@Denizen #177654
I suspect they think caprice is part and parcel of being answerable to none. The usual explanation like with Cheung, in any case, is that God wants to display both his love/mercy and wrath/justice (ignore for now that they’re neglecting the succoring aspect of Justice). But that’s innately contradictory with giving everyone the same fate. So there has to be a saint/reprobate divide if neither love nor wrath is to remain unknown and unglorifiable.
Putting aside whether “love” and “wrath” are even the right words in Calvinism, given the total lack of spontaneity. (I think Piper is a Calvinist?)