sex with his wife.

RT wrote:

A British judge has invoked the ire of online commentators, activists and politicians after remarking that it was a man’s “fundamental human right” to have sex with his wife during an already controversial court case.

I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife… I think he is entitled to have it properly argued,” senior High Court judge Justice Hayden was quoted as saying during a preliminary hearing on a case involving a married couple of 20 years.

The wife has learning difficulties and her condition is deteriorating, prompting social services to raise the alarm about the potential for sexual abuse in the relationship as they felt the woman was no longer able to make decisions about whether she consented to sexual relations. Social services ultimately brought the case to the Court of Protection in London.

The husband has pledged to no longer sleep with his wife but prosecuting lawyers are still pushing for a court order barring sexual relations to prevent the woman from being raped.

Let’s get something out of the way first: all women have learning difficulties. It’s just a matter of how severe those difficulties are.

That said, if she can say yes or no to a question such as “do you want some ice cream?” or “do you feel like watching a movie?” then she can absolutely consent to sex.

This whole “consent” thing is a retarded Jewish invention that overcomplicates basic male-female interaction. If a woman doesn’t want to have sex, she resists, if she wants to stop having sex while having sex, she makes it known. If she for some reason decides to pretend to be okay with having sex while not feeling like having sex, then that’s her problem. Literally something that happens in her mind that can’t be measured or proven.

The insanity of this story is augmented by the fact that even though the poor husband pledged to no longer sleep with his wife, prosecutors still push for a court order to officially make him unable to have sex with his wife.

Do you understand how insane that is?

If a man can’t have sex with his wife, why does he have a wife?

[...]

The idea about marriage that most people have in their subconscious was put there by tales of old, by their grandfathers, and by the Jewish social-engineering media machine.

If marriage doesn’t ask anything from women, and gives them half of your stuff or more whenever they please, it not only does nothing to stop relationships from breaking down but it actually provides incentives for relationships to break down.

These whores will destroy your life if you let them.

The moment they feel they’ve secured you, that you have no alternative front-hole, and that you’re socially and legally prohibited from looking for their replacement… that’s the moment they’ll decide to stop having sex with you. Sex will become less and less frequent. She’ll never be “in the mood,” she’ll always be tired or with headache. She’ll never treat you the same. She’ll look at you with disdain. She’ll resent you. She’ll feel trapped by you even though you’re the one that’s really trapped. She’ll feel you’re abusive even though she’s the one being abusive.

She’ll file for divorce and she’ll take as much from you as she possibly can, and then she’ll tell everyone you know about how terrible you are. She’ll go fuck some loser that can’t compare to you but that will have more than you because she’ll share the stuff she took from you with him, and they’ll laugh at you every time you go get your kids on the weekends.

Your kids won’t understand why daddy looks so poor now while mommy and her new boyfriend seem so well off. You’ll want to explain to them… but you won’t be able to. You wouldn’t even know where to start.

As time passes, you’ll see how your own kids prefer mommy’s boyfriend. They’ll tell you how funny he is, how many great things they do together, and how much time they spend together. Every time you send them back to her house… you’ll feel like a shadow. An empty human husk trapping the echoes of the man that you once were and mixing them with the cries of the man that you wanted to be.

All because you thought marriage meant something other than your doom.

jazavac #sexist incels.is

(what is the female sex drive)

It's an instinctive need to acquire the highest quality seed possible while ensuring the survival of the offspring. Anything that she instinctively sees as signs of quality seed will be seen as attractive. Dual mating strategy and betabuxxing comes in when the quality male doesn't want to take care of the offspring. Today, it only comes down to looking good because provider males became unnecessary and people have sex for gratification, not reproduction.

Modus Coperandi #sexist incels.is

(what is the female sex drive?)

foids sex drive is just as visual as mens. that's why chad wins.
it's all about how you look.
if you don't look sexually arousing you will never be able to witness a truly horny foid.

foid sexuality seems to be dependable on her state of mind, the thoughts your image causes in her is what matters.
if you fuck a foid and all she thinks about is how she is gonna decorate the apartment while you plow her pussy, she will never orgasm.

foids seem to be unable of selective thinking. so if you show a flaw it will instantly occupy their mind.
foid culture is one of constant mogging and bragging.
if you do something un-normie the first thing she thinks will be: "I'm gonna tell my friends about this!"
lots of foids have no ego. they're merely extensions of their in-group thinking.

so what really matters for you: don't be ugly + don't be obviously abnormal.

foid sexuality is a mind game. it's not about physical contact.

ultimately to be long term successful you need to become a part of her fantasies.
which will obviously never happen for creatures like us.

Various incels #sexist incels.is

(what is the female sex drive?)

(Animecel2D)
Seeing a chad

(LordDylan)
Feeling dominated by chad, foids are so shallow they all have the same preference.

(Napoleon de Geso)
Femoid sex drive is outdated, they choose primitive chad instead of evolved gracile man like Elliot

(Hikikomori)
I'm not sure that it matters, we're incels and will never pleasure them anyway.

(CrookedOzCel)
They want low inhib thugmaxxed gigachad to beat the shit out of them

(Macrocephalus)
Being treated like a piece of meat by a very good looking man

Some incels #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.

image

(C0nserve)

I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come

Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already

(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.

Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.

(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.

(Deoxysxx)

I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father

I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.

Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.

(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.

And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.

His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.

(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks

Andrew Anglin #sexist #wingnut #psycho dailystormer.name

[From "British Politician Sargon of Akkad Calls for Women to be Raped"]

"100% deal with it."

UKIP candidate Carl Benjamin stands by his comments that he "wouldn't even rape" a female Labour MP and tells Sky's @KateEMcCann to "deal with it".

Get more on this story here: http://po.st/5WnwrX

8:00 PM - Apr 18, 2019

You might remember Sargon of Akkad from YouTube.

And you may have been thinking “what the heck happened to that lad?”

Well, he’s a politician now.

And he is based and redpilled, and is calling for women to be raped.

This is quite awesome.

Aside from exterminating Jews, the main thing that I have always wanted was for women to be raped. For years, we have not had a single politician in a Western country that was willing to call for women to be raped – even while this is a very popular position in Middle Eastern countries.

It’s yet to be seen if Sargon will be able to enact his policy of rape once elected, or if he will pull a Donald Trump and build a few miles of groping and call it rape.

What is certain is that Sargon will win the election for Prime Minister of the UK based on the promise that women will be raped.

Rape has overwhelming popular support as a policy among the public, with up to 98% of people supporting it. However, thus far, no politician in the West has had the nerve to run on a rape platform.

I salute Sargon of Akkad, and wish him the best.

The Daily Stormer is officially endorsing Sargon of Akkad as Prime Minister of the UK.

RealRice #sexist incels.is

Hmm, well let's think about it logically.
I cannot think or comprehend of anything more cucked than having a daughter. Honestly, think about it rationally. You are feeding, clothing, raising and rearing a girl for at least 18 years solely so she can go and get ravaged by another man. All the hard work you put into your beautiful little girl - reading her stories at bedtime, making her go to sports practice, making sure she had a healthy diet, educating her, playing with her. All of it has one simple result: her body is more enjoyable for the men that will eventually fuck her in every hole.
Raised the perfect girl? Great. Who benefits? If you're lucky, a random man who had nothing to do with the way she grew up, who marries her. He gets to fuck her tight pussy every night. He gets the benefits of her kind and sweet personality that came from the way you raised her.
As a man who has a daugher you are LITERALLY dedicating at least 20 years of your life simply to raise a girl for another man to enjoy. It is the ULTIMATE AND FINAL cuck. Think about it logically

Orlov #sexist incels.is

Having a daughter is the worst thing that can happen to a man

Just imagine it, you feed and nurture this fucking thing with a hole for years just so it can grow up and become a cum dumpster for Chads and normies. You feed your baby girl, teach her how to walk, talk, she goes to expensive schools... and then she hits puberty, goes to high school and college and she randomly swallows gallons of cum at parties and thinks she is smart and strong and emancipated for doing it.

Only thing worse than that is having multiple daughters. Females are worthless scum, you nurture them just so they can betray you and whore themselves out. If you have a daughter you are raising a play toy for Chad and normie-scum. There's really no decency in it whatsoever, even if she is a straight-a student she is still a fucking degraded whore who would let Chad shit in her mouth just for validation.

SlayaCaleb88 #sexist incels.is

The Different types of Chads and Staceys

I have pretty much seen enough in my life to narrow them all down to this

CHADS:

Conservative/Christian/Self Righteous Chad(my most hated one)

These Chads are most likely people with top genetics that love that piece of shit called Jesus, most notably (Paul Joseph Watson, Alex Jones, Ben Shapiro,) they will often say incels are entitled and spoiled rotten, bashing incels makes them feel stronger and morally superior.

Party/Jock/Celebrity Chad

These ones are just your typical hollywood produced Chads, they bully incels because they think its fun to do.


Abusive/Criminal/Tough Guy Chad

These people are what women piss their panties with cum thinking about are great guys, only the deadshit fucked up foids go for these types of Chads, these are the type of Chads that the Conservative Chad does not want his daughter around.


STACEYS:

Rich Girl/Celebrity/Popular in Highschool Stacey (Higher Tier Foids)

These are foids that have been living on recruit dificulty most of their life and have never gone thru hardship, they only want the top guys to fuck.


Normal average looking women that still count as staceys (they aren't ugly or hot)

These chics are what most of our looksmatch are at, they are just average foids.

BECKY'S (Society is real fucked up thinking these foids deserve any one)

Bash the Fash Becky:
This is your typical foid that loves to get up on a soapbox and be an activist for some ideology that can easily be debunked, mostly feminists as well.

Beta Orbiter Becky:
This is just some below average looking foid that gets Incel Tears hard, not even I would go for any of these fucking disgusting animals.

Autistic Becky: (Now this one really fucking makes me angry)

Why the fuck should an Autistic Becky with my fucking looksmatch be able to get any fucking guy? Autism doesn't even exist for these types of foids and its a joke to them really, This goes to show how easy women have it compared to men.

HumanTrash #sexist #psycho incels.is

[LifeFuel] Every second a foid dies somewhere in the world

Just thinking about this makes me feel so much better, right now when you are reading this a filthy chad-worshiping cunt dies somewhere :feelsautistic: Doesn't matter if it's a baby or a 120-years old granny, they are all whores and they will all die.

Anon #sexist antifeministtech.info

Summarizing some of the points here :

The scarcer reproductive resource is the one far more valued than the less scarce one.

BUT,

The scarcer reproductive resource is the slower to evolve, and hence obstructs the overall evolution of the species.

The scarcer reproductive resource has the more specialized skills, as there is not enough room for too many skills outside of those ancillary to reproduction.

Once a species has any purpose beyond mere reproduction, the scarcer reproductive resource starts to become obsolete, as they cannot transition to any other useful role.

The scarcer reproductive resource makes virtually no contribution to anything that a more advanced civilization would measure our progress on, which pretty much comes down to space exploration and matter/energy harnessing.

Hence, the scarcer reproductive resource is really just a stepping stone towards the eventual evolutionary endgame, which breaks the Fermi paradox.

So yes, this does explain the Fermi paradox. Out of millions of species’ that have ever existed, only one has become sentient. In the same way, out of millions of civilizations that reach our level, perhaps only one manages to adapt around the scarcer reproductive resource.

Eden Decoded #sexist facebook.com

Harsh reality: Female prophetesses have done far more harm to women in the church than good. If you are looking for someone to blame for all of the lasciviousness, lewdness, sexual deviancy, broken homes, standoffish wives, and lonely-burning-in-lust single women (who put their worldly desires before their children); take a look at the female leadership in the church.

Far too many women will not learn that Satan has put the stumblingblock of an out of order 'woman of God' right in their midst to usher them straight to hell.

This is why you see gluttonous women, drunk women, shameless women, violent women running amok in the church right now.

Get back to 'biblical standards.' But alas you have to actually read the Bible...something far too many church women don't make time to do. There you will see that female leadership in the church is out of order, and not of God.

Mack Major #fundie #homophobia #sexist edendecoded.com

The rise of homosexuality, promiscuity, gang violence, fatherlessness, lesbianism and single motherhood within the African-American community is directly attributed to GODDESS WORSHIP.

When you watch porn, you're unwittingly engaging in goddess worship. You're subjecting yourself to the worship of Cerces: Mama Wata: Yemonja. (I will use these names interchangeably throughout this article).

This is why in all porn movies (gay porn being the exception), the woman is always the starring attraction. Everything centers around her. This is because Mama Wata operates through goddess sensuality. The porn industry itself is highly occult in nature: and its purpose is to make money off people while opening them up for demonic visitation and infiltration through sex.

Here's something else to consider: Notice how whenever people - particularly women - get near a beach or some other body of water, they tend to want to get almost naked? Why the desire to show one's body so openly to others, specifically around water?

My contention is that the spirit of Yemonja is behind it. This demon is also behind the whole strong-independent-single mother phenomenon among many black women in the United States today. Most single black mothers and their children are under the powerful control of this marine spirit.

Yemonja is also behind the rise of homosexuality and lesbianism among so many black Americans. This is the goddess of single mothers, fatherless kids, female sensuality and weak effeminate men.

When a person enters into a covenant with this spirit, the children of the single mother becomes the property of Mama Wata.

To secure worship from them, this spirit leads the children into becoming emotionally-driven or effeminate males (if they're sons), and sexually promiscuous and domineering females (if they're daughters).

Mama Wata has specific colors that are worn by her more open followers. Those colors are aquamarine blue and sea green. Have you noticed a proliferation of women (and effeminate guys) dyeing their hair those exact same colors lately?

Sea shells worn as jewelry and hair adornments are another tell-tale sign of this spirit's direct influence within society today. This is because Mama Wata/Yemonja is known as the water spirit, meaning it is believed to dwell in or has its base of operation within bodies of water.

Mama Wata is personified as a mermaid spirit.

How does one enter into a covenant with this demonic creature? It mainly happens through sex! Particularly through engaging in fornication, adultery, masturbation, watching porn, visiting strip clubs, watching strippers and homosexual acts. Sex is the initiation ritual that brings one into covenant agreement with Mama Wata.

I've been warning you for some time that sexual sin is nothing to play around with! It's never just harmless pleasure. That's what this demon wants you to think, to make it easier to gain control over your life. When you have sex outside of wedlock, you are forming a covenant with demons.

This is the one big secret that witches and those given over to the occult do NOT want you to understand. They initiate others into the occult through having sex with them: including CHRISTIANS!

Many of you don't realize it: but this demonic spirit is the very reason why so many of you struggle to get into a relationship that's worth having.

It's also one of the main demonic principalities behind the high crime, incarceration and murder rates among African-American males. It's behind the gang confederacy in Chicago known as Folk Nation, which includes the GD, Black Gangster Disciples and the Latin Disciples. They use those colors because those are Mama Watas colors! These gangs are responsible for a large portion of the violent murders that has plagued Chicago's black and Latino communities in recent times.

Yemonja will always seek to claim her children back: even if it's by death. And it's the reason behind so many men being unable to find financial security or to maintain gainful employment.

All these are negative side effects of making covenants with demons.

Sidenote: All attempts at black unity and upliftment will fail miserably unless this demon principality is dealt with first. We cannot solve our physical problems until we first conquer our spiritual nemesis.

Many of you are yoked to Mama Wata, whether intentionally or not. And now you must get unyoked. Only the mighty power of Jesus Christ can set you free.

To combat this notorious demon, a person needs to give their full heart and allegiance to Jesus Christ. The sinful lifestyle needs to be completely abandoned without reservation. One needs to be baptized in water. And they need to seek God for the baptism and in filling of the Holy Ghost.

Vox Day #sexist voxday.blogspot.com

There are very solid rational, Constitutional, and historical reasons for denying female suffrage. John Adams summarized them best in his famous written exchange with his wife:

"I long to hear that you have declared an independency. And, by the way, in the new code of laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors.

"Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands.

"Remember, all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation."
- Abigail Adams, 31 March 1776

"Depend upon it, we know better than to repeal our masculine systems. Although they are in full force, you know they are little more than theory. We dare not exert our power in its full latitude. We are obliged to go fair and softly, and, in practice, you know we are the subjects.

"We have only the name of masters, and rather than give up this, which would completely subject us to the despotism of the petticoat, I hope General Washington and all our brave heroes would fight."
- John Adams, 14 April 1776

Events have proven John Adams correct. Free men are accustomed to voluntarily limiting the use of their power and not pushing it to the full extent of its capabilities. Women, to say the least, are not. Just as an angry woman does not pull her punches, women in politics do not restrain their instincts to attempt to control the uncontrollable. Abigail Adams is projecting: she wrongly assumes all men would be tyrants if they could because she knows that is true of herself and other women. And women do not hold themselves bound by laws in any case, regardless of whether they have had voice or representation or not. They are bound by fear.

This is why a nation that wishes to remain wealthy and free does not permit female involvement in its governance, and why totalitarians from the Italian Fascists to the Soviet Bolsheviks have historically made a priority of female involvement in the political process.

Mr Punch #sexist #racist stormfront.org

Re: 'Get a job!' Danish minister lashes out at Muslim youths accused of harassing bar owners

Well done, but women like her emasculated their own men. When I lived in Europe I noticed women in feminist countries like Denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands were always desperate to be ****ed by foreign men.

In the Netherlands, for example, they have a problem with Turk and Moroccan "lover boys" who have hypnotic control of young, young girls. This sounds a joke but it is a serious a problem, where these Pakis turn the girls into whores.

Once women help kikes destroy their men folk they replace them with any primitive who knows how to put a woman in her place. A woman always returns to being treated like property. At least white men treated white women like valuable property. Women won't have votes in 100 years whether the Muslims win or not. The equality experiment is over.

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist #homophobia jesusisprecious.org

America lacks real men these days. The reprobate court system has brutally and relentlessly stripped fathers and husbands of their God-given authority. In fact, there's not a court room in the United States that recognizes a man's right to rule over his wife (Genesis 3:16). The courts force men into submission and give rebellious wives the upper-hand. In many cases, the judges presiding over Christian families are homosexuals, having lower morals than animals. How can there be any justice?

Tragically, the homosexual movement has flourished to the same extent as feminism in America. Parents are told to shut-up by their children. There is no respect for parental authority anymore. Women are portrayed as admirals, commanders and 5-star generals by Hollywood; but in reality they are helpless without men to guide them in such positions, which require a man's decisiveness, ruggedness and masculinity. The only exception are butches (women who have become men), losing all their femininity. Lesbianism is of the Devil. Lesbianism and masculine females are virtually synonymous, and not one of them loves the King James Bible, because it is authoritative and holy. The truth is that as America has descended into wickedness, the churches have followed afar off lock-in-step. The very idea of women wearing pants is repulsive to any God-fearing Christian who believes in old-fashioned decency, morality and good living. God hasn't changed. Let me say that again... GOD HASN'T CHANGED (Malachi 3:6).

caamib #sexist reddit.com

Yawn. Just more idiocy.

So you admit you shouldn't have said those things, but they were, even though you yourself admit were wrong and dumb as fuck, supposed to "shake me up"? Hahahah oh wow.

And, no, once again, if your "opinion" is something that has nothing to do with anything I ever stated, then it's not an opinion. It really isn't that hard. I mean, it is to you since you're mentally retarded. but it shouldn't be to anybody with an IQ above 20.

>So why cant others so the same, even if its directed at you?

BECAUSE MY OPINIONS DON'T BREAK THE RULES. YOURS DO, AS THEY'RE ABOUT ATTACKING ME WITH INCORRECT CLAIMS ABOUT SHIT I MOSTLY EXPLAINED BY 2013, YOU TOOL.

>if someone says they dont think your very smart based on what you say, you can disagree but accept its their opinion.

Not why you were banned, you lunatic. Keep playing the victim.

>but I think someone should have sat down with you when you were much much younger and taught you a bit about women and relationships

**HAHAHAHA MY PARENTS, WHO DIDN'T GROW UP IN A FEMINIST SOCIETY, WERE SUPPOSED TO TEACH A 12 YEAR-OLD ME TO SHOOT A GIRL OF THE SAME AGE IN THE HEAD- HAHAHAHAHA**

>but its like you turned your sub into your own safe space.

I have protected it from insane monsters like you and will continue doing so. This is by no means a safe space, as people are disagreeing with us every day. It's just not allowing crazy fucks like you in.

>your mind on women or racism I think it would make you a lot happier.

Of course. Being as delusional and stupid as you would make me somewhat happier. So would heroin. The same deal. You're selling snake oil, pal. Dangerous, cancerous snake oil.

And see how he uses the term "racism", and that's wrong, while supporting blacks killing everybody white in the world oh wow.

And, once again, go fuck yourself.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy #fundie #sexist #wingnut godlikeproductions.com

Feminism is being used by the NWO/CIA/Pentagon/etc. as a military psychological weapon to control society

feminism as a military psychological weapon to control society

[link to famguardian.org]


feminism as a military psychological weapon to control society


Message To All so-called Patriot Americans: You Can't Handle The Truth

1. Current US child support laws were actually invented in the former communist Soviet Union.

2. Current child support laws are communist infiltrations into the united states of America.

feminism as a military psychological weapon to control society

Amerika the 4th Reich:

FEMINISM IS SOCIALISM

First thing communist countries do is put the women to work to take over the family unit. Increasing the workforce decreases wages - Economy101 - basic simple concepts of supply and demand. Women in the workforce doubled the workforce which decreased wages - (which was deceptively hidden thru deflation/the devaluing of the dollar).

(example: Let's say I own a factory. I have 500 employees knocking on my door everyday looking for work; I can then decrease wages and say, "If you don't like it there's the door. I have 500 ppl knocking on my door everyday looking for work." On the other hand, if I cannot find enough ppl to work in my factory, I would have to increase wages (if I can still make a profit.)
Read again from top now and Continue)...

That is why in the 1950's, the avg. American family lived fine on one income but today the avg. American family needs two incomes just to get by. Women in the workforce; feminism, just created more Taxpaying Slaves for The State resulting in the enslavement of the average American family unit.

Feminists are being used ... they have complained about power control freak men, husbands ... only to have it replaced by a Power-Control-Freak Totalitarian Police STATE. Create a (so-called) problem just to justify the excuse for more power to solve it is the oldest Dictator ploy in the book.

Either Fathers own their children or the STATE OWNS the children. Law of the Jungle; women look for the best Provider -- when the best Provider becomes the STATE (i.e. the Welfare State), she then marries (into) the STATE and now the STATE OWNS her children.

"Who owns the youth owns the future!" - Adolf Hitler ... thus the US Dept. of (in)Human(e) Services; Division of Family Destruction. Either the man/husband/father is the Head of His Household ... or the STATE is the HEAD of your Household! Attack the Family Unit = weaken society ... thus more STATE CONTROL. Cut the Head (man of the household) out - thus more STATE CONTROL = own the children thus more STATE CONTROL - breed ignorant society thus more STATE CONTROL.

Feminism = weaker men; weaker men = LESS RESISTANCE thus more STATE CONTROL.
Patriarchy = Men own their wives ... it's called a family unit ... it's called morality.

Feminism/matriarchy = everyone having sex with each others' women while still remaining "friends" like a bunch of ANIMALS! Feminism/matriarchy = village = socialism = tribalism = lowest form of civilization = NO SURPLUS = Deficit = Slavery.

Patriarchy = family unit = efficiency = prosperity = Individual Rights = opposite of socialism = Surplus = free time for great works/inventions ... i.e. immigrants who come here and prosper come from patriarchal family structures because Patriarchy = family unit = efficiency.

Name me one time when Government Sponsored Propaganda was not Totalitarian in Nature. Feminism is Government Sponsored Propaganda - to weaken society; weaken the family unit; weaken it's men ... for more STATE CONTROL.

Multiculturalism = everyone different (immigrants not "Americanized") = NO UNITY amongst society = Divide & Conquer/LESS RESISTANCE thus more STATE CONTROL.
Homosexuality + abortion = population control.

Population control techniques deployed at Americans + allowing more illegal immigrants into the country = higher % (of society) of a working slave force - cheap labor.

Racial Eugenics in AmeriKa:
The #1 Group to benefit from Affirmative Action are white women (thus) they are using mathematics to keep a large percentage of minority men DOWN
"He who rules mathematics rules the Universe"
This is the mathematics of racial eugenics.
This is the mathematics of the New World Order.

AmeriKa Today has 1/3 of the entire world's prison population and 78% of Amerikan prisoners are black men, and that is not even counting latino men.
If these black men were all let out of jail, there would not be enough jobs for them all.

The Shadow Government who is truly in Control of AmeriKa, wants and needs all these minority males in jail so that they can give half the good jobs to white women.

I am going to expose this evil to Non-White AmerIka. I am not against white people, I am against the evils of feminism, I am against having all these minority males living horrific lives in jail at the expense of the AmeriKan Feminist WHITE WOMAN.

Even after DNA proves that he is NOT the biological Father, Judges in the US still force thousands of men to pay child support even with the DNA evidence in front of them !!!

Thousands of men in California ALONE are being forced to pay child support AFTER DNA Proves that He is NOT the Biological father:
[link to www.abcnews.go.com]
News/paternity021002.html
www.glennjsacks.com/california_governor_davis.htm

Not even Saddam Hussein would force a man to pay child support for a child that is NOT his !!!
Feminism is a Weapon of Mass Destruction

"First You Get the Women, Then You've Got the Children, So Follow the Men" -Adolph Hitler

"The `perennial' father is a menace to society and must be treated as such. Like the mental defectives and those afflicted with certain hereditary diseases, he should, after due warning, be rendered incapable of further parentage." -W.J. Ruth. "Population Control For Unemployment." Birth Control Review, Volume XVII, Number 5 (May 1933), page 134.

In the Book of Genesis, when Satan attacked Adam and Eve, he attacked through the weaker vessel: the woman. Just like The STATE is doing today, attacking us through feminism, through the 'woman'. Falsely "empower" the woman for her to make the wrong choices that way to weaken the man to control him. This is how evil attacks man, who was made in the image of God.

In the Book of Exodus, Pharaoh of Egypt decided to kill all the male Israelite infants to weaken the Israelites militarily. This is nothing new. Think about it ! ! !

Statism is Antichrist plain and simple. God should be the King and Head of an individual man, and the man/husband should be the head of his household, not the Anti-Christ STATE.

In this last century alone, governments around the world have killed over 500 million people of their own people. All this government sponsored propaganda about Domestic Violence is just a smoke screen to divert attention from the real abuse: Government Abuse Against It's Own People. This is the real Domestic Violence.

The Bible depicted governments as Beasts; in Daniel and Revelations. Look at old Nazi film; their Armies marching like ants mimicking the Animal Kingdom and therefore subhuman. Individual Freemen become just another cog in the Wheel of the Predator Beast State which becomes the Alpha Male which today IT is doing this through the propaganda of feminism. By feminizing society and thus emasculating it's males for more State Control.

"To disobey tyranny is to obey God." - Thomas Jefferson


Paying child support kills children by Funding/Subsidizing the #1 KILLER of children: single-mother-households:
Children from single-mother households, compared to children of two-parent families where the biological father is present, are more likely to go to prison by 20 times, to commit suicide by 5 times, to have behavioral problems by 20 times, to become rapists by 14 times, to run away by 32 times, to abuse chemical substances by 10 times, to drop out of high school by 9 times, to be seriously abused by 33 times, to be fatally abused by 73 times, to be one tenth as likely to get A's in school, and to [per Lenore Weitzman] have a 72% lower standard of living.

"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it." - Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861 (1809-1865)

Question to America:

America used to be free. Not anymore. America has turned into Amerika.

Question to America:
1. I steal your car.
2. You take me to Court and the Judge 'gives' me custody of your car.
3. On top of that, the Judge now says you must keep paying the monthly payments, insurance, and overall maintenance of the car.
If you refuse to 'pay', you are labeled/vilified into a lowlife scumbag dirt bag criminal and thrown in jail surrounded by violent criminals.
And to make matters even worse, the government pays/sponsors for a massive government Nazi-like propaganda campaign, brainwashing society, convincing them that if you don't accept/pay for this, with a smile on your face no doubt, that you are than a scumbag dirt bag lowlife 'deadbeat' who belongs in jail surrounded by murderers, rapists, child molesters, etc.

Question to America:
What exactly happened here?
Explain to me what happened here, because this is exactly what they are doing to American Fathers.

If the British had this current System some 200 yrs. ago the American Revolution would have never happened. Benjamin Franklin had like 13 bastard children, he would have ended up in jail as a 'deadbeat' dad.
The rest of our Founding Fathers would have been forced to 'attend' Anger Management Courses.

This US Media Propaganda Machine would have called the Protestors of the Boston Tea Party a bunch of 'nuts' and/or anarchists.

Feminism is a military psychological weapon to feminize/emasculate society for more State Control by weakening the State's Main Competitor: Men

The US Federal Government is the Biggest Deadbeat: $5.7 TRILLION on the National Debt - (financial-future of 'our children').

The STATE Kidnaps children from their Fathers than demand ransom/extortion deceptively called 'child support.'

Maxim of law: The children that belong to the mother are those of slaves and animals. But the children that belong to the Father are those of Freemen.

That is why the Slave Masters used to separate the black slave Father from the black slave mother and child to weaken them to better control them. Divide & Conquer: this is nothing new.
And now they are doing it to men today in Amerika: 2008

Even after DNA proves that he is NOT the biological Father, thousands of men in America are still FORCED to pay this ransom/extortion deceptively called child support even with DNA EVIDENCE PROVING he is NOT the Father:
[link to www.abcnews.go.com]

Why aren't former Enron Execs forced to pay child support to all the familes who lost their money?
Why should Corporations have more rights then Individuals?
The Constitution spoke of Rights of the Individual (not of the rights of Corporations)

Also:
Women today can dump their babies off in garbage dumpsters and go to jail, but when they get out of jail (they are than not forced to pay child support)

Women today can dump their babies off in Police Stations and Hospitals and not be prosecuted for it (a new law now) And these women are not forced to pay child support...

Women can also give up their baby to adoption (orphanages)... and not be forced to pay child support. Women can dump THEIR responsibilities...

Why can't men ?

Society today promotes, advocates, and supports homosexuality while at the same time promote, advocate, and fully support destroying heterosexual males with alimony and child support... this is SATANIC !!!

"Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle! Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." - Thomas Paine


All Praise and Glory to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob

the Only True God - The Creator of both the Heavens and the Earth in the NAME OF JESUS THE CHRIST

Feminst Lesbian #sexist fstdt.com

A penis is a rape device; as domestic violence statistics reveal, men are the evil virus problem. Given sperm may be created without use of a man, and women have well proven themselves even more capable then men, castration is something to be enforced eventually for all men. A peaceful and productive future depends on real vision and executing a plan that cuts to the core issue here. Castration is the cure. Stop the Rape!”
“Girls, it’s easy—just feed him female hormones. Small doses at first. Once you see his boobs develop just gradually increase the hormones. My husband can’t get it up and my girlfriends with their strap-on vibrators give me orgasms that no man can equal.”

caamib #sexist reddit.com

This is the brief story of my second gf and her silly, irrational actions. Bear in mind, she is likely my best female friend today.

1.I meet her on a dating site. She just broke up with her boyfriend. I'm still a virgin at the time and she's very uninterested in meeting, wasting our time in fruitless bs talks about nothing.
2.I lose my virginity with some slut and tell this to her. She
a) immediately goes back to her ex AND b)immediately wants a meeting with me
3.We meet and she wants me, not her bf
4.She breaks up with her bf and says she wants to be with me
5.She meets me the second time after this. But now I'm no longer interesting to her. Now she blocks me on Fb.
6.She wants to get back to her "bf", he doesn't want her back.
7.Three months pass. She contacts me again, asking me to solve some fucking problem of hers. I decline and block her on Facebook. She then sends me an SMS, offering sex.
8.She tries to torture me by making up excuses to "give up" on sex and then offering it again ( she later, when we were already in a relationship, admitted these were all fake "changes of mind").
9.I finally snap and post her pic on my blog. She then finally agrees to really have sex with me - under the condition that I no longer contact her.
10.We have sex and I no longer contact her. But she contacts me. (EDIT - some of the insaner manginas online used to claim she did so because she was afraid I'd "blackmail" her again. However, that's just insanity by manginas, since when we stopped contacting I had no more pics of her. When she contacted me again I was BACK ON HER FRIEND LIST AND COULD SEE ALL HER PICS AGAIN). So we start a relationship.
11.Our relationship is a joke and she is a crazy woman.
12.We finally, after about a month and a half, see it's not working and break it off.
13.She briefly goes back to her previous "bf" who fucks her once but then dumps him as well.
14.After some months of me doing other stuff we get back in contact and are friends now. She's a lesbian now. She destroys her relationship with some woman.
Still, in summer of 2014 she start dating one of my best friends but dumps him after a week or two, before they even had sex, because she now finally decided to be a full lesbian.
15.In early 2015 she has such a fight with her schizophrenic mother that she has to come to my place, which I don't want to allow her without fucking me. She does and is angry about it for some time, making a fuss over nothing, but eventually we go on being friends like nothing happened. After all, by that time connections are too strong and we share even some financial interests, along with co-operation in various areas. We depend on each other too much in any case. This helps mend any conflicts but the fact is also that we're by now used to each other and share some common traits - it's not like hate each other but have to tolerate each other. I like her as a person and we share a history.

Lessons:

modern Western women are completely insane. It's a waste of time to try and find logic in the actions. What they do is often as random as throwing a dice. So don't expect anything, especially anything good.

actual full lesbians don't exist

women in general base their appreciation of a man on how successful he is in attracting other women - how this is achieved and his objective qualities are irrelevant. You can be a smelly rapist with an IQ of 70, she will like you more than a virgin with an IQ of 170.

consent is a nonsensical concept in modern society. It's a word that is used to protect female chastity and husband's property, not ignoring the whims of some slut. Modern Western women will hate you if you think about consent. You need to show you have a spine and fuck them regardless of their stupid whims, or they won't respect you.

Relationships in the modern Western world are a joke. Your "gf's" or "wife's" pussy is everybody else's as well as "yours" - and laws are made that way too. There is basically nothing a husband or a boyfriend can do about a cheating wife and pathetic cucks will always protect these sluts. So have no qualms about fucking other men's wives or girlfriends in the West - if you won't somebody else will. Besides, the guy they claim to be with is doing the same to other men's "gf's" and "wives". Expect absolutely no fidelity of any "gf" you will have in a feminist culture - it's like expecting a cat to not eat that steak when you leave the cat with it in a room to go grocery shopping. Fidelity is achieved in a sane patriarchal culture by marrying women off as virgins, making being a slut an undesirable trait and not allowing any feminist laws. In the Western culture your "gf's" or "wives" pussy is E-V-E-R-Y-B-O-D-Y'S and she is not fit to be a caring wife and a mother. You will be raising some retard's children, not your own.

Arcterex #wingnut #sexist #racist reddit.com

It's a story that would be roughly the same if the BF was Indian too. I think it's funny how Eastern traditionalism is not always susceptible to appeals based on Western progressivism. That's because traditionalism was often based on "whatever worked"; perhaps they couldn't explain the psychological impacts that having casual sex with 80 partners before marriage had on the woman or the quality of her marriage (although they do now). But they saw its effects and believed in it. Outside of the mother-daughter context, in an advanced educated society, Eastern traditionalists will need to do better job at explaining the 'why' of their beliefs- and they should; there's a lot of merit to their perspectives which are underplayed in the modern West. When you dig beneath, a great deal of science validates traditionalist ideas about human nature, about relationships, about gender differentiation, about how 'restriction' and deferring gratification leads to happiness more so than indulging your whims. There is a lot I hope Asia can do to civilize the West before it plunges totally into degeneracy.

Now coming back to the story (sorry), too little to the story, but I doubt the mother is trying to force her Western daughter into celibacy before marriage; she is more likely using that ideal as a counter-balance to the Western model of the complete opposite.

I find it interesting that how in the US, when an Asian woman has a problem with her father, the answer is to find another race of guy to date. Lot of people have problems with their parents, including their opposite-gender parent. AF Daddy Issues -> pigchasing? Chris Rock told fathers they had one goal with their daughter "keep them off the stripper pole". That daughters would 'punish' their fathers for mistreating them by doing what would harm them most (that their own daughter would be stripping naked in some sleazy strip club). AFs probably on some subconscious level know that flushing their genetics down the toilet by dating some unsuccessful, doughy mediocrity would be more of a "take that!" to their Dad than anything else.

David J. Stewart #fundie #homophobia #sexist jesusisprecious.org

The only reason why the compromised Boy Scouts voted to allow churches to ban queer Scout Leaders is because most of the churches would have rightfully kicked the Boy Scouts out of their church! Tragically (and any spiritually discerning pastor fully realizes this), this is just a foot in the door for homosexuals in the Boy Scouts. Eventually, when the country has sunk even lower into sodomy and filth, they'll allow gays everywhere! The only BOY SCOUTS ladies and gentleman are the pederasts scouting for your sons to sodomize!!! PLEASE BAN THE BOY SCOUTS!!! They are a wicked organization that cater to agendas and have no fear of God. THEY HAVE NO TESTICLES!!! Is that what you want your sons to become... Cowardly yellow chickens like the Boy Scout organization???!!!

Do you know what really creeped me out this week. I knew that singer Barry Manilow was a lifelong atheist. I learned not too long ago that he's also been a homosexual since his youth. I had heard that he married his longtime friend and manager, another man! But what creeped me out was learning that Barry Manilow is the female in their same-sex union! There's pictures online of Barry dressed in drag. It's sick. Perhaps you didn't know this, but one homosexual always assumes the role of the male and the other the female. One takes a dominant role, and the other submissive. This is true of lesbians and sodomites! In the case of two lesbians, one will assume the masculine male role, which is what Rachel Maddow is—a dyke! This is why it is sometimes difficult to tell if someone is a homosexual, because a man who assumes the male role in the same-sex union will still appear manly, like Rock Hutson, George H. Bush and Ronald Reagan. The Bible teaches that homosexuals and the righteous will never co-exist in harmony. Proverbs 29:27, “An unjust man is an abomination to the just: and he that is upright in the way is abomination to the wicked.”

The liberals, queers and kooks condemn us fundamental Christians as “hate-mongers” for agreeing with God that homosexuality is a sin, abnormal and vile (Romans 1:24-32). I'm not condemning anyone, the Holy Bible condemn all of us as woeful sinners (Romans 3:23)!!! I'm upset and angry that homosexuals are forcing their sick perversion on America's children!!! GAY IS NOT OK! The King James Bible, which is the inspired Word of God, condemns and forbids the sin of homosexuality. Taylor Swift is doing her part to help the queer agenda, defiant against a holy God!!! We are hated here on earth by the wicked, but beloved of our heavenly Father, Oh Christians! Jesus is coming soon!

1sexistpig2another #sexist alphagameplan.blogspot.com

Can't argue against men having screwed a lot of things up all along, and I agree that without foolish men we wouldn't even have feminism. But to say that giving women the vote didn't escalate the rate of decay and increase the stupidity factor in the political environment is a bit of a stretch. Do you really believe that if women never started voting we would have even had a sexual revolution in the 60s? And would politicians really have voted to start supporting baby momas without having women voters to cater to? What about all those domestic violence laws and abortion? VAWA?

Sorry, I find it a quite a stretch to say that the goliath of a government we have now would be this monstrous were it not for the female vote to cater to and the feminist propaganda machine to tell them what they want.

Jv #sexist ministryoftofu.com

More “female logic.” “You men are threatened, nyah nyah nyah.” I know you live in a dream world where every man is too whipped to tell you what an imbecile you sound like, so I’ll tell you now: this has nothing to do with patriarchy or any of your other man-hating feminazi tripe. Yes, lots of women want successful men, just like successful men want hot women who like sex and don’t speak when they’re not spoken to. What makes this woman an abomination is the painful contrast between her monstrous appearance and deluded demands. She’s not a role model for “women’s progress” or whatever else your ruined mind has been taught to parrot.

5EKKT7R #wingnut #fundie #sexist lunaticoutpost.com

HILARY WTF IS YOUR PROBLEM!!!

STUPID F&CKING SATANIC sweety SNAKE

-She's a she
-She's fat inducing lard
-She's old
-She's a baby boomer
-She's a member of the wealthiest 1%
-She's the face of establishment politics
-She's a globalist neo-con
-She's of, by, and for the collusion between big govt and big corp
-She's a shameless liar
-She's the most non-transparent politician in history
-She has stroke-induced brain damage
-She's a cuckquean

She is literally every reason not to vote for a politician all rolled into one person. But wait, there's more:

-She was fired from the Watergate investigation for lying and being unethical
-She lied about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary
-She lied throughout her Whitewater scandal
-She lied about taking "sniper fire" when visiting the Balkans during 90s
-She lied about Benghazi
-She lied throughout her email scandal and continues to lie about it
-She lied about being broke after leaving the White House
-She described blacks as being "super-predators"
-She hired a VP of Goldman-Sachs to be her 2016 campaign manager.
-She received millions of dollars from Goldman-Sachs for speaking engagements
-Her "charity" received tens of millions of dollars from Goldman-Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup, and UBS
-Her "charity" received tens of millions of dollars from China, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Yemen, Qatar, and the UAE
-She supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Turkey
-She voted for the Patriot Act twice
-She was "adamantly against illegal immigration" before she was for it
-She was opposed to gay marriage before she was for it
-She was a lawyer who defended a rapist and laughed at the plight of the 12 year old rape victim
-She approved the sale of US uranium to Russian nuclear corporations in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her "charity"
-She gave out eight Secretary of State's Awards for Corporate Excellence, and seven were to corporations who donated millions to her "charity"

She is literally every reason not to vote for a politician all rolled into one person.
she is the personification of a piece of shit
the queen of england and her both are
a flaccid penis looking cyst of flesh

sweetlingsuniverse #wingnut #homophobia #sexist sweetlingsuniverse.tumblr.com

You got it!

But it doesn’t stop there either. The homofascist agenda of same-sex marriage and the innumerable petty impositions that come with it are in truth all part of the same matriarchic tyranny. By the way, the majority in Obergefell v. Hodges did not grant the freedom of homosexuals to marry as it cynically averred. The freedom to “marry” is not something the government actually grants at all.

Stay with me. .

What these thugs of the judiciary did was grant the government the power to universally impose a construct of marriage contrary to the imperatives of the natural order and against the inalienable rights of private property and ideological free-association of natural law on the people!

There was nothing stopping anyone from entering any kind of marital association.

This is all about the official approbation of homo marriage, which, of course, just established a universal regime that will violate not civil rights, which is the essence of what the Court created in this instance out of thin air, as the state can neither create nor abolish natural rights, but inalienable rights of natural law. That is to say, more of the following: The same-sex marriage tyranny.

The only thing the government can do with regard to natural rights — is suppress and/or criminalize the act of expressing or exercising them. Hello!

The only sense in which the government could possibly permit the freedom to marry is to the get the hell out of regulating marriage all together.

Hocus Pocus

Now ya see it, now ya don’t.

Of course, the issue with doing business with homosexuals is not doing business with homosexuals; the issue is the state compelling persons to actively participate in homofascist rituals, the state forcing persons to engage in activities that go beyond the normal business transactions of ideological and behavioral neutrality. This is the practice of compelling persons to engage in behavior that is contrary to persons’ religious and/or moral convictions or else pay a fine or go to jail! The is imposing the "religion" and/or “morality” of homofascists on Christians. Christians will now be the new nigger in the face of the repressive tolerance of cultural Marxism on steroids under the universal regime of same-sex marriage.

Religious liberty and the governmentally imposed lifestyles of cultural Marxism, including feminism and the various expressions of homosexuality, cannot freely coexist. Welcome to the next front of social strife and instability.

Thomas Pollock #wingnut #sexist menstribune.com

We have seen that masculinity and femininity are drawn from the two fundamental forces in the universe, the forces of repulsion and attraction. These forces are not all that comprise what we call male and female, but they are the quintessential ingredient. The inherent relationship between these two forces is such that attraction will operate on repulsion to pull it towards itself, or in human terms, attraction tries to ensnare while repulsion tries to escape. On the political scale the preponderance of one or the another of these two forces will tend towards two different extremes; the masculine towards complete freedom, the feminine towards a complete totalitarian society. We can understand then why Aristotle wrote; “women do not conspire against tyrants; and they are of course friendly to tyrannies .. since under them they have a good time,” because the essential characteristic of oppressive government is feminine unity, which involves a “centralization of power.”

There can be no such thing as a pure male tyranny then, since maleness, or repulsion, does not associate at all, either as oppressor or the oppressed, but since no man or woman is completely male or female, it can not be said that all women are tyrants and all men want only freedom. But if you will observe, male tyrants, even highly praised ones like Julius Caesar and Napoleon, have been noted for their feminine characteristics - for being “in touch with their feminine sides.” Conversely, women with a strong desire for freedom have been known for their masculinity. Now a single individual acting as a tyrant can still retain a good measure of masculinity because it is a single person, a more feminine state would be a “tyranny of the majority” due to the collectivist nature of women; which of the two tyrannies is worst we may appraise by Lord Acton’s words; “It is bad to be oppressed by a minority, but it is worse to be oppressed by a majority — from the absolute will of an entire people there is no appeal, no redemption, no refuge but treason.”

MattyAnon #sexist reddit.com

"When a man and a woman join together to face the world, they have the potential to be so much more than the sum of their strengths."

Potential yes. In practice not so much. But oh how I wish this was really how a relationship worked. This is what men want. It is not how women behave.
A partnership. Two people working together. A man and a woman with complementary skills and emotions working together. It sounds so beautiful but this is not how women work. Women do not partner with men. Women exploit men, while men think they are building something together. Your commitment is used against you. Your voluntary reduction in your options is used as leverage to get what she wants. It's been said before: women are dream killers. Why? Because when you're in a long term relationship with her, it is now your job to support her dream. And you can bet that dream is boring as fuck.

There is no relationship equity. There is no gratitude. There is no partnership. There is only the man doing stuff for the woman, and the woman doing the bare minimum required to maintain the flow of commitment and resources.

"Behind every great man is a great woman"... bulllshit. Every great man achieves what he achieves despite women. We can achieve so much more if we're not also having to support women.

Women claim to be the strong, independent equal of men. I say great: let's give them exactly what they ask for. All the equality and independence they can choke down.

Matt Forney #sexist mattforney.com

It’s time to stop beating around the bush: feminists want to be raped.

It’s the only logical explanation for how they behave. It’s the only way to understand why they can cheer on hordes of Muslim “refugees” swarming into Europe to rape and pillage. It’s the only way to comprehend why they can whip themselves up into a frenzy over masculine men meeting up for a beer and smearing them as leading “pro-rape rallies.”

Everything feminists do, from holding up “Refugees Welcome” signs at airports to passing affirmative consent laws, is geared around encouraging men to assault them.

This isn’t a conscious urge. No feminist wakes up in the morning and thinks to herself, “I’m gonna try and get raped today!” There’s no Protocols of the Elders of Seneca Falls laying out a secret plot to turn females into walking fuckdolls for rapist men.

But deep in the recesses of her lizard hindbrain, the average feminist wants nothing more than for a man to shove her into a wall and force himself deep inside her.

Here are the reasons why feminists want to be sexually assaulted, and why they’re working around the clock to aid rapists.

1. Feminism is an r-selected ideology, and rape is an r-selected sexual strategy.

As Anonymous Conservative has shown repeatedly, leftism and conservatism are merely expressions of two competing reproductive strategies: r-selection and K-selection. To review quickly, K-selection breeds children to compete in a world of limited resources through a two-parent upbringing, defined by high sexual dimorphism, monogamy, late sexual maturation, and loyalty to the in-group (i.e. wolves). R-selection breeds children for a world of abundant resources through a single-mother upbringing, defined by low sexual dimorphism, promiscuity, early sexual maturation, and disloyalty to the tribe (i.e. rabbits).

The conflict between leftism (of which feminism is a subset) and conservatism is the conflict between r and K. K-selected individuals want a world that encourages competition and meritocracy, while r-selected individuals want a world of free resources: free food, free money, free shelter and free sex. In a K-selected world, men and girls have to compete to earn the right to mate with one another; in an r-selected world, men and girls have sex with no thought as to the consequences.

What does this have to do with feminism and rape? Simple: rape is the ultimate r-selected sexual strategy.

By its very definition, rape is an act of entitlement: forcing yourself on someone who doesn’t want to have sex with you, whom you haven’t earned the right to sleep with. Much in the same way leftists feel entitled to take other peoples’ money away through taxation and welfare, rapists feel entitled to stick their penises in girls’ vaginas. In fact, you could say that rape is an inherently leftist form of sex, which would explain why so many male feminists, such as Jian Ghomeshi and Hugo Schwyzer, enjoy assaulting and abusing girls.

Sexual assault is sexual socialism: redistributing nookie to the least privileged in society.

Feminists, being leftists, are r-strategists themselves. The purpose of feminism is to eliminate restrictions on female sexuality: allow girls to sleep around without getting pregnant, let them legally kill their unborn babies when they do get knocked up, and have it all funded by the taxpayer.

From an r-strategist’s perspective, rape is a good thing, because it allows a female to have children without having to do anything, aside from breathe.

It’s well-known that a great many girls have rape fantasies, and a significant number of rape victims claim to have orgasmed during their assaults. Both these points serve as evidence that a portion of the female population—the r-selected, leftist portion—not only wants to be raped, but is physiologically adapted for it.
Once you accept the premise that feminists subconsciously desire to have their vaginal walls torn up by psychopathic men, their behavior suddenly makes sense. For example, feminists are unwilling to condemn the Muslim “refugees” who have been assaulting girls in Germany and other European countries (and indeed, have accused those who talk about the story of “racism” and/or “Islamophobia”) because they want those refugees to keep raping.

The Muslim “refugees” streaming into Europe from the Middle East are the consummate r-selected cowards. Instead of fighting for their families back home, they’re fleeing to safe countries where they can live off government benefits. Instead of being grateful that Europeans are willing to take them in, they throw temper tantrums because their Internet isn’t fast enough, their food isn’t tasty enough, or they don’t have enough to do, showing that they are parasites looking for someone to leech off of.

Muslims rape European girls for the same reason that they riot over slow WiFi: they believe they deserve to get something for nothing.

Some right-wing personalities have tried to explain the left’s embrace of Muslim “rapefugees” with such nebulous concepts as “pathological altruism,” but the reality is much bleaker. In the darkest recesses of their minds, feminists want swarthy refugees to punch them in the face, tear their clothes off, and spit roast them like plump, juicy swine. Don’t expect them to suddenly realize the truth, either, because—

2. Feminists encourage girls to get raped, then deny all responsibility for their actions.

In the past few years, even the slightest suggestion that girls have a responsibility for their own safety is met with a chorus of “MISOGYNIST!” “DON’T BLAME THE VICTIM!” The oft-repeated feminist chant, “Don’t teach women not to get raped, teach men to not rape,” is an explicit call for girls to place themselves into situations where they’re likely to get sexually assaulted, then dodge all blame.

While some feminists are no doubt doing this out of naivete, the subconscious motivator for many of them is their r-selected psychology.

Personal responsibility is a K-strategist concept; in the rabbit warren, things just happen. By discouraging girls from protecting themselves, feminists are implicitly encouraging them to get violated, then pinning the blame on an undefinable “rape culture.” Which brings me to my next point—

3. Feminists talk about the West having a “rape culture” because they want a rape culture.

As mentioned above, the worldwide leftist outrage against Roosh and the Return of Kings tribal meetups far outstripped their reaction to the Muslim gang rape attacks in Germany and Sweden during New Years’ Eve. This isn’t just because of hysteria and slander: r-selected leftists are more threatened by masculine men than by cowardly Muslim rapists.

One of the most laughable claims feminists make about game/red pill/PUA culture is that it encourages men to feel “entitled” to sex and female companionship. Even skimming a manosphere blog will show that this is the opposite of the truth. “Game” and “red pill” philosophy teaches men that they have to earn girls by improving themselves: lifting, dressing better, having interesting hobbies, and being entertaining conversationalists.

If a morbidly obese basement dweller came onto the Roosh V Forum and started whining about how he couldn’t get laid, he’d be laughed at and told to hit the gym and get a life.

The reason why there’s always been an overlap between the seemingly hedonistic manosphere and the more traditionalist alternative right is because both groups have the same view of sexual relationships: men and women need to earn the right to sleep with and marry each other. The end destinations may be different, but the road is the same.

Feminists oppose this because leftists oppose competition in general. Feminist obscurantism in regards to sexual relationships (e.g. their claims that the “friendzone” doesn’t exist or claiming that men just need to “treat women like human beings” if they want to get laid) is about stripping men of their ability to compete for a mate. Similarly, pushing “fat acceptance,” tattoos and piercings, and encouraging girls to be “bossy” and sarcastic is about crippling females’ ability to compete for men.

To make matters worse, feminists have been trying to train men to rape girls for years. Their constant claim that the West has a “rape culture” is just wishful thinking: in actuality, rape has been on the decline for decades. Because of this, feminists have tried to legislate masculinity away through “affirmative consent” and “yes means yes” laws, which force men to explicitly beg for permission at every step of a sexual encounter, branding them “rapists” if they don’t comply.
Affirmative consent laws and “rape culture” claims are a two-pronged attack on masculinity, designed to advantage sneaky males and hurt masculine men, and there’s no sneakier male than a rapist.

Unfortunately, despite all the rape hoaxes the mainstream media conjures up, the “rape culture” that feminists screech about has yet to materialize.

The UVA rape story, for example, turned out to be a lurid, masturbatory fantasy passed off as “news.”

Because feminists couldn’t create a rape culture, they imported one from the Middle East.

From here, all the pieces fall into place. We see clearly why the European Union is debating banning one man from their borders and libeling him as a “rape advocate,” while letting millions of actual Muslim rapists flood their countries.

We see why leftists are driven to protest masculine men but not sneaky “refugee” cowards who abandon their families in search of government freebies and “easy” white women.

The goal of feminism is to turn women into rape-meat.

Every feminist, deep down, wants nothing more than a rapist’s baby in her belly. The armada of horny, restless, greedy Muslims storming into Europe is a bounty for the r-selected feminist. Leftists will wave “Refugees Welcome” signs no matter how many girls are forcibly DP’ed by angry Arab invaders, because Europe’s skyrocketing rape rates are a feature, not a bug.

The only thing that will stop the rape-lust of feminists and their poorly-endowed Muslim abusers is Western men having the courage to call it out.

There can be no compromise, no peace with these traitors inside the walls. While more moderate women can be saved, no one will ever be able to convince the termagents of the left that they should be more afraid of Muslim rapists than white “racists.”

They are our enemies, just as much as the dusky hordes planting their flags on our soil

Antikurva #sexist sluthate.com

Can't read the whole article till later but that's a very irritating little jingle they got going:

"Whatever we wear, wherever we go, yes means yes and no means no"

Well how about

"Liar, liar, bras on fire"?

But if you really want to see the incel revolution, you got to start working on trippy little chants like these:

"However we look, whatever our height, sex with girls is our human right!"

Any takers?

Bob Smith #sexist returnofkings.com

9 Secrets About Female Nature Told By A Hot Girl Dying Of Cancer

Many years ago, I became friends with a very hot blonde in her early 30’s who was dying of cancer. Due to her impending death, she decided that it was okay to relay a vast amount of inside information to me, regarding what women were really all about. She volunteered this information. I have never forgotten what she told me, and it has served me quite well over the years.

Here is a summary of the ten things she told me about the true nature of women, which were related to me over the span of a couple of weeks, shortly before her passing:

1. Women are exactly like little children

We are constantly poking, prodding and testing a man, in order to find out what his boundaries are. If he has no boundaries, we will destroy him, especially if he loves us. A man has to have boundaries, and he has to outline them precisely, and he has to force us to adhere to them with the power of his conviction and the power of his action. If he doesn’t do that, we will beat him over the head with his weaknesses (his lack of boundaries) until he breaks.

2. Women put up a false front about virtually everything

Our faces are fake (makeup), our hair is fake (dyed), our boobs are fake (some of us), everything about us is fake. Most especially when it comes to what is inside of us. We lie constantly, because we are far worse, character-wise, than even our closest friends or lovers will ever know, and we desperately fight to keep all of that hidden.

We are looking for our true daddies, basically – the idealized daddies that we never had – somebody who can see through all of our false fronts and call us out on our bullshit and put us in our place. The problem is, those type of men are very few and far between.

3. If a woman ever tells you, “If we don’t have trust, we don’t have anything,” she is either cheating on you or planning to cheat on you

There are no exceptions to this rule. We use that as cover, to try and make the man feel guilty for questioning our fidelity. What we are really saying here, is, “I will fuck whomever I want and you’d better keep your nose out of it or I’ll cut you off from my pussy and I’ll ruin your freaking life if you keep pressing the issue.” If we really cared about you, and if we really weren’t cheating on you or planning to cheat on you, we would tell you something like, “I am not cheating on you, I love you, and I would never do that. I don’t care if we have to stay up all night, for the next week, and go over every single shred of doubt that’s currently troubling you about this. I have nothing to hide, I would never cheat on you, and I don’t want you thinking these things about me. Please tell me exactly why you think I am cheating, point by point, and I will do anything and everything that I have to do to prove to you that I’m not cheating, in order to ease your worried mind.”

4. Women are much hornier than men

Vastly, exponentially, hornier than men. A woman will do just about anything, sexually speaking, so long as she is fairly certain she won’t get caught. For example, we will occasionally go out of town in order to rendezvous with a man we’ve been longing to fuck, and/or to have multiple sex partners in the same evening, and/or at the same time.

This is something that hot women do, most especially. In our minds, it is a natural desire, and a natural thing, and so long as nobody else finds out, it’s “game on”. Women are receptacles for cock, that’s how we have been biologically designed. Nothing feels better to us than being completely filled up with multiple penises, than being the center of sexual attention, than being the object of unbridled group lust. Since it’s something we can’t risk doing on our home turf (don’t shit where you eat), we have to think outside the box, in order to get our boxes completely satisfied. And you might find this shocking, but many women – many, many women – have sex with dogs on a routine basis. This is just one example of how insatiable we truly are.

I can see why you might not believe it, to which I say, look really hard at all of the women you know who have dogs. Look at women who have dogs whenever you see them out on the street, in the act of walking those dogs. Or at the park. You will notice that most of them have male dogs – the vast majority, in fact. This isn’t a coincidence. And look at all the female teachers who are exposed in the media for having sex with underage students. We have no self-control when it comes to sex – or anything else, for that matter. To our way of thinking, losing control is what makes sex great. Doing anything that is taboo is what makes sex great.

5. Women do not have female friends—they have female competition

We lie to our so-called female friends and pretend we are loyal and faithful to them, just like we do with the men in our lives. Secretly, we are jealous of each other, and we want all of the desirable things that other women have—most especially when it comes to our female friends’ things.

And we consider men to be things. If one of our friends has a hot man, we want him to want us. We will do everything we can to seduce him. Not because we really want him—we don’t really want anybody. We do it because we are rarely happy, and we don’t want our girlfriends to be happy, either, and we want to boost our own egos more than anything else.

And after we get him to fuck us, when our girlfriends find out that he has had sex with us, that’s when we finally get what we wanted in the first place. If we break up the previously happy couple, that’s fine, too. It’s all about our pussy, not hers. It’s about winning.

6. Women always lie about the number of sexual partners they’ve had

They also lie about not wanting men with large penises. If we told the actual truth about the number of different men and women we’ve slept with, and if we told the actual truth about our fervent desire for big dicks, our pool of potential suitors would shrink drastically, to the point where it would completely dry up. So we lie. Most often, we will claim that we’ve had between three and eight sexual partners in our lifetime. And, to our way of thinking, it isn’t a lie, because if we had five sexual partners last Saturday evening, and our man asks us how many sexual partners we have had, and we answer, “Five”, well, technically, we aren’t lying.

7. All women dislike themselves

And because we dislike ourselves, we fervently hate any man who doesn’t see through our bullshit. The more a man loves us, the more we hate him. The more he overlooks our sins, and the more he fails to see how corrupt we are, and the more he gives us the benefit of every single doubt – the more we despise him. We will escalate our bad behavior until we finally break him and he wakes up and realizes how worthless we are and what a fool he has been for believing in us.

8. Women want what they can’t have

We want a man whom we can’t have. We want a man who honestly doesn’t give a fuck about us, who doesn’t care if we come or go. That’s the kind of man we will pursue. Call them bad boys or call them whatever you want, that’s the kind of man we want – period. The kind of guy who will make us orgasm, crudely, and give us a huge sexual thrill in the bedroom, and then discard us like used toilet paper, and fuck our female friends afterwards, just because he can. (Just like we would do with his male friends.)

9. All women are masochists

And all hot women are narcissistic masochists. We hate it when things are going well, especially if they continue to go well for long periods of time. We know down deep that we are fucked-up and not worthy of anything that is truly good. So when things are going well in a relationship, we eventually sabotage it. We just can’t help ourselves in this regard.

We could have the greatest, most handsome, most well-hung husband in the world—a one-of-a-kind man who makes all of our girlfriends jealous; we could have the greatest children in the world, who are beautiful, well-behaved and ambitious; we could have the most enviable career imaginable; we could have all of the money and prestige and the truly good things in life, and we could repeatedly tell ourselves over and over, and believe, on the surface, that we would never cheat on our husbands. But down deep we know that it’s a lie. Because one day, we could walk into a grocery store, and some bad boy could whisper just the right combination of words in our ear, and the next thing you know, we’re at the Motel 6 getting it in the ass. That’s just how we are, and any woman—especially a hot woman—who says otherwise, is a liar.

Over the years, my deceased friend’s words have proven to be spot-on, in the vast majority of cases. And if they ring true from your own personal experience as well, then I am more than happy that I shared them with you here today. I know that my deceased friend would be thrilled to know that I have shared this information with the manosphere. After all, she used to be a hottie, and she’s now dead, and by giving me the inside scoop on her female competition, she continues to beat them—she continues to “win”—even from beyond the grave.

ThePUAMole & Nihilism+ #sexist sluthate.com

ThePUAMole;

The war is over: the feminists have defeated the PUAs

Look at the scoreboard, guys: the PUAs (even the good ones) are down thirty points.

You can't stop feminism because the world runs on sex. Interestingly, this means that, just as men argued over how to rule the world in the past, with the women on the sidelines, the opposite will be the case now, except to the extent that the women attempt to recruit men, which is of course unsustainable, as there's little reward for the men other than not being destroyed, and for that they can just go MGTOW.

Nihilism+;

Well look at you, being all smart and shit.

Actually nope, sorry. Still retarded and autistic. PUAs and Feminists are incahoots with one another, its as clear as day. The chicks who are on PUA infield videos? Pretty sure they are paid actresses who also more than likely post feminist blogs dissing men and wanting to rule the world as well. Cycle goes like this:

Incel pays money for PUA shit------>Incel tries PUA shit but gets buried by feminists--------->feminists posts about PUAs (who they are secretly dating) to get the PUA network's name out------->PUAs attack feminists to get the feminists name out------->incel on the feminists side now side with PUAs cuz they feel betrayed by feminists false advice to white knight chicks into bed with them----->incel pays money for PUA shit.

And on and on. Its a vicious cycle man.

Feminists, PUAs and Chads will rule everything in a number of years. Its only a matter of time. Anyone with any belief that even strays one degree from PUAism or Feminism will be crushed decisively.

Therumancer #sexist #homophobia escapistmagazine.com

It's political. To be fairly honest very few people care about lesbians in general. Guys are either turned on by it, or don't care as it has nothing to do with them. Women can use it as an insult, but in general don't care that much about it either if they aren't involved.

While I won't say it's never happened, I can't think of many examples outside of fantasy (oftentimes directed at men) where lesbians have attacked and raped children especially in the pre-sexual age groups.

Yet when it comes to gay men, the same cannot be said. When you hear about gay sexual assault it's inevitably involving men, and despite Lesbianism having been prevelent you'll notice that back in say ancient Greece you didn't have young girls being run down and captured as homosexual sex slaves the same way you had it going on with boys. This is incidently where the term "Greeking" comes from (though it doesn't nessicarly have a pedophille connotation).

In general it's the gay men that get the serious opposition when it comes to gay rights. Despite what the media might imply it's not all religious fantatics and such, nor misguided "homophobes" who dislike them for no reason other than being differant (actually most involved have reasons and frequently they have little to do with religion).

Given that the purpose of such articles is specifically to garner attention, and whether anyone wants to admit it or not, the majority of anti-gay sentiment is men against gay men, you need to focus on gay men to really make a serious issue on gay rights.


[ Is that because they are gay, or because they are men? I mean, when you hear about human sexual assault it's inevitably involving men. Occam's Razor and all, the simpler explanation seems to be about sex/gender and not sexual orientationOnly to you Cheeze, you can argue semantics either way. The bottom line is that your pro-gay, I'm not. There really isn't any point to us argueing about it anymore over the internet.

All we're going to do is retread old territory and accomplish nothing while generating hundreds of responses. ]


Only to you Cheeze, you can argue semantics either way. The bottom line is that your pro-gay, I'm not. There really isn't any point to us argueing about it anymore over the internet.

All we're going to do is retread old territory and accomplish nothing while generating hundreds of responses.


[ If you're going to post the same "gay men are rapists" thing every time homosexuality comes up, the least he can do is post the exact same response every time. Y'know, for balance. ]


His general "well maybe it's a problem with men and not with male homosexuals" is inherantly rididculous for a number of reasons. Foremost of course being the way in which he makes an absurd arguement given that we need heterosexual sex and reproduction to continue the species. So when all is said and done that pretty much trumps anything. Homosexuals by their nature do not reproduce so can be targeted to reduce a problem without hurting our species at all. Anything you target reducing the overall problem.

Plus a lot of it revolves around pre-sexual humans as I've made clear. While there are exceptions to every rule, in general when dealing with a hetero rapist or "child molestor" your dealing with someone going after teens and generally physically capable children. Someone like a Roman Polanski (going after 13 year old jailbait) being the quintessential example, along with various cases of teachers and high school students, etc... In comparison in cases when your hear about like 6-8 year old kids being sexually assaulted the perpetrator is a gay man.

Even when looking at porn, when it comes to heterosexuals your mostly looking at jailbait, for the real little kids it's *almost* universally gay porn.
...
On the other hand when you have cases of someone having sex on like an 8 year old, in the majority of cases it's a male homosexual. This is not to say heterosexuals have not done it, it's just far, far less common.

Makeshift Alpha #sexist google.no

Most people think ow if I can become an Alpha male, women will like me and want to sleep with me (often not even sleep with you most the time men are just looking for female approval). The truth is women will want to sleep with you more, Hypergamy is women’s natural state, meaning that they are always looking to mate with the Alpha male.


Hypergamy (colloquially referred to as “marrying up”) is the act or practice of seeking a spouse of higher looks, socioeconomic, caste or status than oneself. The term is often used more specifically in reference to a perceived tendency among human cultures for females to seek or be encouraged to pursue male suitors that are higher status than themselves

The problem with this line of thinking is it’s in itself very beta and weak. Wanting to become all Alpha for someone else approval, it’s very externally referenced. The attraction from women is a byproduct. You should want to ‘become a alpha’ for yourself, for the piece of mind, for the ability to enjoy your life and to have power in the world

Makeshift Alpha #sexist google.no

I have just skim read the book ‘Date like a woman think like a man’ by Steve Harvey. It could be considered ‘The Game’ for women. In that case, I believe it could be considered a good thing. However, I don’t think it would actually work. Now, if you were to actually write the game when for women, it would be a really short book. It would go something like this “marry young, lose weight, be affectionate“. This however would not sell and would not get a huge film deal. So this book has been padded at and am filled with crap

jawakiller #fundie #sexist #homophobia escapistmagazine.com

Because gays are scary dude... O.O

Haha. Thats prolly the truth. But seriously, I have gotten into fights with gays who think its cool to hit on me. Why? Because I have to prove I'm manly and not gay. I know I'm not into homosexual stuff but the ladies don't. And yes, its necessary.

I wish it wasn't like that but thats just how it is

[And... is it difficult living in Hickville and are your "manly man man" friends as insecure as well?Seriously, there's no other explanation but horrid, massive insecurity for that kind of behavior.]

Wow, that was really stupid sounding. No offensive, I'm sure you're a real nice guy but you didn't even read my comment. I said the only reason I fight gays (with the occasional exception, like when a gay's annoying as fuck) is because some women might get the idea that you're gay. So I'm not proving it to my friends, genius. Ladies are my reason. And here in hickville we would actually be over-joyed if all the homosexuals left. Then we'd go and ride our pick-up trucks and shoot some shotguns. Unfortunately I don't live in this legendary "hickville". And fighting is not always a sign of weakness. People like you are usually the ones I end up fighting.


[You know, I'm just one female out of many, but if I was around to see you get in a fight with a gay guy just because he was hitting on you, I wouldn't find it manly at all. I think it would be kind of dumb. And I wouldn't even be inclined to believe your display of "Look ladies, I'm not gay". Call me crazy, but you simply telling the guy "I'm not gay, so don't hit on me" would be much more convincing to me than a fist fight. Or is it just unreasonable to give people the benefit of the doubt anymore?]


Women like confident men (and those who don't usually turn lesbian or hook up with some wimp). Unfortunately, where I live, women are not like the mystical women on escapist. They're actually real. They are the ones I'm hanging out with so their opinion actually matters. Women like power, so when a homosexual male tries flirting (in a rather sexual way) with me they watch. If I mumble something about not being gay, they walk away. If I tell him (in a loud voice) I'm not a frickin fag (pardon the vulgar phrasing), the women see me as more of a man. Maybe that only happens in college, I really don't know.

But calling me gay is a really lame attack strategy. Just thought I'd say that before more people use the same "he hates gays, must be gay" line.

Oh and by the way, if you really wanna be more "tolerant", tolerate my homophobia. Chow kids!


[Social conservatism is a plague on society. Gotta love the people who say "tolerate my intolerance." There's absolutely no reason to tolerate a person's bigotry. Let's look at it like this:

Intolerance of gays: suppression of rights
Tolerance of gays: furthering of rights to the point of equalityMaybe we should start tolerating intolerance towards blacks or jews or maybe white males. They don't deserve equality either. Fuck it man. Let's go for it. Do you care? I don't care. And about women liking you because you just called a guy a "fricken fag" tells me that you're either in high school where petty shit like that is still funny or you hang out with Sarah Palin..]


A homosexual can't be compared to a Jew or a black guy. Homosexuality isn't a race. Yeah. And shut up with the leftist shit. You don't know much about it so just stop.

Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi #sexist #fundie failedmessiah.typepad.com

You 'wanton' women who walk around in short skirts and painted faces bring rape on yourselves, and every time you entice men by your dress or your actions you will be tortured in hell for it, Sefardi haredi kiruv (outreach) Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi (also spelled: "Mizrahi") says.

[The video is available in the link of the quote]

Jack Package #sexist #wingnut returnofkings.com

Black Cricket Player Fined $10,000 For Asking White Reporter Out On A Date

Over the past week, another example of non-issue hysteria has been created in the Australian media, further feeding the need for female indignation. The following interview is what started the response:

Chris Gayle Flirts With Reporter Mel McLaughlin During Live Interview in Big Bash League

The man being interviewed is Chris Gayle, a professional cricketer from Jamaica. The interview was held shortly after Gayle left the field after being dismissed in a T20 match for Melbourne vs. Hobart. Gayle currently holds the record for the highest score in a domestic T20 game of 175 not out. This is only one of the many records that Gayle currently holds. His full player bio can be found here.

Off the field, Gayle has always been known as a smooth “ladies’ man.” It is his on-field performances, and his laid-back attitude and flamboyant lifestyle off the field, that have made him one of the more known and likable characters in world cricket today. It is also because of his character that he behaved in this way in the interview with Mel McLaughlin

The response from Mel McLaughlin

The response in the days after the event from the journalist who interviewed Gayle has to be applauded. McLaughlin could have easily used this to set herself up as a professional victim. However, her take on this is that while she was uncomfortable at the time, it isn’t a big a deal. Notice in the interview here she was continually trying to get those interviewing her to get over it as she wanted to talk about what she is actually paid to talk about— cricket.

Even though McLaughlin has accepted that Gayle didn’t mean to cause offence and she wants to move on, others in the media couldn’t accept this and are continuing with their assault on Gayle. While pretending to care about the welfare of McLaughlin, the people interviewing her in the video above don’t seem to care that she was feeling uncomfortable in continually having to answer the same question as to whether she felt harassed or not.

The media response

Chris has currently been fined $10,000 for this “offence,” but even the most novice of fortune tellers could have predicted that wasn’t the end of it. There are currently countless articles vilifying Gayle’s actions from a plethora of media channels on this issue, but the worst of all these is that the most respected source for cricket news the world over (ESPNCricinfo) has published these articles.

Much in the same way that Gamergate began with articles claiming that “gamers are dead,” cricket journalist Dan Brettig is also trying to lecture to men that we need to bend over backwards to accommodate women into another section of what used to be a male space. This was then backed up by a “cricket feminist” claiming that women’s cricket is just as good as men’s, as well as the usual garbage of wanting to introduce quota systems onto cricket administration boards.

Out of fear of becoming the next target for feminist sabotage, the chairman of Cricket Australia Jamie Sutherland has shown support for those wanting harsh penalties on Gayle. The media are currently and quite successfully calling for Gayle to be sacked, and it is now likely that Gayle won’t be part of the next season. Similar to how Bill Cosby had his name tarnished by claims of harassment in the name of publicity, so too has someone come out months after the event allegedly occurred to say that Gayle exposed himself to a female journalist in Sydney during the Cricket World Cup in February 2015:

This journalist is from the same company (Fairfax media) where Gayle was previously employed as a guest columnist. Even though Gayle has denied the allegations and there hasn’t been a single piece of evidence shown to prove this allegation, we can safely assume that Gayle won’t be employed to contribute any columns to this paper in the future.

The public response

The public response to this has been much polarized. After reading the comments sections from various new sources, there have been a surprising amount of people who are getting sick of being lectured to by leftist PC thought police. A lot of people are seeing this “incident”—a man complimenting a woman and then asking her out for a drink. There are, of course, those of the public who have joined the media in blowing this out of proportion.

People are now rightly so comparing this incident to one of Maria Sharapova flirting with a male journalist in a press conference:

Sharapova flirts with Aussie journo

This issue has nothing to do with whether Gayle made the journalist uncomfortable or not. The PC zombies are instead outraged that a man would take steps to fulfill his own sexual strategy rather than passively waiting in line so that women have full control in fulfilling theirs. Gayle putting a woman on the spot scares women and manginas because he is showing that they don’t always have full control. This is also why the red pill is so offensive to most women.

This issue will more than likely blow over in the next couple of days. However, with more and more examples of issues like this coming up each day, it might have the same effect of opening the eyes of a number of men to the feminizing of society.

Puffi #sexist intjforum.com

I could never knowingly date a woman who was not a virgin. I find them disgusting. I don't find married women or women who have boyfriends disgusting because I don't think about them that way, but when it's time to actually date someone, I would never be with a woman if she was not a virgin.

Years ago when I first started analyzing this I thought it was only the "slutty" women I didn't like, but no, it's the sex act itself. That someone else has been inside my girlfriend or wife... I don't understand how anyone can live with that thought. I see an extremely vivid image of that happening in my mind and I feel such disgust I can't live with it.

I'm not religious and I have no moral objection to any of this stuff. I simply find it disgusting. I just don't want to believe that no women that I (initially) like are romantic or strong-willed enough to wait for the right man.

This way of thinking seems very rare in Western countries. Some may say they prefer a virgin, but are too realistic to completely shut non-virgins out of their dating life. So, any thoughts? Do you know anyone like me? Have you ever met a woman who thinks this way? I sure haven't.

MidNightRider2001 #homophobia #sexist disqus.com

The rapid homosexualization of the US population over the past 3 decades shows how sex ratios become imbalanced and unequal. It's now not possible for a large percentage of males under age 30 to even date a woman due to higher rates of non-heterosexuality in females. You can read the study and see for yourself.
Now, it's possible the homosexually displaced heterosexual males will turn to drugs, booze, video games, or other activities and nothing will happen.
Or it's possible some of these males will realize that they're victims of a world that's thrown them overboard and violence will ensue. It may create a small civil war or regular acts of terrorism. Only time will tell.
When a large enough portion of males realize women may legally wed women, yet they as men are mathematically eliminated from doing so, I predict violence. In fact, we may have already seen some in the past college shootings.

Isaiah4verse1 #sexist reddit.com

(Bolding by me to make quotes easier to recognize)

(White knight? How is laughing at a bunch of losers white knighting? I didn't even say anything. Also already alpha, also already married, got a bigass house and the wife and I made plans to make homemade quesaritos after the holiday. My life is awesome, yours sucks, you're not getting sex, I am, you're using this place to try and justify why you aren't getting sex and I find it hilarious because you're pathetic. Now that we've cleared that up I've got more of your goofy shit to read for entertainment, I actually forgot about this hours ago but you've brought me back.)

You guys make it so easy.

Let's bust up your delusions you have towards your own slavery, shall we?

Also already alpha

Alpha males do not marry, they sow their oats. This is a biological fact. If you presume to be alpha in your marriage that means you are in a constant state of trying to woo your wife. In other words, you have to WORK non stop just to keep her from leaving!

also already married

The laws are in her favour. You don't have her, she's got YOU.

got a bigass house

Her house.

and the wife and I made plans

Her plans. That's why you put her first. You are only secondary.

My life is awesome

Says the happy house slave. If that were true you'd be too distracted by it to peruse and comment on Reddit.

yours sucks

Prove it.

you're not getting sex, I am

While we're in agreement that women's only value is in her vagina, consider for a moment this analogy.

Take your most favourite dish and eat it every day, 3 times a day for the rest of your life.

Take your favourite song and listen to it 3 times a day for the rest of your life.

Take the favourite episode of your favourite show and watch it 3 times a day for the rest of your life.

Get the picture?

I don't consider receiving sexual rations in exchange for the immense cost of marriage with an aging hambeast a prize. Single men are free to have as much sex according to their terms with whoever they want, with much more attractive women for infinitely less cost. The single man versus the married man is taking a million different favourite dishes and having a different one 3 times a day. That is paradise.

you're using this place to try and justify why you aren't getting sex

You are not an alpha male. Alpha males do not brag about getting sex because it comes easy to them. You brag about getting sex because you put a lot of work into it. But even if I'm wrong and that's not the case, you have reduced your entire marriage to an act that lasts one hour long at best. Your marriage summed up is an available vagina. I'm sure your wife will be pleased to know that she's just a wet hole and no thought whatsoever is given to any other attribute of a "happy marriage".

I find it hilarious because you're pathetic.

I find you hilarious because you're married. Marriage is for men with no ambition, no imagination and no purpose.

Now that we've cleared that up I've got more of your goofy shit to read for entertainment, I actually forgot about this hours ago but you've brought me back.

At least you have something to do in between chores and picking out drapes! Happy wife happy life!!!

Isaiah4verse1 #sexist reddit.com

Had some feminist clown say the same thing once.

A social movement requires integrity. Women have a fundamental lack of integrity. It is for this reason that feminism, even with government and big business backing is falling apart after 40 FUCKING YEARS! LOL. If feminism were left in the hands of women alone it would have been dead in 1971.

That being said, feminism is a shit test. Women, solipsistic idiots that they are, believe they are so spectacular, that men would put up with the ultimate fitness test of feminism and still be alpha enough, in spite of the resistance to anything masculine, to gain access to their vaginas.

Again, being the idiots that the are, women made a miscalculation when they flooded the market with vagina. Now, men can get the milk without buying the cow and this is absolutely terrifying to women. The devaluing of the only value they have: vagina! So that's why feminism has shifted to neo-Victorian ideals and government sanctioned chivalry. Rape culture and the false rape epidemic, street harassment, and every thing women are doing now to stamp their feet is women's way of punishing undesirable men for simply existing. Women are mad there are fewer and fewer high status men available. Yes even the fat, ugly and otherwise undesirable ones.

Tl;dr: feminism is a shit test/beta male punishment

And genetics never once bent in favour of any social movement.

Thankfully high status men are not getting married and also the beta male backup men are starting to leave the plantation. So feminism has resulted in little more than generations of increasingly unattractive angry women.

Isaiah4verse1 #sexist reddit.com

So what? Nobody likes women least of all women themselves. The only thing they have of value is their vagina. No one likes what's attached to the vagina. Do you guys really care what some twat thinks? I've read 8th grade class newspapers with better writing skills than the average female "journalist".

Isaiah4verse1 #sexist reddit.com

You are certainly not a man but a mangina. Toeing the line of female supremacy for the scent of vagina.

We've already discussed scientifically that women are little more than walking wombs and consumption machines. Please don't compensate for my last slamming by pretending to be intelligent, it's pathetic. You don't expect me to regard anything you say about science when you have to pretend to be an armchair, nickel and dime, pop psychologist.

The truth is you really don't care what I have to say. You just need to be SEEN to care by women to get that pat on the head and a couple brownie point from women seeing as you're on of many men who fear confrontation with females. You also desperately need their approval. I hate to break it to you, mangina, but they're not going to fly across the globe to suck your little pee pee.

You are not a man.

Valens #sexist sluthate.com

Reminder: Even demographics are against incels [RedPill]

The reasons for this are very simple...

1) The male to female ratio at birth is circa 105:100. Assuming that every woman has a male equivalent according to attractiveness (e.g. the equivalent of the most attractive female is the most attractive male, and so on), this leads to almost 5% of males not having a female equivalent their age at all. So even the most hideous and fat woman in your area and age group would be above the bottom 5 percentiles of men (aka truecels). The 105:100 ratio basically remains unchanged until late adolescence, when it slowly begins to approach 1:1. This ratio is finally reached around age 50 - a poor consolation for all those dispensable, young sub 5-percentile males out there.

2) But the reality is even worse than that. Most western countries have a fertility rate below replacement level (less than 2.1 births/woman). As a result, each year the number of births will be smaller than the year before. For males, this has disadvantageous effects on the dating market. Women generally seek out partners who are 1-3 years older than themselves and vice versa. However, the low birth rates result in the situation that there are fewer young females out there for the numerous older males.

As an illustration, I've got some numbers from Germany from 2014, where the fertility rate is very low:

Number of men born in 1991: ~479,900
Number of women bon in 1994: ~406,800
Difference: ~73,100
Male to female ratio: ~1.18

As you can see, for sub 15th percentile men it would be virtually impossible (or very hard) to find a girl three years younger than themselves (i.e. girls who would be the most receptive to their approaches). Sure, they can try to find a girl their own age but then they will have to compete with men who are some years older who are again a)more numerous because of the falling number of births b)more mature and therefore generally more desired and c)have a higher income. The only other alternative seems to be MILF-game.

I think the change of fertility rate is also the reason why getting a partner as a man is percieved to be more difficult now than it used to be because the fertility rate was higher back then. This also applies to (many) third world countries. A 25-year-old man in Nigeria, where each year there are considerably more births than the year before, can have his pick from an abundant pool of women who are 20 and younger. Hence, inceldom is most likely a non-issue in such countries whereas every first-world country is known to have a significant percentage of young men who simply stay behind in terms of dating.

3) The number of single immigrant men often exceeds the number of single immigrant women. Men are more likely to have the financial means and the willingness to take risks to immigrate alone while the women who immigrate are often already engaged of married. Of course, immigrant men try to enter the local dating market. On the other hand, natives often can't access foreign women the same way because they come from cultures (Muslim, Hindu) where women are heavily discouraged from having premarital relationships. In many Western European countries a big part of the immigrants comes from such cultures. Even if foreigners, especially ethnics, have a hard time dating local women, some of them will succeed due to high individual LMS or some kind of racial fetishism from the woman. Even a relatively small percentage of women who are open to dating foreigners is enough to skew the odds in the dating market a little bit against men once again.

tl;dr: If you're a truecel and objectively belong to the most unattractive men in your age group, it really doesn't make sense to even try and waste your energy. You can actively look out for the most ugly girls on the street - chances are you're still statistically below her in todays dating market. Just concentrate on escort-game and hedonism in general

Hecuba #sexist radicalhubarchives.wordpress.com

Julie Bindel is well known within malestream media and her capitulation to the trans issue which is totally anti-feminist and promotes male domination over all women, will be viewed by men and Male Supremacist System as another feminist finally accepting she is wrong and men are right. Malestream media and its virulent MRA followers will delight in saying to Feminists ‘look another Feminist Icon has capitulated to male domination and it won’t be long before all you women fall in line and kiss the feet of us superior males.’

Yes we all know women have to ‘make deals with the devil, (meaning we live within the Male Supremacist System) but there is a huge difference between deciding what is best for our well-being and security and blatantly reneging on one’s politics. Ms. Bindel has time and again declared she is a Radical Feminist but she has swiftly capitulated because her career is far more important than her politics.

Ms. Bindel is not a fool and she knows what happens when women capitulate to male demands, because it is men as usual who win and the woman will not be accorded any kudos or financial security. Capitulating to male oppressors only ensures the Male Supremacist System continues to wage war on any woman who dares to speak out against male domination over all women.

Ms. Bindel is no longer a feminist and she should say so rather than attempting to pander to a male in a frock. Note this male promotes virulent women-hating and male contempt for women.

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

It is hypocritical and unjust that a woman can drag her husband into court for any number of reasons; BUT, a husband cannot legally do anything about a rebellious wife. If a wife refuses to clean the house, care for her children, be honest with the husband, cook dinner, et cetera; what recourse of action is there for a husband? He can’t call the police because there’s no law enforcing a husband’s right to a submissive wife. In fact, a husband who exercises his Biblical authority to rule over his wife is breaking the law. It’s called “Domestic Abuse.” As a consequence of feminism’s evil influence, many unrealistic laws have been enacted in America. Thus, a husband who tracks his wife’s whereabouts is now considered abusive. A husband who shelters his wife from a meddling mother-in-law is considered abusive. A husband who controls the mail is considered abusive. But God said that a husband is to RULE OVER his own wife (Genesis 3:16). As the law stands today throughout the United States, men have been effectively castrated in their marriages and homes. This is evil.

Having said that, it’s not hard to figure out why many fathers refuse to pay alimony and/or child support—It’s because the Court System is extremely unfair and heathen! God hates a false balance in the courts— “A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight” (Proverb 11:1). I can understand why a man would refuse to cooperate with an unfair legal system that caters to rebellious wives and irresponsible mothers. A woman receiving alimony can legally “shack up” with another man who has a good job, and there’s nothing her former husband can do about it. So why should her husband support her if she’s living with another man? It is unfair.

Concerning child support, many men refuse to pay a dime, because the money goes to a rebellious wife, who quit her marriage and abandoned her husband. Women file for divorce at TWICE the rate of men in America. Some men support their children because they want to, and I respect that. That is the Biblical thing to do. A man should support his children; however, I can also understand why men get angry and refuse to pay a dime. Such men realize that the government will support the children, and they will not go hungry. Such men protest an unjust Court System that persecutes hardworking husbands and fathers, placing the financial burden upon his shoulder, while the mother (often lazy) shacks-up with a friend or lives with mama.

Bill P #sexist unz.com

Have any of these fools thought of the political implications of telling parents that their daughters have to serve in combat? It’s hard enough for parents to stomach their sons going to war, but at least they tend to think the young man might have a fighting chance.

Women in their prime are about comparable in terms of physical ability to 14yo boys. Why not lower the age of military service to 14? What’s the difference, morally speaking? To me, one of the creepiest scenes from WWII video footage was of Hitler patting adolescent boys on the head before sending them out to die in a lost cause. Listen to the last boy. He’s a little kid. If I ever found myself sympathizing with Nazis, all I’d have to do to cure the sentiment would be to watch that clip and I’d be ready to string them up without compunction. Does Obama want to be shown sending women off to combat? Does Ash Carter?

These people are sick in the head. Women and children should only have to fight as a last resort, and our current situation is anything but that.

Next page