new

Most people that believe in evolution don't even know the facts.
People are taught that humans evolving from monkeys is a fact and they believe it blindly. Evolution is a THEORY for a reason. While evolution happens on a very small scale (adaptation), humans did not come from monkeys.

Prove that the world is more than 10,000 years old.....You can't.

but I can prove it is not:

If mankind has been on earth over a million years, as the evolutionists tell us, then why do the records of their activity only go back a few thousand years. The evidence agrees with the Bible account, not with the evolutionists. Evolutionary theory is a myth. God created everything; the evidence clearly points to it. Nothing else can explain the mountain of evidence

Man, whom the evolutionists claim to have come into existence over a million years ago, is said to have "stopped evolving" 100,000 years ago. Why then do we not have at least 100,000 years of civilizations, cities, and human remains?

Where are all those half man/half ape fossils which should be abundant in the earth's soil layers? They don't exist. This is what is known as the "missing link" by evolutionists.

Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals, each of these is an impossibility of science and the natural world.

The supposed hominids (creatures in-between ape and human that evolutionists believe used to exist) bones and skull record used by evolutionists often consists of `finds' which are thoroughly unrevealing and inconsistent. They are neither clear nor conclusive even though evolutionists present them as if they were. Nine of the twelve popularly supposed hominids are actually extinct apes/ monkeys and not part human at all. The final three supposed hominids put forth by evolutionists are actually modern human beings and not part monkey/ ape at all. Therefore, all twelve of the supposed hominids can be explained as being either fully monkey/ ape or fully modern human but not as something in between.

The God of heaven created our world about 6,000 years ago. Then, about 2348 B.C., a gigantic Flood covered the earth. Keeping in mind that we are dealing with very ancient events, all the evidence can be reconciled with these figures.

Many believe in evolution for the simple reason that they think science has proven it to be a `fact' and, therefore, it must be accepted... In recent years, a great many people...having finally been persuaded to make a real examination of the problem of evolution, have become convinced of its fallacy and are now convinced anti-evolutionists."
-- Henry Morris, former evolutionist.

How can evolutionists believe in evolution when science seems to go against so much of it?

[This is a weird one... it's a Greek God Fundie. Not sure if it counts.]

Your assumption that, people no longer believe in the Gods of Olympus because science has proved them wrong, is false, ignorant and possibly intolerant.

People still do believe in the Gods and not just as symbols but as real divine beings and by the way Zeus is God.

Your understanding of the issues involved is abyssmal, but thats not your fault, we are after all living in the Age of Iron, according to Hesiod.

Material philosophy, what you call science, is only one philosopical tradition among many. It has much to offer in terms of an explanation as to why things occur the way they do in the world but Materialism fails to answer satisfactoraly the most pressing questions we face as sentient beings. Questions relating to existence itself especially living sentient existence and issues relating to this such as ethics.

In my opinion only an Idealist philosophy can do this because only an idealistic philosophy asserts that mind precedes matter.

Zeus is the eternal cause of thunder not the material cause. Science can tell you 'what' happens to matter when a thunder storm occurs but it can't explain 'why' there is such a thing as thunder in the first place.