These just sound tailor-made for abuse.
"-Directing a child’s upbringing”
But I worry that someone will say this includes any book chosen for a reading assignment. "This character, a MALE, has an EARRING! I am bringing MY child up to know that this is WRONG!” Even if the character is a sailor from the time when they wore earrings to denote number of trips around the world…
“-Directing a child’s moral and religious training”
So, making the schools cancel ‘Pride’ participation.
“-Making and consenting to all physical and mental healthcare decisions for the child”
Obviously about transgendered treatments, but this could also prevent schools from treating kids having an asthma attack, or diabetics with blood-sugar problems, or calling an ambulance if they break a leg in Phys Ed.
“[…]-Procedures requiring a five-day notice to receive consent from a parent before their child receives instruction concerning gender roles, stereotypes, identity, expression or sexual orientation.”
And when the English teacher, "The Virgin" Connie Swail, comes back from Christmas break visible pregnant, that’s demonstrating her sexual orientation! I’ll SUE!
Or if Miss Johnson becomes Mrs. Gallitan, the woman changing her name to the spouse is CLEARLY a gender role!
And if we cover a WWII spy that the Germans kept missing because they could not believe that a woman could be so effective or so dangerous, that’s FLOGGING A STEREOTYPE! Never mind that she was successful because THE BAD GUYS believed the stereotype.
“-Allowing parents to withdraw their child from any instruction or presentation that they believe is harmful, including those that conflict with their beliefs and/or practices concerning sex, morality or religion.”
Note that evolutionary theory does not actually conflict with religion, as no science does, but it’s enough that the parents BELIEVE it does. So, even teaching that the South started the Civil War could be a violation.