The less human the people are
A bit of a digression to start with, but it will loop back on topic: I tend to be a bit weirded out by claims that future technological, environmental and/or cultural changes might make us “less human”. People’s ideas of “the essence of humanity” is usually based on the present day norms or the imagined norms of an idealized past; less often they might be based on a particular philosophy which someone has a very strong attachment to. Yes, major changes are likely to result in people becoming “less human” from that particular perspective, but it’s equally valid for those future people (or even our future selves) to see people today as being “less human” from their perspective. It’s a similar line of thinking that leads some people to dehumanize people in primitive cultures.
Human nature can’t be fully divorced from culture, technology, or environment. Without those things, we’re just feral, not even up to the level of apes as most apes do have a little bit of culture. Children who are feral too long have significant difficulty assimilating into any culture, and struggle to learn even basic grammar or even sometimes the concept of other people owning things. That is “human nature” in a complete vacuum, yet it’s hard for anyone to call that “most human”. Human nature will gradually shift as it always has, but that’s not “less human”, it’s “differently human”.
Now people who grew up in an environment where there were only rich people and servants, and had/have the expectation of gaining a lot of power, are going to be “differently human” than everyone else. That doesn’t make them not a threat which needs to be dealt with. It means that there’s no good reason to dehumanize them, even if they dehumanize everyone else in return.
The OP appears to be delusional and fell down at least one conspiracy theory hole, so clearly he probably doesn’t have a very good grasp on human nature (as it presently exists, and within Western Society) anyway.