Men who eat meat should be banned from having sex, the animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has declared.
15 comments
Those in PETA should declare that certain animals should eat carrots. You’re in a cage with a bowl of that vegetable. A divider raises to reveal a very hungry puma that has tasted human blood: with only a wire divider between it and you.
That wire divider starts to rise.
Now declare to that puma that it should eat those carrots and not you : before it bans you from having opinions.
Via the ability to exist to have those - or any other - opinions.
One thing’s for sure: you will never have sex, whoever declared that.
Least of all with a cougar : or any other woman between the ages of 21 and that which constitutes that mature appelation.
And PETA should be banned from trying to be taken seriously as they are a crazed lying propaganda factory who kill more animals they save, will happily murder people's pets, and have endorsed and supported terrorism.
Are they assuming that women who aren’t vegans only that way in order to impress/please men? Or that women mostly have sex because men coerce them into it, so keeping women from having sex would be an ineffective form of coercion/punishment because that’s what they want anyway? How does this work with lesbians, or do they assume the vast majority of lesbians are vegans already?
@Timjer #172894
Probably their idea of breeding away any genes that carry willingness to partake of animal tissue.
Don’t ask me what they plan to do about herbivores (e.g. deer) that will partake of carrion if need be. I grimly wonder if non-Gaian Gnosticism is more frequent than usual in their ranks.
“Men who eat meat should be banned from having sex,”
This is the shit that keeps me from being vegan. An intense fear of making arguments that are this fucking stupid.
While animal wellfare is a thing, that's something else and if not a joke, appears to be advocacy for eugenism, something that will not help anything. It's like a type of revenge punishment against people who don't live the way they want, or an unrealistic pseudoscientific belief where humans would eventually become vegetarians via artificial selection.
It's noble to fight against unnecessary inhumane treatment and to improve farming and slaughter conditions (this reminds me that the political right is now retrograding the US on that front too recently). But there's been work by people like Temple Grandin who have helped to develop more humane conditions. Such and regulations are solutions, not the above nonsense.
Then there are interesting technologies that may allow tasty and equivalent alternatives, possibly viable, scalable and affordable, why not promote that instead of extremism?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
