(Commenting on a picture of Kamala Harris next to Hillary Clinton)
Funny how blowjobs impacted both their careers differently.
(Trump retweeted this)
14 comments
@Sasha #204700
I’ve said it before, but if ones “masculinity” feels threatened by the mere thought of an independent vagina, then said masculinity is so fragile and weak its pathetic and almost nonexistent.
…Look, despite my testosterone levels being on the higher side (no, that’s really what blood test say), I’m more of a quiet type who doesn’t like conflict. Many men might see me more as a beta male because of that. Yet… Despite that, I never feel threatened in my manliness by the mere existence of strong women. So I have to ask, who’s the REAL beta male then?
Because what the Andrew Tates and such of the world feel towards womenfolk is not hatred. It’s fear. And fear is not born in a vacuum; it’s formed out of the insecurities we feel.
I assume everyone knows about Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky, right? Though it’s hard to say that this had any real effect on her career one way or the other. I mean, after her husband’s presidency, she became Senator of New York and Secretary of State, and won the popular vote for presidency in 2016. The Bill/Monica thing barely came up all that time. That’s a distinguished political resume, regardless.
The idea that “Kamala Harris slept her way to the top” is an unfounded and ridiculous rumor which popped up almost immediately after she became the presumptive nominee, and the specific version of “traded blowjobs” (with an unidentified person) appears to have originated in a “joke” told by Trump himself. Which might never been anything more than an almost entirely unnoticed blip if it hadn’t gotten posted by some Xwitter rando and then boosted by Trump, presumably to make it look like he himself wasn’t the origin of this. (Maybe it wasn’t; someone else could have come up with it told him, and only after he repeated it did anyone notice.) Regardless, this is far, far too recent to have had any reputational impact on her career at all - a career which has been just as distinguished as Clinton’s, and is now officially her party’s presidential candidate nominee just like she was. So even as what passes for cruel “jokes” among conservatives this makes the opposite of sense.
oh but when a dude gets a position purely based on his maleness and his maleness alone regardless of how competent he is that’s perfectly fine but a woman (especially a woman of color) who rose to the top of her career based on merit alone that can’t possibly happen unless she slept her way to the top… and definitely doesn’t scream “very insecure about themselves” nope, not at all… /s
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
