All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
I live in an apartment right in the heart of college rentals. Sitting right on my front porch, I watch it unfold before my very eyes. It's things I've been cogniscent of for awhile, but after watching this Oktoberfest weekend, I felt so assured of the things I've been tossing around in my mind for years.
Rape served a very important function in mitigating female behavior and keeping it in check. Back in the time of prehistory, a woman couldn't behave as shamelessly slutty as she can today, because of the risk of catching the eye of the wrong male. But now, with "consent" laws barring nature back, and feminism and sexual-liberation perverting whole generations of hearts and minds, we find ourselves in a situation gone way, way, too far.
These harpies need to be humbled. And for their own good. Like the child with absolutely no boundaries and no discipline, they may feel they yearn for no rules, but become absolutely lost without an adult to tell them no! If you've ever met such a kid, the type who can have anyone over, at anytime, and do anything, is miserable. The insertion of an authority figure who deals out punishment is met with intense anger and resistance. But the discipline is what was so badly needed. The slaps and smacks may smart, but it helps the child have some semblance of direction as they develop.
These hussies are so far gone, living in a world that is a virtual macrocosm for them of the home for the child with the completely negligent, permissive parent. Disciplinary smacks and slaps come in a different form for these more grown children (college women), since the situation was more extreme in permissiveness and went on for more years. But the curing power of good ol' fashion physical strength wielded to correct can not be understated.
It's not only morally justifiable to rape such a woman, it's and brave.
At the risk of stating the obvious, this isn't true for all female human beings. We're not talking about nuns or grandmothers or humble, married, women of twenty years.
We're talking about filthy, unmitigated, sluts. Oblivious and loud. Shameless. Belligerent. Entitled. Selfie taking, Tindr-whoring, Teenage-walking-herpes-sores. We are talking about bad, bad, individuals. Unruly, neglicted, children, run-amok. That badly need to be punished. Badly.
For the good of society these women need to be raped.
Here we will teach how to do it safely.
Women do leverage sex for additional benefit, unless his attractiveness is drastically more valuable anyway. So... in a way.... brace for it... most women are prostitutes. The only difference is you've got a long-term contract going. The one where you can take him to the cleaners any time. That scam called marriage.
For the sake of argument, lets stick with the strictly economic form of hypergamy, i.e. women marry up economically. In male-female households, the woman usually earns more practically very little of the time.
So, lets say we minus the cost of a nanny, daily sessions with a shitty therapist, all his own expenses, and a housekeeper... what is the rest he's giving her for? Lets say she works part-time. Minus that too and it still leaves a hefty sum left over(in the salaries of most median earning men at least).
The "final solution to the Jewish question" had nothing to do with extermination. It was the continuation of the Transfer Agreement and the Madagascar Plan, i.e. territorial in nature.
No documents suggest it was anything other than this - you literally have to declare that it is a "code word" for extermination, which is what the Voodoo historians do in order to "prove" the genocide. They've essentially been forced into such measures, as they are compensating for a staggering lack of direct evidence.
As far as population estimates go, there are many of them, ranging widely, and it is far from an established fact that Jewish population in Europe decreased by 6 million between 1939 and 1945.
I roll my eyes at having to explain I don't literally think "all women DESERVE to be raped" but the basic ideas are this.
1. Rape did serve important, healthy, and natural biological purposes historically in limiting the extent to which female bad behavior can go.
2. Women in many ways are like children, and most can not self-regulate very well, so in the absence of something like parents or a natural limiting force like rape, they just run amok and destroy their selves and everything they touch.
3. Because rape is so completely arm-barred back by the state, and feminism has grown to be this infestation that caused even the social consequences for female behavior to dissappear, we find ourselves in a precarious situation. Unbridled female sluttishness, entitlement, narcissism, vileness and destruction gone viral.
4. Such women need to be Corrected. Humbled. Brought back down to a healthy place and realistic mindset. For their own good as well as that of those around them. That particular corrective action is quite clear, the one that used to naturally limit the behavior: rape.
5. We are here to provide encouragement and advice how to do that and do it safely. Regression analysis to find out which variables make it less likely to get into legal trouble. Very few women report the rapes, what can you do to make it even less likely? Example: remind the victim that "no one will believe them". When they orgasm (which is actually very common during rape, Google it) speak up and let them know that you are aware of it and that it will come out during trial if they reported it.
Etc.
Once more, it goes without saying that not all women deserve it, and some even make mistakes and could get caught up with the wrong crowd and dress/behave that way for one night. But there are swarms and swarms of filth parading around downtown and around campus every friday and saturday night, very badly needing to be Corrected. And there are many men out there fit to do it with just a little encouragement. The Elliot Rodger types could so easily be making a difference and gaining a purpose with just a little direction and support. I am not a "neckbeardy" type or a perma-virge or anything like that. I've had consentual sex with 9 girls, and have had serious relationships etc. But I do have a great deal of sympathy for these guys. Remember, "rape" is person dependent. The only thing that makes it "rape" as opposed to a "totes great lay" is the guy in the eyes of said harlot is a "creeeeeeeper" instead of a "hawtie!!!"
These cosmo types, vain, vile, venemous, femenist, filth have criteria that are completely shallow and unvirtuous. It's only in this insanely gynocentric world that we'd call that, her sexual best ineterest "completely cool" and rape, said discriminated man's best interest "abominable, uniquely horrendous! Worse then death!"
Worse than death? Really? If that's not proof of a social narrative carefully crafted by women, I don't know what is.
I consider marriage to mean ongoing consent to sex (at least until a separation), and find the concept of "marital rape" to be oxymoronic. Rape means having sex with someone without their consent, and your spouse has already consented to sex by marrying you. I believe so-called "rape" in a marriage should only be illegal inasmuch as it involves physical assault.
So, because of this viewpoint, I have a question that I'd like people who call themselves "blue pill" or "purple pill" to answer. If a husband has sex with his blackout drunk wife, is it rape?
Think of it from a purely biological perspective for a bit. You are a caveman looking to impregnate a woman to raise a big family and continue your bloodline.
Which woman do you chose? The cave woman that has had 100 different mens DNA inside of her or the cave woman that has had much less? You want to chose the woman that allows your sperm the greatest chance of survival and you want the one who will not pollute your future generation.
You want to bond with your cave woman to the highest level, spiritually, mentally and physically. The cave woman that has been with 50 cave men has lost a lot of her pair bonding ability, she has more male DNA in her body and on a purely instinctive level, your biological warning sense tells you to run.
Just as the cave woman seeks the strongest male to provide and protect her and the future children, the cave man looks for the most fertile and untouched.
The above was what a guy told me when I showed him a similar thread about number of sexual partners. He said that he was repulsed on a level out of his control so thought it came from the cave man times haha.
Personally, a womans number of partners wasn't anything at the fore front of my mind but after I met a woman that accidentally let the cat out of the bag and tripped herself up with her own lies, I found the fact an instant and pure turn off. It was to such an extent I didn't understand myself at first.
Women label it as insecurity but I would argue that anyone who hides their past or is afraid of the truth and afraid of being open were the insecure ones. The only reason why women label men as insecure is because deep down, that's all they got as a defense or a possible way to attempt to escape the outcome, shaming in the hopes the guy will buy into it and let it go.
I see the labeling someone as insecure for not celebrating your high number of partners as an attempt to shame them into thinking that it is their problem. If you go back to my little cave man story, it would be equivalent to the promiscuous cave woman labeling the alpha cave man as too weak to mate with her in the hopes he had a fragile enough ego to make the mistake of mating with a woman that gave his sperm less chance of survival.
Just a story based on what my buddy said, not to be taken too literally but you get the idea. Oh by the way, my buddy rejects promiscuous women but he is one of the most secure guys Ive ever known so good luck with that insecurity label.
China’s salvation.
The fundamental flaw in the existing Chinese nation is the continued existence of the so-called “Chinese” Communist Party and its hold on power over the organs of the state. The reason why this should no longer be so are myriad but the most succinct reason is that the Communist Party represents a foreign transplant ideology and culture that is distinctly ahistorical and unChinese. The Communist Party is therefore illegitimate. However, consideration must be taken in that the solution to the problem does not end up being worse than the original predicament. The most vocal opponents of the Communist Party both within and without China are the self styled Democratists who champion Western Liberalism as it is practiced in Europe and the United States. However they are not a true opposition to the Communists as they are in fact their doppelgangers hewn from the same Western milieu. The motto of the Communist Party is that only Socialism can save China, under the aegis of a single Marxist-Leninist vanguard party. The motto of the Democrats is that only Socialism can save China, under the aegis of two Marxist-Leninist vanguard parties. The end goal of both the Communists and the Democrats are the same, to ape the reigning Weltanschauung of the West, their only difference is in who should be in the driver’s seat.
The problem lies in the goal itself in that the total Westernization of China ultimately means China’s suicide. As the originators, innovators, and most accomplished practitioners of Western Liberalism are in the West, the legitimacy of any Liberal Democratic Chinese polity will ultimately be forever beholden to the West. That is any deviation from the reigning Western consensus is punished by deligitmization in the form of being labeled insufficiently democratic. Furthermore the core ideology that governs the West is at present virtually indistinguishable from the Communist Party in essence if not in form and has degenerated into what can best be described as Tartarism. What is Tartarism you ask? Tartarism is a social-governmental arrangement in which alien elite, actively hostile to the majority population, seeks to govern by dissolving the ethnic consciousness and cultural distinctiveness of said majority into an indistinctive lump in their imperial soup.
Just as the Manchu Qing usurpers claimed the mantle of the Chinese nation and enslaved the Han with the aid of various compradors and collaborators, the current socio-governmental system as embodied by the West consists of a thoroughly Judaized elite waging a subversive war to destroy the vitality of their respective nations by changing the demographic profile of their societies.
Since Western Liberalism is not a solution to China’s existing predicament, the only remaining solution is for China to chart her own distinctive political course. For many, a return to tradition would seem to be in order. That is the restoration of an emperor as the foundation of government and legitimacy. Unfortunately such romanticism is ill advised because it is precisely the imperial system, or rather its failure that has led us to the China of today. It is simply not only the problem of a “bad” emperor that can bring disaster, but rather even a good emperor is no guarantee of anything. The crux of the issue that the emperor, by virtue of being the emperor, stands above and beyond the lives of regular citizens. By being so detached, even a good emperor stands at risk of developing a fatal case of nobless oblige where his magnanimity can turn out to be disastrous in the long run. Still the optimal form of government has always involved some form of autocracy because the very fundamental nature of democracy means that it must be dysfunctional. By granting political power to everyone in the form of a vote, you grant it to no one because the value of a vote is diluted by its universality. In addition, a democracy assumes the fundamental equality of all voting constituents which flies in the face of empirical evidence. Not all individuals are equal and the voice of neither a fool nor ten thousand fools is worth that of one wise man. Thus political rights should and must be restricted in some manner for the good of all.
The question then remains as to how political rights must be structured and restricted in a post-Communist China. The first strata that must be disenfranchised are naturally women. Giving women political power over men is a more mendacious and reckless act than providing a loaded firearm to an infant. It endangers not just one family but that of the whole nation. The obvious next choice would be the non-Han minorities. China is and shall always be the domain of the Han race. There must be no exceptions to this restriction because one exception begins us down the slippery slope of more exceptions. Non-Han minorities should never exercise political over the Han. The next but not the most obvious choice should be the elderly. Citizens over the age of 65 should have no political rights. This is primarily to avoid the inevitable problem of gerontacratic capture that presently ensnares the West. The elderly vote much more consistently and in greater numbers than any voting block and their primary concern seems to be to keep the flow of government redistribution heading in their direction. This has not proven to be a problem in other Chinese micro-polities, but it is better to be safe than sorry and nip this potential problem in the bud. Education restrictions are generally a poor choice since the educational system in China, as it is becoming in the West, mere credentialism and the over-educated tend to over-indulge in liberalism. The lumpen proletariat and lumpen bourgeoisie are the backbone of any nation and they must not be excluded. The next and most difficult step is to configure a polity that can escape being seized by the plutocracy. This is already a problem in that the capitalist class in China is as materialistic and traitorous as any other and twice as self serving. Hong Kong and Singapore are already controlled by monopolistic cartels and property tycoons who have no compunctions about squeezing every last ounce of sweet and blood from the citizens and show no compunction against importing hostile racial aliens as a means to save or make more money. This is particularly difficult because money will always be wedded to political power and thus to work against this is to work against human nature. Since oligarchy is the default system of human hierarchical organization attempting to interfere in this usually results in externalities. The most brute force method is to restrict political rights to only those who have served 5 or more years in the military. This may be overly restrictive and results in a sample too unrepresentative of the Chinese people but it may be the only panacea to this most vexing of dilemmas.
In sum, the post Communist Chinese state must be governed by male Hans between the ages of 23-65 with a conditional 5 years of military service.
+ Posted to: "Women want to be raped by a high value man"
I was hoping someone would make a post about this. I agree on everything, and this applies to LTRs (*long term relationships) too, heck, I think that it's when it mostly applies! We know that we are Always the same woman and it's unlikely that our man will have to do this to hve sex.
And here is another truth I feel inside I am ashamed of - if I ever found out my SO raped someone my first reaction wouldn't be horror but anger and jealousy because fuck, did you really want her that much to push yourself onto her?
Women want to be raped by a high value man
Not pussyfooting around this one. Title is literal.
If anything could ever be classified as a Feminist's Nightmare, it's the irreconcilable notion that women are extremely aroused at the thought of being able to make a high value man so lustful that he loses control and has to have her. Many women have struggled with this concept. Some have cleverly come up with positive terminology to deflect from the dissonance; they'll use terms like "ravishment" to doll it up, as if simply assigning a new word takes away from the reality of what's going on.
Here in TRP we do not shy from these realities. What goes through a woman's head when she contemplates being ravished is that she is of such high SMV that men lose their control just to have her. This is a level of validation few women get to truly experience. The male equivalent would be a pair of beautiful women demanding that you have a threesome with them.
I've no doubt this type of post causes SJW's to froth at the mouth, but their impotent rage doesn't invalidate reality. Consider the success of 50 Shades of Grey. The basic synopsis is that a powerful, rich, alpha man completely lusts and forcefully dominates a perfectly boring average woman. You'd think this banal concept would only sell to a fringe that gets off on this kink, but the book sold 70 million copies in 8 months. That's more than any Harry Potter novel. And now that the movie is out I guarantee it will be a box-office hit. Let women scream and "Wow, just wow" at you all they want -- their words mean nothing in relation to their actions. Women want to be taken by force by a high value man.
So when is it rape instead of ravishment? Aside from obvious cases of drugging someone or having sex with the unconscious (for the feminazi retards: No one here condones these instances of legitimate rape) the difference is strictly in the disparity of your SMV's. The stranger-in-the-bush is often characterized as some seedy low-life thug. This evokes intense fear. Being forcefully held down in bed by the muscular CEO of a Fortune 500 company does not evoke this fear. No woman alive is comfortable by the idea that she enjoys rape, so she needs to reframe it. Be aware of that.
So how does the average TRP'er benefit from this? If you're already sexually active with a woman, discuss the concept of a safeword. Even though women love the idea of being taken, there's always the chance that she may be in one of those emotional frames where she genuinely isn't up for sex, this is a failsafe. Once you've established that, next time you're looking to sexually escalate simply ignore her token attempts to refuse. She turns her lips away from a kiss, you force her against a wall and take it. She tries to push you off, you squeeze her. You grab her and throw her onto the bed, then lay into her with your weight so she can't get away. And so on.
Paradoxically this creates intense arousal and pair-bonding in women. I encourage you to try this. Of all the women I've had sex with only ~5% genuinely hated rough, aggressive sex. The other 95% beg for more afterwards. Surprising how many victims offer to make food and drink after their "trauma".
Responding to an article about Black residents leaving Austin
Between articles like these popping up near constantly and the rush of articles last week claiming that gay men are attacking black women and "stealing their cultural identity" I am just about tapped out on my sympathy to "racism".
I grew up in a small town that was very segregated. I was aware of racism and felt terrible about it. Now it is getting to the point that I don't care at all. I am tired of the "all white people are terrible" line of thought that permeates liberal spaces. My family immigrated from Germany to escape nazis. The other side of my family was Cherokee. None of my ancestors were slave owners and if they would have been, then that's not my fault.
Meanwhile I have to endure article after article, supposedly written by intelligent black thinkers, that tell me my very existence is racist.
You want to move to east austin? You are a racist gentrifier.
You want to move to the suburbs? You are a racist participating in white flight.
You have black friends? You are a racist collecting tokens.
Don't have black friends? You are a racist practicing ethic cleansing
Support affirmative action? You are a racist! You practice the racism of "lowered expectations" thinking the proud black race needs a helping hand and can't qualify on their own merits.
Don't support affirmative action? You're a racist! You are to scared to compete on a level playing field.
If you try to expand your horizons and immerse yourself in black culture? You're a racist! You are appropriating culture from the proud black woman!
If you don't know anything about black culture? You're a racist! You just like to whitewash society.
It's impossible to not be racist it seems, so I don't care anymore. The biggest killer of young black men are other black men. The biggest barrier to economic affluence and the greatest contributor to intergenerational poverty in the black community is the black cultures acceptance of ignorance and celebration of thug life. The most racist person I ever met was my black coworker Tatiana who used to get the shit beat out of her for getting good grades. That's right....doing well in school is considered "acting white", and as such she HATED "ignorant black people". But keep in mind....I never see articles from black writers saying how maybe black people need to step up and fix problems in their community. No...it's always the white mans fault.
And then let's not forget the brain trust that is the black feminist. In the 60s a bunch of gay drag queens got together and as a form of fighting back started to adopt speech and mannerisms over exaggerating females. Watch Paris is burning. The sashay. The "mmmhmmmm". The twirling of the head and rolling of the eyes? Gay men invented that. Then 50 years later an over indulged black woman says that gays actually stole that from HER people. And we need to cut it the hell out and get back in the closet.
Fuck her. Fuck people who say I am a racist simply because I exist. Why does the black intelligentsia of this country keep on alienating everyone and telling us we are evil and worthless? That right there should tell you how powerful black people have gotten. They now are secure enough that they don't care about allies. They shit on other minorities like the lgbt. And they insist they are the victims.
I am the most liberal person I know. I believe strongly in social justice. But I am so fucking sick of being called a racist.
Here, read the brilliance of the social justice warrior. This does more harm to liberal political causes then ann coulter and rush Limbaugh combined
Women are extreme egoists with a profound understanding of indirect communication. They are master manipulators, but slaves to their own emotions.
They will often feign insanity or ignorance to retain plausible deniability, but they are not crazy. They are Machiavellian.
[In response to an article about the recent violence faced by and mass emigration of French Jews]
At some point, Europe will come to the startling realisation that they got rid of 6 million Jews who would have built and further enhanced their rich culture and let in 40 million Muslims that set about destroying their culture and replacing it with Sharia Law. Hopefully, we'll all be in Israel by then.
["That's not racist at all."]
Yeah, keep telling yourself that it's only a minority and that their culture and religion has nothing to do with what is going on in the world right now. No, please, if it makes you feel more righteous. I prefer to use my eyes, brain etc. to decide what's right and what is wrong. Accuse me all you like - it is arbitrary and quite frankly the goto rhetoric that liberals use when someone even dares commit the cardinal sin of suggesting that there are negative traits within a culture and that maybe, there might be some form of poison within that culture that is causing would-be innocents to behave this way.
No one wants to hear what I stated above but Paris is only the beginning. These protests - in the name of Palestine - are only a means to an end in their battle against Western culture. Idiots like you give them the green light to use the very freedom we fought for in WW2 against us. I hope I'm wrong but these protests will start becoming a real nuisance for European governments. Sharia law doesn't respect our law, just remember that.
When it's all over, I'll come an bury your corpse that was beheaded by the very people you seek to defend.
Richard Nesbitt claims that the Western tendency to analyze reality by breaking it into atomized components, rather than the East Asian tendency of holistic thought, encouraged the development of the scientific method, formal logic, and rhetoric. Nisbett is a huge critic of IQ hereditarianism, but that doesn't need to stop one from integrating his ideas into an HBD-centric outlook. And Jayman doesn't talk much about IQ, HBDChick even less so.
Asian science is not up to par, but Asian technology is world-class. This fits the idea that Asians are better at situated/relational thought than abstract thought. And Chinese-Americans do pretty well (my parents being two examples of that)
LessWrong is a high-IQ tech oriented site, but it's 85% White, and has a third as many Asians as Google by percent. They're all about abstract/formal thought, even more than its average IQ would predict.
I've seen another theory, suggesting that although Asians have all the essentials for intelligence, they're effectively oversocialized. They're low in psychopathy, which is requires to produce geniuses. They're too conscientious and agreeable.
Contrast this with Africans, who score low in IQ, but also score low in conscientiousness, or Jews, who score high in IQ but do not suffer the oversocialization that keeps Asians from producing Nobel prize winners. Jews as individuals are willing to enrage the entire world against them, even the Jewish community.
Marxism and Anarchism are effectively a revolt against the values of 19th century Bourgeois liberal Jewish culture. When white nationalists accuse Jews of hating white culture, they don't realize that the tendency of high IQ, low conscientiousness people is to revolt against the culture they grow up, whatever that culture may be, it's not a personal hatred of white people.
As someone very low in conscientious myself, I find myself challenging everything that I see as having authority, it's my natural tendency. It's typically Jewish too. My old friend in the US used to go shoplifiting for fun in Wallmart with Jewish anarchists, typical low conscientiousness high IQ behavior. How many people go shoplifting with Chinese anarchists? When thinking back of the Jewish girl I fell in love with compared with Chinese girls and Dutch girls I met, I found that she appreciated my eccentric behavior and ideas that I tried to hide from her, the ones that high conscientiousness Dutch and Chinese girls would find repulsive.*
Asian culture seems to place a strong emphasis on maintaining social harmony, whereas Jewish culture (and upper class white male culture in a broader sense) revel in continual strife and disagreement, as long as it stays verbal. In Singapore, when a college professor disagrees with some government policy, he doesn't write to the newspaper or organize a protest as it would disturb the social harmony, instead, he privately tries to contact the government official with his suggestion. I think that's where the great divergence comes from.
On the question of society's trust of men in general
Consult the male survival guide rule #10
Male survival in 21st century America:
1. Do not get married.
2. Do not have children.
3. Get a vasectomy.
4. Do not tell your sexual partners you have had a vasectomy.
5. Do not cohabit with any woman you are in a relationship with.
6. Do not ever be alone with a child for any reason.
7. Do not date or have sex with any woman who has a child.
8. Do not provide regular financial support to any woman.
9. Do not attempt to protect or help female strangers. If you see someone beating up a woman, walk away. Do not attempt to help her. Do not call the police.
10. Do not speak to or touch a child you do not know. If you see a child drowning, walk away. If you see a child being kidnapped, walk away. Do not call the police.
11. Do not speak to the police for any reason ever.
12. Carry a cell phone or other device capable of audio and video recording at all times.
Surely [crop circles] CAN be faked...but what of the circles found in where the stalks were NOT "mechanically" trampled? MANY circles are found in which the stalks are heated and basically "explode" from the heat (like a microwave) causing the plant to fall over.
This opens up a whole new argument though...if "they" are complex enough to make these circles why not communicate with us in other ways??
I guess the jury's out for me on this one still...
[Sovereign Citizens] is simply a labeling of yet another group of Americans as terrorists. I mean, to label everyone who knows the laws and fights the government based on them, a terrorist, just like the punks who shot the cops. This is a clear cut case of propaganda straight from the globalist agenda handbook.
http://adask.wordpress.com/ Adask writes "Am I about to be labeled a domestic terrorist."
Should the number 1 be illegal? the number 1e10000? infinity? What about all the numbers in between? If you answered no, congratulations, you just agreed child porn should be legal. An image is nothing but a number, to make a set of images illegal is to make a number illegal.
Is collëcting knivës usëd in murdërs a crimë?
By dëfinition somëonë had to commit a murdër in ordër for thë collëctor to havë his prizëd possëssion. Howëvër thë collëctor did not commit thë murdër, nor is thërë any rëason to bëliëvë hë wantëd it to bë committëd.
This is an ëvën strongër casë bëcausë knivës typically cost monëy, whilë porn typically doës not. A përson who buys knivës usëd in murdërs is crëating a dirëct ëconomic incëntivë that doësn't ëxist in thë porn scënario. Yët no onë would takë sëriously thë claim that simply having a knifë is ëquivalënt or ëvën analogous to committing a murdër.
What's thë diffërëncë? Simply that child porn is a knëë-jërk moralistic issuë whilë knivës arë somëthing wë approach with rationality and intëllëctual consistëncy.
I had a thought recently about feminism and how women behave. Women inherently see men as having authority over them. However, this authority is not a societal construct. The balance of leadership and submission is in-built in our natures. If you look at how feminists behave, they act like children rebelling against their parents. This is quite different to how people behave when they feel like they have authority over their own lives. People who have their own sense of authority over their lives do not act this way. Women claim that they are rebelling against the so-called patriarchy, but they are not. They are rebelling against their own submissive nature. Thus, it never ends. They cannot win, because there is no external oppressor. In a way, feminists don't entirely hate men for being men; they hate men for the fact that women are women.
It all begins where 'the holy book' ends. Thus the end is really the beginning. And the beginning is really the end. This is where things really go wonky.
Have you watched 'Plato's Allegory of The Cave'?
There is a wide world of belief out there. But there is only one truth. It is said to be 7 billion Homo Sapiens on the planet, but there is only one Human Race. There is only one Reality we all exist in, and only one History that has established our communal 'Reality'. This history is shared by all Homo Sapiens. That is what makes it 'communal'. This history is the reason why Human Beings exist today. There are certainly different historical paths for each culture that is located in different parts of the world, but each story starts in exactly the same place.
There is one particular section of history that is peculiar to us 'Homo Sapiens' or 'Hued Man' as we are also called. It is absolute, undeniable proof that 'aliens' do exist. It is proof that 'God' exists, and, in fact, is very concerned with the affairs of us human beings. This proof that exists is ancient, historical, and extant. More important than the fact that this proof currently exists is the reality of what this 'proof' actually is. It is a people. The People once called 'Hebrews'. The only reason these people once called 'The Hebrews' are even known to the civilizations of modern man is because that word only exists in a document the Ancient Greeks referred to as 'Genesis', or 'Origins', but was know to The Hebrews as 'Bereshit' and is now contained in a book called 'The Bible'.
It is the first book of the Roman Catholic 'Canon'; the first book of the Judaic 'Torah' or Greek 'Pentateuch', and it is the first book of the Protestant Christian 'Holy Bible'. It is also a historical document specifically related to the people called 'The Hebrews' and the oldest copies of it are about 3000 years old. It is not the fact that three separate religions use this document as the foundation for their faith and belief in 'God', but the age of the document, its historical accuracy, and the fact that the Hebrew People still exist is what gives it its importance.
But as an Archeological document and not a religious one. This is why the religious aspects are not as relevant as the historical aspects that mark the actual presence of the Hebrew People from Ancient Times until now. To put it more bluntly: The existence of this 'Hebrew People' is proof of the ancient interaction between human beings and an advanced Alien Race who call themselves 'The Annunaki', and more to the point, the Hebrew People validate and substantiate this exact history as it is related in detail in the most ancient document on earth: The Sumerian Tablets. Outside of the Sumerian Tablets, only one other document exists that has similar content, but it is depicted as 'religious' in most modern circles. That book is the aforementioned document best known as 'Genesis', but it should be known as the 'Genos (Offspring) of Isis'.
Now as unorthodox as it might seem the Sumerian Tablets tell us 'Aliens' (forgive the negative connotation) who called themselves 'The Annunaki' genetically modified 'Homo Neanderthalensis' into 'Homo Sapiens' or 'Wise Man'. They then (Let Us) proceeded to teach us-their new 'creation'-how to speak, how to read, how to write, how to build and how to live so they could use us to make the mining of gold on Earth 'easier'. The 'proof' of this fact is found in the area now corresponding to modern-day Iraq, the northeastern section of Syria and to a much lesser extent southeastern Turkey, smaller parts of southwestern Iran and Kuwait. Which is why 'civilization' popped up so suddenly in Ancient Sumer/Mesopotamia.
A city in Sumer, called in the Hebrew Documents 'Ur', is where the patriarch of the Hebrew People 'Abraham' is said to have come from, shortly after the time one of The Annunaki named Marduk (The Dragon) went rogue and declared himself 'God' and began using humans worshipers to fulfill his desires rather than use them to mine gold as instructed to send back to their home planet of Nibiru. The 1/3 of the Stars of Heaven were his Igigi: Over 200 strong. Marduk was a leader of an Army, also called The Nephilim because they are the ones who married human females, impregnated them and gave rise to the Giants 'in those days'.
In defiance of the Annunaki Leader Enlil, Ea Enki wrote the 'Enuma Elish' (Sumerian Tablets) and the Daughter of Anu 'Innana' singled out the one then named 'Abram' and directed him away from Sumer, away from Ur, away from his family and familiar life in Mesopotamia, to the home base of Her Brother Ea Enki, in Africa. A place almost everyone in a first world country is familiar with: Where a second and almost equally unprecedented civilization sprung up, in modern day Egypt.
Then the Exodus happens approximately 400 years later, bringing the descendants of Abraham, now a great number, out of Egypt to create a nation/race (Genos) called 'Israel', led by one they called 'prophet', who was given (or copied from) a set of Stone (Sumerian) Tablets by the same Annunaki who called out to Abram.
Tablets to be placed in an Ark as a Covenant. Sound familiar?
They were more than likely a copy of The Sumerian Tablets, first written by the Annunaki named 'Enki' who was called "Ea" (Lord) of (Enki) Earth. It took this Prophet, best known as Moses, 40 days and nights to copy these tablets, so there is little logical chance they were simply 'ten commandments'. A set of the Sumerian Tablets were found in Mesopotamia, in-of all places-a temple of Innana, the same Annunaki mentioned by name in the Sumerian Tablets. The same Innana who, as the Sumerian Records indicate, 'took a special interest in a certain people from among the humans'. Those people who are now called 'The Hebrews'.
This is the same Annunaki called 'Eloah' (Goddess) by the Ancient Hebrews, as is historically verified in the book of Job, written thousands of years ago. It is this same Annunaki who ordered and established the Ancient Hebrew nation 'Israel', which is now defunct, having been scattered to the winds sometime around 70 A.D. by Titus, a General of the Roman Empire. The modern day nation/state of (Zionist) Israel is not comprised of the original Hebrews, and everyone, at the top, knows this. But 'they' also know that you, the general population, do not know this, and they have thus far successfully kept it that way.
Anyone who tries to teach the world the truth about how 'The Jews are not 'Hebrew' and gives attempts to give facts is labeled a crackpot, an anti-Semite or some other derogatory epithet that draws the eyes away from the truth and entices the mind to disregard what has been said.
As a result, there is yet to be a correct interpretation of the identity of 'the Woman of the Apocalypse'. Mostly because the truth is impossible to believe. You, whoever you believe yourself to be, are reading this right now for one reason and one reason alone: Innana, whom the Ancient Hebrew called 'Eloah'.
She was known as one of the 'Great Ones' or 'Elohiym', or by the name most would be unfamiliar with: The Annunaki. The story began with Abram, when El(oah) Shaddai (Many Breasted God(dess)) called out to him and said she would make a Nation (Genos) of him. It would come to be known as 'Israel'. Peopled by 12 Tribes (the 12 stars in the Woman's Crown). The 'son' She named 'Yisreal'.
She called these people 'Hebrew' because of the situation they would have to 'go/pass/transition' through before all of the wrongs caused by Marduk could be made right. That is why the meaning of the 'hebrew' word is so important. Then you can understand what Innana was doing and why She was doing it: To Provide Proof and 'a way' back to The Truth, back to the beginning, before everything went to 'hell'.
Marduk, as the Dragon, was grounded to Earth by having his capability of flight destroyed. Parts of this 'war in heaven' are written about in the Hindi 'Upanishads'. The part played by 'Michael' was Enlil's son. Marduk was Enki's son. After the destruction of Marduk and the Igigi's ships and home base by powerful weapons, the Annunaki abandoned Earth. The weapons they used to destroy Marduk's flight had an unexpected effect that killed Annunkai and Earthling alike: Radiation.
In the meantime, our surviving human ancestors were left at the mercy of Marduk and his Igigi. Innana still had her ship (clothed with the Sun) and fled to the Moon (Moon under her feet), where she remained out of reach of Marduk. The 'time' allotted to Marduk as 'ruler over Earth' and the time that Innana had to hide from him are about the same: Approximately 1 'Shar' (circuit of Nibiru around the Sun) or about 3 thousand to thirty-five hundred Earth years.
The water poured from the mouth of the serpent/dragon/devil was misinformation to obscure and erase the evidence of Innana's presence and activities in human history. To fool human beings into thinking he Marduk/Ra/Zeus/Etc was the defacto 'God' of Earth and all human beings. Rather than the spiritual truth: All Living Beings Are Divines Ones; i.e. 'Gods'.
Marduk is 'The Fallen One' who 'deceives the whole world', is called 'Devil' and 'Satan', a word that only means 'adversary', and surely he is the adversary of man. This is the secret that has been kept hidden. This is the truth that will make you free.
We-Earthlings Collectively-still have to forgive him.
The time has come. Now you know The Truth. Now you can be freed.
Reject it or accept it.
All of this is related to us in the Sumerian Tablets. You can learn to read cuneiform or read the translations by those who already know how. The choice is up to you. I have no need to deceive, but you have a need to know.
The Truth Stands On Its Own.
But if you have any questions I am willing and able to answer them.
The P.O.E.M or Peace On Earth Movement Facebook page. : https://www.facebook.com/pages/POEM-Peace-On-Earth-Movement/588726381233293
women who serve males are still our sisters. i was once a handmaiden, because i had been groomed since before my birth to serve men. during that sleeping time i harmed myself and my sisters by undermining my sisters' understanding of men and male hatred of women.
our handmaiden sisters live in a state of constant terror so deep that they literally anesthetize themselves with the lies that men love women and that they can trust men to protect them from other men. the pain of awakening to the vast evil that is male hatred of women is unbearable to these sisters and they literally cannot physically and mentally tolerate the truth of male hatred of women.
it is cruel to wake a sister before she is ready. IF she is ever ready. and it is her right to sleep. stockholm syndrome means that they operate under the delusion that they are "free" to "choose". one cannot "choose" anything that is harmful to oneself. it is impossible. this is why a warrior must use compassion AND insight/discernment when working for the liberation from male violence.
radical feminists are women who understand that men are women's enemies and seek to liberate women from male oppression.
it is because i love women, all of them. even the handmaidens, that i am taking the time to answer your questions. as a woman, you are my sister and i stand with you. i am not saying you are a handmaiden. rather i am saying that you, handmaidens, and i are all women. and that is why we are all suffering under the patriarchy.
when i am relating to handmaidens, i focus on making their lives easier in very small ways like simply being polite when online. or by truthfully identifying men as the agent of violence against women, as gently as i can while still being truthful. it's important to remember that handmaidens are also suffering under the patriarchy. perhaps more so than i, because i have the dignity of a decolonized mind free from unexamined self-hatred. i am aware of the mental scars i bear and have sufficient control of my mind to accurately perceive reality. and reality shows us that men hate women with a vicious intensity.
i am not a radfem because i like being comfortable. i am a radfem because i believe in my own humanity.
do you believe that you are human?
I don't consider money laundering a crime at all. It's nothing but transferring money from A to B. That in and of itself does not harm anyone.
If someone robs a bank and proceeds to launder the funds, the crime was the bank robbery not the subsequent money transfer. Law enforcement should focus on stopping the robbery, not demanding everyone be inconvienced and innovation crushed because it makes their investigation easier.
[In response to the OP discussing how his sister asked him if he was ashamed for being a white male because he reads Men's Rights websites.]
You should ask her if she is ashamed of the burden of original sin or should blacks feel like the burdened sons of Cain.
Here is my response to that attitude, but it is sure to inflame further-
People are quick to blame white people for historic wrongs, but that is because they developed technology in more barbaric times. Do you think the Zulus would have been more kind with muskets? For every white person you want to unload on for historic wrongs, you need to get on your knees and thank a hundred first for the renaissance, the age of exploration, the industrial revolution, the atomic age, and the information age we live in. Take a look at your life and ask yourself how much of current civilization would exist if not for the white man. For all I know, whites are the only reason that we all are not currently as barbaric as the very people that are decried with rants against historic wrongs. These accomplishments have given you the luxury to decry the effort they were built upon and you would have been no better but for what the founders of this world have allowed you, so allow them the thanks you owe in spades.
"Do they walk around feeling in danger all the time? And safe from what exactly?"
I'd like to submit a report a friend was sharing with me. He's a masterful PUA and even with no $ he pulls as many 18 yr old gorgeous exotic models as he wants any day of the week. But he couldn't help but notice that the top 1% have the most self esteem issues, are the most emotionally insecure and go the most batshit crazy. You'd think their extreme beauty would make them confident, but it appeared to be the exact opposite.
He decided to run an experiment... Once he got them feeling relatively safe with him, he started asking the girls if they had ever been molested or sexually abused when they were young. A SHOCKING number of them (I'll have to ask him about the exact breakdown, but def most of them) broke down into tears and admitted yes. Some of them couldn't even remember, they were so young or had blocked the memories. Some of them had never even admitted it to anyone before. Most of the time it was some male friend of the family. Some man who couldn't control himself in the presence of a young innocent 10 and seized his only chance at ever being with a female of that status.
If a man is going to lose all control risk sexually abusing a little girl it's going to be for the top 1%. He's not going to risk it for a girl who's going to grow into a 6 or even an 8. I don't need to get into all the ways being sexually abused as a child affects your self esteem. But this interesting report might explain why the hottest are the most insecure.
And it also shows why men shouldn't resent them for their crazy emotional behavior no matter how devious it may seem and how many shit tests they throw out. These women are suffering and they need an extra strong, stable Alpha to give them security and make them feel safe to overcome their negative experiences with men.
It's men that they need to feel safe from and only a real man can give them that security.
“my friend has been alone for a few weeks” he’s the only one to blame. No muslim in his right mind would ever reveal publicly that he has committed fornication or that he has stolen something or that he drinks alcohol.
so why does your friend reveal publicly that he’s gay? what did he expect when confessing in a video that he is attracted to men ? what he does does not concern anybody and if he’s been alone for weeks it's his own goddamn fault for doing something so stupid. what did he expect when he revealed this fact? God doesn’t approve of homosexuality, does your friend expect to be accepted by muslims? It's like saying “I LOVE DRINKING BEER AND WINE” and expect to not be judged. your friend is an idiot for doing this and he’s now suffering the consequences of his own stupidity. He could have gone to an imam and explained his problem and asked for help but no, he had to make a pointless video on his blog like a brainless teenager. Your friend isn’t just homosexual, he has the IQ of a donkey.
I'd like to discuss the issue mentioned in the title within the context of an /r/asianamerican moderator,Chinglishese, who is dating a white guy, and is therefore an active participant in Asian-American disempowerment and perpetuating the WM/AF stereotype. It's completely unacceptable for her to moderate a forum that is actively trying to change this stereotype.
The phenomenon of self-loathing Asian-American women who only date white men is a very important issue to the AA community that cannot be ignored. By dating a white man, chinglishese is capitulating and submitting to her oppressor. This is one of the most important issues facing the AA community, and there needs to be a movement of AA solidarity against white men who fetishize and exoticize Asian women.
Yes. And maybe I already have.
For all of you who are responding with "absolutely not" replies, I remind you that not only did the Messenger of Allah (saw) have more than one, but nearly all the Sahaba did as well.
The only religion on earth that says that one is the norm is Christianity. All other religions either place no limit, or specifically allow multiple wives.
So please stop behaving as if multiple wives is a bad thing. It's a great thing. You have never experienced it, so don't act like you have any knowledge of what it is like.
Having multiple wives is better than having one. Far better. Most men have trouble with multiple wives because they don't keep an Islamic atmosphere at home, and they marry women with weak Islam and shallow personalities.
Following the guidance of Islam always leads to better and more tranquil results than any other solutions.
I lol at the "intellectual's" who simply write off Magick as being fake when they themselves haven't seen it (authentic magick) being performed or it's 'miraculous' effects on people.
Even many Non-Muslim academics (Princeton & Harvard Professors even) and people involved in the work of paranormal investigations have begun to take an interest in the Jinn. A good majority of them have become convinced that many haunting's aren't the work of "ghost's" or "spirits" but by invisible demonic entities (i.e Jinn).
Though learning magick is Kufr (disbelief in Islam) you can find many cult-sites on the internet filled with testimonials of successful "enchantments" and spells by fairly educated people whom go into detail about their encounters with the Jinn (after summoning them). They see them whilst in a trance like state (induced by meditation) or in their sleep.
I'm warning you all that I'm simply posting this site so that you guys may see online magicians at work, read their testimonials, and maybe reconsider whether you believe it to be fake or not. I'm not posting this so that any of you can learn the material and try it yourselves, as such would take you out of the folds of Islam! The people on this site believe they are encountering with Angels, however in the Islamic tradition it's common knowledge that we only have the capacity of communicating with Jinn's willingly, whom can take different forms on-command. The following is the website: evocationmagic.com
It was a republican president who set the slaves free. The democrat in office now is a pro-slavery agent of the Illuminati or the Rockefeller family. Shit's pretty obvious, it's out in broad daylight for one.
(in response to a thread started by a lesbian who recently began dating a man)
It's not that you are betraying the community, it's that you are betraying yourself. In Jr. High you started the shed the chains of the heteronormative patriarchy, and you decided to put those chains back on.
Trust me, as someone who has been in relationships with men and is now a lesbian, men are all evil violent defective creatures. They will abuse you, they will feed off your positive energy while offering nothing in return, they will rape you. They put on a shiny 'White Knight' facade, but given enough time that facade will crack and their inner violent nature will shine through.
I know what you are saying, "My Nigel isn't like that'. He is, as all men are. I don't know if it is in their genetics or rooted deeply in their privilege, but they are all violent abusive fucks. I hope you can get free of him before he has a chance to hurt you.
Witchwind, a feminist blogger, explains the facade Men put up in order to trap and abuse us very we'll here. Please read this and take heed to what you are walking into: http://witchwind.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/spot-the-man-behind-the-man/
Liberals view Islam as the lost proletariat that will fight against the West. They view Muslims as the disenfranchised group of brown people that will fight against the United States. Despite the fact that they are the most conservative people on Earth (They hate gays, women and minorities) liberals will ally with them for the sake of anti-Americanism and anti-capitalism.
As an atheist and a conservative, I'm sick of hearing excuses by liberals apologizing for far-wing conservative Islamic values. The culture of Islamic countries are anti-liberal.
When I was about 6? I was talking with my neighbors about Jesus. They went to a Catholic school and I wanted to know about him. I heard that they crucified him and thought "Gosh, people were so wicked back then. What would have happened to me if I lived back then?" at which point I had a vision of me bowing on the ground getting my head chopped off by a person that came on a horse in red.
This has led me to believe that I'm John the Baptist.
Or everything that religion did in the past regarding culture, science (yes science) and things like that. Most things that we are using nowadays were invented by religion. Whether it's printing the fact that a big share of hospitals are owned by Christian orders or the calendar that most Western countries are using. Of course there are a ton of bad things but I think that a lot of people forget about the good things that Christianity gave us. The whole debate about religion is biased as fuck and I would like to see people talk about it objectively.
[In Orthodox Judaism a man has to be the one to provide a get and divorce his wife. This is in response to an article about a husband holding his soon-to-be ex-wife hostage in marriage after she was granted a civil divorce.]
Why did the state of New Jersey grant the civil divorce in the first place? There should be a law in place preventing a civil divorce from being granted if the religious divorce is blocked.
Except the Jews (as a whole) aren't like most groups of people. They act as a tightly knit ethnic/religious criminal syndicate. This is ingrained in their belief system.
The Jewish people have been expelled from almost every country they have ever lived in at least once over the course of history.
Who is to blame? Are all these countries anti-semitic for no reason? Or was the expulsion of Jews justified because of the way the Jewish people (as a whole) interacted with society?
Are you serious? People are in danger of burning in hell and you want the fish to come to you? If you saw someone standing on the train tracks with a train barreling down on them, wouldn't you plead with them to get off the tracks? Wouldn't you beg them? I would. This is an emergency. If someone agrees to talk to me, then you better believe that I will try to bring them to Christ. I am so sick and tired of these lazy, afraid to stand up for the Cross, fake Christians. Get mad at me all you want. Call me a bible thumper. I don't care, because if you're a true follower of Christ, then you realize how serious this situation is. People's souls are on the line. We have to do something about it.
Brother DON'T even kiss a your gf before marriage! WHY? Because I had with my gf (now ex) some boundaries. We crossed them.. a lot. We both broke up and now we both feel dirtier.
What you need to do- stop doing any physical contacts and (if you truly know that she is THE ONE) then marry as soon as you can. Why wait for a wedding? :D I'm totally serious.
In time I will, God willing. You've waited 2000 years, you can wait 20-30 more.
There are a number of things the Messiah does. For one, he needs to know Torah, so I study Torah A LOT. Actually I only have to read it once more and I'm done. So I'm doing some of the things I'm supposed to do. I also have to learn Hebrew. I also have to have a regular life and support myself.
I predict that I will, believe it or not, invent fusion power. I believe God will give me the knowledge to do that. Why? Because it is the power of the sun/son. This is something I have learned from the part of me that is a sage and it was in one of the visions I had. I know it is crazy. Trust me. It has caused me a good deal of grief in my life. For one thing, I will be thought of as the antichrist by people. I'm even asexual which is one of the prophecies of the antichrist according to Christians. It used to scare me that I would be him for it is said a terrible punishment awaits this person. It takes a lot of faith in God and in my ability to understand the Tanakh to be who I am.
You know the reason I believe this? It is because I've had visions and dreams and that's the only reason. I haven't always believed this, btw. Check out my video on another post that explains the sin of the Golden Calf. I think I have biblical wisdom. God says in Isaiah that in time He will pour out His spirit upon all flesh and "young men will have visions and old men will have dreams." I have both which tells me I have God's ruach upon me.
And who has God's ruach upon them? The Messiah.
If you watch my video on the Sin of the Golden Calf I think this is good teaching. NO ONE I have ever heard of has explained it so and I believe it is the correct interpretation of events.
I might not be the Messiah. But if I am, you just called me an idiot asshole, as if I haven't suffered enough as it is. My life has been full of suffering, because I am the suffering servant which is a Messianic prophecy. It hurts just to be rejected by people.
Of course the Messiah will be thought to be insane. Isn't that a common perception?
Thanks for "goddamning" me. Is that a curse? BTW I've cursed two people unknowingly and they both died. People hated me in HS because they thought I was a weird guy that caused one of my classmates dad's to die. True story. And I did. I cursed him for raising a wicked son.
The easiest part of the Messiah's duty is to bring peace to the earth. Don't forget his tongue is like an iron rod. So I need to have recognition so I can speak to people. I'm starting on the internet but I don't expect you to believe me. If I invent fusion power I will have a platform.
I've been on here for months and have never before said this to people. I'm not trying to be some kind of celebrity. You asked what authority I had and I answered.
And how do I tell what tribe your from? From my sound judgment that doesn't come from what I see or hear. I read the twelve blessings Israel said to his sons and I can see what person you are. For example, I can see the lion in you if you are from the tribe of Judah. If you are from Zebulun, I see a person that should live by the sea. The problem comes when I get to Simeon and Levi for they were both given the same blessing. But I have a way with that even for I can tell a man who should be a priest.
As for Shiloh, well, you'll see. I'm not giving that away. As for my name, it is said that the Messiah's name will have special meaning. The meanings of my names comes out as "Beloved Protector of Mankind to Preserve the Son of David." In other words, "Beloved Protector of Mankind to Preserve the Son of David/Solomon/Wisdom.
[The user has self-identified as a Jew and is now getting into an argument with real Jews]
I'm the fucking Messiah asshole. Tell me, what was the sin of the golden calf? Why do you think I call myself "the golden cowboy?" I'm in every single one of you, just like that gold was in every one of the Jews present after drinking the water. I'm a cowboy that can wrestle with God for the Jewish people. I can trace myself to King David and I can tell you what tribe your from. I'm also Elijah. Elijah is the Messiah jackass.
You don't know what you don't know. And what you know is what you've been taught at your Yeshiva. Now its time to humble yourself. The only people who should have the arrogance of you are the soldiers in the IDF.
I saw a little guy like you at the synagogue. An 18 year old Jew kid in America with a smirk on his face. He shouldn't be so proud unless he's serving in the military in Israel.
[Asked on a Jewish forum]
Are you guys really plotting to destroy Western cultures and European society? I'm not accusing; Just merely wondering what the majority of 'everyday, normal Jews' (like I assume post on Reddit) think of what this Jewish woman has to say:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ[1]
I posted this in r/conspiracy and it did get quite a bit of support.
I mean, if you weren't, wouldn't there be some kind of massive outcry from the Jewish community, ostracizing this person for speaking about a "Jewish leading role"?
Why must the transformation take place?
Well, that is a cop out.
If I were Islamic and claimed it was true, then I would have the burden of proof wouldn't I. I am not Muslim.
You however, claimed it was false. YOU MADE THAT CLAIM. And that means you have the burden of proof.
Its your standard.
Its also the standard routinely listed by atheists:
The first thing to keep in mind is that the phrase “burden of proof” is a bit more extreme than what is often needed in reality. Using that phrase makes it sound like a person has to definitely prove, beyond a doubt, that something is true; that, however, is only rarely the case. A more accurate label would be a “burden of support” — the key is that a person must support what they are saying. This can involve empirical evidence, logical arguments, and even positive proof. http://atheism.about.com/od/doesgodexist/a/burdenofproof.htm
Amazingly, the burden of proof for YOU evaporates as soon as you actually have to back up the snake oil claims you are selling?
The debate is over because you clearly cannot support what you are saying, and just rejected your own standard while, frankly, being incredibly arrogant about the entire thing.
But then, what else other than sheer and blind arrogance would drive someone to tell a billion people that they were wrong ... unless they proved to HIM, but some ever changing standard, that they were right ... and, BTW, all claims he made require no support. Smarter than a billion people JUST by being obstinate, eh?
You do realize that some Muslims have Ph.D's and quite intelligent and educated? If you deny that they are educated and intelligent, does that make it so?
Again, lets test your standard. If I JUST reject atheism's silly arguments, is that a valid position that makes Christianity proven fact? But its good enough for atheism ...
Clearly, even when repeatedly spelled out you don't want to understand no matter how many people explain it to you.
I honestly believe that this Malala stuff is blown way out of proportion. I understand that she has a positive message and presents another avenue to combat Islam but most of the stuff she and her supporters say is nonsense.
Education won't save women or children who live in a country with Sharia Law.
She says send books not guns. Well if we literally followed her advice all those books would be burned and the people with the books would be executed. We have to send both.
All that being said, Malala does not espouse any of the theology or love that Jesus spoke of. She's just a little girl with a lot of attention. I wouldn't be surprised if there were powerful people suggesting to her what to say. Basically being manipulated.
Christ was about self sacrifice for others and recognizing and rejecting sin. Where is the salvation in sending books? There is no salvation in books, only Jesus.
I love seeing the mythology of this story grow. Mainly how it derailed media attention away from drone protests. Or how independent news agencies in Pakistan did some investigative journalism to learn from members of Malala's family that the supposed threats she received were false, as well as point out inconsistencies in the official story.[1] Unfortunately, most of this is available only in Urdu.
Or how Malala's father is an investor in for-profit charter schools[2] that are now being pushed by the UN on Pakistan, spearheaded by Malala as a "women's rights movement."
How about the fact the reason Malala got so famous was because the BBC reported an an entry she had in her diary? How did they get their hands on that?
Or how about the location of her injury keeps on appearing on different sides, or disappearing altogether?[3]
Or how about the fact that if the Taliban were against girls getting an education, why stop the bus and attack just the one girl? Or how a military helicopter was ready to rush her to the hospital despite there not being an army base nearby?
The Malala "myth" certainly seems like propaganda.
Disinformation purposely released for the public to believe. I personally believe aliens are not what they appear to be. Jacques Valleé and J. Allen Hynek both agree and they were the top UFOlogists in their day. They studied thousands of cases and came to the conclusion that these things are hostile because they pretend to be something they are not. Furthermore they fly millions of light years to earth just so they can make amazing maneuvers while flying in the air, occasionally abduct people, and preach New Age doctrine. How likely is that?
Speaking of amazing maneuvers, we've seen ufo's making right angle turns while going thousands of miles per hour, that's just not possible. These things are not material.
Aliens are demons.
Hasidic Jews? What are you talking about???
Most Israeli Arabs are not so devoutly Muslim, or Christian. It's more of a cultural identity than a religious practice.
The problem becomes when preachers mix politics and religion. The Arab youth come for the "death to Israel" chants, and stay to hear extremist Islamic theology.
I just wish there are more peaceful people teaching them faith in the G-d of the Bible, not Allah of the Koran. (No, they're not the same, and to say so doesn't help anyone achieve peace or understanding)
It isn't a secret. Thousands of human beings have been abducted against their will by the Alien Intervention. On this subreddit this statement is not very controversial. It is an acknowledged fact by anyone who's cared to look into it. If people that are awake are not stirred by this statement, then what hope is there for the rest of humanity? Have we lost all ability to act? Why aren't there flyers on every street corner alerting people to this fact? Are we pacified cattle?
I don't think we are. I trust in the human spirit but boy, do we have a long way to go. Each and every one of us has perhaps tried to effect change in ourselves and within our personal sphere of relationships. It isn't easy. The leadership is aware of it. They are doing precious little. Worse still some of them are cooperating with The Intervention. The choice is fundamental. Regular people - me, you, your neighbor - need to stand up and take this public.
Good Aliens? Bad Aliens? Which are which? Do you know? Are you sure? They need to cease their Intervention into human affairs and make themselves known to humanity. This matter cannot remain secret. It must be public. The stakes are too high and our leadership is too weak. If the democratic will of humanity decides to have dealings with a particular Alien race, then so be it. If it does not they must respect our boundaries to space. This approach is so reasonable, yet how many of us will argue against it? Have we been pacified? By whom and for what reason?
