“There is a reason that economists are inordinately inclined to be dubious about evolution.”
Inordinately?
Do you have any actual numbers to show, here? Because I don’t trust Vox Day as far as I can throw a tank.
"And that reason is this: we comprehend large numbers.”
No, that can’t be the reason. Because astronomers also understand large numbers, due to the distances and durations they work with, and they’re almost completely accepting of evolution (as are most scientists).
So, guess again, bubbles.
"…there isn’t a single economist who is impressed by a biologist waving his hand and summoning “millions and billions of years”"
Nor should there be, but the fact is that any scientist claiming ‘billions of years’ has something to back up his claims. Not just hand-waving.
“We work in trillions, bitch.”
So do geologists, astronomers…
“So waving your hand and imagining that the mere evocation of ONE MILLION YEARS allows sufficient time for anything and everything to happen not only doesn’t impress us, it confirms our original impression that you are actually retarded.”
So, you have no actual argument against evolutionary theory, just ad hominem… And pretense at special expertise.
"Evolution by natural selection never happened because it is mathematically impossible.”
I assume you’re using big-numbers-out-of-my-ass as the ‘odds,’ then?
Which is meaningless in the evaluation of historical events. if it happened, the odds are 1:1.
“And if you don’t accept that, it is only because you don’t understand the relevant math.”
I don’t think you understand enough of the science to actually evaluate the mathiness, here.