Because atheists' are by definition learning disabled and dullards.
They can't even think that big to begin with. They think the movies Prometheus and Frankenstein are based on true stories.
Now that science is starting to refute Neverbiogenesis and Neverlution they'll be saying it was aliens that are our creators lol.
Anything but God you know.
They always toot their horn that they're so smart while believing that jello came alive one day from a lightning bolt hitting a mud puddle and then the jello compiled its own DNA from nothing and then populated the world with plants and animals lol.
Rofl
12 comments
I do love when people insult how intelligent the other party is they often have basic spelling mistakes. This is of course of top of the statements being the dumbest bilge you can find. It's a little chef's kiss of stupidity.
So, this is in response to someone asking why, since "atheists" believe the universe wasn't created and that's not a problem, why is "Who created God?" a gotcha question? "Atheists" are fine with something existing that wasn't created.
The real answer is that it is asked when theists state things can't just come from nothing, everything has to be created. God however is a thing, so to be logically consistent, God would need a creator.
For this idiot, I'll just hit 3 points.
Someone: “Have you ever talked to any actual atheists?”
BS (condescending): “Why would I? You gotta remember, it is I who decide
I like this bit from one of the comments, so I'm gonna post it here for posterity and because I want to share it; also, it brings to mind the poems Vincent Price used to do on Hilarious House of Frightenstein , for some reason, and that's always a good thing in my book:
A Zoroastrian I know says Jews have got it wrong,
They think the movies Prometheus and Frankenstein are based on true stories.
I have actually seen someone claim that Frankenstein was a true story. It was… a fundie. Specfifically AV1611VET, in the source thread for a quote where he claims that the legendary creatures and biology failures mentioned in the Bible (/inserted into the King James translation) checkmates evolution. His proof? A registry listing a family of chemists called Godwin (Shelley’s maiden name) including a daughter called Mary.
Anyways, my irony meter did not even explode. It just… winked out of reality with a banshee wail.
“Because atheists' are by definition learning disabled and dullards.”
“They can't even think that big to begin with.”
“They think the movies Prometheus and Frankenstein are based on true stories.”
“Now that science is starting to refute Neverbiogenesis and Neverlution they'll be saying it was aliens that are our creators lol.”
“Anything but God you know.”
“They always toot their horn that they're so smart while believing that jello came alive one day from a lightning bolt hitting a mud puddle and then the jello compiled its own DNA from nothing and then populated the world with plants and animals lol.”
“Rofl”
(Scoff) Movies? Young-uns these days. In my day we read dense novels and liked ’em! [This is a joke] This includes Frankenstein, which in no sense did I consider real or even particularly realistic. It’s called suspension of disbelief. And yes, there are a tiny number of people who are so credulous that they think it was aliens, which is especially dumb because it has the exact same infinite regress issues which God has except maybe a bit worse. We put them on this site, mocking and deconstructing them for being just as dumb as you.
But I can see where this general line of thinking comes from. The God of the Bible is an immoral person’s idea of moral purity, a petty person’s idea of a supreme authority, and an unimaginative person’s idea of an omnipotent being. He pretty much had to be written that way, lowest common denominator and all that. This does result in those less limited individuals being unimpressed by “God’s greatness” if they ever take the time to really think about it. It also results in those more limited individuals believing that this lack of being unimpressed means a deficiency on the part of the unimpressed person.
Says Starr, while at the same time exposing their incredible ignorance and weak typing skills to the world.
Alternative description:
This reminds me that a strange Jello analogy was also used here https://fstdt.com/88M5ZQYK4.JS
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
