This is the demonic theology of secular humanism and “moral relativism.” “If it feels good, do it.” “What might be right for you may not be right for me.” “That’s fine if that’s what YOU believe, but it’s not what I believe, and that’s fine.” There is no moral compass, no absolute truth.
There is just SOOO much wrong with that statement, I almost don’t know where to start. OK, as I have said before many times now, back in the day, I used to be quite the fan of Ayn Rand. I’ve kinda distanced myself from that these days, but I still think she had SOME good points. I’ve read some of her collections of essays, and I remember she basically addresses some of those points. She was an atheist, and I’d call her a “secular humanist” (though I don’t know if she ever called herself that, or if the term was even in common use at the time she was alive), but if you read one thing she wrote, you’d know she emphatically did NOT call her philosophy “moral relativism”! Like things like “That’s fine if that’s what YOU believe, but it’s not what I believe, and that’s fine.”? OK, that doesn’t even SOUND like so-called “moral relativism”, that’s just someone saying in effect, “you may like it, but I don’t.”